Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Porcine rotavirus mainly infects primary porcine enterocytes at the basolateral surface

Veterinary Research volume 50, Article number: 110 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Intestinal epithelium functions as a barrier to protect multicellular organisms from the outside world. It consists of epithelial cells closely connected by intercellular junctions, selective gates which control paracellular diffusion of solutes, ions and macromolecules across the epithelium and keep out pathogens. Rotavirus is one of the major enteric viruses causing severe diarrhea in humans and animals. It specifically infects the enterocytes on villi of small intestines. The polarity of rotavirus replication in their target enterocytes and the role of intestinal epithelial integrity were examined in the present study. Treatment with EGTA, a drug that chelates calcium and disrupts the intercellular junctions, (i) significantly enhanced the infection of rotavirus in primary enterocytes, (ii) increased the binding of rotavirus to enterocytes, but (iii) considerably blocked internalization of rotavirus. After internalization, rotavirus was resistant to EGTA treatment. To investigate the polarity of rotavirus infection, the primary enterocytes were cultured in a transwell system and infected with rotavirus at either the apical or the basolateral surface. Rotavirus preferentially infected enterocytes at the basolateral surface. Restriction of infection through apical inoculation was overcome by EGTA treatment. Overall, our findings demonstrate that integrity of the intestinal epithelium is crucial in the host’s innate defense against rotavirus infection. In addition, the intercellular receptor is located basolaterally and disruption of intercellular junctions facilitates the binding of rotavirus to their receptor at the basolateral surface.

Introduction

Diarrhea is one of the most important causes of death in young piglets and can be evoked by viruses, bacteria and parasites. Rotaviruses are considered as the most important pathogens that cause diarrhea in piglets and children. They belong to the genus rotavirus within the family Reoviridae. It consists of a triple-layered capsid encapsulating a genome consisting of eleven segments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) that encodes six structural (VP1–VP4, VP6 and VP7) and six non-structural (NSP1–NSP6) proteins. Each gene segment encodes one viral protein, except for gene segment eleven which encodes NSP5 and NSP6. In vivo, rotavirus infects primarily mature enterocytes in the polarized intestinal epithelium. Many studies on rotavirus biology have been conducted in nonpolarized cultures of MA104 cells (monkey kidney epithelial cells), or intestinal epithelial cell lines IPEC-J2 and Caco-2 cells, since they are most permissive for replication of some genotypes of rotavirus strains [1,2,3,4,5]. However, there are still a lot of rotavirus strains that do not grow in these cells [6, 7]. Therefore, it is necessary to have a culture system of intestinal enterocytes for the investigation of rotavirus replication mechanisms.

Attachment and entry into the target cells are the first steps of viral infection, and several cell surface molecules have been identified as receptors or co-receptors for rotaviruses, such as sialic acids, integrins and hsc70 using continuous cell lines [8,9,10,11]. More recently, histo-blood group antigens have been reported to mediate the attachment of rotavirus strains [12,13,14]. Besides, the junction proteins JAM-A, occludin and ZO-1 have also been suggested to play an important role during rotavirus entry into MA104 cells [15, 16].

Tight junctions are essential for establishing a barrier between different compartments of the body. Their primary physiological role is to function as paracellular gates which restrict diffusion on the basis of size and charge. The main protein components of the transmembrane strands are proteins of the claudin family and three junctional marvel domain proteins: occludin, tricellulin and MarvelD3 [17]. The junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs) and zonula occludens (ZO) are also important proteins of tight junctions. Tight junction components are known to be targets for various pathogenic bacteria and viruses. They hijack the recycling process of tight junction proteins (internalization, hydrolysis, synthesis, and egression) to enter and infect cells or target junctional signaling mechanisms to open the intercellular space. For hepatitis C virus (HCV) entry, claudin-1 was identified as a key factor and claudin-6 and claudin-9 as additional co-receptors [18, 19]. JAM-A with two extracellular V-type Ig domains serves as a receptor for feline calicivirus and all three serotypes of reovirus [20, 21]. Polarized epithelial cells are characterized by the presence of two distinct plasma membrane domains: the apical, corresponding to the luminal surface, and the basolateral, corresponding to the serosal surface [22, 23]. The two domains are separated by tight junctions which play an important role in maintaining the cell polarity and the unique protein-lipid composition of each domain. The best characterized experimental epithelial cell system for the study of polarized virus infection is that of the Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell [24, 25] which provides a convenient model for the study of epithelial cell polarity. The entry of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), type C retrovirus, human cytomegalovirus (HCMC), Semlike Forest virus (SFV), equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) and bovine herpesvirus-4 (BoHV-4) occurs at the basolateral membrane of polarized epithelial cells [26,27,28,29,30], whereas simian virus 40 (SV40), respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis A virus (HAV) preferentially infect cells at the apical surface [31, 32].

