Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

ZNF283, a Krüppel-associated box zinc finger protein, inhibits RNA synthesis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by interacting with Nsp9 and Nsp10

Veterinary Research volume 55, Article number: 9 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a viral pathogen with substantial economic implications for the global swine industry. The existing vaccination strategies and antiviral drugs offer limited protection. Replication of the viral RNA genome encompasses a complex series of steps, wherein a replication complex is assembled from various components derived from both viral and cellular sources, as well as from the viral genomic RNA template. In this study, we found that ZNF283, a Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) containing zinc finger protein, was upregulated in PRRSV-infected Marc-145 cells and porcine alveolar macrophages and that ZNF283 inhibited PRRSV replication and RNA synthesis. We also found that ZNF283 interacts with the viral proteins Nsp9, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and Nsp10, a helicase. The main regions involved in the interaction between ZNF283 and Nsp9 were determined to be the KRAB domain of ZNF283 and amino acids 178–449 of Nsp9. The KRAB domain of ZNF283 plays a role in facilitating Nsp10 binding. In addition, ZNF283 may have an affinity for the 3' untranslated region of PRRSV. These findings suggest that ZNF283 is an antiviral factor that inhibits PRRSV infection and extend our understanding of the interactions between KRAB-containing zinc finger proteins and viruses.

Introduction

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is responsible for sow abortion, boar sperm abnormalities, and respiratory disease in piglets [1]. Despite the abundant literature on the antigenic and genomic diversity, persistent infection, and immunosuppression of PRRSV, further investigations are warranted regarding virus‒host interactions.

PRRSV is classified within the family Arteriviridae and is characterized as a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus with a genome length of approximately 15 kb and a minimum of 11 identified open reading frames (ORFs) [2]. The viral replicase polyproteins pp1a and pp1ab are crucial components of viral replication and are encoded by ORF1a and ORF1b, respectively. These polyproteins undergo proteolytic cleavage, resulting in the formation of 16 nonstructural proteins (Nsps) [3]. ORF2a and ORF3–ORF5 encode four envelope proteins, namely, GP2a, GP3, GP4, and GP5, which undergo N-glycosylation. ORF2b and ORF6 encode two glycosylated proteins (E and M) associated with the membrane. ORF7 encodes a nucleocapsid protein [4].

Efficient and accurate formation of replication and transcription complexes (RTCs) is essential for the synthesis of PRRSV RNA within the cellular environment. This process occurs on intracellular membranes that undergo remodelling to facilitate protein‒protein interactions and establish a conducive milieu for replication [5]. As in other positive-sense RNA viruses, virus-encoded hydrophobic membrane-spanning Nsps are frequently used to execute this mechanism [6]. The core components of PRRSV RTCs include Nsp9, Nsp10, Nsp11, and Nsp12 [7,8,9]. Nsp9, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, interacts with host proteins, including DEAD-box RNA helicase 5 (DDX5), retinoblastoma protein (Rb), annexin A2 (ANXA2), interleukin-2 enhancer-binding factor 2 (ILF2), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor X1 (NLRX1) and zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP), to regulate viral replication [10,11,12,13,14,15]. PRRSV Nsp10 encodes an RNA helicase responsible for synthesizing subgenomic mRNA (sgmRNA) and potentially facilitating the unwinding of RNA secondary structures during replication [16]. The translocation of DDX18 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm is induced by Nsp10, ultimately facilitating viral proliferation [17]. Nsp9 and Nsp10 have been demonstrated to serve as the principal virulence factors of highly pathogenic Chinese PRRSV (HP-PRRSV) [18]. The primary function of Nsp11 is to suppress the production of host type I interferons [19,20,21,22]. The Nsp12 protein is specific to arteriviruses [23]. The presence of Cys35 and Cys79 in Nsp12 is essential for the synthesis of sgmRNAs [8] and facilitates viral mRNA synthesis and replication through the recruitment of Hsp70 [24].

Krüppel-associated box containing zinc-finger proteins (KRAB-ZFPs) represent the most extensive group of transcriptional repressors encoded by the genomes of higher organisms [25]. KRAB-ZFP proteins are composed of a KRAB domain and multiple C2H2 zinc fingers. Specifically, the C2H2 zinc-finger domains of KRAB-ZFP are responsible for DNA binding, whereas the KRAB domain functions as a transcriptional repressor [26, 27]. The proposed functions attributed to members of the KRAB-ZFP family include transcriptional repression of the RNA polymerase I, II, and III promoters, as well as RNA binding and splicing. In addition, these family members play crucial roles in metabolism, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and cancer [28, 29]. Increasing evidence suggests that KRAB-ZFPs are involved in host antiviral defence mechanisms. For instance, the transcriptional activity of murine leukaemia viruses is suppressed by ZFP809 and ZFP998 [30, 31]. Moreover, SZF1 and ZNF557 can induce gene silencing of multiple genes associated with Epstein–Barr virus and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpes virus [32, 33]. These studies demonstrated that KARB-ZFPs regulate viral replication through their interaction with viral nucleic acids. However, whether KRAB-ZFP controls viral replication by targeting viral proteins is unclear.

ZNF283 consists of a KRAB domain and 16 C2H2 zinc finger domains. Given the involvement of ZNF283 in the interplay between foot-and-mouth disease virus and its host [34], we investigated the potential involvement of ZNF283 in PRRSV replication. In the present study, PRRSV infection upregulated ZNF283 mRNA and protein expression, and ZNF283 impeded virus production and viral RNA synthesis. Furthermore, ZNF283 engages in interactions with Nsp9 and Nsp10 and specifically targets the PRRSV 3' untranslated region (UTR). Our findings indicate that the interplay between these proteins may be important for the regulation of PRRSV RNA synthesis.

Materials and methods

Cells and virus

The Marc-145 cell line derived from African green monkey kidneys and the HEK-293 T cell line derived from human embryonic kidneys were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco, C11995500) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (VivaCell Biosciences, 2238253). The cells were cultured under controlled conditions in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The PRRSV strains XH-GD (GenBank accession number: EU624117.1), GM2-like (lineage 3) and NADC30-like (lineage 1) were preserved in our laboratory. The PRRSV JXA1 strain (GenBank accession no. EF112445.1) was obtained from Prof. Kegong Tian.

