- Open Access
Ovine and murine T cell epitopes from the non-structural protein 1 (NS1) of bluetongue virus serotype 8 (BTV-8) are shared among viral serotypes
© Rojas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 9 October 2013
- Accepted: 27 February 2014
- Published: 12 March 2014
Bluetongue virus (BTV) is a non-enveloped dsRNA virus that causes a haemorrhagic disease mainly in sheep. It is an economically important Orbivirus of the Reoviridae family. In order to estimate the importance of T cell responses during BTV infection, it is essential to identify the epitopes targeted by the immune system. In the present work, we selected potential T cell epitopes (3 MHC-class II-binding and 8 MHC-class I binding peptides) for the C57BL/6 mouse strain from the BTV-8 non-structural protein NS1, using H2b-binding predictive algorithms. Peptide binding assays confirmed all MHC-class I predicted peptides bound MHC-class I molecules. The immunogenicity of these 11 predicted peptides was then determined using splenocytes from BTV-8-inoculated C57BL/6 mice. Four MHC-class I binding peptides elicited specific IFN-γ production and generated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in BTV-8 infected mice. CTL specific for 2 of these peptides were also able to recognise target cells infected with different BTV serotypes. Similarly, using a combination of IFN-γ ELISPOT, intracellular cytokine staining and proliferation assays, two MHC-class II peptides were identified as CD4+ T cell epitopes in BTV-8 infected mice. Importantly, two peptides were also consistently immunogenic in sheep infected with BTV-8 using IFN-γ ELISPOT assays. Both of these peptides stimulated CD4+ T cells that cross-reacted with other BTV serotypes. The characterisation of these T cell epitopes can help develop vaccines protecting against a broad spectrum of BTV serotypes and differentiate infected from vaccinated animals.
- Peripheral Blood Leukocyte
- ELISPOT Assay
- Intracellular Cytokine Staining
- Bluetongue Virus
- Helper Epitope
Bluetongue virus (BTV) is the prototype member of the Orbivirus genus of the Reoviridae family, transmitted to the vertebrate host by biting midges . The genome consists of ten double-stranded RNA segments, encoding 7 structural- and 4 non-structural- proteins [2, 3]. The outer capsid layer includes VP2 and VP5 [4, 5] responsible for eliciting serotype-specific neutralising antibodies [6, 7]. The non-structural (NS) proteins are involved in the control of BTV replication, maturation and export from the cell [8, 9].
A long-lasting immunity is developed in animals that recover from bluetongue where both neutralising antibodies  and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) [11, 12] are involved in this protective immunity. However, the variability of the outer capsid of this virus represents one of the major challenges for the development of a vaccine capable of protecting animals against multiple serotypes. On the other hand, cellular immunity plays a key role in BTV immunity as adoptive transfer of lymphocytes could partially protect monozygotic sheep from subsequent BTV challenge  and protection can exist in the absence of neutralising antibodies [14, 15]. Importantly, the determinants for cellular immunity are more likely to be shared among serotypes. Indeed, BTV vaccination and infection in sheep induces CTLs cross-reactive to multiple serotypes [11, 16–18]. Based on this observation, vaccination designed to elicit T cell responses can potentially protect animals against several BTV serotypes.
Analysis of CTL responses to BTV in experimentally infected sheep showed that virtually all animals recognise epitopes within the non-structural protein 1 (NS1) . Thus, we have investigated T cell epitopes from the NS1 protein capable of cross-reacting with multiple BTV serotypes both in sheep and mouse, as murine models of BTV infection represent a valuable tool for designing novel vaccination strategies [19, 20]. In the present report we identify novel CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes in mouse model from the NS1 protein of BTV-8, as well as two immunoreactive CD4 epitopes in BTV-8 infected sheep capable of cross-reacting with other serotypes. This work underlines the potential of stimulating anti-BTV T cells in order to develop more effective vaccinations.