Most studies of the rotavirus replication have been performed with MA104 cells, a poorly differentiated monkey kidney epithelial cell line. These cells do not exhibit the highly polarized and differentiated phenotype of enterocytes in vivo. The human intestinal epithelial cell line Caco-2, established from a human colon adenocarcinoma, has been shown to spontaneously display the morphologic and biochemical properties of mature enterocytes [33]. Caco-2 cells are polarized with two plasma membrane domains: an apical one which faces the external lumen and a basolateral one which faces the internal milieu. Svensson et al. demonstrated that the MA104-cell adapted rhesus rotavirus (RRV) could infect both the apical and basolateral domains of Caco-2 cells in a symmetric manner, whereas the virions were secreted preferentially from the apical plasma membrane [34, 35]. In another study, Ciarlet et al. demonstrated that NA-sensitive strains infect efficiently only from the apical surface, NA-resistant strains infect equally well from the apical and basolateral surface [36]. Bugarcic and Taylor further demonstrated that the NSP4, a nonstructural glycoprotein encoded by rotavirus which induces diarrhea by acting as an enterotoxin, was actively secreted into the culture medium preferentially from the apical surface of infected Caco-2 cells [37]. Rotavirus mainly infects the mature villus enterocytes of jejunum and ileum in vivo. The importance of polarization and intercellular junctions have been less examined for porcine rotaviruses in their target cells [36, 38]. In this study, the co-culture system of porcine enterocytes that was established in our laboratory was used for this study [39].

Materials and methods

Piglets and virus samples

Primary porcine enterocytes were isolated from the ileum of 3 days old piglets and co-cultured with porcine myofibroblasts [39]. The enterocytes were maintained with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s F12 Ham medium (DMEM-F12). Rotavirus strains, originating from porcine fecal samples, 12R050 (G5P[7]) and 12R046 (G9P[23]) were passaged 4 times on MA104 cells and have previously been shown to replicate in porcine primary enterocytes [6, 39, 40].

Disruption of intercellular junctions

The enterocytes were grown in transwells or normal plastic wells with myofibroblasts. Cells were grown to confluency and the trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was measured until a steady TEER of ~500–700 Ω cm−2 was attained. TEER was measured prior to and following treatment with PBS containing 8 mM ethylene glycol tetra-acetic acid (EGTA) (VWR International, Leuven, Belgium) for 30 min at 37 °C. PBS alone was used as control. After 30 min, the cells were washed 3 times with DMEM. The viability of the cells was assessed by ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) staining after an additional 24 h incubation.

Replication kinetics of rotavirus in primary enterocytes treated with EGTA

After 2 days of cultivation, enterocytes were treated with PBS containing 8 mM EGTA or PBS alone for 30 min. Afterwards, cells were inoculated with trypsin-treated (5 µg/mL, 30 min at 37 °C) rotavirus 12R050 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.05. Cells were washed 3 times with DMEM after 1 h of inoculation. Fresh culture medium containing 1 µg/mL trypsin was added to each well and the cells were further incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. At different time points (0, 9, 18 and 27 h) post-inoculation, the supernatant was collected for virus titration and cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for immunofluorescence staining.

Rotavirus infection in primary enterocytes through different inoculation routes

The ability of rotavirus to infect enterocytes from the apical and the basolateral side was compared using enterocytes grown in a transwell system. After 2 days of cultivation, a monolayer of enterocytes was treated with PBS containing 8 mM EGTA or PBS alone. Next, cells were inoculated with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 at a MOI of 0.05 either at apical or basolateral surface for 30 min at 37 °C. Non-adsorbed virus particles were removed by washing 3 times with DMEM. Fresh culture medium containing 1 µg/mL trypsin was added to each well and cells were further incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Nine hours post-inoculation, the supernatant was collected for virus titration and the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for immunofluorescence staining.

Viral binding, internalization and release assays

For the binding assay, after treatment with PBS containing 8 mM EGTA or PBS alone for 30 min, the cells were chilled on ice for 5 min and washed 3 times with DMEM. Cells were inoculated apically with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 at a MOI of 0.1 for 1 h at 4 °C and washed 3 times with DMEM to remove unbound particles. Cells were further incubated with medium for another 9 h at 37 °C and fixed for immunofluorescence staining.

For the internalization assay, cells were inoculated apically with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 at a MOI of 0.1 for 1 h at 4 °C. After virus binding to the cell surface, cells were washed 3 times with DMEM and then treated with EGTA or PBS for 30 min. After 3 washes with DMEM, cells were incubated with medium for 1 h at 37 °C. Afterwards, cells were washed 3 times with DMEM and further incubated at 37 °C for another 9 h.

For the release assay, cells were inoculated apically with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 at a MOI of 0.1 for 1 h at 37 °C. Then, cells were treated with EGTA or PBS for 30 min. After 3 washes with DMEM, cells were further incubated at 37 °C for another 9 h. The supernatants were harvested at 9 hpi for virus titration.

Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy

Double immunofluorescence stainings against rotavirus A antigens and cytokeratin were performed to specifically visualize the infected enterocytes. The cells were incubated with polyclonal guinea pig anti-monkey rotavirus SA-11 VP6 antibodies (kindly provided by John Patton) and 10% normal goat serum for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by goat anti-guinea pig-IgG FITC labelled antibodies (Southern Biotech) for 1 h at 37 °C [41]. Afterwards, cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with monoclonal anti-human cytokeratin antibodies, followed by 1 h at 37 °C with goat anti-mouse-IgG Texas Red labelled antibodies (Molecular Probes). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst for 10 min at RT. Infected enterocytes were visualized by fluorescence microscopy.

Virus titration

Rotavirus titration was conducted in MA104 cells grown confluently in 96-well plates. Ten-fold serial dilutions of supernatant (10−1–10−8) were inoculated and after 5 days the cytopathogenic effect (CPE) was examined using a light microscope. The cell culture infective dose (TCID50) was calculated using the formula of Reed and Muench [42].

