Differential interactions of virulent and non-virulent H. parasuis strains with naïve or swine influenza virus pre-infected dendritic cells
© Mussá et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 August 2012
Accepted: 31 October 2012
Published: 16 November 2012
Pigs possess a microbiota in the upper respiratory tract that includes Haemophilus parasuis. Pigs are also considered the reservoir of influenza viruses and infection with this virus commonly results in increased impact of bacterial infections, including those by H. parasuis. However, the mechanisms involved in host innate responses towards H. parasuis and their implications in a co-infection with influenza virus are unknown. Therefore, the ability of a non-virulent H. parasuis serovar 3 (SW114) and a virulent serovar 5 (Nagasaki) strains to interact with porcine bone marrow dendritic cells (poBMDC) and their modulation in a co-infection with swine influenza virus (SwIV) H3N2 was examined. At 1 hour post infection (hpi), SW114 interaction with poBMDC was higher than that of Nagasaki, while at 8 hpi both strains showed similar levels of interaction. The co-infection with H3N2 SwIV and either SW114 or Nagasaki induced higher levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12 and IL-10 compared to mock or H3N2 SwIV infection alone. Moreover, IL-12 and IFN-α secretion differentially increased in cells co-infected with H3N2 SwIV and Nagasaki. These results pave the way for understanding the differences in the interaction of non-virulent and virulent strains of H. parasuis with the swine immune system and their modulation in a viral co-infection.
Haemophilus parasuis is a non-motile, Gram-negative, small pleomorphic rod of the family Pasteurellaceae and the causal agent of Glässer’s disease, which is characterized by fibrinous polyserositis and polyarthritis [2, 3]. Glässer’s disease is common in all countries with commercial pig production and its economic cost is considered one of the highest in nursery pigs, in which the disease is more prevalent . Fifteen serovars of H. parasuis have been defined, with serovars 1, 5, 10, 12, 13 and 14 classified as highly virulent; serovars 2, 4 and 15 as moderately virulent; and serovars 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11 as non-virulent . The pathogenesis of H. parasuis remains unclear, but disease production is influenced by stress, the presence of virulent strains of H. parasuis and other pathogens in the farm and immune status of the animals . Differences between virulent and non-virulent strains have been determined at the genetic level , in functional assays of phagocytosis , serum resistance , adhesion and invasion of endothelial cells [10, 11] and, more recently, in adhesion and invasion to epithelial cells . However, H. parasuis interaction with porcine DC has not been addressed before, neither has its possible immunomodulation in the presence of other respiratory pathogens such as swine influenza virus (SwIV).
Influenza viruses are enveloped, single stranded RNA (ssRNA) viruses in the Orthomyxoviridae family. Pigs play a crucial role in the interspecies transmission of influenza viruses [13–15]. The pathogenicity of influenza virus lies in its ability to elude host anti-viral immune responses. In pigs, primary SwIV infection induced cytokines like IFN-α, IL-6, IL-1, TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-12, which have been associated with acute influenza virus infection in pigs .
An efficient immune response against a particular pathogen depends on the efficient recognition of the pathogen/antigen, and dendritic cells (DC) play an essential role in priming this effective immune response. They constitute the bridge between the innate and adaptive immune response . According to their functionality and phenotype, DC can be classified as conventional DC (cDC) known as professional presenting cells or plasmacytoid DC (pDC), which naturally produce high levels of type-I interferon . In swine, both cDC and pDC have important antigen-presenting functions and they complement each other by having distinct regulation of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I, SLA-I in swine) and class II (MHC-II, SLA-II in swine) depending on antigen presentation and different profile of secreted cytokines . Interestingly, conventional DC are amongst the first cells encountered by most viruses, simply due to their availability at every possible entry site of the body . Respiratory disease in pigs is common in modern pig production worldwide and is often referred to as porcine respiratory disease complex. This disease complex results from infection with various combinations of primary and secondary respiratory pathogens, including H. parasuis and SwIV [21, 22]. Our main goal was to assess whether H. parasuis virulence implied a differential interaction with swine DC and whether this interaction would be altered in the presence of another respiratory pathogen involved in the porcine respiratory disease complex, such as SwIV, considering all this previous knowledge and the availability of DC beneath the epithelium of respiratory organs. Here, we report different patterns of interaction and activation of swine DC after encountering virulent and non-virulent H. parasuis strains which was in turn altered in the presence of swine influenza virus. These results will help understanding how bacteria-viral infection influences the outcome of the elicited immune response.