Cell lines, virus stock preparation and inactivation
BTV stocks and virus titres were prepared as described previously . Briefly, Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK) cells were infected with BTV at multiplicity of infection of 1 and culture supernatants were collected after 48 h. After 3 cycles of freeze/thaw and a 2-min sonication step, the supernatants were clarified by centrifugation and stored at -80 °C until use. Virus titres were determined using a standard plaque titration assay using the Vero cell line. Inactivated virus (BEI-BTV) were obtained by incubating viral stocks (1 × 106 plaque forming unit (pfu)/mL) for 48 h at 37 °C with 3 mM of freshly prepared binary ethyleneimine (BEI) and neutralised with 0.02 M sodium thiosulphate at the end of the incubation time.
Infections and animals
Female (7–12 week-old) C57BL/6 mice (Harlan Interfauna Ibérica, Barcelona, Spain) were inoculated subcutaneously with 100 pfu of BTV-8 (Belgium/06) three times at 10 days intervals and sacrificed three days after the last inoculation. Three month-old female sheep (Mallorquina breed) (n = 8) were inoculated three times at 28-day intervals with 1 × 105 pfu BTV-8. Venous blood was collected 14 days after the last inoculation and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) were prepared as described below. All the procedures herein described were carried out under European Community guidelines and approved by the local ethical review committee.
Peptides and peptide binding assays
Prediction of H-2 b binding peptides from NS1 and binding assays
Predictive algorithm scores
Predicted allele binding
SYFPEITHI score (Db/Kb)
NetMHC predicted affinity nM (Db/Kb)
BIMAS proPred-I score (Db/Kb)
Binding assay* (Db/Kb)
NS1(166) Cl I
NS1(166) Cl II
Splenocytes and lymph node cells preparation
Spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected from inoculated mice three days after the last inoculation. Single cell suspensions were prepared by mechanical disruption of the organs through a cell strainer. After lysing the erythrocytes, splenocytes or lymph node cells from each mouse were tested against the appropriate stimuli individually at least in triplicate in T cell medium (RPMI supplemented with 10%FCS (Lonza Biowhittaker, NJ, USA), 4 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, 1% 100X non-essential amino-acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100U/mL penicillin/100 μg/mL streptomycin and 50nM β-mercaptoethanol (all from Gibco, Invitrogen)).
PBL preparation and in vitro stimulation
PBL were prepared by standard centrifugation method. Briefly, venous blood collected in EDTA (6 mM final concentration) was diluted 1:1 in PBS + 0.03% (w/v) EDTA (pH 7.4) and overlayed over a Ficoll cushion (GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Barcelona, Spain). Blood was centrifuged at 800 × g for 30 min at room temperature without brake, and the PBL present at the interface were transferred to a fresh tube and washed with PBS + 0.03% (w/v) EDTA. Contaminant erythrocytes were lysed and after two further washes, cells were cryopreserved in 90% FCS + 10% DMSO until use. Sheep PBL were thawed by slowly diluting the cryovial content into PBL medium (RPMI + 17% AIM-V medium + 5% FCS + 4 mM L-Glutamine + 10 mM HEPES + 1% 100X non-essential amino-acids + 1 mM sodium pyruvate + 100U/mL penicillin/100 μg/mL streptomycin + 50 nM β-mercaptoethanol (all from Gibco, Invitrogen, CA, USA)). Sheep PBL were washed three times and rested for 1–2 h at room temperature in PBL medium before use. In some experiments, 5 × 106 sheep PBL per well were restimulated with 10 μg/mL of NS1 peptide in 24 well plates for 7 days prior to flow cytometry analysis for intracellular IFN-γ.