Antibodies and reagents

The following primary antibodies were used: PRRSV N protein antibody (JNT, China; no. JN0401), mouse anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (anti-GAPDH) antibody (TransGen Biotech, China; no. HC301), rabbit anti-HA (Cell Signaling Technology, USA; no. 3724 T), rabbit anti-Flag (Abmart, China; no. T20008M), mouse anti-HA (Abmart; no. M20003M), mouse anti-Flag (Beyotime, China; no. AF519), rabbit anti-GFP (Proteintech; no. 50430-2-AP), mouse anti-GFP (Proteintech; no. 66002-Ig), rabbit anti-β-actin (Proteintech; no. 81115-1-RR) and mouse anti-dsRNA (Scicons, Hungary; no. 10010500). The anti-ZNF283 antibody was generated by immunizing rabbits with bacterially expressed full-length porcine ZNF283.

Plasmid construction and transfection

cDNA encoding ZNF283 was amplified from PK-15 cells and cloned and inserted into the pCAGGS vector with a C-terminal HA tag to construct a recombinant plasmid (pHA-ZNF283) using seamless cloning technology. The EGFP-tagged ZNF283 KRAB domain (amino acids 56–97) was generated by PCR amplification of pHA-ZNF283, which was cloned and inserted into the expression vector pEGFP-C1. PRRSV Nsp9, Nsp10, Nsp11, and Nsp12 were cloned and inserted into a pCAGGS vector with a C-terminal Flag tag to generate recombinant plasmids (pFlag-Nsp9, pFlag-Nsp10, pFlag-Nsp11, and pFlag-Nsp12). The truncations of pHA-ZNF283 and pFlag-Nsp9 were subcloned from the pHA-ZNF283 and pFlag-Nsp9 plasmids, respectively. The primers used for amplification are listed in Table 1. The expression plasmids were introduced into Marc-145 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and into HEK-293 T cells using polyethylenimine linear (PEI) (FuShen, China; no. FSF0002) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Table 1 The primers used in the present study
Full size table

shRNA-mediated knockdown

For short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown of monkey ZNF283, three sequences targeting ZNF283 and a scrambled sequence were synthesized (Genewiz) (Table 2). The control scrambled shRNA sequence was used as the experimental control and theoretically had no effect on any gene. A pair of annealed oligonucleotides was phosphorylated and annealed using T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, USA; no. M0201S) and ligated into the AgeI/EcoRI-digested pLKO.1-U6-EF1a-mCherry-T2A-puro vector using T4 DNA ligase (Thermo Scientific, USA; no. EL0011).

Table 2 The shRNA sequences used in the present study
Full size table

For determination of the effects of ZNF283 knockdown on PRRSV replication and transcription, Marc-145 cells in 6-well plates were transfected with shmZNF283 or scrambled shRNA. The cells were infected with PRRSV at 24 h after transfection and subsequently harvested at specific time intervals for subsequent analyses.

Subcellular proteome extraction

Marc-145 cells were transfected with HA-ZNF283 for 24 h and then mock-infected or infected with PRRSV for 36 h. The isolation of nuclear components was conducted by employing a nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction kit (Beyotime, no. P0027). The cells were detached using a cell scraper and collected by centrifugation at 1000 rpm. Subsequently, the cells were treated with 200 μL of cytoplasmic protein extraction buffer A containing the protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 15 min on ice and then added to 10 μL of buffer B. After vigorous vortex mixing and centrifugation at 13 000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were collected for analysis of cytoplasmic proteins. The precipitates were resuspended in 50 μL of nuclear protein extraction buffer for 30 min on ice and centrifuged at 13 000 rpm for 15 min at 4 ℃. The supernatants were collected for nuclear protein analysis. SDS‒PAGE and Western blotting analysis were performed on the supernatant.

Western blotting

The cells were collected using NP-40 lysis buffer (Beyotime, no. P0013F) with the protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Beyotime, no. ST506). Subsequently, equivalent quantities of proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequently transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore). The membranes were blocked using a 5% skim milk solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C with the designated primary antibodies. Following three washes with Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20, the membranes were incubated with IRDye 800CW goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) or anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the membranes were subjected to further washing and visualized utilizing an azure laser scanner (USA).

Viral titres

Marc-145 cells were cultured in 96-well plates, and the virus supernatants were subjected to tenfold serial dilution. A total of 100 μL of the diluted supernatant was added to each well, with eight replicates per well. After a 2 h incubation period at 37 °C, the medium was replaced with a novel medium comprising 2% foetal bovine serum. The plates were incubated for 3–5 days prior to the determination of virus titres. The cells were observed daily for cytopathic effects, and the determination of 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) was conducted using the Reed–Muench method.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT‒qPCR)

Total cellular RNA was extracted using an RNA Rapid Extraction Kit (Fastagen, China; no. 220011), and 1 μg of RNA obtained from each sample was reverse transcribed using a reverse transcription kit (Accurate Biology, China; no. A0212) to generate cDNA. Subsequently, complementary DNA (cDNA) was utilized as a template in the ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR master mix (Vazyme, China; no. Q711-02). The mRNA expression levels were normalized to the expression of GAPDH. All RT‒qPCR experiments were performed using a CFX96 real-time system (Bio-Rad, USA). The primers used for qPCR are listed in Table 3. The RT‒qPCR primer sequences used for PRRSV gRNA and sgmRNAs were previously published [35].

Table 3 The primers employed in the present study
Full size table

Confocal microscopy

Marc-145 cells were cultured on glass coverslips in 12-well plates and subsequently transfected with the designated plasmids, as indicated in the figure legends. For visualization of endogenous immunofluorescence, Marc-145 cells were infected with PRRSV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.2 and incubated at 37 °C. After 24 h of transfection or infection, the cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Subsequently, the cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min at room temperature and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies in 5% BSA in PBS at 4 °C overnight. The cells were then rinsed with PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, USA; no. A11011) or Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (Invitrogen; no. A11012) for 1 h. Finally, the cells were washed and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Beyotime; no. C1006) for 5 min. The cells were imaged using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti2-U) or a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoviewver.10, Olympus, Japan). The analysis of signal overlap between various channels was conducted using FluoView FV10i software (Olympus). The scatterplot points aligned along the diagonal axis suggest colocalization, while the scatterplot points aligned along the x- and y-axes suggest the absence of colocalization.

Coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) assay

HEK-293T cells were cultured in 100 mm dishes and subsequently transfected or cotransfected with suitable eukaryotic expression plasmids. At 36 h post-transfection, the cells were collected and lysed on ice for 15 min in 1 mL of NP-40 lysis buffer containing the protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The resulting samples were then subjected to centrifugation at 12 000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. A fraction of the supernatant obtained from the lysed cells was used as the whole lysate sample, while the remaining fractions were immunoprecipitated with the specified antibodies or isotype control or with normal IgG overnight at 4 °C, followed by treatment with a protein A/G agarose gel (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA; no. SC-2003) for 6 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed thrice with 1 mL of NP-40 lysis buffer. Finally, the whole lysate samples and immunoprecipitation samples were resuspended in sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis loading buffer (EpiZyme, LT101S), heated to 95 °C for 8 min, and analysed via Western blotting.

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

Linear fragments of the PRRSV 5'UTR or 3'UTR were amplified via PCR from the PRRSV genome. Seamless cloning was used to construct the plasmid. The resulting 5'UTR fragments were cloned and inserted into the BglII/HindIII-digested pGL3-control vector (Promega) to generate the pGL3-5'UTR construct. Subsequently, the 3'UTR fragments were inserted into the pGL3-5'UTR plasmids at the XbaI and BamHI restriction sites, resulting in the pGL3-5'-3'UTR construct. Additionally, the 3'UTR fragments were cloned and inserted into the XbaI-digested pGL3-Luc vector, generating the pGL3-3'UTR construct. The primers used for amplification are listed in Table 3. Marc-145 cells were cultured in 12-well plates and transfected with 0.8 μg of HA-tagged ZNF283 plasmid or HA-tagged empty vector, 0.4 μg of reporter plasmid (pGL3-5'-3'UTR, pGL3-5'UTR, or pGL3-3'UTR), or 0.02 μg of pRL-TK reference plasmid using Lipofectamine 3000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (TransGen Biotech) was used to evaluate firefly and Renilla luciferase activities in lysed cells according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 8 software with two-tailed unpaired t tests. Significant differences are denoted in the figures through asterisks as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.

Results

PRRSV infection activates ZNF283 expression and induces ZNF283 translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm

For analysis of the potential effects of PRRSV infection on ZNF283 expression, Marc-145 cells and porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) were infected with a low dose of PRRSV for various durations. The mRNA and protein levels of ZNF283 were measured by qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. The findings indicated that ZNF283 mRNA expression in Marc-145 cells and PAMs was elevated following PRRSV infection (Figures 1A and C), whereas ZNF283 protein levels were significantly increased compared to those in the uninfected mock-treated cells (Figures 1B and D). Both the mRNA and protein expression of ZNF283 significantly increased after infection with high-dose PRRSV (see Additional file 1). These results suggested that ZNF283 expression can be activated by viral infection.

Figure 1
figure 1

The expression of ZNF283 is upregulated by PRRSV infection. Marc-145 cells and PAMs were mock-infected or infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 0.2 for various durations. The cells were then collected and analysed for ZNF283 mRNA and protein expression levels using RT‒qPCR (A and C) and Western blotting (B and D), respectively. E Marc-145 cells were transfected with HA-tagged ZNF283 for 24 h and then infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 0.2. Mock-infected cells served as controls. At 24 h post-infection, the cells were fixed and immunostained with mouse anti-N protein and rabbit anti-HA antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. F Marc-145 cells were transfected with HA-ZNF283 for 24 h and then infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 0.2. At 36 h post-infection, cellular fractionation followed by Western blotting was performed. HDAC1 and GAPDH were used as control proteins for the nuclear and cytosolic fractions, respectively.

Full size image

To explore whether PRRSV infection affects the localization pattern of ZNF283, we conducted confocal microscopy assays in Marc-145 cells. In the absence of PRRSV, HA-ZNF283 exhibited primary nuclear localization, with a minor fraction of the protein being observed within the cytoplasm (Figure 1E). In addition, subcellular localization analysis of HA-ZNF283 was performed by nucleocytoplasmic separation. Consistent with the observations made through confocal microscopy, PRRSV-infected cells presented an evident reduction in HA-ZNF283 in the nuclear fraction, while HA-ZNF283 had a nuclear localization in noninfected cells (Figure 1F). These results indicated that PRRSV infection promoted the translocation of ZNF283 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.

ZNF283 overexpression inhibits PRRSV replication

For analysis of the impact of ZNF283 on PRRSV replication, Marc-145 cells were transfected with either HA-tagged ZNF283 plasmids or HA-tagged empty vectors for 24 h before infection with PRRSV for various time periods. We found that upregulation of ZNF283 expression notably decreased the viral titre (Figure 2A) and the expression of the nucleocapsid (N) protein (Figures 2B, C) at 36 h and 48 h post-infection in Marc-145 cells. Moreover, ZNF283 inhibited the replication of various strains of PRRSV, such as GM2-like, JXA1 and NADC30-like strains (Additional file 2). These results suggested that ZNF283 suppressed the replication of PRRSV.

Figure 2
figure 2

Overexpression of ZNF283 inhibits PRRSV replication. Marc-145 cells were transfected with HA-tagged ZNF283 or HA-tagged empty vectors for 24 h and then infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 0.2. At 12, 24, 36, and 48 h post-infection, viral titres in the cell supernatant (A) and the expression levels of the N protein (B and C) were assessed using TCID50 and Western blotting, respectively.

Full size image

ZNF283 knockdown promotes PRRSV replication

To further confirm the role of ZNF283 in PRRSV infection, we designed an shRNA targeting the ZNF283 gene in Marc-145 cells, and its knockdown efficiency was determined using RT‒qPCR and Western blotting. At 24 h post-transfection, the transcript levels of ZNF283 were significantly impaired by all three independent shRNAs (Figure 3A). shmZNF283-3, which had the highest knockdown efficiency at protein levels, was selected for further experiments (Figure 3B). Marc-145 cells were transfected with shmZNF283-3 or scrambled shRNA and then infected with PRRSV for various durations. ZNF283 depletion significantly increased viral titres and N protein expression in Marc-145 cells throughout the infection process (Figures 3C, D and E). The results showed that the downregulation of ZNF283 facilitated PRRSV replication.

Figure 3
figure 3

ZNF283 knockdown facilitates the proliferation of PRRSV. Marc-145 cells were transfected with three independent shRNAs targeting ZNF283 for 24 h, and RT‒qPCR (A) and Western blotting (B) were used to evaluate the knockdown efficiency of ZNF283. Marc-145 cells were transfected with shmZNF283 or scrambled shRNA for 24 h and then infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 0.5 for various time periods. The culture supernatant was used for the TCID50 assay (C), and N protein expression levels were analysed using Western blotting (D and E).

