Skip to main content

The morphology and metabolic changes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae during its growth as a biofilm


Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is an important swine respiratory pathogen. Previous studies have suggested that growth as a biofilm is a natural state of A. pleuropneumoniae infection. To understand the survival features involved in the biofilm state, the growth features, morphology and gene expression profiles of planktonic and biofilm A. pleuropneumoniae were compared. A. pleuropneumoniae in biofilms showed reduced viability but maintained the presence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) after late log-phase. Under the microscope, bacteria in biofilms formed dense aggregated structures that were connected by abundant EPS, with reduced condensed chromatin. By construction of Δpga and ΔdspB mutants, polymeric β-1,6-linked N-acetylglucosamine and dispersin B were confirmed to be critical for normal biofilm formation. RNA-seq analysis indicated that, compared to their planktonic counterparts, A. pleuropneumoniae in biofilms had an extensively altered transcriptome. Carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism and translation were significantly repressed, while fermentation and genes contributing to EPS synthesis and translocation were up-regulated. The regulators Fnr (HlyX) and Fis were found to be up-regulated and their binding motifs were identified in the majority of the differentially expressed genes, suggesting their coordinated global role in regulating biofilm metabolism. By comparing the transcriptome of wild-type biofilm and Δpga, the utilization of oligosaccharides, iron and sulfur and fermentation were found to be important in adhesion and aggregation during biofilm formation. Additionally, when used as inocula, biofilm bacteria showed reduced virulence in mouse, compared with planktonic grown cells. Thus, these results have identified new facets of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm maintenance and regulation.


Biofilms are compacted and functionally coordinated aggregates of bacterial cells attached to or embedded on biotic or abiotic surfaces, and their metabolic state, pathogenicity and immunogenicity are different from those of bacteria in the planktonic state [1, 2]. Biofilms contain extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) comprising cross-linked polysaccharides, proteins and/or extracellular DNA, which form a solid physical barrier enabling defense against external environmental stresses [3]. EPS can also mask antigenic epitopes on bacterial surfaces [4]. Bacteria in biofilms can release extracellular nucleases to degrade neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [5]. Such features result in biofilms inducing a lower host inflammatory response compared with their planktonic counterparts, and facilitate immune escape [6]. Bacteria inside the biofilm initiate the stringent response, enter dormancy, express efflux pumps and transfer drug-resistant genes horizontally, all of which contribute to resistance against adverse stressors [7]. Hence, the biofilm mode of growth is often associated with persistent infection and acts as a reservoir for recurrent infection.

Biofilm formation depends on the host environment and is regulated by many bacterial signal transduction systems including quorum sensing, two-component, secondary messenger transduction and stringent response systems [8,9,10]. In Staphylococcus aureus, the Agr quorum sensing (QS) system coordinates with multiple global regulatory factors including SarA, CcpA, Fur and two-component systems including SaeRS and LytSR to regulate the production of extracellular DNA, lectin and bacterial surface proteins, all of which are the main components of biofilm EPS [10, 11]. The secondary messenger molecule C-di-GMP is also a known key factor of bacteria involved in biofilm formation [12]. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, C-di-GMP regulates the production of extracellular polysaccharides and cellulose [13].

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is an important respiratory pathogen of swine, which has high lethality rate resulting in significant economic losses in the world swine industry [14]. In addition to acute infection, A. pleuropneumoniae can persist in the tonsils and lungs of sub-clinically infected pigs, becoming a potential source of disease outbreaks [15, 16]. It has been reported that most field isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae can form biofilms [17], and pigs naturally infected with the bacterium can be present as biofilm aggregates in the lungs [18]. A recent study found a negative correlation between the ability of field isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae to form biofilms in vitro and the severity of pig lung pathological injury [17]. Additionally, it has also been reported that A. pleuropneumoniae present in swine farm environmental samples show strong biofilm formation in vitro [19], and the bacterium can use products of other bacteria to enable its growth in mixed biofilms [20, 21]. A. pleuropneumoniae growing in the biofilm mode of growth has enhanced antibiotic resistance [22], and a low propensity to stimulate the immune system because of lipid A modification [23]. Therefore, growth in biofilms is considered a natural state of A. pleuropneumoniae during persistent infection [21]. Understanding the structure and survival mechanisms of A. pleuropneumoniae in biofilms is crucial for developing methods of prevention and eliminatation.

The regulation and formation of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms is a complex process. Previous studies have shown that poly-beta (1,6)-N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (PNAG), synthesized and exported by proteins encoded by the pgaABCD locus, is a major polysaccharide component of the EPS of some Gram-negative bacteria including A. pleuropneumoniae [24]. A. pleuropneumoniae also possesses the gene encoding dispersin B (dspB) which is a glycosidase that degrades PNAG [25]. The histone-like nucleoid structuring protein H-NS and sigma E directly represses and activates the expression of pga, respectively [26]. Many other genes have been found to directly or indirectly affect A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm formation, including those encoding the type 2 quorum sensing signal synthetic enzyme LuxS, the two-component signaling systems (TCS) ArcAB and CpxAR, and the stringent response system [27,28,29,30,31,32]. The transcriptomes of static and biofilms at different growth stages in a drip-flow apparatus have also been compared [33]. Generally, genes involved in energy metabolism were down-regulated, while genes encoding some transporters were up-regulated in biofilms, compared with the planktonic counterparts. The study [33] used microarray hybridization, a technique that has now been superseded by RNA-seq.

To further understand the survival and regulation mechanisms of A. pleuropneumoniae growing as a biofilm, in this study, we compared the growth features, morphologies, gene expression profiles (using RNA-Seq) and virulence in mice of planktonic and biofilm grown bacteria. Significant differences in growth, morphology, transcriptome and virulence were found, and three major regulators (Fnr/HlyX and Fis) were identified as being important for the biofilm mode of growth. Our results deepen the understanding of the A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm mode of growth.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The strains, plasmids and primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 3. All A. pleuropneumoniae strains were cultured at 37 °C on TSA plates or in TSB medium (Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA) supplemented with 10 μg/mL NAD. Chloramphenicol at 2 μg/mL was added into the medium when screening for A. pleuropneumoniae mutants or complementary strains containing recombinant plasmid. All E. coli strains were cultured at 37 °C on LA plate or in LB medium (OXOID, Hampshire, UK). E. coli DH5α, TOP10 and β2155 containing recombinant plasmids were screened on LA plates containing 20 μg/mL chloramphenicol. An additional 50 μg/mL 2,6-diaminoheptanoic acid (DAP, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) supplementation was required for the cultivation of strain β2155.

Culture and detection of growth feature of planktonic bacteria

For each A. pleuropneumoniae culture replicate, a single colony of the bacteria on TSA plate kept in 4 °C less than 4 days was incubated into TSB medium overnight (12–14 h) by shaking at 180 r/min at 37 °C. For culture of A. pleuropneumoniae planktonic bacteria (PK), overnight-cultures were transferred to 5 mL fresh TSB medium at 1:100 and cultured at 37 °C at 180 r/min. Samples of planktonic bacteria were taken at 0, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 8, 12 and 24 h. At each timepoint, the OD600nm of the culture was measured and bacterial numbers were determined by viable bacterial counts by plating the cultures onto TSA plates after serial dilutions in normal saline from 10–3 to 10–6. Three plating replicates were conducted for each dilution. After incubation of the plates at 37 °C overnight, the colony forming units (CFU) on each plate were recorded and the original bacterial numbers in each group were calculated.