Neuraminidase treatment of enterocytes

To remove SAs from cells, monolayers of co-cultured enterocytes were washed 3 times with warm DMEM (MA104 cells were used as control and underwent the same manipulations). Then, cells were incubated with 50 mU/mL NA from Vibrio cholerae (Roche Diagnostics) at 37 °C for 1 h. Cells that were mock treated were incubated with DMEM and underwent the same manipulations as NA-treated cells. Afterwards, cells were inoculated with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 at a MOI of 0.1. After 60 min of incubation at 37 °C, cells were washed 3 times with DMEM and further incubated for 12 h (37 °C, 5% CO2). Then, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for immunofluorescence staining.

Statistical analysis

Data were statistically processed by GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for analysis of variance (ANOVA). The data are represented as means with standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. Results with p values of < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Viability of enterocytes after EGTA treatment

After a 30-min treatment with PBS containing 8 mM EGTA, the enterocytes became round and lost their intercellular junctions (Figure 1A). The TEER significantly dropped to baseline levels after treatment with EGTA, but not after treatment with PBS. Twenty-four hours after EGTA treatment, the enterocytes formed again a monolayer with a stable TEER of 500–700 Ω cm−2 (Figure 1B), and only 2 ± 0.9% of cells were EMA positive, which means that the effect of EGTA was reversible and did not alter the cell viability (Figure 1C). These results show that enterocytes are able to restore their intercellular bridges upon addition of bivalent ions.

Figure 1
figure 1

Disruption and restoration of intercellular junctions in primary enterocytes after EGTA treatment. A Representative microscopic images of enterocytes directly and 24 h after a 30 min treatment with EGTA. Scale bar: 100 µm. B Trans-epithelial electrical resistance of cells prior to treatment and after a 30-min treatment with PBS (control) or EGTA. C The percentage of EMA positive cells 24 h after treatment with PBS or EGTA. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of the results of three separate experiments. Statistically significant (p < 0.01) differences are indicated with two asterisks.

Full size image

Disruption of intercellular junctions between enterocytes increases their susceptibility to rotavirus

The percentage of infection and the virus titer were evaluated at different time points post-inoculation (0, 9, 18 and 27 hpi) in EGTA or PBS treated cells. The percentage of infection was 0.001 ± 0.001 at 0 hpi, 0.04 ± 0.02% at 9 hpi, 0.07 ± 0.05% at 18 hpi and 0.1 ± 0.07% at 27 hpi after mock treatment with PBS. When the cells were treated with EGTA, the infection was significantly increased to 0.002 ± 0.0005% at 0 hpi, 0.6 ± 0.3% at 9 hpi, 0.8 ± 0.3% at 18 hpi and 1 ± 0.3% at 27 hpi (Figure 2B). The virus titer increased over time. After mock treatment with PBS, the virus titer was 102.0 ± 0.3 TCID50/mL at 0 hpi, 102.6 ± 0.5 TCID50/mL at 9 hpi, 103.2 ± 0.5 TCID50/mL at 18 hpi and 103.6 ± 0.7 TCID50/mL at 27 hpi. The virus titer was significantly higher in EGTA treated cells with a virus titer of 102.5 ± 0.4 TCID50/mL at 0 hpi, 103.4 ± 0.4 TCID50/mL at 9 hpi, 104.3 ± 0.3 TCID50/mL at 18 hpi and 104.6 ± 0.3 TCID50/mL at 27 hpi (Figure 2C). These results demonstrate that disruption of intercellular junctions clearly increases the susceptibility of primary enterocytes to rotavirus infection.

Figure 2
figure 2

Kinetics of rotavirus 12R050 (G5P[7]) replication in enterocytes after treatment with EGTA. A Representative confocal images of rotavirus infection (green) in primary enterocytes after a 30-min treatment with EGTA or PBS at 0, 9, 18 and 72 hpi. Scale bar: 50 µm. B The percentage of rotavirus infected enterocytes was analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. C Virus titer was determined in the supernatant with MA104 cells. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of the results of three separate experiments. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences are indicated with an asterisk.

Full size image

Rotavirus preferentially infects at the basolateral surface of enterocytes

To investigate whether rotavirus preferentially infects enterocytes, either at the apical or the basolateral surface, we inoculated the cells with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 (MOI of 0.05) by both routes. Nine hours post-inoculation, the supernatant was collected for virus titration and the cells were fixed for immunofluorescence staining. Upon inoculation with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046, 8 and 15 times more cells per well were infected upon basolateral inoculation than upon apical inoculation. To determine whether intercellular junctions also protect the basolateral surfaces of enterocytes from rotavirus infection, cells were treated with 8 mM EGTA before inoculation at apical (and basolateral as control) surfaces. Disruption of intercellular junctions increased the infection upon inoculation with 12R050 and 12R046 at the apical surface with a factor of 13 and 19, respectively. Treatment with EGTA did not change infection after inoculation at the basolateral surfaces with neither of the two strains (Figure 3B). The virus titer was significantly higher upon basolateral inoculation (103.4 ± 0.2 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 103.2 ± 0.6 TCID50/mL for 12R046) than upon apical inoculation (102.3 ± 0.3 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 101.9 ± 0.1 TCID50/mL for 12R046) (Figure 3C).