Murine IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were performed according to the manufacturer protocol (Diaclone, France). Briefly, 2 × 105 splenocytes per well were plated in the presence of 10 μg/mL peptide (final concentration) or chemically-inactivated BTV (BEI-BTV). Ovine IFN-γ ELISPOT assays were performed using MSIPS4510 plate (Millipore). Membranes were incubated at 4 °C with 5 μg/mL anti-ovine IFN-γ antibody (MT17.1, Mabtech, Sweden). Sheep PBL were plated at a density of 2–3 × 105 cells per well and incubated with peptide (10 μg/mL), BEI-BTV, PBL medium as negative control or concanavalin-A (0.5 μg/mL) as positive control. Membranes were incubated with biotin-labelled anti-ovine IFN-γ antibody (MT307-biotin, Mabtech, Sweden) and developed with streptavidin conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (ExtrAvidin-AP, Sigma, USA). Membranes were revealed using SigmaFAST BCIP/NBT (Sigma).
Proliferation assays and intracellular cytokine staining
Splenocytes or sheep PBL (2–3 × 105 per well) were cultured in the presence of BEI-BTV or NS1 peptides (10 μg/mL). For proliferation assay, cells were cultured for 72 h before 3H-Thymidne was added to each well and incubated overnight. Data are presented as stimulation index (ratio of incorporated 3H-thymidine in test to control cultures) or as average cpm. For intracellular cytokine staining, splenocytes were stained with anti-mouse CD4-FITC and anti-mouse CD8α-PcP antibodies (both from BD Pharmingen, CA, USA) whereas sheep PBL were stained with anti-ovine CD4-FITC and anti-ovine CD8-PE antibodies (both from Serotec). After permeabilisation, splenocytes were stained with anti-mouse IFN-γ-PE and anti-mouse TNF-α-APC (both from BD pharmingen), whereas sheep PBL were stained with anti-ovine IFN-γ-A647 (Serotec, UK).
Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to observe difference within the same animal, whereas non-parametric two-tailed Mann Whitney rank U tests were used to compare group of values for several animals. Data handling analyses was performed using Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc. San Diego, CA, USA).
Infection with BTV-8 induces T cell responses to other BTV serotypes in mice and sheep
Prediction of peptide binding from NS1 protein to H-2b haplotype and binding assays
Using a combination of three epitope prediction algorithms available on the web (SYFPEITHI, Pro-Pred-I, NetMHC I and II) [22–25], 11 peptides from NS1 protein from BTV-8 were selected and synthesised (Table 1). The ability of these synthesised peptides to bind H-2 Db and Kb molecules was assessed using a binding assay on RMA-S cells. All 8 peptides predicted to bind murine MHC class I molecules showed binding affinity for either Db or Kb molecules. NS1 peptide binding was ranked according to the binding to RMA-S cells of the control peptide gp33-41. Four NS1 peptides displayed a strong affinity for either Db or Kb molecules, and conversely, 3 NS1 peptides only had low affinity for their MHC molecules (Table 1). Peptide NS1(222) displayed, as predicted, moderate binding to both Db and Kb molecules. Overall, the NetMHC algorithm appears to predict more accurately the peptide binding to Db and Kb molecules, although NS1(403) peptide which was not predicted to bind using this algorithm had weak affinity for Db in RMA-S cell binding assays. Thus, we can conclude that the combination of several predictive algorithms proved useful for the detection of putative T cell epitopes.
Response to Db and Kb binding NS1 peptides
To analyse whether these 4 peptides were naturally processed and presented by target cells cultured with BTV (Figure 2C). MC57 cells were incubated with BEI-BTV either from serotype 1, 4 or 8 and used as target cell for CTL raised against NS1(125), NS1(152), NS1(235) or NS1(403) peptide. MC57 cells were pulsed with the relevant NS1 peptide as positive control, or with mock BHK lysate as negative control. CTLs specific for NS1(152), NS1(235) or NS1(403) peptide were able to lyse target cells cultured with BTV-8. However, CTLs specific for NS1(125) peptide failed to recognise target cells cultured in the presence of BTV. Importantly, CTLs specific for NS1(152) or NS1(403) peptide were capable of lysing target cells pulsed either with BTV-1 or BTV-4, demonstrating that these CTLs can recognise cells infected with different BTV serotypes. Therefore, NS1(152) and NS1(403) peptides are naturally processed by other BTV serotypes and are capable of inducing cross-reactive CTL responses.