Culture and detection of growth feature of biofilm

For culture of biofilm (BF), overnight-cultures of A. pleuropneumoniae were transferred into BHI (OXOID, Hampshire, UK) [8] at 1:75 in 12-wells flat bottom cell culture plates (LabServ; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China) at 2 mL per well and incubated at 37 °C statically. Samples were collected at 0, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 8, 12 and 24 h for bacterial numbers measurement and crystal violet (CV) staining of biofilm. The upper suspension was separated and diluted in normal saline for determination of bacterial numbers. The adhesion layer bacteria were collected as biofilms and resuspended in 2 mL of saline, dispersed totally by vortex and diluted in saline. The bacterial numbers in the dilutions were determined by viable bacterial counts as described above.

For quantifications of the biomass of the adherent layer, the upper suspensions were discarded and the wells were gently washed twice with normal saline to remove unattached bacteria and residual medium, followed by fixation of the adherent layer after air-dry. Then, 2 mL of 0.1% Crystal Violet Ammonium Oxalate Solution (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. China) was added into each well to stain the fixed biofilm layer, which was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. After washing the wells with saline, the dyed adherent layers were dissolved by 2 mL of 33% glacial acetic acid solution per well and resuspended by pipetting. The OD595nm of the dissolved solutions in the wells were measured.

Construction of mutants and complementary strains

The mutants ΔpgaABCD and ΔdspB were constructed according to the methods described in our previous studies [34]. Briefly, using A. pleuropneumoniae 4074 genome as template, upstream and downstream fragments of pgaABCD and dspB were amplified with primers pga1/2-pga3/4 and dspB1/2-dspB3/4, respectively (Additional file 3). The amplified products were ligated to the SalI/NotI site of pEMOC2 [35] using the ClonExpress MultiS One Step Cloning Kit (Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., China). Then the recombinant plasmid was transformed from E. coli β2155 to A. pleuropneumoniae WT strain by conjugation [35]. The suspected mutants were screened using the plates supplemented with 2 μg/mL chloramphenicol and 10% (v/w) sucrose and mutants confirmed by PCR using the primers in Additional file 3.

The complementary strains were constructed using the plasmid pMC-express [36] (Additional file 3). The full-length fragments of pgaABCD and dspB were amplified with primers pMC-pga F/R and pMC-dspB F/R, respectively, using A. pleuropneumoniae 4074 genome as template (Additional file 3). The amplification products were cloned into pMC-express vector cut with KpnI and NotI. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into the corresponding mutant strains by electroporation. The transformants were screened using the plates with chloramphenicol (2 μg/mL) and the complementary strains were confirmed by PCR using the primers in Additional file 3.

Morphological observations

The planktonic and biofilm grown bacteria were cultured to logarithmic phase as described above and observed under a transmission electron microscope (TEM) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Planktonic or bacteria obtained from the biofilm adhesion layer were centrifuged at 5000 g for 5 min and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde. For observation under TEM, the fixed cells were rinsed for 15 min in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) 3 times. The cells were further fixed with 1% osmic acid-0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 2 h and rinsed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) 3 times. The samples were dehydrated by an alcohol gradient (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100%) and permeated by epoxy (2:1), acetone: epoxy (1:1) and epoxy. The epoxy was embedded and sectioned, and then double-stained with uranium and the bacterial morphologies were observed under TEM (Tecnai G20 TWIN, FEI, USA).

For observation under SEM, the immobilized bacterial samples were washed with PBS (0.1 M, no NaCl) 3–5 times. After gradient dehydration with alcohol, the samples were treated with isoamyl acetate 3 times each for 20 min. The dehydrated samples were dried and sprayed in vacuum. Finally, the morphology of bacteria was observed using high-resolution SEM (Hitachi U8010, Hitachi, Ltd., Japan).

RNA extraction and transcriptome analysis

After overnight culture, the WT planktonic bacteria were sub-cultured for 4 h to log-phase. WT and Δpga were sub-cultured in 12-well plates at 37 °C for 5 h (log-phase). WT biofilms were sampled from the adherent layer. Since Δpga does not form any adherent layer, the whole cultures of this strain were sampled. Then, the planktonic and biofilm grown cells were collected by centrifugation at 5000 g, and total RNA extracted using the Total RNA Extraction Kit (Tianmo Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. Each group of samples had three independent biological replicates.

After rRNA removal and quality control, the RNA samples were sequenced. Paired-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina sequencing platform and data quality assessment and filtering was performed by FASTQC and Trimmomatic software. The high-quality sequences obtained after quality control were mapped to the A. pleuropneumoniae 4074 genome (NZ_CP029003.1) based on the Burrows-Wheeler method. The RPKM (Reads per Kilobase per Million Reads) value was used as the index of gene expression. The genes with fold change ≥ 2 and p adjust ≤ 0.05 were regarded as differentially expressed genes. Hierarchical clustering was used to classify genes with different expression regulation patterns. Pathway analysis was performed by KEGG pathway enrichment of differentially expressed genes (p value ≤ 0.05).

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Culture and RNA extraction of bacteria were described above. Residual gDNA was digested and cDNA was synthesized using the HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (+ gDNA wiper; Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., China). Using the obtained cDNA as template, qPCR was performed with TB Green Premix Ex Taq II Kit (Tli RNaseH Plus) (Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China) using primers of differentially expressed genes listed in Additional file 3. The 2−ΔΔCt of each gene was calculated as the relative expression level with the 16S rRNA expression amount as the endogenous reference.

Mouse infection assay

A model of intranasal infection in mice was used to compare the virulence of A. pleuropneumoniae planktonic with biofilm bacteria as described in a previous study [34]. PK and BF bacterial solutions for infection were prepared from log-phase culture as described above. Four-week-old female Kunming mice were anesthetized with 20 μL/g of Avertin (1.25% tribromoethanol) and intranasally infected with 20 μL inoculum containing 4 × 106 CFU biofilm (n = 6) or the same dose of planktonic bacteria (n = 6), and number of mice surviving recorded for 72 h. For detection of the bacterial loads in the lungs after sub-lethal dose infection of biofilm (n = 6) or planktonic bacteria (n = 6), mice were infected intranasally with bacterial cultures from mid-log phase at a dose of 2 × 106 CFU. Then, mice were euthanized at 12, 48 and 72 h after infection. The lungs were collected and thoroughly homogenized and plated on TSA plates after dilution, and the CFUs determined.

Sequence analysis of potential binding sites of regulators

For binding site analysis of differential gene promoter regions, the reference binding motifs of Fnr and Fis were extracted from DB database. The MEME-FIMO online tool (Find Individual Motif Occurences, p-value < 0.001) was used to search the promoter regions of selected genes for the specific binding motifs of Fnr, Fis and H-NS.

Statistical analysis

A two-tailed t-test was used for statistical analysis of biofilm quantification. The log rank (Mantel-Cox) test was performed for comparison of mortalities of mice in the infection assay. Bacterial loads in the lungs of mice were statistically analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered to be significant. For RNA-seq and pathway analysis, the statistical methods have been described above.