Figure 3
figure 3

Rotavirus preferentially infects the basolateral surface of enterocytes and disruption of ICJ overcomes the restriction of rotavirus infection at the apical surface. A Representative confocal images of rotavirus infection (green) in enterocytes. Scale bar: 50 µm. To compare epithelial cell susceptibility to rotavirus, cells were exposed at either the apical surface or the basolateral surface to rotavirus 12R050 (G5P[7]) and 12R046 (G9P[23]). B The total number of infected cells per well was counted for each condition. C The virus titer was determined in supernatant for each condition. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of the results of three separate experiments. Statistically significant differences are indicated with one asterisk (p < 0.05) and two asterisks (p < 0.01).

Full size image

Increased susceptibility of enterocytes to rotavirus infection is correlated with the virus entry step

We first examined rotavirus binding to enterocytes after an EGTA treatment. After 30 min treatment with EGTA, enterocytes were inoculated apically with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 (MOI of 0.1) at 4 °C for 1 h. The percentage of infection and virus titer were determined at 9 hpi. After EGTA treatment, the percentage of infection was 18 and 5 times higher than after mock PBS treatment for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively. The virus titer after EGTA treatment (104.6 ± 0.3 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 104.2 ± 0.5 TCID50/mL for 12R046) was higher than after mock PBS treatment (103.4 ± 0.5 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 103.5 ± 0.5 TCID50/mL for 12R046) (Figure 4).

Figure 4
figure 4

EGTA treatment increases the binding of rotavirus to enterocytes. Cells were pre-incubated with PBS or EGTA and inoculated with rotavirus at 4 °C for 1 h. After removing the unbound viral particles, cells were further incubated for 9 h. A Representative confocal image of infection in enterocytes. Scale bar: 50 µm. The percentage of infected cells (B) and the virus titer (C) were determined. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of the results of three separate experiments. Statistically significant differences are indicated with one asterisk (p < 0.05) and two asterisks (p < 0.01).

Full size image

Next, we investigated whether EGTA is able to affect the internalization stage of rotavirus infection. After inoculation with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 (MOI of 0.1) at 4 °C for 1 h, enterocytes were treated with EGTA for 30 min. Cells were further cultured for 9 h and the percentage of infection and virus titer were assessed. As shown in Figure 5, after EGTA treatment, the percentage of infection was 29 and 50 times lower than after mock PBS treatment for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively. The virus titer after EGTA treatment (101.9 ± 0.1 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 102.0 ± 0.3 TCID50/mL for 12R046) was lower than after mock PBS treatment (103.3 ± 0.6 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 103.5 ± 0.6 TCID50/mL for 12R046).

Figure 5
figure 5

EGTA treatment inhibits the internalization of rotavirus in enterocytes. Cells were inoculated with rotavirus at 4 °C for 1 h. After removing the unbound viral particles, cells were treated with EGTA or PBS at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, the cells were further incubated for 9 h after 3 washings with DMEM at 37 °C. A Representative confocal images of infection in enterocytes. Scale bar: 50 µm. The percentage of infected cells (B) and virus titer (C) were determined. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of the results of three separate experiments. Statistically significant differences are indicated with one asterisk (p < 0.05) and two asterisks (p < 0.01).

Full size image

Finally, we examined the effects of EGTA on the post-internalization stage of the rotavirus replication cycle. After inoculation with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 (MOI of 0.1) at 37 °C for 1 h, enterocytes were treated with EGTA for 30 min. The percentage of infected cells and the virus titer were determined at 9 hpi. After EGTA treatment, the percentage of infection was 0.41 ± 0.07% and 0.39 ± 0.02% and the virus titer was 103.0 ± 1 TCID50/mL and 103.0 ± 1 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively. After the mock treatment with PBS, the percentage of infection was 0.41 ± 0.03% and 0.36 ± 0.02% and the virus titer was 103.1 ± 0.8 TCID50/mL and 103.0 ± 1 TCID50/mL for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively (Figure 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

EGTA treatment has no effect on the post-internalization stage of rotavirus particle in enterocytes. Cells were inoculated with rotavirus at 37 °C for 1 h. After 3 washings, cells were treated with EGTA or PBS for 30 min. Then, the cells were further incubated for 9 h at 37 °C. A Representative confocal image of infection in enterocytes. Scale bar: 50 µm. The percentage of infected cells (B) and virus titer (C) were determined. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of the results of three separate experiment.

Full size image

Effect of NA treatment of enterocytes on rotavirus replication

To assess the role of SAs on rotavirus replication in enterocytes, enterocytes were pretreated with 50 mU/mL NA prior to inoculation with rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 (MOI of 0.1). The percentage of infection of the NA treated enterocytes was 0.36 ± 0.07% and 0.35 ± 0.07% for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively. The percentage of infection for mock treated enterocytes was similar as NA treated enterocytes (0.38 ± 0.06% and 0.37 ± 0.05% for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively). As a control, the percentage of infection of NA treated MA104 cells (8.5 ± 1.7% and 5.3 ± 1.0% for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively) was significantly lower than mock treated MA104 cells (34.6 ± 2.5% and 23.0 ± 4.6% for 12R050 and 12R046, respectively) (Figure 7).

Figure 7
figure 7

Effect of neuraminidase treatment on the replication of rotaviruses in primary enterocytes and MA104 cells. Primary enterocytes and MA104 Cells were treated with 50 mU/mL NA from Vibrio Cholerae for 1 h at 37 °C before inoculation with rotavirus at a MOI of 0.1. The percentage of infection was measured by immunofluorescence staining at 12 hpi. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of the results of three separate experiments. Statistically significant differences are indicated with two asterisks (p < 0.01) and three asterisks (p < 0.001).