Response to I-Ab binding peptides
Response to predicted NS1 peptides in sheep
In the present work, we described CTL and T helper epitopes from the NS1 protein of BTV-8 in mice and sheep. Three CTL and 2 helper epitopes were described in C57BL/6 mice, and 2 helper epitopes were described in sheep. These T cells are naturally activated during BTV-8 infection and are likely to contribute to the elimination of the virus. As previously described , we confirmed that T cells can cross-react with other BTV serotypes. Interestingly, IFN-γ production to BTV-1 was always lower when compared to BTV-8 or BTV-4, indicating either that this strain can interfere with IFN-γ production or that BTV-1 may not share some antigenic determinants responsible for the IFN-γ production observed with its other two serotypes. It remains unclear whether the different response to BTV-1 observed in these experiments was due to a different antigen repertoire presented to the host, or to a mechanism of immune evasion specific to BTV-1.
Murine models for BTV infection are well established [19, 27] and represent a very useful tool to design more rational and cost-effective vaccination strategies for the disease. The description of T cells determinants in mice will therefore allow for a better monitoring of effective vaccination to the virus in these experimental models. In turn, this is likely to further improve the design of novel vaccination approaches in the natural host. Predictive algorithms for MHC binding peptides have proved useful in identifying T cell epitopes for virus or tumour antigens . In the present work, we have used a combination of algorithms available on the web to predict H-2b binding peptides from NS1. The binding to MHC class I molecules of these predicted peptides was verified using binding assay with RMA-S cells [21, 29]. The NetMHC algorithm appears to predict more accurately the binding to Db and Kb molecules than the other 2 algorithms. However, NS1(403) peptide which was a predicted binder using SYFPEITHI and Pro-Pred-I algorithms but not by the NetMHC algorithm showed weak affinity for Db in RMA-S cell binding assays. Importantly, in spite of its weak binding NS1(403) peptide was a CTL epitope shared among several BTV serotypes. On the other hand, NS1(125) peptide which showed strong binding to Db could elicit IFN-γ production but displayed only a weak CTL activity in inoculated mice, with no evidence of natural processing in BTV-infected cells. Taken together these data confirm that MHC binding affinity alone is not always a good predictor of CTL activity, and that immune responses may be directed to low affinity peptides .
The immunogenicity of these predicted peptides was assessed in BTV-8 inoculated mice using a combination of IFN-γ ELISPOT assays, intracellular cytokine staining, CTL assays (for MHC class I binding peptides) and proliferation assays (for MHC class II binding peptides). Only NS1(125) peptide displayed consistent IFN-γ production in all inoculated mice. However, this peptide only displayed weak CTL activity and no evidence of natural processing was observed in cell pulsed with BTV. Peptides NS1(152), NS1(235) and NS1(403) induced moderate IFN-γ production, however they displayed consistent CTL activity and were able to lyse target cells pulsed with BTV. Two CD4 epitopes were also identified in C57BL/6 inoculated mice using a combination of proliferation assay and intracellular cytokine staining. These data highlight the importance of using several complementary techniques to identify novel epitopes.
We also describe two CD4 epitopes from NS1 in sheep. Both of these helper epitopes were not only presented by BTV-8, but also by BTV-1 and BTV-4. Definition of these cross-reactive epitopes is an essential part of the ongoing effort to improve BTV vaccination and monitoring. From a biological point of view, defining these T cell epitopes will help understand the process of infection of BTV, as well as its interaction with the host immune system. The susceptibility that BTV displays to type I interferon as well as the lymphopenia observed in the host after infection, indicate that BTV is immunosuppressive . Animals that recover from the infection develop a strong humoral and cellular immunity to the virus, demonstrating that effective immunity to BTV can be eventually mounted. However during the infection period, animals are immune-compromised and therefore susceptible to opportunistic infections. A better understanding of the T cell response to BTV may be central to comprehend the mechanisms through which this virus is capable of evading the host immune response and often persist for month in the host .