A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm differs from planktonic bacteria in their growth curves

A. pleuropneumoniae planktonic or biofilm growth were determined by detecting OD600nm and colony-forming units (CFU) (Figures 1A, B). Bacteria growing in shaking culture or statically in microtiter plates were the source of planktonic and biofilm cells, respectively. For biofilm grown bacteria, CFUs of adherent and non-adherent (upper layer) were determined. Biomass was also quantified by crystal violet (CV) staining. In the early stage of culture (5–6 h), the growth trends of planktonic bacteria and biofilm were similar (Figures 1A, B). Thereafter, as the biofilm approached maturity, planktonic bacteria entered the stationary phase with the highest CFU (Figures 1A, B). The biomass detected by CV staining increased in the early stage of biofilm formation (2.5–5.5 h), which was consistent with the trend of bacterial proliferation as detected by the CFU in both upper and adherent layers (Figure 1B). As the biofilm matured, the quantities of viable bacterial numbers reached its peak at 5.5–8 h, corresponding with the thickest EPS of the biofilm according to the CV staining (Figure 1B). At the later stage of biofilm formation, the quantities of the biomass were stable until 24 h, but the number of viable bacteria in the biofilm layer and upper layer decreased (Figure 1B). Taken together, under the conditions used in this study, the biofilm growth of A. pleuropneumoniae entered maturation at 5–5.5 h, the same time as that of late-log phase and the beginning of the stationary phase of planktonic bacteria. Thereafter, the biomass of biofilm was maintained to 24 h, but the number of viable bacteria declined, while the viable bacteria in planktonic cultures was maintained to 24 h.

Figure 1
figure 1

Growth curve and morphological structures of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm and planktonic bacteria. A Growth curves represented by bacterial culture absorbance at OD600nm and colony forming units (CFU) of A. pleuropneumoniae planktonic bacteria (PK) with shaking at 37 °C. B Growth curves of biofilm cells (BF) shown by CFU of the upper and adhesion layers of the biofilm cultures grown statically in 12-well plates (bar graphs). The total CFU of both upper and adhesion layers of the biofilm is shown (black line). Biomass of the biofilms were determined by crystal violet (CV) staining of the adhesion layer (purple line). C Morphology of PK and BF grown cells under an optical microscope (OM; Gram staining), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The magnification of the image is shown. For growth curves and CV staining of biofilms, data are shown as means ± SD from three independent replicates.

Morphological structure of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms

The morphologies of biofilms in the mature stage (5 h) were observed. Gram staining showed that, compared with planktonic bacteria, those grown as biofilm aggregated into clusters with flocculent impurities that could be stained around the clusters (Figure 1C). Transmission electron microscopy revealed that, compared to planktonic bacteria, there were numerous interconnected extracellular flocs in biofilm grown bacteria (Figure 1C), inside of which condensed chromatin could be seen as black clumps or filaments. Compared with planktonic bacteria, there were fewer black masses inside the biofilm (Figure 1C). In mature biofilms observed under scanning electron microscopy, there were dense aggregated structures connected by abundant EPS (Figure 1C).

PNAG and dispersin B are critical for A. pleuropneumoniae normal biofilm formation

It has been reported that PNAG and dispensin B are essential for the formation and degradation of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm extracellular matrix [25]. To verify the role of PNAG in biofilm formation and the role of dispersin B in biofilm dispersion of A. pleuropneumoniae, we constructed the deletion mutants and complementary strains of pgaABCD and dspB, respectively (Additional file 1). Deletion of pgaABCDpga) and dspBdspB) did not affect A. pleuropneumoniae growth (Additional file 2). Gram-staining and electron microscopy indicated that Δpga failed to adhere to microplate surfaces/slide to form a biofilm structure (Figure 2). The results confirmed that PNAG was essential for the formation of a biofilm. In contrast, ΔdspB exhibited obvious enhanced biofilm formation, with more aggregates and extracellular matrix (Figure 2). Therefore, the above results confirmed that A. pleuropneumoniae formed biofilm dependent on PNAG as the main component of the EPS, while dispersin B was involved in limiting biofilm formation.

Figure 2
figure 2

Morphology of Δpga and ΔdspB. A CV staining of biofilms formed by WT, Δpga and ΔdspB cultured for 5 h in 12-well plates. Data are shown as means ± SD from three independent replicates. A two-tailed t-test was used to compare the biofilm quantities of WT and the Δpga or ΔdspB (***, p < 0.001). B Morphology of Δpga and ΔdspB under optical microscopy (OM; Gram staining), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The magnifications of the images are shown

A. pleuropneumoniae grown in biofilms have significantly altered gene transcriptional patterns from planktonic bacteria

Planktonic wild-type (WT) bacteria were grown to mid-log phase, and WT and Δpga were also grown statically in microplates until the biofilm maturity stage (5 h). The biofilm/adhesion layer of WT (BF), Δpga (unable to generate adhesion layer), and planktonic WT (PK) were harvested for RNA sequencing and analysis. According to the hierarchical clustering heatmap (Figure 3A) and principal component analysis (Figure 3B), there was good reproducibility among the three independent samples in each group. The PK and BF groups had different hierarchical clustering patterns (Figure 3A) and great distance on the x-axis (Figure 3B), indicating that the transcriptional patterns of bacteria grown in biofilms were significantly different to those grown planktonically. Compared with the PK group, there were 646 differentially expressed genes (332 up-regulated, 314 down-regulated) in the BF group (Additional file 4). Generally, the transcriptional pattern of the Δpga group was more similar with that of BF group (Figures 3A, B, Additional file 5), with fewer differentially expressed genes (198 up-regulated, 15 down-regulated). Transcript levels of 11 genes were determined by qRT-PCR under the same sampling conditions as RNA-Seq (Figure 3C) and correlated well with transcriptome data (Figure 3D).

Figure 3
figure 3

Transcriptome levels and gene expression difference analysis of PK, BF and Δpga. A Heatmap of differentially expressed genes from all comparison groups (PK, BF and Δpga) after RNA-seq analysis. The horizontal line represents genes, while each column represents a sample. Each treatment group consisted of three independent biological replicates. Red: genes with increased expression levels. Blue: genes with decreased expression levels. B Principal component analysis of gene expressions from all comparison groups (PK, BF and Δpga) after RNA-seq analysis. Different colors represent different groups. C The log2 fold change values of qRT-PCR showing the transcriptional changes of 11 differentially expressed genes in BF compared with PK group from RNA-seq analysis. D Pearson coefficient correlation analysis between qRT-PCR and RNA-seq analysis. X-axis: log2 value from qRT-PCR; Y-axis: log2 value from RNA-seq.