Material and methods
Porcine bone marrow dendritic cells (poBMDC)
Bone marrow hematopoietic cells were obtained from femurs of eight-week old healthy Large white X Landrace pigs, negative for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and type-2 porcine circovirus (PCV2) by RT-PCR as previously described by Olvera et al. and Sibila et al. [23, 24]. These animals were also negative by enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for influenza virus and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (HIPRA, Amer, Spain), for Mycoplasma (OXOID, Cambridge, UK), for Parvovirus, Adenovirus and Aujeszky’s disease virus (INGENASA, Madrid, Spain), and Salmonella (SVANOVA Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Bone marrow dendritic cells (BMDC) were generated using an eight day protocol as previously described by Mussá et al. and Carrasco et al. [25, 26]. Briefly, bone marrow haematopoietic cells (BMHC) were resuspended in RPMI-1640 (Lonza, Walkesville, USA) culture medium containing 2 mM of L-glutamine (Invitrogen®, Barcelona, Spain), 100 U/mL of Polymixin B (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) 10% of fetal calf serum (FCS) Euroclone, Sziano, Italy) and 100 U/mL of penicillin with 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (Invitrogen®, Barcelona, Spain). Every 3 days new medium containing 100 ng/mL of rpGM-CSF (R&D Systems, Madrid, Spain) was added. At day 8 of generation floating and semi-adherent cells were harvested, washed in RPMI with L-glutamine only and used in the proposed experiments. Animal care and procedures were in accordance with the guidelines of the Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) under the supervision of the Ethical and Animal Welfare Committee of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (number of approval: 1189) and under the supervision of the Ethical and Animal Welfare Committee of the Government of Catalonia (number of approval: 5796).
Two reference strains of H. parasuis, SW114 and Nagasaki, belonging to the nasal and systemic clade respectively on the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) were used to inoculate poBMDC. SW114 is the serovar 3 reference strain (non-virulent); Nagasaki is the serovar 5 reference strain (highly virulent) [5, 27]. For DC inoculation, bacteria were grown overnight as described by Olvera et al. . Briefly, strains were cultured on chocolate agar plates (BioMérieux, Madrid, Spain) overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. The following day, colonies were collected and resuspended in PBS at the appropriate concentration. Bacterial counts in the inocula were confirmed by plating serial dilutions on chocolate agar plates.
Porcine A/swine/Spain/SF32071/2007(H3N2) SwIV strain was isolated from a natural outbreak in a conventional farm in 2007, in Spain. Eight sequences of this virus, corresponding to HA, NP, PA, PB2, NA, PB1/ PB1-F2, NS1/NS2 and M1/M2 genes were submitted to GenBank (accession numbers: HE774666, HE774667, HE774668, HE774669, HE774670, HE774671, HE774672 and HE774673). Virus isolation and SwIV-cell infection were performed as previously described by Mussá et al.  except for the fact that the post infection medium did not contain any antibiotics.