Full size image

Discussion

Rotavirus infection is primarily restricted to the polarized epithelial cells of small intestines. Previous studies examining the polarity of rotavirus infections have been conducted in continuous cell lines and conflicting results were reported. In this study, we used primary enterocytes to explore the infection of rotavirus in polarized target cells, which is closely resembling the in vivo situation. Primary enterocytes formed a polarized epithelium with a stable TEER of 500–700 Ω cm−2 after 2 days of cultivation. We observed that treatment with EGTA disrupted the intercellular junctions of enterocytes leading to a significantly drop of the TEER to baseline levels and significantly enhanced the infection of rotavirus in enterocytes. EGTA was found to mainly affect the binding of rotavirus to enterocytes. Upon different inoculation route, rotavirus mainly infected enterocytes at the basolateral surface. To our knowledge, this study is the first to disrupt intercellular bridges in a primary enterocyte culture system to explore the infection of rotavirus in polarized primary enterocytes.

The polarized epithelium of the gastrointestinal system displays the highest turnover of all solid organs, undergoing complete renewal every 2 to 3 days in pigs. It maintains a constant and effective barrier function to restrict the movement of solutes, ions, macromolecules and pathogens across the mucosa. This regulation can be attributed to the junctional complex between adjacent epithelial cells which is composed of the tight junction (TJ), adherens junction (AJ) and desmosomes. TJs are located at the apicolateral borders of adjacent epithelial cells, and form belt-like areas responsible for selectively regulating the passage of ions and neutral molecules through the paracellular space. One of the most important functions of TJs is to restrict pathogen access to the basaloteral side of the epithelium and the systemic blood circulation. Paradoxically, some viruses utilize TJ proteins as receptors. Coxsackie B virus (CVB) and adenovirus bind to the coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) which is expressed at the TJ and is associated with ZO-1 protein [43]. Reoviruses bind to the junctional adhesion molecule (JAM) which is a TJ-localized integral membrane protein and JAM-A functions as coreceptor for rotavirus entry into MA104 cells [15, 20]. The TJ proteins occludin and claudin-1 facilitate the entry of hepatitis C virus (HCV) [44, 45]. Calcium is the most important ion in regulating intercellular junction integrity. Low level of calcium disrupts AJ of epithelial cells, which is supposed to be caused by removing calcium from binding sites on E-cadherin extracellular domains, leading to a conformational change and disruption of cell–cell adhesion [46, 47]. Depletion of extracellular calcium also mediates the redistribution of TJ proteins. Incubation of Caco-2 cells in calcium-free medium rapidly decreased transepithelial resistance and increased paracellular permeability, indicating a decreased tightness of TJ [48]. EGTA is a chelating agent which specifically sequestrates extracellular calcium. EGTA-induced depletion of calcium from the culture of polarized epithelial cells results in rapid splitting of ICJ. In our study, the primary enterocytes rapidly lost their ICJ after treatment with EGTA and became round, indicating that EGTA efficiently destroyed the ICJ of primary enterocytes. The disrupting effect of EGTA can be reversed by replenishing extracellular calcium [49]. In the present study, the enterocytes lost their contacts and became individual round cells after the EGTA treatment. The EGTA treated enterocytes reformed monolayers and maintained their viability after re-supplementation with calcium containing medium.

Destruction of the epithelial integrity by EGTA breaks down the barrier function of the epithelium against viruses. Van Cleemput et al. demonstrated that disruption of ICJ in equine respiratory mucosal explants and equine respiratory epithelial cells by EGTA significantly increased the infection of equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV1) [29]. A similar effect of EGTA was found for bovine herpesvirus 4 (BoHV-4) [30]. Treatment of bovine nasal mucosal and tracheal explants and bovine respiratory epithelial cells with EGTA enhanced BoHV-4 infection [30]. Rotavirus is one of the major enteric viruses that replicates in intestinal epithelial cells, which seriously causes blunting of intestinal villi and enterocyte vacuolization and lysis. We investigated the effect of disruption of ICJ of enterocytes in a monolayer on rotavirus infection. Treatment of cultured enterocytes with EGTA significantly increased the virus replication, which confirmed that the intercellular junctions protect intestinal epithelial cells to rotavirus infection and that depletion of intercellular junctions can significantly boost rotavirus replication in intestinal epithelial cells. Furthermore, we found that EGTA mainly affected the binding of rotavirus to enterocytes. This indicates that a main receptor is present in the intercellular region. Further work will focus on the identification of this receptor. Previous work in the rotavirus field demonstrated that sialidase-sensitive animal rotavirus strains can use terminal sialic acid as cellular receptor, whereas sialidase-insensitive human rotavirus strains bind to glycans with internal sialic acid, such as GM1 [50]. Recently, more and more data suggest that human rotavirus strains specifically recognize A-type histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs) [12, 51]. The rotavirus strains used in this study are porcine rotaviruses with G5P[7] and G9P[23] genotypes [6]. According to the phylogenetic analyses done by Liu et al., P[7] and P[23] genotypes of porcine rotaviruses belong to the P[I] genogroup and should be considered to be sialidase-sensitive [51]. In our study, we demonstrated that by using MA104 cells, these rotavirus strains are sialidase-sensitive, because removal of the sialic acids of MA104 cells by treating the cells with neuraminidase significantly reduced viral replication. However, in primary porcine enterocytes, these low-passage P [7] and P[23] rotaviruses are sialidase-insensitive strains. The treatment of epithelial cells with neuraminidase did not affect viral replication, which indicated that these types of rotavirus strains do not bind terminal sialic acids on true target epithelial cells. These results demonstrate that for studying the receptors of rotaviruses, primary enterocytes should be used and not MA104 cells. We hypothesize that intercellular receptors of rotavirus are hidden by the intercellular junctions and that breaking down the intercellular junctions facilitates the exposure of this receptor and promotes rotavirus infection. Further investigations are needed to find out which proteins/glycans are these unknown receptors. The outer layer of the rotavirus contains calcium which stabilizes the trimeric VP7 [52]. During cell entry, the rotavirus triple layered particle uncoats, losing VP4 and VP7 [53]. In vitro, calcium chelation triggers uncoating of the triple layer particle. Loss of calcium causes VP7 to dissociate from the double layer particle and to release VP5* which is free to fold back to its most stable, post cleavage conformation to facilitate the membrane-disruptive step [54, 55]. Expressed VP7 protein undergoes an antigenic change upon calcium chelation, losing its ability to bind neutralizing monoclonal antibodies [52]. Abdelhakim et al. indicated that when the BSC-1 cells were pulsed with EDTA-containing medium, rotavirus does not internalize due to the loss of both VP7 and VP4, which significantly reduces rotavirus infection [56]. Similar results were observed with our primary enterocytes. We treated the cells with EGTA after binding of the rotavirus to investigate the effect of EGTA on the internalization stage of rotavirus. The results showed that calcium chelation at the internalization stage significantly blocked rotavirus infection. These findings indicate that rotavirus replication inside cells is mediated in a calcium-dependent manner.