The transcriptional levels of genes in multiple metabolic pathways of A. pleuropneumoniae grown in biofilms were significantly changed

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed on genes differentially expressed in the BF group compared with the PK group, and 124 up-regulated and 201 down-regulated genes were matched into multiple pathways (Figure 4). Among them, the genes involved in metabolism, genetic information and environmental information processing pathways accounted for 45.5%, 23.4% and 16.0% of the total, respectively. Genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism (19.9%), energy metabolism (17.9%), translation (23.4%) and membrane transport (11.4%) accounted for 72.6% (146/201) of the down-regulated, but only 32.3% (40/124) of the up-regulated genes (Figure 4A). Significantly down-regulated pathways that were enriched included oxidative phosphorylation, phosphotransferase system (PTS), glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pyruvate metabolism, citrate cycle (TCA cycle), and ribosome synthesis (Figures 4B, 5). ATP synthase and pathways involved in aerobic respiration were significantly down-regulated. Similarly, reduction pathways such as nitrate, TMAO\DMSO and fumaric acid reductions involved in the electron transport chain of anaerobic respiration were also significantly down-regulated (Figure 5). In contrast, the fermentation pathways for lactic acid and ethanol production were up-regulated (Figure 5). The riboflavin metabolic pathway, with its product flavin mononucleotide (FMN) as a cofactor of L-lactate dehydrogenase LldD and various enzymes [37], was up-regulated (Figure 5). The catabolism of stored carbon sources, starch glycogen and N-acetylneuraminate (Neu5Ac), were up-regulated. Notably, three enzymes (Nan A/K/E) leading to the production of GlcNAc-6P, the precursor for synthesis of PNAG, peptidoglycan and lipid A [38,39,40], were up-regulated. As expected, the pgaABCD operon encoding the PNAG synthetase and export proteins was significantly up-regulated (Figure 5). In addition, up-regulated genes involved in other pathways were enriched, for example many genes involved in sulfur metabolism, which is critical for providing sulfur atoms for methionine, glutathione and iron-sulfur clusters (Figure 5). Molybdenum cofactor and folate synthesis, histidine metabolism and some transporters of Fe (III) and Fe (II) were also up-regulated. Altogether, the transcriptional changes of many metabolic genes indicated that bacteria grown in biofilms significantly reduced energy metabolism and genetic activities, increased fermentation and related cofactor synthesis, and accumulated extracellular matrix PNAG.

Figure 4
figure 4

Functional classification and pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in BF compared with PK bacteria. A Statistical histogram showing pathway classification of the distribution of differentially expressed genes in BF compared with PK group at different KEGG pathway levels. B KEGG pathway enrichment chord diagram showing differentially expressed genes in BF compared with PK group corresponding to significantly enriched pathways (p value ≤ 0.05). The left half circle is the differentially expressed genes arranged according to the value of log2FC from large to small. The right half circle is the KEGG pathways of the significantly enriched differentially expressed genes

Figure 5
figure 5

Schematic diagram of metabolic pathway changes of BF compared with PK bacteria. Red: up-regulated genes; Blue: down-regulated genes.

Analysis of transcriptional regulation in biofilm grown A. pleuropneumoniae

As previously described, the formation of a bacterial biofilm and its maintenance requires signal transduction systems and regulators in response to specific conditions or stimuli. We next focused on the differentially expressed transcriptional regulators in A. pleuropneumoniae grown in biofilms. In particular, the global regulatory proteins Fnr (also named as HlyX) which is important for the transition from aerobic to anaerobic growth, the nucleoid associated protein Fis, and the histone-like nucleoid associated protein H-NS, were differentially expressed in the biofilm transcriptome.

Fnr is a known global regulator in response to oxygen levels [41]. It was up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae grown as a biofilm (log2FC = 1.470, Figure 3). Fnr of A. pleuropneumoniae consists of 255 amino acids, which is homologous to Fnr of E. coli with 75% sequence identity and also with a similar function [42]. The DNA binding motif of Fnr in the upstream region of differentially expressed genes or operons of BF were searched (Additional file 4). The results showed that 63% of these genes had Fnr binding site(s) (Table 1 and Additional file 4, p < 0.001). Among these genes, most of which were down-regulated, were those involved in transcription and translation, glycolysis, the TCA cycle and anaerobic respiratory electron transport chain. The up-regulated genes mainly participated in L-lactate fermentation, cofactor synthesis (FMN, molybdopterin), amino acid metabolism, Neu5Ac metabolism, PNAG synthesis, and fnr itself. Notably, Fnr binding sites were also found in the promoter regions of apxICABD and apxIICA encoding the important virulence factors of A. pleuropneumoniae, the RTX toxins [43]. These genes were also significantly down-regulated when A. pleuropneumoniae was growing as a biofilm.

Table 1 Identification of Fnr binding sitesa in the promoter regions of differentially expressed genes (BF compared with PK)

As a multifunctional protein involved in regulation of transcription, replication and recombination, Fis is considered to be an important regulator controlling the transition from log phase to stationary phase during growth [44, 45] and was significantly up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms (log2FC = 1.672, Figure 3). Fis of A. pleuropneumoniae had 71% sequence identity with that of E. coli, with a conserved DNA binding domain at the C-terminus. The Fis binding motif was found in the upstream sequences of 68% of the differentially expressed genes of the BF group (Table 2 and Additional file 4, p < 0.001). The down-regulated genes with a Fis binding motif in the upstream region were involved in transcription and translation, glycolysis, the TCA cycle, multiple terminal respiratory enzymes and also included apxIICA. The up-regulated genes were involved in fermentation, FMN metabolism and folate biosynthesis. Among these genes potentially regulated by Fis, 77.5% contained Fnr binding motifs in their promoters, indicating that these genes were cross-regulated by Fnr and Fis in A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms (Table 2). In addition, Fis and HlyX were found to have binding sites of each other in their promoter regions (Table 2).

Table 2 Identification of Fis binding sitesa in the promoter regions of differentially expressed genes (BF compared with PK)

The known A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm regulatory protein H-NS [26] was down-regulated in the biofilm transcriptome (log2FC = − 1.158, Figure 3). H-NS binding sites were found in the upstream regions of 20.7% differentially expressed genes of the BF group (Table 3 and Additional file 4, p < 0.001), i.e., less than that with Fnr and Fis binding motifs.

Table 3 Identification of H-NS binding sitesa in the promoter regions of differentially expressed genes (BF compared with PK)

Genes associated with bacterial aggregation and adhesion during biofilm formation

Using the transcriptome of Δpga which cannot adhere and form biofilms as the control, the genes differentially expressed in BF were considered as being associated with bacterial aggregation and adhesion during biofilm formation. Among these genes, 198 were up-regulated and 15 were down-regulated, with more than 64% of the genes involved in metabolism. The up-regulated genes included those taking part in metabolism and transport of galactose, mannose, maltose, fucose and Neu5Ac (Table 4 and Additional file 5). These oligosaccharides usually form or modify cell membrane glycoconjugates such as glycoproteins and lipopolysaccharides, which are involved in cell structure, bacterial recognition and adhesion. Four enzymes involved in fermentation were all up-regulated in biofilms, as were those involved in the utilization of iron and sulfur sources. Among the 15 down-regulated genes, 11 encoded multiple terminal respiratory enzymes (the nitrate/nitrite reductase, TMAO reductase, DMSO reductase and hydrogenase). Therefore, the utilization of oligosaccharides, iron and sulfur, fermentation and repressed anaerobic respiration may be involved in mediating the adhesion or aggregation of bacteria during A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm formation.