Full size image

ZNF283 suppresses the synthesis of PRRSV subgenomic and genomic RNA

For analysis of the potential involvement of ZNF283 in PRRSV RNA synthesis, Marc-145 cells were transfected with either HA-tagged ZNF283 or an HA-tagged vector for 24 h before infection with PRRSV for 36 h. The Nsp1, GP2, GP3, GP4, GP5, M and N genes represent the expression levels of the viral genome, sgmRNA2, sgmRNA3, sgmRNA4, sgmRNA5, sgmRNA6 and sgmRNA7, respectively. Compared to those in the control group, the expression of ZNF283 effectively suppressed the production of the Nsp1, GP2, GP3, GP4, GP5, M and N genes (Figure 4A). ZNF283 overexpression significantly decreased the level of dsRNA, an intermediate in viral genome replication (Figure 4C). Furthermore, transfection with the shmZNF283-3 plasmid resulted in the downregulation of ZNF283 in Marc-145 cells, leading to significant upregulation of the expression of the Nsp1, GP2, GP3, GP4, GP5, M and N genes (Figure 4B). ZNF283 knockdown significantly elevated the level of dsRNA (Figure 4D). These results suggested that ZNF283 exerts a detrimental effect on PRRSV RNA synthesis.

Figure 4
figure 4

ZNF283 suppresses PRRSV RNA synthesis. Marc-145 cells were transfected with HA-tagged ZNF283 or shmZNF283 and then infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 0.2. An empty vector or scrambled shRNA was used as a control. A and B Cells were harvested at 36 h post-infection for RT‒qPCR analysis of viral RNA expression. C and D At 36 h post-infection, the cells were fixed for immunofluorescence staining of dsRNA (green). The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue).

Full size image

ZNF283 interacts with PRRSV Nsp9 and Nsp10

KRAB-ZFPs constitute the most extensive group of transcriptional regulators in mammalian cells [36]. The core components of the PRRSV RTC are primarily Nsp9, Nsp10, Nsp11, and Nsp12. For determination of which transcription complex protein interacted with ZNF283, the HA-tagged ZNF283 plasmid was transfected into Marc-145 cells along with the Flag-tagged Nsp9, Nsp10, Nsp11, and Nsp12 plasmids. Colocalization of the ZNF283 and PRRSV proteins was observed by confocal microscopy. ZNF283 was intensely colocalized with Nsp9 and Nsp10 in the cytoplasm but was not colocalized with Nsp11 or Nsp12 (Figure 5A). Immunoprecipitation assays revealed that ZNF283 interacted with Nsp9 and Nsp10 (Figures 5B, C).

Figure 5
figure 5

ZNF283 interacts with PRRSV Nsp9 and Nsp10. A Marc-145 cells were cotransfected with HA-tagged ZNF283 and plasmid-encoded Flag-tagged PRRSV viral proteins (Nsp9, Nsp10, Nsp11, and Nsp12) for 24 h. The cells were then fixed, and immunofluorescence analysis was performed using rabbit anti-HA and mouse anti-Flag antibodies. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. B and C HEK-293T cells were cotransfected with HA-tagged ZNF283 and Flag-tagged Nsp9 or Nsp10 for 36 h, followed by immunoprecipitation with mouse anti-Flag or mouse anti-HA antibodies. Cell lysates were analysed by Western blotting using rabbit anti-HA or rabbit anti-Flag antibodies.

Full size image

The KRAB domain of ZNF283 interacts with the Nsp9 amino acid (aa) 178–449 region

ZNF283 consists of a KRAB domain (aa 56–97) and 16 C2H2 zinc finger motifs (aa 192–663). Based on the ZNF283 structure, a series of plasmids expressing truncated mutants of HA-tagged ZNF283 were generated, encompassing aa 1–191, 1–296, 1–408, 1–527, and 192–663 (Figure 6A). Western blotting also revealed that the ZNF283 truncation mutants were stably expressed (Additional file 3). Marc-145 cells were cotransfected with Flag-tagged Nsp9 and truncated ZNF283 plasmids and incubated for 24 h. Confocal microscopy revealed that Nsp9 was located within the cytoplasm and that the ZNF283 mutants, which encompassed aa 1–191, exhibited colocalization with Nsp9 (Figure 6B). Further investigation confirmed that aa 56–97 of ZNF283 colocalized with Nsp9 within the cytoplasm, whereas aa 192–663 was confined to the nucleus and did not colocalize with Nsp9 (Figure 6B). Co-IP analysis revealed that Nsp9 interacted with aa 56–97 of ZNF283, whereas no interaction was observed with aa 192–663 (Figure 6C).

Figure 6
figure 6

PRRSV Nsp9 interacts with the ZNF283 KRAB domain from aa 56–97. A Diagrammatic illustration of diverse fragments of ZNF283. B Marc-145 cells were cotransfected with Flag-tagged Nsp9 and plasmid-encoded HA-tagged ZNF283 truncations (aa 1–191, 1–296, 1–408, 1–520, and 192–663) or EGFP-tagged ZNF283 aa 56–97 for 24 h. The cells were fixed and immunostained using either a mouse anti-Flag or rabbit anti-HA antibody. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. C HEK-293T cells were cotransfected with the plasmids Flag-tagged Nsp9 and full-length HA-tagged ZNF283, EGFP-tagged ZNF283 truncations (aa 56–97), or HA-tagged ZNF283 truncations (aa 192–663) for 36 h. Following cell lysis, immunoprecipitation analysis was conducted using a mouse anti-Flag antibody.

Full size image

Based on the predicted domain of Nsp9 [15], five Flag-tagged Nsp9 truncation mutant plasmids were constructed containing aa 1–449, 178–643, 1–177, 178–449, and 450–643 (Figure 7A). The results of the Western blotting analysis demonstrated that the Nsp9 truncation mutants exhibited stable expression (Additional file 4). HA-tagged ZNF283 and Flag-tagged Nsp9 truncation mutant plasmids were cotransfected into Marc-145 cells. Confocal microscopy revealed that the regions from Nsp9 aa 178–449, 1–449, and 178–643 colocalized with ZNF283, whereas the regions from aa 1–177 and 450–643 did not (Figure 7B). Hence, an interaction likely occurs between Nsp9 aa 178–449 and ZNF283. The results of the co-IP assay demonstrated a significant interaction between Nsp9 aa 178–449 and ZNF283 (Figure 7C).