Since the disruption of the intestinal epithelial cells’ integrity leads to enhanced rotavirus binding, we hypothesized that its primary binding/entry receptor is located at the basolateral surface of enterocytes. Therefore, we inoculated the primary enterocytes at either the apical or the basolateral surface. We found that both genotypes of rotavirus strains preferentially infected cells at the basolateral surface. Previous work that addressed the polarity of rotavirus infection in epithelial cells reported conflicting results. Svensson et al. found that the NA-sensitive rhesus rotavirus (RRV) infected Caco-2 cells in an asymmetric manner [35]. Ciarlet et al. demonstrated that NA-sensitive rotaviruses preferentially entered cells at the apical surface, while the NA-resistant rotaviruses entered cells at both the apical and basolateral surface [36]. Cevallos et al. reported that NA-sensitive rotaviruses infected IPEC-J2 cells more efficiently at the basolateral surface [38]. These conflicting results were conducted with different cell lines. In the present study, we demonstrated that rotavirus 12R050 and 12R046 are NA-sensitive for MA104 cell infections, while they are NA-resistant for enterocyte infections. Based on these results, we recommend investigating the polarity of rotavirus infections in the real target cell (primary enterocytes) and not in continuous cell lines. Taken together, these findings suggest that rotavirus mainly uses a basolateral receptor for infection of enterocytes. To our knowledge, our study is the first to use the primary enterocytes closely resembling the in vivo situation to demonstrate that porcine rotavirus strains are preferentially infecting via the basolateral domain of intestinal epithelial cells. Of course, more strains should be included to make a more general statement.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the integrity of intestinal epithelium protects the epithelial cells against rotavirus infection. Disruption of the intercellular junctions by EGTA facilitates the binding of rotavirus to its receptor and increases the replication of rotavirus in enterocytes. Our study provides new insights on the replication of rotavirus in their target cells, which can create opportunities to develop effective strategies against rotavirus infections.

References

  1. Trejo-Cerro Ó, Eichwald C, Schraner EM, Silva-Ayala D, López S, Arias CF (2018) Actin-dependent nonlytic rotavirus exit and infectious virus morphogenetic pathway in nonpolarized cells. J Virol 92:e02076-17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Estes MK, Graham D, Gerba CP, Smith E (1979) Simian rotavirus SA11 replication in cell cultures. J Virol 31:810–815

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Guerrero CA, Zarate S, Corkidi G, López S, Arias CF (2000) Biochemical characterization of rotavirus receptors in MA104 cells. J Virol 74:9362–9371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu F, Li G, Wen K, Bui T, Cao D, Zhang Y, Yuan L (2010) Porcine small intestinal epithelial cell line (IPEC-J2) of rotavirus infection as a new model for the study of innate immune responses to rotaviruses and probiotics. Viral Immunol 23:135–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Obert G, Peiffer I, Servin AL (2000) Rotavirus-induced structural and functional alterations in tight junctions of polarized intestinal Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Virol 74:4645–4651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Theuns S, Desmarets LM, Heylen E, Zeller M, Dedeurwaerder A, Roukaerts ID, Van Ranst M, Matthijnssens J, Nauwynck HJ (2014) Porcine group A rotaviruses with heterogeneous VP7 and VP4 genotype combinations can be found together with enteric bacteria on Belgian swine farms. Vet Microbiol 172:23–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Proescholdt TA (1992) Propagation of porcine group C rotavirus in an intestinal cell line. Master thesis, Iowa State University, Department of Theses & dissertations