Table 4 The differentially expressed genes of BF compared with Δpga

Biofilm-grown A. pleuropneumoniae showed reduced virulence in mice

To compare the virulence of biofilm and planktonic bacteria, mice were infected intranasally with log-phase biofilm and planktonic bacteria. A lethal dose of A. pleuropneumoniae (4 × 106 CFU) resulted in acute mortality in mice, with the earliest death occurring even within 12 h and the lethality stabilized within 72 h (Figure 6A). Compared with that infected by planktonic bacteria, the lethality of mice infected by biofilm-grown bacteria was significantly lower (p < 0.05), and the onset of mouse death was delayed in the biofilm infection group (Figure 6A). A sub-lethal dose (2 × 106 CFU) was also used to assess bacterial colonization capacity. A. pleuropneumoniae proliferated rapidly in mice, with the numbers peaking near 12 h (Figure 6B). There was no significant difference in the bacterial load in vivo between BF and PK at 12 h or 48 h post-infection (Figure 6B). Bacteria were gradually cleared as the infection progressed, and it was seen that the BF-infected group had a higher number of bacteria surviving in vivo than PK at 72 h (Figure 6B). In summary, when used as an inoculum, A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm grown bacteria had reduced virulence in mice, and presented a more sustained in vivo colonization than PK.

Figure 6
figure 6

Pathogenicity of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm (BF) and planktonic (PK) grown bacteria for mice. A Survival rates of mice (6 per group) intranasally infected with PK and BF, respectively, at 4 × 106 CFU in 20 μL for each mouse. Log rank (Mantel-Cox) test was performed for statistical analysis (*, p < 0.05). B Bacterial loads in the lungs of mice intranasally infected with PK or BF at a dose of 2 × 106 CFU per mouse. Dotted line: the limit of detection (400 CFU/g). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test was used for statistical analysis (*, p < 0.05; ns: not significant).


Bacteria living as biofilms is a common trait of prokaryotes. The structure of biofilm aggregates facilitates bacterial resistance to environmental stresses and survival. Persistent and/or latent infections arising from the biofilm mode of growth have become a major factor in the persistence of disease and its re-emergence [46]. As an important respiratory pathogen, it has been reported that most field isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae form biofilms in the laboratory when initially isolated [17]. In pigs, aggregates of A. pleuropneumoniae in host lungs is considered a biofilm mode of growth, which may act as a reservoir for outbreaks of infection when exposed to stressors or when other pathogens evade the host [18]. Therefore, the biofilm mode of growth can be considered as facilitating survival of A. pleuropneumoniae in the host. In this study, we compared the growth features and gene expression patterns of A. pleuropneumoniae grown in biofilms with planktonic cells. A simple in vitro culture method in 12-well plates was used to generate stable A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms, and there were obvious differences in growth curves and morphology, compared with that of the planktonic bacteria obtained from shake cultures (Figure 1). Through construction and comparative analysis of WT, Δpga and complimentary strains, it was confirmed that PNAG, a known polysaccharide component of EPS for biofilm formation of many bacteria, was critical for A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm formation (Figure 2). Similarly, it was also confirmed that dispersin B (encoded by dspB), an enzyme that degrades PNAG was also involved in the regulation of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm formation (Figure 2). These results are consistent with previous studies [24, 25].

Numerous genes have been reported to affect A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm formation [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Among these genes, the H-NS and the TCS CpxAR have been validated to direct regulate the genes pgaABCD encoding PNAG synthesis proteins [26, 32]. For other genes, it is still relatively unknown how they influence A. pleuropneumoniae formation and/or maintenance. In this study, we used RNA-seq analysis to compare the gene expression of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm and planktonic cultures. This contrasts with a previous study also with 4074, that used microarray hybridization to compare transcriptional profiles of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms at different stages in a drip-flow apparatus and also under static culture [33]. The results indicated that some genes involved in energy metabolism were down-regulated and genes encoding transporters were up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms, some of which were also found in this work. For example, the down-regulated genes ppc (encodes phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase), pckA (encodes phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase), dmsABC (encodes anaerobic dimethyl sulfoxide reductase) and genes encoding ribosomal proteins, and the up-regulated genes znuC (zinc ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, fdhC (formate/nitrite transporter family protein) and ribD (5-amino-6-(5-phosphoribosylamino) uracil reductase) were also identified in this study. Unlike hybridization-based microarray technology, RNA-Seq has no upper limit of quantification, which correlates with the number of sequences obtained, and thus it can detect a large range of dynamic expression levels of transcripts [47]. In addition, the advantages of high resolution and low background signal of RNA-seq allow for a high level of reproducibility of gene expression detections, as verified by qRT-PCR in this work (Figures 3C, D). Four times of the number of differentially expressed genes in biofilms were identified in this study compared to that using microarray hybridization, thus expanding our understanding of gene transcription profile of biofilm-grown A. pleuropneumoniae (Figure 5).

The gene expression of A. pleuropneumoniae grown in biofilms was distinct from growth planktonically. In general, many different metabolic pathways and their components were down-regulated in biofilms. These included, enzymes involved in glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, TCA cycle and the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. In addition to aerobic respiration, genes involved in anaerobic respiration using alternative electrons (nitrate, DMSO TMSO) were also down-regulated. In contrast, sulfur and histidine metabolism, iron transport and coenzyme synthesis were up-regulated. Biofilm grown bacteria had significantly up-regulated PNAG synthesis and amino sugar metabolic pathways, which are essential for the formation of cell wall and EPS components of biofilm [48]. These results suggest that A. pleuropneumoniae growing in biofilms have a reduced metabolism compared to their planktonic counterparts, reprogramming of metabolic reactions, and a shift to synthesis and translocation of the cell wall and EPS components, most likely occurring to enable survival to stress.

Antibiotic resistance often contributes to the difficulty of biofilm eradication [21]. It has been reported that A. pleuropneumoniae field isolates contained multiple antibiotic resistance genes and were positively correlated with their ability to form biofilms [49]. In our study, many antibiotic resistance genes were up-regulated in biofilms (Additional file 4), including tet (APPSER1_RS02405) encoding a tetracycline resistance efflux pump [50], vcaM (APPSER1_RS06625) encoding an ABC-type multidrug efflux pump [51], macB (APPSER1_RS03395) encoding a macrolide transport system ATP-binding/permease protein [52], rarD (APPSER1_RS05710) encoding a predicted chloramphenicol resistance permease, and marC (APPSER1_RS06555) encoding a predicted multiple antibiotic resistance protein. In addition, a low growth rate also potentially contributes to resistance to antibiotics. Traditional antibiotics usually target bacterial components essential for proliferation, such as proteins involved in cell wall synthesis, DNA synthesis and protein translation. Metabolic processes have also been found to be affected by antibiotics and directly linked to antibiotic efficacy. Bactericidal antibiotics can kill bacteria by inducing their respiration [53]. Biocides and antibiotics can cause elevated ATP and respiration in bacteria by the PTS and the cAMP-Crp cascade, resulting in over-production of reactive oxygen species to a lethal concentration [54]. Therefore, the decreased metabolic activity and ATP biosynthesis found in the biofilm the “resting-mode” can make bacteria more tolerance to antibiotics [4].