The characterisation of more T cell determinants from BTV in breeds used widely in sheep farming is also important for the monitoring of the health status of naïve populations to BTV. In addition, this knowledge may help understand the susceptibility of these breeds to BTV outbreaks. Vaccination designed to activate T cells specific for determinants shared among serotypes is also likely to limit the economical impact that BTV outbreaks can have on naïve populations.
This work was funded by grants AGL2009-07353, RyC-2010-06516 and AGL2011-25025 from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain) and 228394-NADIR Integrating Activities 7th EU program.
- Schwartz-Cornil I, Mertens PP, Contreras V, Hemati B, Pascale F, Breard E, Mellor PS, MacLachlan NJ, Zientara S: Bluetongue virus: virology, pathogenesis and immunity. Vet Res. 2008, 39: 46-10.1051/vetres:2008023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy P: Bluetongue virus proteins and particles and their role in virus entry, assembly, and release. Adv Virus Res. 2005, 64: 69-123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ratinier M, Caporale M, Golder M, Franzoni G, Allan K, Nunes SF, Armezzani A, Bayoumy A, Rixon F, Shaw A, Palmarini M: Identification and characterization of a novel non-structural protein of bluetongue virus. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7: e1002477-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002477.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grimes JM, Burroughs JN, Gouet P, Diprose JM, Malby R, Zientara S, Mertens PP, Stuart DI: The atomic structure of the bluetongue virus core. Nature. 1998, 395: 470-478. 10.1038/26694.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mertens PP, Burroughs JN, Anderson J: Purification and properties of virus particles, infectious subviral particles, and cores of bluetongue virus serotypes 1 and 4. Virology. 1987, 157: 375-386. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90280-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mertens PP, Crook NE, Rubinstein R, Pedley S, Payne CC: Cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus classification by electropherotype; validation by serological analyses and agarose gel electrophoresis. J Gen Virol. 1989, 70: 173-185. 10.1099/0022-1317-70-1-173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassan SS, Roy P: Expression and functional characterization of bluetongue virus VP2 protein: role in cell entry. J Virol. 1999, 73: 9832-9842.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huismans H, Van Dijk AA: Bluetongue virus structural components. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1990, 162: 21-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han Z, Harty RN: The NS3 protein of bluetongue virus exhibits viroporin-like properties. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 43092-43097. 10.1074/jbc.M403663200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeggo MH, Wardley RC, Taylor WP: Role of neutralising antibody in passive immunity to bluetongue infection. Res Vet Sci. 1984, 36: 81-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrew M, Whiteley P, Janardhana V, Lobato Z, Gould A, Coupar B: Antigen specificity of the ovine cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to bluetongue virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1995, 47: 311-322. 10.1016/0165-2427(94)05410-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeggo MH, Wardley RC, Brownlie J: Importance of ovine cytotoxic T cells in protection against bluetongue virus infection. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985, 178: 477-487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeggo MH, Wardley RC, Brownlie J: A study of the role of cell-mediated immunity in bluetongue virus infection in sheep, using cellular adoptive transfer techniques. Immunology. 1984, 52: 403-410.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stott JL, Barber TL, Osburn BI: Immunologic response of sheep to inactivated and virulent bluetongue virus. Am J Vet Res. 1985, 46: 1043-1049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stott JL, Osburn BI, Barber TL: The current status of research on an experimental inactivated bluetongue virus vaccine. Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc. 1979, 83: 55-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takamatsu H, Jeggo MH: Cultivation of bluetongue virus-specific ovine T cells and their cross-reactivity with different serotype viruses. Immunology. 