DC infection or stimulation with Poly:IC
Staining of H. parasuis
H. parasuis was assessed by flow cytometry or by immunofluorescence at 1h and at 8 hpi (Figure 1a and 1b). For flow cytometry, poBMDC were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 10 min at room temperature (RT). After washing (centrifugation 450 × g for 5 min at 4°C), cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X100 in PBS for 15 min at 37°C. Then, 1h incubation at 4°C for each antibody was used. A polyclonal rabbit anti-SW114 or anti-Nagasaki serum (10 μL serum/490 μL PBS 2% FCS) was used as primary antibody. An FITC-conjugated monoclonal anti-rabbit (Clone RG-16, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) was used as a secondary antibody at 1:100 dilution. For immunofluorescence, the cells were infected on a circular glass cover slip (VWR International, Barcelona, Spain) inserted in 24 well plates (Nunc®, Kamstrupvej, Denmark). After infection, supernatants were collected for ELISA. Then, the cells were fixed with ethanol (Panreac, Barcelona, Spain) for 10 min at 4°C, dehydrated with acetone and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at 37°C. Then, the cells were washed with PBS with 0.1% BSA and 100 μL of polyclonal rabbit anti-SW114 or anti-Nagasaki serum diluted as before were added and the slides were incubated for 1h at 4°C. After three washes, a secondary antibody anti-rabbit Immunoglobulin-FITC diluted 1:50 was added and incubated for 1h at 4°C. Phalloidin, Tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate (TRITC) (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) at 5 μg/mL was used to stain actin filaments situated beneath the cell membrane and finally after several washes, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Cover slips were dried and mounted using 1 drop of Fluoprep (BioMérieux, Madrid, Spain). To detect autofluorescence, mock or infected-poBMDC were stained as controls with the primary and/or secondary antibody. Treated cells were viewed on a Nikon eclipse 90i epifluorescence microscope equipped with a DXM 1200F camera (Nikon Corporate, Japan). To assess the association of bacteria with poBMDC, image stacks were captured using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope, with an objective of 63×. Z stack images were acquired at intervals of 0.3 μm. Images were processed by using the ImageJ v1.42k software .
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Mock and infected poBMDC were fixed with 2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA) and 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (EM grade, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), pH 7.4 and processed following conventional procedures as previously described in detail by Rodriguez-Cariño et al., . Briefly, the samples were post-fixed with osmium, dehydrated in acetone, embedded in Epon, polymerized at 60°C and cut with an ultramicrotome. Finally, ultrathin sections placed in copper grids were contrasted with conventional uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate solutions and observed using a Jeol 1400 (Jeol LTD, Tokyo, Japan) transmission electron microscope equipped with a CCD GATAN ES1000W Erlangshen camera.
Intracellular survival assay
Cells were infected as described above. After 1 h of H. parasuis infection (time zero) (Figure 1b and 1c), RPMI containing 2mM of L-glutamine and 10% of FCS, penicillin G (5 μg/mL) and gentamicin (100 μg/mL) (both from Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) was added and the poBMDC were left at 37°C and 5% CO2 for a further two or four hours. At these times, after three washes with PBS, poBMDC were disrupted using sterile water, and serial 10 fold dilutions of lysate were plated on chocolate agar and incubated for 48 h. At the same times, 100 μL of cell culture supernatants were plated on chocolate agar (Biomérieux, Madrid, Spain) to check if H. parasuis was efficiently killed by the antibiotics.
Fifty microliters of poBMDC (5 × 105 cells) were plated in 96 well U-bottom plates (Nunc® Kamstrupvej, Denmark) and washed with PBS 2% FCS. Then, 100 μL hybridoma supernatants containing anti-SLA-I (4B7/8) or anti-SLA-II (1F12), and the human CTLA4 murine immunoglobulin fusion protein (CTLA4-muIg; Ancell, Bayport, Minnesota, USA) were used as primary antibodies. The secondary antibody was R-phycoerythrin anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK). Stained cells were acquired using a Coulter® EPICS XL-MCL cytometer and analysed with the EXPO 32 ADC v.1.2 program. The mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of each sample were analysed.
Enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The supernatants of 8 h infected-poBMDC were thawed only once for cytokine detection by ELISA. All ELISA were read with KC Junior Program (BioTek, Potton, UK) using the filter PowerWave XS reader. For IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10 and TNF-α, the Duo Set Developed ELISA system from R&D System® was used following the manufacturer’s instructions while for IFN-α an in house ELISA using antibodies purchased from PBL Interferon Source was used according to Kekarainen et al. . To detect IL-8 and IL-18, swine IL-8 (CXCL8) VetSet™ ELISA development kit (Kingfisher Biotek, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and pig IL-18 Module Set BMS672MST (Bender Med Systems, Vienna, Austria) were used following the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally IL-12 secretion was analysed using antibodies anti IL-12/IL-23p40 (R&D Systems, Madrid, Spain) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following amounts of antibodies: 2 μg/mL of anti IL-12/IL23 monoclonal antibody were used to coat a 96 well plate (Costar, NY, USA) overnight at RT. After washing, serial dilutions of the recombinant porcine IL-12 starting from 10 000 pg/mL were added. Then 125 ng/mL of biotinylated anti-porcine IL-12/IL-23 p40 antibody was used. Finally, 0.05 μg/mL of peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK) was added. The reaction was revealed using 3,3’,5,5’ tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) and stopped using H2SO4 (0.5M). The limits of detection were 3.9 U/mL and 78.1 pg/mL for IFN-α and IL-12 respectively.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For statistical comparisons, the pig (as source of cells) was used as the experimental unit. The significance level (α) was set at 0.05. A non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney) was chosen to compare the different values obtained for all the immunological parameters between groups at all sampling times.
Differential interaction of H. parasuis Nagasaki and SW114 individually or in SwIV co-infection with swine DC
Intracellular survival of H. parasuis in poBMDC
Activation profile of H. parasuis-SwIV-infected DC
Expression levels of activation markers were also analysed after co-infection. One hour after H3N2 SwIV single infection or H3N2 SwIV-SW114 and H3N2 SwIV-Nagasaki co-infections, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in SLA-I and CD80/86 expression. However, at this time, significant decreases (p < 0.05) of SLA-II were observed in H3N2 SwIV plus SW114 or Nagasaki co-infected cells (Figure 8b). At 8 hpi, only H3N2 SwIV single infection or co-infection with Nagasaki induced a statistically significant increase of SLA-I when compared to SW114 single infection (Figure 8a).
Cytokine pattern of H. parasuis infected DC: effects of SwIV co-infection
Co-infection of poBMDC with H3N2 SwIV and SW114 or Nagasaki resulted in similar levels in most of the tested cytokines. However, a significant increase in the secretion of IL-12 compared to mock control cells was observed at 8 hpi in Nagasaki co-infected cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 9d). IL-12 production in Nagasaki infected-poBMDC was modulated by a previous H3N2 SwIV virus infection, while induction of IL-12 by SW114 was not affected. H3N2 SwIV induced higher levels of IFN-α compared to mock control cells. Surprisingly, a significant decrease of this cytokine was observed in H3N2 SwIV-SW114 co-infected cells compared to H3N2 SwIV infected cells whereas the Nagasaki strain significantly upregulated IFN-α secretion in co-infected cells compared to Nagasaki single infected cells (Figure 9h).
Poly:IC immunomodulation on H. parasuis infected DC
In the present study, the immune response generated by porcine DC against H. parasuis non-virulent serovar 3 (SW114) or virulent serovar 5 (Nagasaki) alone or after a previous infection with H3N2 SwIV was evaluated. The goals in this study were the following: (i) to establish an in vitro model to study the interaction of virulent and non-virulent H. parasuis strains with DC that could give us some insight into the virulence associated with the immune response; (ii) to analyse whether SwIV infection could alter those responses.