It was noted that the genes encoding the major virulence genes of A. pleuropneumoniae, the apxIA and apxIIA, were significantly down-regulated in biofilms. A. pleuropneumoniae has four types of RTX toxins, the ApxI, ApxII, ApxIII and ApxIV [15]. The strain used in this study is a virulent strain of serovar 1, which possess both ApxI and ApxII that are both necessary for full virulence of A. pleuropneumoniae [55]. Consistent with the down-regulation of the structural genes of both ApxI and ApxII, when used as inocula, biofilm grown bacteria showed reduced lethality for mice (Figure 6A). When the mice were infected with sub-lethal doses, the bacterial numbers recovered from the lungs showed no significant difference between biofilm and planktonic bacteria groups up to 48 h post-infection (Figure 6B), indicating that the difference in lethality was not related to differences in bacterial proliferation in vivo. At 72 h post-infection, the viable number in the lungs of mice infected with biofilm was higher than that infected with planktonic bacteria (Figure 6B), suggesting that the survival time of biofilm was longer in vivo. These results indicate that A. pleuropneumoniae growing as as biofilm are less virulent, which is in agreement with previous studies that A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm grown cells trigger weaker immune responses [23], and negatively correlates with the severity of lung lesions of pigs [17]. Therefore, it can be inferred that A. pleuropneumoniae growing in biofilms down-regulate some main virulence factors and basic metabolic activities, while up-regulating the expression of antibiotic resistance genes and those involved in the maintenance of EPS structures, which can facilitate long-lasting survival in the host.

The biofilm mode of growth is known to be dependent on signal transduction proteins and regulators [8,9,10]. In this study, in addition to H-NS that was up-regulated in biofilms, two other regulators were identified to be up-regulated, Fnr (HlyX) and Fis. Up-regulated expression of Fnr may be activated by the anaerobic environment inside the biofilm [56]. Many differentially expressed genes involved in the metabolic pathways in A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms have been reported to be regulated by Fnr [57]. Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses showed that Fnr (HlyX) induces the expression of genes encoding alternative terminal reductases and hydrogenases which are functional in the anaerobic metabolism of A. pleuropneumoniae [57]. However, in this study, Fnr was induced in biofilms, but a lot of its target genes involved in energy and carbohydrate metabolism, including multiple terminal respiratory enzymes, mannose/fructose transporter and the enzymes involved in TCA cycle were down-regulated (Table 1). Simultaneously, fis encoding the global regulator Fis [45], was also up-regulated. By analyzing the binding motifs of Fis and Fnr in the database in the upstream regions of the differentially expressed genes in biofilms, we found that most of the upstream regions of these genes had binding sites of both Fis and Fnr, with more genes potentially regulated by Fis (Tables 1, 2). As a typical nucleoid associated protein that functions by binding to specific DNA sequences, Fis has the ability to mask the Fnr binding site, thereby inhibiting the activity of Fnr on the target genes [58, 59]. In E. coli, a combined RNA-seq and ChIP-seq analysis has illustrated the extensive role of Fis in regulation of sugar metabolism and transport, as well as the genes involved in cell division, bacteriocin transport and biofilm formation [60]. The overlapping of the regulons of A. pleuropneumoniae Fis and Fnr provides an explanation for differential regulation of Fnr target genes in the biofilm transcriptome. Binding of Fis with nrf and nir promoters is known to inhibit Fnr regulation [61, 62]. Additionally, A. pleuropneumoniae Fis and Fnr may regulate each other’s expression since there are binding sites of each other in the upstream regions of their coding genes (Tables 1, 2). A detailed analysis of the cross-regulation of Fis and Fnr on A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm gene expression will be the subject of further study.

At present, effective strategies to prevent biofilm formation include the inhibition of sessile bacterial adhesion and initial structure formation by interfering with EPS secretion, such as the utilization of peptidoglycan hydrolase [63], and the use of an antibody against specific EPS components [64]. Lysis of intercellular junctions using DNases and proteases [65, 66] and release of antibiotic-sensitive individual cells from biofilm aggregates by changing the levels of signaling molecules [67, 68] have also been reported to be effective for biofilm treatment. Based on the metabolic behavior of A. pleuropneumoniae growing in biofilms, according to the gene expression profile, we speculate that reducing the availability of specific nutrients including oligosaccharides (sialic acid, fucose, galactose.), amino acids, iron or sulfur sources may reduce the adhesion and aggregation of A. pleuropneumoniae and the formation of biofilms.

In summary, the growth features, morphology, gene expression and virulence of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm grown bacteria were compared with their planktonic counterparts. The results confirmed that A. pleuropneumoniae self-aggregated and adhered to surfaces and secreted EPS to form biofilm. The gene expression profiles of A. pleuropneumoniae in biofilms were altered extensively, suggesting a lower level of basic metabolic activity, and a fermentation mode of growth accompanied by expression of genes for major EPS synthesis (Figure 7). The regulators Fnr and Fis appear to coordinately have a global regulatory role in maintaining the metabolism of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilms. Down-regulation of known virulence genes, e.g., the Apx toxins, is consistent with the reduced virulence of biofilm grown bacteria compared to their planktonic counterparts. These results increase our understanding of A. pleuropneumoniae biofilm regulation and development of its clearance strategies.

Figure 7
figure 7

Metabolic changes of A. pleuropneumoniae living in biofilms compared with planktonic bacteria. The contents in the purple outlined cell indicate the pathways closely related to adhesion and aggregation during biofilm formation. The pathways in blue outlined cell indicate those altered during the biofilm mode of growth. Red box: up-regulated pathways. Blue box: down-regulated pathways.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus repository and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE221940.


  1. Chua SL, Liu Y, Yam JK, Chen Y, Vejborg RM, Tan BG, Kjelleberg S, Tolker-Nielsen T, Givskov M, Yang L (2014) Dispersed cells represent a distinct stage in the transition from bacterial biofilm to planktonic lifestyles. Nat Commun 5:4462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trubenová B, Roizman D, Moter A, Rolff J, Regoes RR (2022) Population genetics, biofilm recalcitrance, and antibiotic resistance evolution. Trends Microbiol 30:841–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vuong C, Voyich JM, Fischer ER, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, DeLeo FR, Otto M (2004) Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) protects Staphylococcus epidermidis against major components of the human innate immune system. Cell Microbiol 6:269–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall CW, Mah TF (2017) Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:276–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smolarz M, Zawrotniak M, Satala D, Rapala-Kozik M (2021) Extracellular nucleic acids present in the Candida albicans biofilm trigger the release of neutrophil extracellular traps. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:681030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Paharik AE, Horswill AR (2016) The staphylococcal biofilm: adhesins, regulation, and host response. Microbiol Spectr 4:4.2.06

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang T, Zhu J, Xu J, Shao H, Zhou R (2020) Regulation of (p)ppGpp and its homologs on environmental adaptation, survival, and pathogenicity of Streptococci. Front Microbiol 11:1842