Figure 7
figure 7

ZNF283 interacts with the aa 178–449 region of Nsp9. A Schematic representation of Nsp9 truncation mutants. B Marc-145 cells were cotransfected with HA-tagged ZNF283 and plasmid-encoded Flag-tagged Nsp9 truncations (aa 1–177, 178–449, 450–643, 1–499, and 178–643) for 24 h. The cells were fixed and immunostained with mouse anti-Flag and rabbit anti-HA antibodies. Nuclei were detected by counterstaining with DAPI. C HEK-293T cells were cotransfected with the HA-tagged ZNF283 plasmid and Flag-tagged truncated Nsp9 (aa 178–449) for 36 h. Immunoprecipitation of cell lysates was performed using either mouse anti-Flag or mouse anti-HA antibodies, followed by Western blotting analysis using either rabbit anti-HA or rabbit anti-Flag antibodies.

Full size image

To verify whether ZNF283 aa 56–97 interacted with Nsp9 aa 178–449, we cotransfected plasmids encoding EGFP-tagged ZNF283 aa 56–97 and Flag-tagged Nsp9 aa 178–449 into Marc-145 or HEK-293 T cells. The EGFP-tagged ZNF283 aa 56–97 truncation mutant was expressed normally (Additional file 3). In Marc-145 cells, the two proteins were strongly colocalized in the cytoplasm (Figure 8A). Furthermore, HEK-293 T cell lysates were incubated with GFP beads or Flag beads, and the proteins were examined by Western blotting using anti-GFP or anti-Flag antibodies. As shown in Figure 8B, ZNF283 (aa 56–97) coimmunoprecipitated with Nsp9 (aa 178–449). These findings collectively demonstrated that the interaction between ZNF283 and Nsp9 depends on aa 56–97 (KRAB domain) of ZNF283 and aa 178–449 of Nsp9 (Figure 8C).

Figure 8
figure 8

The KRAB domain of ZNF283 interacts with the aa 178–449 region of Nsp9. A Marc-145 cells were cotransfected with Flag-tagged truncated Nsp9 spanning aa 178–449 and EGFP-tagged ZNF283 KRAB domain spanning aa 56–97 or an EGFP-tagged vector. After 24 h, the cells were stained with DAPI and incubated with antibodies specific for the Flag-tagged protein. B HEK-293T cells were cotransfected with Flag-tagged truncated Nsp9 (aa 178–449) and EGFP-tagged ZNF283 aa 56–97. Thirty-six hours after transfection, the cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with mouse anti-Flag or mouse anti-GFP antibodies and then immunoblotted using the indicated antibodies from different species. C Schematic representation of the interaction between ZNF283 and PRRSV Nsp9.

Full size image

The KRAB domain of ZNF283 interacts with Nsp10

For determination of the primary domain of ZNF283 that interacts with Nsp10, Marc-145 or HEK-293 T cells were cotransfected with the EGFP-ZNF283 aa 56–97 or HA-ZNF283 aa 192–663 plasmids along with Flag-Nsp10. Confocal microscopy revealed that ZNF283 aa 56–97 colocalized with Nsp10 within the cytoplasm, whereas ZNF283 aa 192–663 displayed nuclear localization and did not colocalize with Nsp10 (Figure 9A). Co-IP further demonstrated that Nsp10 interacted with the aa 56–97 region of ZNF283 but not with the aa 192–663 region (Figure 9B). These results suggested that the interaction between ZNF283 and Nsp10 occurred via the KRAB domain.

Figure 9
figure 9

PRRSV Nsp10 interacts with the ZNF283 KRAB domain from aa 56–97. A Marc-145 cells were cotransfected with Flag-tagged Nsp10 and EGFP-tagged ZNF283 truncations (aa 56–97) or HA-tagged ZNF283 truncations (aa 192–663) for 24 h. The cells were fixed and immunostained using either mouse anti-Flag or rabbit anti-HA antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. B HEK-293T cells were cotransfected with Flag-tagged Nsp10 and HA-tagged ZNF283, EGFP-tagged ZNF283 truncations (aa 56–97), or HA-tagged ZNF283 truncations (aa 192–663) for 36 h. After cell lysis, immunoprecipitation analysis was performed using a mouse anti-Flag antibody.

Full size image

ZNF283 specifically targets the PRRSV 3'UTR

We previously demonstrated that ZNF283 specifically prevents the accumulation of PRRSV RNA, suggesting that ZNF283 targets specific viral RNA sequences. In light of the dsRNA replication intermediates generated during PRRSV replication, we investigated the potential colocalization of ZNF283 with PRRSV dsRNA. Confocal microscopy demonstrated colocalization between ZNF283 and the viral dsRNA within the infected cells (Figure 10A).

Figure 10
figure 10

ZNF283 has a specific affinity for the PRRSV 3'UTR. A Marc-145 cells were transfected with HA-tagged ZNF283 for 24 h and then mock-infected or infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 0.2 for 36 h. The cells were fixed for immunofluorescence staining with HA-tagged (green) and dsRNA (red). The nuclei were labelled with DAPI. B The 5'UTR or 3'UTR of PRRSV was cloned and inserted into the control reporter pGL3-Luc, as indicated. The resulting constructs, HA-tagged ZNF283 and pRL-TK, which are plasmids expressing Renilla luciferase and were used to normalize transfection efficiency, were cotransfected into Marc-145 cells. After 24 h of transfection, the cells were lysed, and luciferase activities were quantified.

Full size image

The 5'UTR and 3'UTR are important regulatory elements in the process of virus replication and transcription [37,38,39]. To identify the target sequence of ZNF283 in the PRRSV sequence, we cloned the PRRSV 5'UTR or 3'UTR into a pGL3-Luc reporter using a previously described strategy [40] and analysed the effect of ZNF283 on the PRRSV 5'UTR and 3'UTR-mediated luciferase activity. The constructs were evaluated using Marc-145 cells. Similarly, compared with the control, ZNF283 significantly reduced luciferase activity when both the 5'UTR and 3'UTR or the 3'UTR alone were fused; however, ZNF283 did not significantly suppress 5'UTR luciferase activity (Figure 10B). These findings suggested that the ZNF283 target sequence was located within the PRRSV 3'UTR. Furthermore, these findings suggested that the target sequence of ZNF283 was functional when it was inserted downstream of the luciferase coding sequence.

Discussion

PRRSV is an important pathogen with a substantial impact on the global swine industry. However, the intricacies of the interactions between PRRSV and host proteins remain unclear. In the present study, ZNF283 overexpression effectively inhibited PRRSV replication. Additionally, ZNF283 disrupts viral RNA synthesis and establishes interactions with Nsp9 and Nsp10.