1989, 66: 258-263.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janardhana V, Andrew ME, Lobato ZI, Coupar BE: The ovine cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to bluetongue virus. Res Vet Sci. 1999, 67: 213-221. 10.1053/rvsc.1999.0306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Umeshappa CS, Singh KP, Pandey AB, Singh RP, Nanjundappa RH: Cell-mediated immune response and cross-protective efficacy of binary ethylenimine-inactivated bluetongue virus serotype-1 vaccine in sheep. Vaccine. 2010, 28: 2522-2531. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calvo-Pinilla E, Rodriguez-Calvo T, Sevilla N, Ortego J: Heterologous prime boost vaccination with DNA and recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara protects IFNAR(-/-) mice against lethal bluetongue infection. Vaccine. 2009, 28: 437-445. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jabbar TK, Calvo-Pinilla E, Mateos F, Gubbins S, Bin-Tarif A, Bachanek-Bankowska K, Alpar O, Ortego J, Takamatsu HH, Mertens PP, Castillo-Olivares J: Protection of IFNAR (-/-) mice against bluetongue virus serotype 8, by heterologous (DNA/rMVA) and homologous (rMVA/rMVA) vaccination, expressing outer-capsid protein VP2. PloS One. 2013, 8: e60574-10.1371/journal.pone.0060574.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rojas JM, Rodriguez-Calvo T, Pena L, Sevilla N: T cell responses to bluetongue virus are directed against multiple and identical CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes from the VP7 core protein in mouse and sheep. Vaccine. 2011, 29: 6848-6857. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP, Bachor OA, Stevanovic S: SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics. 1999, 50: 213-219. 10.1007/s002510050595.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh H, Raghava GP: ProPred1: prediction of promiscuous MHC Class-I binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1009-1014. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Worning P, Lauemoller SL, Lamberth K, Buus S, Brunak S, Lund O: Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Sci. 2003, 12: 1007-1017. 10.1110/ps.0239403.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen M, Lund O: NN-align. An artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009, 10: 296-10.1186/1471-2105-10-296.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sevilla N, Kunz S, Holz A, Lewicki H, Homann D, Yamada H, Campbell KP, de La Torre JC, Oldstone MB: Immunosuppression and resultant viral persistence by specific viral targeting of dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2000, 192: 1249-1260. 10.1084/jem.192.9.1249.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calvo-Pinilla E, Rodriguez-Calvo T, Anguita J, Sevilla N, Ortego J: Establishment of a bluetongue virus infection model in mice that are deficient in the alpha/beta interferon receptor. PloS One. 2009, 4: e5171-10.1371/journal.pone.0005171.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rojas JM, McArdle SE, Horton RB, Bell M, Mian S, Li G, Ali SA, Rees RC: Peptide immunisation of HLA-DR-transgenic mice permits the identification of a novel HLA-DRbeta1*0101- and HLA-DRbeta1*0401-restricted epitope from p53. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005, 54: 243-253. 10.1007/s00262-004-0596-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen ML, Ruhwald M, Nissen MH, Buus S, Claesson MH: Self-peptides with intermediate capacity to bind and stabilize MHC class I molecules may be immunogenic. Scand J Immunol. 2003, 57: 21-27. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2003.01182.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jorgensen KW, Rasmussen M, Buus S, Nielsen M: NetMHCstab - predicting stability of peptide:MHC-I complexes; impacts for CTL epitope discovery. Immunology. 2014, 141: 18-26. 10.1111/imm.12160.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Umeshappa CS, Singh KP, Nanjundappa RH, Pandey AB: Apoptosis and immuno-suppression in sheep infected with bluetongue virus serotype-23. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 144: 310-318. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.02.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takamatsu H, Mellor PS, Mertens PP, Kirkham PA, Burroughs JN, Parkhouse RM: A possible overwintering mechanism for bluetongue virus in the absence of the insect vector. J Gen Virol. 2003, 84: 227-235. 10.1099/vir.0.18705-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.