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Labrie J, Pelletier-Jacques G, Deslandes V, Ramjeet M, Auger E, Nash JH, Jacques M (2010) Effects of growth conditions on biofilm formation by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Vet Res 41:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shrout JD, Chopp DL, Just CL, Hentzer M, Givskov M, Parsek MR (2006) The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. Mol Microbiol 62:1264–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fazli M, Almblad H, Rybtke ML, Givskov M, Eberl L, Tolker-Nielsen T (2014) Regulation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species. Environ Microbiol 16:1961–1981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schilcher K, Horswill AR (2020) Staphylococcal biofilm development: structure, regulation, and treatment strategies. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 84:e00026-e119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hengge R (2009) Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:263–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vandana DS (2022) Genetic regulation, biosynthesis and applications of extracellular polysaccharides of the biofilm matrix of bacteria. Carbohydr Polym 291:119536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bossé JT, Janson H, Sheehan BJ, Beddek AJ, Rycroft AN, Kroll JS, Langford PR (2002) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: pathobiology and pathogenesis of infection. Microbes Infect 4:225–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sassu EL, Bossé JT, Tobias TJ, Gottschalk M, Langford PR, Hennig-Pauka I (2018) Update on Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae-knowledge, gaps and challenges. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:72–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gottschalk M (2015) The challenge of detecting herds sub-clinically infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Vet J 206:30–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aper D, Frömbling J, Bağcıoğlu M, Ehling-Schulz M, Hennig-Pauka I (2020) Comparison of metabolic adaptation and biofilm formation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae field isolates from the upper and lower respiratory tract of swine with respiratory disease. Vet Microbiol 240:108532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tremblay YDN, Labrie J, Chenier S, Jacques M (2017) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae grows as aggregates in the lung of pigs: is it time to refine our in vitro biofilm assays? Microb Biotechnol 10:756–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loera-Muro A, Ramírez-Castillo FY, Moreno-Flores AC, Martin EM, Avelar-González FJ, Guerrero-Barrera AL (2021) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae surviving on environmental multi-species biofilms in swine farms. Front Vet Sci 8:722683

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Loera-Muro A, Jacques M, Avelar-González FJ, Labrie J, Tremblay YD, Oropeza-Navarro R, Guerrero-Barrera AL (2016) Auxotrophic Actinobacillus pleurpneumoniae grows in multispecies biofilms without the need for nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (NAD) supplementation. BMC Microbiol 16:128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hathroubi S, Loera-Muro A, Guerrero-Barrera AL, Tremblay YDN, Jacques M (2018) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biofilms: role in pathogenicity and potential impact for vaccination development. Anim Health Res Rev 19:17–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Gong S, Dong X, Li J, Grenier D, Yi L (2020) In vitro mixed biofilm of Streptococcus suis and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae impacts antibiotic susceptibility and modulates virulence factor gene expression. Front Microbiol 11:507

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hathroubi S, Beaudry F, Provost C, Martelet L, Segura M, Gagnon CA, Jacques M (2016) Impact of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biofilm mode of growth on the lipid a structures and stimulation of immune cells. Innate Immun 22:353–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Izano EA, Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Mulks MH, Velliyagounder K, Ragunath C, Kher WB, Ramasubbu N, Jabbouri S, Perry MB, Kaplan JB (2007) Poly-N-acetylglucosamine mediates biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Microb Pathog 43:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan JB, Velliyagounder K, Ragunath C, Rohde H, Mack D, Knobloch JK, Ramasubbu N (2004) Genes involved in the synthesis and degradation of matrix polysaccharide in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biofilms. J Bacteriol 186:8213–8220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bossé JT, Sinha S, Li MS, O’Dwyer CA, Nash JH, Rycroft AN, Kroll JS, Langford PR (2010) Regulation of pga operon expression and biofilm formation in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by sigmaE and H-NS. J Bacteriol 192:2414–2423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li L, Xu Z, Zhou Y, Li T, Sun L, Chen H, Zhou R (2011) Analysis on Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae LuxS regulated genes reveals pleiotropic roles of LuxS/AI-2 on biofilm formation, adhesion ability and iron metabolism. Microb Pathog 50:293–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, Zhou R, Li T, Kang M, Wan Y, Xu Z, Chen H (2008) Enhanced biofilm formation and reduced virulence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae luxS mutant. Microb Pathog 45:192–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Buettner FF, Maas A, Gerlach GF (2008) An Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae arcA deletion mutant is attenuated and deficient in biofilm formation. Vet Microbiol 127:106–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li L, Zhu J, Yang K, Xu Z, Liu Z, Zhou R (2014) Changes in gene expression of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in response to anaerobic stress reveal induction of central metabolism and biofilm formation. J Microbiol 52:473–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li G, Xie F, Zhang Y, Bossé JT, Langford PR, Wang C (2015) Role of (p)ppGpp in viability and biofilm formation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae S8. PLoS One 10:e0141501

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Li H, Liu F, Peng W, Yan K, Zhao H, Liu T, Cheng H, Chang P, Yuan F, Chen H, Bei W (2018) The CpxA/CpxR two-component system affects biofilm formation and virulence in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tremblay YD, Deslandes V, Jacques M (2013) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae genes expression in biofilms cultured under static conditions and in a drip-flow apparatus. BMC Genomics 14:364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Q, Tang H, Yan C, Han W, Peng L, Xu J, Chen X, Langford PR, Bei W, Huang Q, Zhou R, Li L (2022) The metabolic adaptation in response to nitrate is critical for Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae growth and pathogenicity under the regulation of NarQ/P. Infect Immun 90:e0023922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu J, Hu L, Xu Z, Tan C, Yuan F, Fu S, Cheng H, Chen H, Bei W (2015) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae two-component system QseB/QseC regulates the transcription of PilM, an important determinant of bacterial adherence and virulence. Vet Microbiol 177:184–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bossé JT, Durham AL, Rycroft AN, Kroll JS, Langford PR (2009) New plasmid tools for genetic analysis of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and other pasteurellaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6124–6131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hermann T (2015) Non-coding RNA: antibiotic tricks a switch. Nature 526:650–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Plumbridge J, Vimr E (1999) Convergent pathways for utilization of the amino sugars N-acetylglucosamine, N-acetylmannosamine, and N-acetylneuraminic acid by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 181:47–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Whitney JC, Howell PL (2013) Synthase-dependent exopolysaccharide secretion in Gram-negative bacteria. Trends Microbiol 21:63–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson MS, Raetz CR (1987) Biosynthesis of lipid a precursors in Escherichia coli. a cytoplasmic acyltransferase that converts UDP-N-acetylglucosamine to UDP-3-O-(R-3-hydroxymyristoyl)-N-acetylglucosamine. J Biol Chem 262:5159–5169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spiro S, Guest JR (1990) FNR and its role in oxygen-regulated gene expression in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev 6:399–428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. MacInnes JI, Kim JE, Lian CJ, Soltes GA (1990) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae hlyX gene homology with the fnr gene of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 172:4587–4592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Frey J (1995) Virulence in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and RTX toxins. Trends Microbiol 3:257–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ball CA, Osuna R, Ferguson KC, Johnson RC (1992) Dramatic changes in Fis levels upon nutrient upshift in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 174:8043–8056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kahramanoglou C, Seshasayee AS, Prieto AI, Ibberson D, Schmidt S, Zimmermann J, Benes V, Fraser GM, Luscombe NM (2011) Direct and indirect effects of H-NS and Fis on global gene expression control in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 39:2073–2091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Koo H, Allan RN, Howlin RP, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L (2017) Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:740–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10:57–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Winkler JD, Garcia C, Olson M, Callaway E, Kao KC (2014) Evolved osmotolerant Escherichia coli mutants frequently exhibit defective N-acetylglucosamine catabolism and point mutations in cell shape-regulating protein MreB. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3729–3740