  8. Isa P, Arias CF, Lopez S (2006) Role of sialic acids in rotavirus infection. Glycoconj J 23:27–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hewish MJ, Takada Y, Coulson BS (2000) Integrins α2β1 and α4β1 can mediate SA11 rotavirus attachment and entry into cells. J Virol 74:228–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Salas-Cárdenas SP, Olaya-Galán NN, Fernández K, Velez F, Guerrero CA, Gutiérrez MF (2018) Decreased rotavirus infection of MA104 cells via probiotic extract binding to Hsc70 and β3 integrin receptors. Univ Sci 23:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zárate S, Cuadras MA, Espinosa R, Romero P, Juárez KO, Camacho-Nuez M, Arias CF, López S (2003) Interaction of rotaviruses with Hsc70 during cell entry is mediated by VP5. J Virol 77:7254–7260

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu L, Crawford SE, Czako R, Cortes-Penfield NW, Smith DF, Le Pendu J, Estes MK, Prasad BV (2012) Cell attachment protein VP8* of a human rotavirus specifically interacts with A-type histo-blood group antigen. Nature 485:256–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang X, Liu Y, Tan M (2017) Histo-blood group antigens as receptors for rotavirus, new understanding on rotavirus epidemiology and vaccine strategy. Emerg Microbes Infect 6:e22

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma X, Li DD, Sun XM, Guo YQ, Xiang JY, Wang WH, Zhang LX, Gu QJ, Duan ZJ (2015) Binding patterns of rotavirus genotypes P[4], P[6], and P[8] in China with histo-blood group antigens. PLoS One 10:e0134584

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Torres-Flores JM, Silva-Ayala D, Espinoza MA, López S, Arias CF (2015) The tight junction protein JAM-A functions as coreceptor for rotavirus entry into MA104 cells. Virology 475:172–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva-Ayala D, López T, Gutiérrez M, Perrimon N, López S, Arias CF (2013) Genome-wide RNAi screen reveals a role for the ESCRT complex in rotavirus cell entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:10270–10275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zihni C, Mills C, Matter K, Balda MS (2016) Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:564–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu S, Yang W, Shen L, Turner JR, Coyne CB, Wang T (2009) Tight junction proteins claudin-1 and occludin control hepatitis C virus entry and are downregulated during infection to prevent superinfection. J Virol 83:2011–2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng A, Yuan F, Li Y, Zhu F, Hou P, Li J, Song X, Ding M, Deng H (2007) Claudin-6 and claudin-9 function as additional coreceptors for hepatitis C virus. J Virol 81:12465–12471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Barton ES, Forrest JC, Connolly JL, Chappell JD, Liu Y, Schnell FJ, Nusrat A, Parkos CA, Dermody TS (2001) Junction adhesion molecule is a receptor for reovirus. Cell 104:441–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Makino A, Shimojima M, Miyazawa T, Kato K, Tohya Y, Akashi H (2006) Junctional adhesion molecule 1 is a functional receptor for feline calicivirus. J Virol 80:4482–4490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Simons K, Fuller SD (1985) Cell surface polarity in epithelia. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1:243–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez-Boulan E, Nelson WJ (1989) Morphogenesis of the polarized epithelial cell phenotype. Science 245:718–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown PS, Wang E, Aroeti B, Chapin SJ, Mostov KE, Dunn KW (2000) Definition of distinct compartments in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells for membrane-volume sorting, polarized sorting and apical recycling. Traffic 1:124–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Balcarova-Ständer J, Pfeiffer S, Fuller S, Simons K (1984) Development of cell surface polarity in the epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line. EMBO J 3:2687–2694

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Roth M, Srinivas R, Compans R (1983) Basolateral maturation of retroviruses in polarized epithelial cells. J Virol 45:1065–1073

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Boulan ER, Sabatini DD (1978) Asymmetric budding of viruses in epithelial monlayers: a model system for study of epithelial polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:5071–5075

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fantini J, Baghdiguian S, Yahi N, Chermann J-C (1991) Selected human immunodeficiency virus replicates preferentially through the basolateral surface of differentiated human colon epithelial cells. Virology 185:904–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Cleemput J, Poelaert KC, Laval K, Maes R, Hussey GS, Van den Broeck W, Nauwynck HJ (2017) Access to a main alphaherpesvirus receptor, located basolaterally in the respiratory epithelium, is masked by intercellular junctions. Sci Rep 7:16656

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang B, Xie J, Van Cleemput J, Wei R, Opsomer G, Nauwynck HJ (2019) Gammaherpesvirus BoHV-4 infects bovine respiratory epithelial cells mainly at the basolateral side. Vet Res 50:11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Clayson ET, Compans RW (1988) Entry of simian virus 40 is restricted to apical surfaces of polarized epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biol 8:3391–3396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Blank CA, Anderson DA, Beard M, Lemon SM (2000) Infection of polarized cultures of human intestinal epithelial cells with hepatitis A virus: vectorial release of progeny virions through apical cellular membranes. J Virol 74:6476–6484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fogh J, Fogh JM, Orfeo T (1977) One hundred and twenty-seven cultured human tumor cell lines producing tumors in nude mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 59:221–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jourdan N, Maurice M, Delautier D, Quero AM, Servin AL, Trugnan G (1997) Rotavirus is released from the apical surface of cultured human intestinal cells through nonconventional vesicular transport that bypasses the Golgi apparatus. J Virol 71:8268–8278