Dendritic cells are competent antigen-presenting cells responsible for activation of naive T cells and generation of primary T-cell responses . DC constitute the bridge between the innate and adaptive immune response . The sentinel functions and the availability of DC beneath the epithelium of respiratory organs make them a suitable target for respiratory pathogens, such as SwIV or H. parasuis in pigs. Extensive studies on DC have been done in mice and humans and although the knowledge on swine immunology has been developing quickly in recent years, studies to highlight the interaction of pathogens with the porcine immune system are scarce. A recent study evaluated the ability of Streptococcus suis to interact with swine DC. Thus, S. suis capsular polysaccharide (CPS) was shown to interfere with DC phagocytosis and to be mainly responsible for DC activation, addressing the role of S. suis CPS as a critical virulence factor . In a previous study, we have shown that phagocytosis resistance was a virulence mechanism of H. parasuis, on porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM). Although the Nagasaki strain entered the cells, it showed negligible association with PAM .
In the present study, we describe marked differences in the interaction of a virulent and a non-virulent strain of H. parasuis with porcine DC. Firstly, SW114 was rapidly internalised by poBMDC compared to Nagasaki and this ability was not affected by a previous infection with a H3N2 SwIV. The lower level of interaction of Nagasaki with poBMDC, as it was also observed in alveolar macrophages , could be a general evasion strategy from the immune system. On the contrary to H. ducreyi which persists in DC without affecting the eukaryotic cell viability , Nagasaki was killed once internalized in poBMDC. Although Nagasaki was internalised in lower numbers, it induced more cellular lesions when compared to SW114, indicating that virulence factors could be acting at this level. Although cell death after H. parasuis infection evaluated by the number of apoptotic and necrotic cells did not change regardless of single or co-infected experiments (data not shown), it seems that one strategy of the Nagasaki strain in interacting with swine DC may be to alter cell morphology to a certain extent without inducing increased cell death.
Antigen presentation, activation of co-stimulatory markers and signalling through released cytokines are three key points in triggering an effective immune response by APC. The reduction in SLA-II observed in H3N2 SwIV plus SW114 or Nagasaki-infected cells might be due to a reduction of an accessible surface membrane since SW114 was attached in large numbers at 1 and 8 hpi. However, after 8 h when the interaction of both bacterial strains with DC was similar, SLA-I expression decreased in H3N2 SwIV plus SW114-infected cells while increased in H3N2 SwIV plus Nagasaki infected cells. These differences in interaction of both pathogens with poBMDC might suggest that they interfere in a different way with the transport and/or recirculation of MHC I and II molecules. For example, it has been reported that Helicobacter pylori infect murine DC and as a consequence, MHC-II is retained within the H. pylori vacuoles and the export of MHC-II molecules to the cell surface is blocked .
The activation of APC is conditioned by the local environment in which they are primed, and this influences the way in which they control T helper type 1/type 2 (Th1/Th2)  or Th17  cell development. In addition, adaptive immune response to micro-organisms is often characterised by the polarisation of the cytokine response. Generally speaking, type I cytokines are known to suppress type II responses and vice versa. Pathogens that strongly polarise the immune response may modify the type I and type II cytokine balance and/or effectors and consequently the local environment in which immunity to a concurrent micro-organism develops. In our system, swine DC infected with either of the H. parasuis strains tested showed a predominant inflammatory pattern of cytokines with high levels of IL-1β, IL-8, IL-6, IL-18 and TNF-α. Previously, Bouchet el al., reported that H. parasuis serotype 4 of moderate virulence, induced IL-8 and IL-6 secretion in higher levels compared to serotype 5 (high virulence) in newborn pig tracheal cells  while the same authors also reported that field strains of H. parasuis serotypes 4 and 5 induced similar levels of IL-8 and IL-6 . The data presented here indicate that there is no difference in the capacity of SW114 (serovar 3, non-virulent) or Nagasaki (serovar 5, virulent) to induce IL-1β, IL-8, IL-6, IL-18, IL-10, IFN-α and TNF-α in porcine DC. Different cell types used in these studies may account for the above-mentioned apparent discrepancies.