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Pereira MF, Rossi CC, Seide LE, Martins Filho S, Dolinski CM, Bazzolli DMS (2018) Antimicrobial resistance, biofilm formation and virulence reveal Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains’ pathogenicity complexity. Res Vet Sci 118:498–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Archambault M, Harel J, Gouré J, Tremblay YD, Jacques M (2012) Antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance genes of Canadian isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Microb Drug Resist 18:198–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Huda N, Lee EW, Chen J, Morita Y, Kuroda T, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T (2003) Molecular cloning and characterization of an ABC multidrug efflux pump, VcaM, in Non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:2413–2417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Alav I, Kobylka J, Kuth MS, Pos KM, Picard M, Blair JMA, Bavro VN (2021) Structure, assembly, and function of tripartite efflux and type 1 secretion systems in gram-negative bacteria. Chem Rev 121:5479–5596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Lobritz MA, Belenky P, Porter CB, Gutierrez A, Yang JH, Schwarz EG, Dwyer DJ, Khalil AS, Collins JJ (2015) Antibiotic efficacy is linked to bacterial cellular respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:8173–8180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Zeng J, Hong Y, Zhao N, Liu Q, Zhu W, Xiao L, Wang W, Chen M, Hong S, Wu L, Xue Y, Wang D, Niu J, Drlica K, Zhao X (2022) A broadly applicable, stress-mediated bacterial death pathway regulated by the phosphotransferase system (PTS) and the cAMP-Crp cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2118566119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Boekema BK, Kamp EM, Smits MA, Smith HE, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N (2004) Both ApxI and ApxII of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 are necessary for full virulence. Vet Microbiol 100:17–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Spero MA, Newman DK (2018) Chlorate specifically targets oxidant-starved, antibiotic-tolerant populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. mBio 9:e01400-18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Buettner FF, Bendalla IM, Bossé JT, Meens J, Nash JH, Härtig E, Langford PR, Gerlach GF (2009) Analysis of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae HlyX (FNR) regulon and identification of iron-regulated protein B as an essential virulence factor. Proteomics 9:2383–2398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Browning DF, Cole JA, Busby SJ (2000) Suppression of FNR-dependent transcription activation at the Escherichia coli nir promoter by Fis, IHF and H-NS: modulation of transcription initiation by a complex nucleo-protein assembly. Mol Microbiol 37:1258–1269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Myers KS, Yan H, Ong IM, Chung D, Liang K, Tran F, Keleş S, Landick R, Kiley PJ (2013) Genome-scale analysis of Escherichia coli FNR reveals complex features of transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet 9:e1003565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gawade P, Gunjal G, Sharma A, Ghosh P (2020) Reconstruction of transcriptional regulatory networks of Fis and H-NS in Escherichia coli from genome-wide data analysis. Genomics 112:1264–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Browning DF, Grainger DC, Beatty CM, Wolfe AJ, Cole JA, Busby SJ (2005) Integration of three signals at the Escherichia coli nrf promoter: a role for Fis protein in catabolite repression. Mol Microbiol 57:496–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Browning DF, Cole JA, Busby SJ (2008) Regulation by nucleoid-associated proteins at the Escherichia coli nir operon promoter. J Bacteriol 190:7258–7267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Baker P, Hill PJ, Snarr BD, Alnabelseya N, Pestrak MJ, Lee MJ, Jennings LK, Tam J, Melnyk RA, Parsek MR, Sheppard DC, Wozniak DJ, Howell PL (2016) Exopolysaccharide biosynthetic glycoside hydrolases can be utilized to disrupt and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Sci Adv 2:e1501632

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Goodman SD, Obergfell KP, Jurcisek JA, Novotny LA, Downey JS, Ayala EA, Tjokro N, Li B, Justice SS, Bakaletz LO (2011) Biofilms can be dispersed by focusing the immune system on a common family of bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins. Mucosal Immunol 4:625–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Cherny KE, Sauer K (2019) Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires the DNA-specific endonuclease EndA to degrade extracellular genomic DNA to disperse from the biofilm. J Bacteriol 201:e00059-e119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, Takada K, Agata T, Mizunoe Y (2010) Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465:346–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sambanthamoorthy K, Sloup RE, Parashar V, Smith JM, Kim EE, Semmelhack MF, Neiditch MB, Waters CM (2012) Identification of small molecules that antagonize diguanylate cyclase enzymes to inhibit biofilm formation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5202–5211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Anderson JK, Huang JY, Wreden C, Sweeney EG, Goers J, Remington SJ, Guillemin K (2015) Chemorepulsion from the quorum signal autoinducer-2 promotes Helicobacter pylori biofilm dispersal. mBio 6:e00379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Majorbio Technology Co., Ltd for providing technical support for RNA-seq and analysis.


This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1800404), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31572535), Hubei Provincial Central Guidance Local Science and Technology Development Project of China (No.2020ZYYD029), and the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S019901/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conception of the work: LL; laboratory techniques: QZ, LP, WH and HC; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data: QZ, HT, and QH; preparation of the manuscript: QZ, LL and PL. funding acquisition and project administration: LL, RZ, XC and PL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Kunming mice were purchased from Laboratory Animal Centre, Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan, China. All animal procedures abide by the ethical principles of animal welfare and were performed according to protocols approved by the Ethic Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University (HZAUMO-2023-0001).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Marcelo Gottschalk

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Validation of the mutants Δ

pga, ΔdspB and their complementary strains. (A-B) gDNA was extracted from A. pleuropneumoniae wild type (WT), Δpga, ΔdspB and their complementary strains. (C-D) RNA was extracted from A. pleuropneumoniae WT, Δpga, ΔdspB and their complementary strains, and cDNA was synthesized by RT-PCR after gDNA erasure. PCR identification was performed using the indicated primers with gDNA or cDNA as template. Primers pga-UF and pga-DR bind to the upstream and downstream regions of the pga operon, respectively; the primers Δpga-F/R amplify the internal fragment of the pga operon; Primers APPSER1_RS10490 -F/R and APPSER1_RS10515-F/R are used to amplify the upstream and downstream genes of pga operon, respectively. Primers dspB-F/R amplify the full-length fragment of the dspB; Primers ΔdspB -F/R amplifie the internal fragment of the dspB; Primers APPSER1_RS05990-F/R and APPSER1_RS06000-F/R are used to amplify the upstream and downstream genes of dspB, respectively.

Additional file 2: Growth curves of

A. pleuropneumoniae wild type (WT), Δpga, ΔdspB and their complementary strains. The absorbances at OD600nm of bacterial cultures were determined every 2 h. Data are shown as means ± SD from three independent replicates.


Additional file 3: Bacterial strains, plasmids and primers used in this study.


Additional file 4: The differentially expressed genes of BF compared with PK and analysis of transcription factor binding sites on their promoters.


Additional file 5: The differentially expressed genes of BF compared with Δ pga.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Peng, L., Han, W. et al. The morphology and metabolic changes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae during its growth as a biofilm. Vet Res 54, 42 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae
  • biofilm
  • planktonic
  • morphology
  • transcription
  • metabolism
  • regulator