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Svensson L, Finlay B, Bass D, Von Bonsdorff C, Greenberg H (1991) Symmetric infection of rotavirus on polarized human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. J Virol 65:4190–4197

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ciarlet M, Crawford SE, Estes MK (2001) Differential infection of polarized epithelial cell lines by sialic acid-dependent and sialic acid-independent rotavirus strains. J Virol 75:11834–11850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bugarc̀ić A, Taylor JA (2006) Rotavirus nonstructural glycoprotein NSP4 is secreted from the apical surfaces of polarized epithelial cells. J Virol 80:12343–12349

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Porta DC, López S, Arias CF, Isa P (2016) Polarized rotavirus entry and release from differentiated small intestinal cells. Virology 499:65–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cui T, Theuns S, Desmarets LM, Xie J, De Gryse GM, Yang B, Van den Broeck W, Nauwynck HJ (2018) Establishment of porcine enterocyte/myofibroblast co-cultures for the growth of porcine rota-and coronaviruses. Sci Rep 8:15195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Theuns S, Conceição-Neto N, Christiaens I, Zeller M, Desmarets LM, Roukaerts ID, Acar DD, Heylen E, Matthijnssens J, Nauwynck HJ (2015) Complete genome sequence of a porcine epidemic diarrhea virus from a novel outbreak in Belgium, January 2015. Genome Announc 3:e00506-15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoshino Y, Wyatt RG, Greenberg HB, Flores J, Kapikian AZ (1984) Serotypic similarity and diversity of rotaviruses of mammalian and avian origin as studied by plaque-reduction neutralization. J Infect Dis 149:694–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Reed LJ, Muench H (1938) A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Epidemiol 27:493–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cohen CJ, Shieh JT, Pickles RJ, Okegawa T, Hsieh J-T, Bergelson JM (2001) The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor is a transmembrane component of the tight junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:15191–15196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Evans MJ, von Hahn T, Tscherne DM, Syder AJ, Panis M, Wölk B, Hatziioannou T, McKeating JA, Bieniasz PD, Rice CM (2007) Claudin-1 is a hepatitis C virus co-receptor required for a late step in entry. Nature 446:801–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ploss A, Evans MJ, Gaysinskaya VA, Panis M, You H, De Jong YP, Rice CM (2009) Human occludin is a hepatitis C virus entry factor required for infection of mouse cells. Nature 457:882–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Alexander J, Blaschuk O, Haselton F (1993) An N-cadherin-like protein contributes to solute barrier maintenance in cultured endothelium. J Cell Physiol 156:610–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pokutta S, Herrenknecht K, Kemler R, Engel J (1994) Conformational changes of the recombinant extracellular domain of E-cadherin upon calcium binding. Eur J Biochem 223:1019–1026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brown RC, Davis TP (2002) Calcium modulation of adherens and tight junction function: a potential mechanism for blood-brain barrier disruption after stroke. Stroke 33:1706–1711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ma TY, Tran D, Hoa N, Nguyen D, Merryfield M, Tarnawski A (2000) Mechanism of extracellular calcium regulation of intestinal epithelial tight junction permeability: role of cytoskeletal involvement. Microsc Res Tech 51:156–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Haselhorst T, Fleming FE, Dyason JC, Hartnell RD, Yu X, Holloway G, Santegoets K, Kiefel MJ, Blanchard H, Coulson BS, von Itzstein M (2009) Sialic acid dependence in rotavirus host cell invasion. Nat Chem Biol 5:91–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu Y, Huang P, Tan M, Liu Y, Biesiada J, Meller J, Castello AA, Jiang B, Jiang X (2012) Rotavirus VP8*: phylogeny, host range, and interaction with histo-blood group antigens. J Virol 86:9899–9910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Dormitzer PR, Greenberg HB, Harrison SC (2000) Purified recombinant rotavirus VP7 forms soluble, calcium-dependent trimers. Virology 277:420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen JZ, Settembre EC, Aoki ST, Zhang X, Bellamy AR, Dormitzer PR, Harrison SC, Grigorieff N (2009) Molecular interactions in rotavirus assembly and uncoating seen by high-resolution cryo-EM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:10644–10648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Rust MJ, Lakadamyali M, Brandenburg B, Zhuang X (2011) Single-virus tracking in live cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top065623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dormitzer PR, Nason EB, Prasad BV, Harrison SC (2004) Structural rearrangements in the membrane penetration protein of a non-enveloped virus. Nature 430:1053–1058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Abdelhakim AH, Salgado EN, Fu X, Pasham M, Nicastro D, Kirchhausen T, Harrison SC (2014) Structural correlates of rotavirus cell entry. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004355

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof J. T. Patton for supplying the antibody against rotavirus. Special thanks go to Marthe Pauwels for the excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council (201406910003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Tingting Cui, Sebastiaan Theuns, Jiexiong Xie & Hans J. Nauwynck

Authors
  1. Tingting Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastiaan Theuns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiexiong Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans J. Nauwynck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TC designed and performed all the experiments and wrote the manuscript. ST participated in the design of experiments and writing of the manuscript. JX assisted in performing the experiments. HJN designed and coordinated the study and contributed to the interpretation of data and the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tingting Cui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, T., Theuns, S., Xie, J. et al. Porcine rotavirus mainly infects primary porcine enterocytes at the basolateral surface. Vet Res 50, 110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-019-0728-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-019-0728-x

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716