PRRSV possesses multiple Nsps within the replicases ORF1a and ORF1b, which actively engage in the synthesis of PRRSV RNA. Notably, viral Nsp9 and the RNA helicase Nsp10 play important roles in this process [41, 42]. ZAP, alternatively referred to as ZC3HAV1 or PARP13, possesses four consecutive CCCH-type zinc finger motifs at its N-terminus and has demonstrated efficacy as a broad-spectrum antiviral protein. ZAP has been found to inhibit various viruses from the Alphaviridae [43], Filoviridae [44], Retroviridae [45], and other related families. It has been reported that ZAP can also inhibit the replication of PRRSV and that the zinc finger domain aa 1–240 of ZAP interacts with PRRSV Nsp9 aa 150–160 [15]. Our research revealed that the KRAB-containing zinc finger protein ZNF283, which is known for its ability to inhibit PRRSV replication and RNA synthesis, interacts with Nsp9 and Nsp10 via its KRAB domain (aa 56–97) rather than its zinc finger domain. This interaction may play an important role in regulating PRRSV RNA synthesis.

KRAB-ZFPs bind to DNA or RNA through their zinc finger region, and their repressive function arises from the KRAB-mediated recruitment of KAP1 [KRAB-associated protein 1, also known as tripartite motif protein 28 (TRIM28)] [46,47,48]. The zinc finger protein ZNF809 inhibits the transcription of murine leukaemia virus by recruiting the KAP1 protein to the primer-binding site [30]. ZNF304 facilitates the recruitment of KAP1 to the 5'-long terminal repeats of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), resulting in the suppression of viral transcription [49]. We speculated that ZNF283 may augment the inhibitory effect on PRRSV RNA synthesis through the recruitment of KAP1. However, further investigation is needed to validate this hypothesis.

The 5'UTRs and 3'UTRs of numerous positive-sense RNA viruses contain specific signals for RNA synthesis that play important roles in viral replication. Examples of these viruses include mouse hepatitis virus [50, 51], bovine viral diarrhoea virus [52, 53], and PRRSV [37, 38]. The PRRSV 5’UTR has eukaryotic promoter activity, and the conserved stem‒loop 2 is critical for sgmRNA synthesis [38, 54]. The 3'UTR of PRRSV, which encompasses an RNA pseudoknot interaction between two terminal stem‒loop structures, has been identified as a molecular switch involved in viral RNA synthesis [55]. The zinc finger protein is capable of binding to the 5'UTR or 3'UTR of the virus through its zinc finger domain. ZAP interacts with RNA and recruits exosome complexes to selectively degrade viral RNAs [56, 57], including the 5'UTR of the Nef segment of HIV-1 [57], 3'-long terminal repeats of Moloney murine leukaemia virus [40], and 3'UTR of xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus [58]. Our findings demonstrated that ZNF283 suppresses luciferase activity mediated by the PRRSV 3'UTR. Additionally, we observed the colocalization of ZNF283 with the intermediate dsRNA involved in PRRSV RNA synthesis. These observations suggest a potential interaction between ZNF283 and the PRRSV 3'UTR, although further investigation is needed to substantiate this speculation.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that ZNF283 functions as a highly effective cell-intrinsic antiviral factor against PRRSV replication, potentially through its interaction with viral Nsp9 and Nsp10. Notably, we identified the KRAB domain of ZNF283 and the aa 178–449 region of Nsp9 as critical interaction regions. ZNF283 binds to Nsp10 via its KRAB domain. These findings strongly contribute to our understanding of the antiviral response of the host to PRRSV infections.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated or analysed during this study are included in the article.

References

  1. Meulenberg JJ, Hulst MM, de Meijer EJ, Moonen PL, den Besten A, de Kluyver EP, Wensvoort G, Moormann RJ (1993) Lelystad virus, the causative agent of porcine epidemic abortion and respiratory syndrome (PEARS), is related to LDV and EAV. Virology 192:62–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson CR, Griggs TF, Gnanandarajah J, Murtaugh MP (2011) Novel structural protein in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus encoded by an alternative ORF5 present in all arteriviruses. J Gen Virol 92:1107–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kappes MA, Faaberg KS (2015) PRRSV structure, replication and recombination: origin of phenotype and genotype diversity. Virology 479–480:475–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dea S, Gagnon CA, Mardassi H, Pirzadeh B, Rogan D (2000) Current knowledge on the structural proteins of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus: comparison of the North American and European isolates. Arch Virol 145:659–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Snijder EJ, Kikkert M, Fang Y (2013) Arterivirus molecular biology and pathogenesis. J Gen Virol 94:2141–2163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nan H, Lan J, Tian M, Dong S, Tian J, Liu L, Xu X, Chen H (2018) The network of interactions among porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus non-structural proteins. Front Microbiol 9:970

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Song J, Liu Y, Gao P, Hu Y, Chai Y, Zhou S, Kong C, Zhou L, Ge X, Guo X, Han J, Yang H (2018) Mapping the nonstructural protein interaction network of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J Virol 92:e01112-e1118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang TY, Fang QQ, Cong F, Liu YG, Wang HM, Zhang HL, Tian ZJ, Tang YD, Cai XH (2019) The Nsp12-coding region of type 2 PRRSV is required for viral subgenomic mRNA synthesis. Emerg Microbes Infect 8:1501–1510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu Y, Ke P, Gao P, Zhang Y, Zhou L, Ge X, Guo X, Han J, Yang H (2021) Identification of an intramolecular switch that controls the interaction of helicase Nsp10 with membrane-associated Nsp12 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J Virol 95:e0051821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao S, Ge X, Wang X, Liu A, Guo X, Zhou L, Yu K, Yang H (2015) The DEAD-box RNA helicase 5 positively regulates the replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by interacting with viral Nsp9 in vitro. Virus Res 195:217–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong J, Zhang N, Ge X, Zhou L, Guo X, Yang H (2014) The interaction of nonstructural protein 9 with retinoblastoma protein benefits the replication of genotype 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in vitro. Virology 464–465:432–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Guo D, Huang L, Yin M, Liu Q, Wang Y, Yang C, Liu Y, Zhang L, Tian Z, Cai X, Yu L, Weng C (2014) The interaction between host Annexin A2 and viral Nsp9 is beneficial for replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virus Res 189:106–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wen X, Bian T, Zhang Z, Zhou L, Ge X, Han J, Guo X, Yang H, Yu K (2017) Interleukin-2 enhancer binding factor 2 interacts with the nsp9 or nsp2 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and exerts negatively regulatory effect on the viral replication. Virol J 14:125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jing H, Song T, Cao S, Sun Y, Wang J, Dong W, Zhang Y, Ding Z, Wang T, Xing Z, Bao W (2019) Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor X1 restricts porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-2 replication by interacting with viral Nsp9. Virus Res 268:18–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao Y, Song Z, Bai J, Liu X, Nauwynck H, Jiang P (2019) ZAP, a CCCH-type zinc finger protein, inhibits porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication and interacts with viral Nsp9. J Virol 93:e00001-19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Z, Wen X, Dong J, Ge X, Zhou L, Yang H, Guo X (2017) Epitope mapping and characterization of a novel Nsp10-specific monoclonal antibody that differentiates genotype 2 PRRSV from genotype 1 PRRSV. Virol J 14:116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin H, Zhou L, Ge X, Zhang H, Zhang R, Wang C, Wang L, Zhang Z, Yang H, Guo X (2017) Cellular DEAD-box RNA helicase 18 (DDX18) promotes the PRRSV replication via Interaction with Virus nsp2 and nsp10. Virus Res 238:204–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Y, Zhou L, Zhang J, Ge X, Zhou R, Zheng H, Geng G, Guo X, Yang H (2014) Nsp9 and Nsp10 contribute to the fatal virulence of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus emerging in China. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun Y, Ke H, Han M, Chen N, Fang W, Yoo D (2016) Nonstructural protein 11 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus suppresses both MAVS and RIG-I expression as one of the mechanisms to antagonize type I interferon production. PLoS One 11:e0168314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang D, Chen J, Yu C, Zhu X, Xu S, Fang L, Xiao S (2019) Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus Nsp11 antagonizes type I interferon signaling by targeting IRF9. J Virol 93:e00623-e719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Su Y, Shi P, Zhang L, Lu D, Zhao C, Li R, Zhang L, Huang J (2018) The superimposed deubiquitination effect of OTULIN and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) Nsp11 promotes multiplication of PRRSV. J Virol 92:e00175-e218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang L, He J, Wang R, Zhang X, Lin S, Ma Z, Zhang Y (2019) Nonstructural protein 11 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus induces STAT2 degradation to inhibit interferon signaling. J Virol 93:e01352-e1419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehmann KC, Hooghiemstra L, Gulyaeva A, Samborskiy DV, Zevenhoven-Dobbe JC, Snijder EJ, Gorbalenya AE, Posthuma CC (2015) Arterivirus Nsp12 versus the coronavirus nsp16 2’-O-methyltransferase: comparison of the C-terminal cleavage products of two nidovirus pp1ab polyproteins. J Gen Virol 96:2643–2655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong S, Liu L, Wu W, Armstrong SD, Xia D, Nan H, Hiscox JA, Chen H (2016) Determination of the interactome of non-structural protein12 from highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus with host cellular proteins using high throughput proteomics and identification of HSP70 as a cellular factor for virus replication. J Proteomics 146:58–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ecco G, Imbeault M, Trono D (2017) KRAB zinc finger proteins. Development 144:2719–2729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Looman C, Abrink M, Mark C, Hellman L (2002) KRAB zinc finger proteins: an analysis of the molecular mechanisms governing their increase in numbers and complexity during evolution. Mol Biol Evol 19:2118–2130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Witzgall R, O’Leary E, Leaf A, Onaldi D, Bonventre JV (1994) The Krüppel-associated box-A (KRAB-A) domain of zinc finger proteins mediates transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:4514–4518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lupo A, Cesaro E, Montano G, Zurlo D, Izzo P, Costanzo P (2013) KRAB-zinc finger proteins: a repressor family displaying multiple biological functions. Curr Genomics 14:268–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Urrutia R (2003) KRAB-containing zinc-finger repressor proteins. Genome Biol 4:231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolf D, Goff SP (2009) Embryonic stem cells use ZFP809 to silence retroviral DNAs. Nature 458:1201–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Young GR, Ferron AKW, Panova V, Eksmond U, Oliver PL, Kassiotis G, Stoye JP (2021) Gv1 A zinc finger gene controlling endogenous MLV expression. Mol Biol Evol 38:2468–2474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Li X, Burton EM, Koganti S, Zhi J, Doyle F, Tenenbaum SA, Horn B, Bhaduri-McIntosh S (2018) KRAB-ZFP repressors enforce quiescence of oncogenic human herpesviruses. J Virol 92:e00298-e318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Burton EM, Akinyemi IA, Frey TR, Xu H, Li X, Su LJ, Zhi J, McIntosh MT, Bhaduri-McIntosh S (2021) A heterochromatin inducing protein differentially recognizes self versus foreign genomes. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang T, Chen H, Qi L, Zhang J, Wu R, Zhang Y, Sun Y (2018) Transcript profiling identifies early response genes against FMDV infection in PK-15 cells. Viruses 10:364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu L, Tian J, Nan H, Tian M, Li Y, Xu X, Huang B, Zhou E, Hiscox JA, Chen H (2016) Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus nucleocapsid protein interacts with Nsp9 and cellular DHX9 to regulate viral RNA synthesis. J Virol 90:5384–5398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun M, Ju J, Ding Y, Zhao C, Tian C (2022) The signaling pathways regulated by KRAB zinc-finger proteins in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1877:18873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun Z, Liu C, Tan F, Gao F, Liu P, Qin A, Yuan S (2010) Identification of dispensable nucleotide sequence in 3’ untranslated region of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virus Res 154:38–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lu J, Gao F, Wei Z, Liu P, Liu C, Zheng H, Li Y, Lin T, Yuan S (2011) A 5’-proximal stem-loop structure of 5’ untranslated region of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus genome is key for virus replication. Virol J 8:172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao F, Lu J, Yao H, Wei Z, Yang Q, Yuan S (2011) Cis-acting structural element in 5’UTR is essential for infectivity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virus Res 163:108–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo X, Carroll JW, Macdonald MR, Goff SP, Gao G (2004) The zinc finger antiviral protein directly binds to specific viral mRNAs through the CCCH zinc finger motifs. J Virol 78:12781–12787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Fang Y, Snijder EJ (2010) The PRRSV replicase: exploring the multifunctionality of an intriguing set of nonstructural proteins. Virus Res 154:61–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Guo X, Ma J, Sun J, Gao G (2007) The zinc-finger antiviral protein recruits the RNA processing exosome to degrade the target mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bick MJ, Carroll JW, Gao G, Goff SP, Rice CM, MacDonald MR (2003) Expression of the zinc-finger antiviral protein inhibits alphavirus replication. J Virol 77:11555–11562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Xuan Y, Gong D, Qi J, Han C, Deng H, Gao G (2013) ZAP inhibits murine gammaherpesvirus 68 ORF64 expression and is antagonized by RTA. J Virol 87:2735–2743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Miyazato P, Matsuo M, Tan BJY, Tokunaga M, Katsuya H, Islam S, Ito J, Murakawa Y, Satou Y (2019) HTLV-1 contains a high CG dinucleotide content and is susceptible to the host antiviral protein ZAP. Retrovirology 16:38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Burdach J, O’Connell MR, Mackay JP, Crossley M (2012) Two-timing zinc finger transcription factors liaising with RNA. Trends Biochem Sci 37:199–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schmitges FW, Radovani E, Najafabadi HS, Barazandeh M, Campitelli LF, Yin Y, Jolma A, Zhong G, Guo H, Kanagalingam T, Dai WF, Taipale J, Emili A, Greenblatt JF, Hughes TR (2016) Multiparameter functional diversity of human C2H2 zinc finger proteins. Genome Res 26:1742–1752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Friedman JR, Fredericks WJ, Jensen DE, Speicher DW, Huang XP, Neilson EG, Rauscher FJ 3rd (1996) KAP-1, a novel corepressor for the highly conserved KRAB repression domain. Genes Dev 10:2067–2078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Krasnopolsky S, Kuzmina A, Taube R (2020) Genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen identifies ZNF304 as a silencer of HIV transcription that promotes viral latency. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu P, Li L, Keane SC, Yang D, Leibowitz JL, Giedroc DP (2009) Mouse hepatitis virus stem-loop 2 adopts a uYNMG(U)a-like tetraloop structure that is highly functionally tolerant of base substitutions. J Virol 83:12084–12093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Züst R, Miller TB, Goebel SJ, Thiel V, Masters PS (2008) Genetic interactions between an essential 3’ cis-acting RNA pseudoknot, replicase gene products, and the extreme 3’ end of the mouse coronavirus genome. J Virol 82:1214–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu H, Grassmann CW, Behrens SE (1999) Sequence and structural elements at the 3’ terminus of bovine viral diarrhea virus genomic RNA: functional role during RNA replication. J Virol 73:3638–3648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yu H, Isken O, Grassmann CW, Behrens SE (2000) A stem-loop motif formed by the immediate 5’ terminus of the bovine viral diarrhea virus genome modulates translation as well as replication of the viral RNA. J Virol 74:5825–5835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Chaudhari J, Nguyen TN, Vu HLX (2022) Identification of cryptic promoter activity in cDNA sequences corresponding to PRRSV 5’ untranslated region and transcription regulatory sequences. Viruses 14:400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Beerens N, Snijder EJ (2007) An RNA pseudoknot in the 3’ end of the arterivirus genome has a critical role in regulating viral RNA synthesis. J Virol 81:9426–9436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen S, Xu Y, Zhang K, Wang X, Sun J, Gao G, Liu Y (2012) Structure of N-terminal domain of ZAP indicates how a zinc-finger protein recognizes complex RNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:430–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhu Y, Chen G, Lv F, Wang X, Ji X, Xu Y, Sun J, Wu L, Zheng YT, Gao G (2011) Zinc-finger antiviral protein inhibits HIV-1 infection by selectively targeting multiply spliced viral mRNAs for degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:15834–15839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang X, Tu F, Zhu Y, Gao G (2012) Zinc-finger antiviral protein inhibits XMRV infection. PLoS One 7:e39159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102704), the Start-up Research Project of Maoming Laboratory (2021TDQD002), and the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (cars-35).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510462, China

    Heyou Yi, Ruirui Ye, Ermin Xie, Lechen Lu, Qiumei Wang, Shaojun Wang, Yankuo Sun, Tao Tian, Yingwu Qiu, Qianwen Wu, Guihong Zhang & Heng Wang

  2. Key Laboratory of Animal Pathogen Infection and Immunology of Fujian Province, College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China

    Heyou Yi

  3. Maoming Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Maoming, 525000, China

    Heyou Yi, Yankuo Sun, Guihong Zhang & Heng Wang

  4. National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

    Yankuo Sun, Guihong Zhang & Heng Wang

Authors
  1. Heyou Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruirui Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ermin Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lechen Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qiumei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shaojun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yankuo Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tao Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yingwu Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qianwen Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Guihong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Heng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HY, HW and GZ conceived and designed the experiments; HY, RY, EX and LL performed the experiments; HY wrote the paper; HY, QW, SW and TT analysed the data; YS, YQ and QW suggested the study; and HW and GZ revised the manuscript and coordinated the research. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guihong Zhang or Heng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Stéphane Biacchesi.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

ZNF283 expression is upregulated by PRRSV infection. Marc-145 cells and PAMs were mock-infected or infected with PRRSV at an MOI of 1 for various durations. The cells were then collected and analysed for ZNF283 mRNA and protein expression levels using RT‒qPCR (A and C) and Western blotting (B and D), respectively.

Additional file 2.

ZNF283 inhibits the replication of different PRRSV strains. Marc-145 cells were transfected with HA-tagged empty vectors or HA-tagged ZNF283 for 24 h and then infected with different PRRSV strains (GM2-like, JXA1, and NADC30-like) at an MOI of 0.2. At 36 h post-infection, viral titres in the cell supernatant (A) and the expression levels of the N protein (B) were assessed using TCID50 and Western blotting, respectively.

Additional file 3.

Verification of the expression of ZNF283 truncation mutants. HEK-293T cells were transfected with plasmid-encoded HA-tagged full-length and truncated ZNF283 (aa 1–191, 1–296, 1–408, 1–520, and 192–663) (A) or EGFP-tagged ZNF283 aa 56–97 (B) for 36 h. Cell lysates were analysed via Western blotting using rabbit anti-HA or rabbit anti-EGFP.

Additional file 4.

Verification of the expression of Nsp9 truncation mutants. HEK-293T cells were transfected with empty vector or plasmid-encoded Flag-tagged full-length or truncated Nsp9 (aa 1–177, 178–449, 450–643, 1–499, or 178–643) for 36 h. Cell lysates were analysed via Western blotting using mouse anti-Flag.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, H., Ye, R., Xie, E. et al. ZNF283, a Krüppel-associated box zinc finger protein, inhibits RNA synthesis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by interacting with Nsp9 and Nsp10. Vet Res 55, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01263-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01263-w

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716