There were significant differences regarding secretion of IL-12, the non-virulent strain being a higher inducer. IL-12 is a cytokine which links both innate and adaptive immunity systems playing a critical role in inducing Th1 responses, which in turn leads to the production of a number of cytotoxic cytokines, as well as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) by T cells . Therefore, differential secretion of IL-12 might be considered a candidate of virulence in terms of immune responses to H. parasuis. Further studies will elucidate whether this will be the case in pigs. Interestingly, when SwIV co-infection took place with Nagasaki, IL-12 secretion increased to levels comparable to cells infected with non-virulent SW114, suggesting that a change in IL-12 pattern was accomplished. IFN-α secretion may be due to viral PAMP through TLR3 or through bacterial PAMP due to TLR4. Nagasaki and SW114 strains differ in the nature of their lipooligosacharide (LOS)  and capsule production , nevertheless, IFN-α secretion was similar when a single bacterial infection took place. However, these structural differences may account for the different cytokine pattern in the co-infection experiment as well as acting as a positive feedback loop for interferon upon influenza infection. In mice, Nakamura et al. reported that co-infection with influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae leads to synergistic stimulation of type I IFN , which might also be the case in the experiments presented in this work.
Recently also in mice, Negishi et al. demonstrated a modulated antibacterial T cell response as a result of cross-interference of RLR and TLR signalling pathways . The authors demonstrated that TLR activation through IRF5 (bacterial infection) induced high levels of IL-12 and low levels of IFN-I whereas RLR activation through IRF3 (viral infection) induced high levels of IFN-I and low levels of IL-12. These pathways of activation could also apply in the data presented here, as SW114 was a high IL-12 and low IFN-α inducer and SwIV a low IL-12 and high IFN-α inducer in infected DC, as shown in Figure 9. Negishi et al. also reported that in the case of bacterial-virus co-infection, IRF3 is able to suppress IL-12. However, this was not the case in the experiments presented here, where in the co-infection or Poly:IC stimulation, IL-12 was not only inhibited but induced by the virulent Nagasaki strain. Differences in animal species and the degree of pathogen virulence used in these studies may account for the above-mentioned apparent discrepancies.
Overall, the results presented in this work show that in vitro DC studies may help to understand the complex relationship of virulent and non-virulent bacteria and the intimate relation among different pathogens in co-infections. These in vitro analyses allowed us to investigate new avenues for the stimulation of the immune system for better response to pathogens. In conclusion, we report for the first time immunological differences among virulent versus non-virulent H. parasuis strains in their interaction with DC and their modulation by SwIV co-infection.
This work was partly funded by the following Projects: CSD 2006–00007, AGL2009-12945-C02-01, AGL2010-22200-C02-01 and AGL2010-15232 by the Spanish Government. PhD studies of Mrs. Tufária Mussá are supported by a doctoral grant from the Spanish Agency of International Cooperation and Development (AECID) while PhD studies of Mrs. Mar Costa-Hurtado and Mr. Massimiliano Baratelli are supported by a doctoral grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN). Authors also thank Dr Francesc E. Borrás and Dr Daniel Benitez-Ribas from the DC.CAT group (the Catalan group for DCs studies) and Dr Llilianne Ganges for their comments and suggestion in this work. Authors thank Dr Kevin Dalton for editing the English language in the manuscript and Dr Maria Ballester, Núria Galofré and Núria Aloy for technical support.
- Biberstein EL, White DC: A proposal for the establishment of two new Haemophilus species. J Med Microbiol. 1969, 2: 75-78. 10.1099/00222615-2-1-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amano H, Shibata M, Kajio N, Morozumi T: Pathologic observations of pigs intranasally inoculated with serovar 1, 4 and 5 of Haemophilus parasuis using immunoperoxidase method. J Vet Med Sci. 1994, 56: 639-644. 10.1292/jvms.56.639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aragon V, Segales J, Oliveira S: Glässer´s Disease. Disease of Swine. Edited by: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW. 2012, Wiley-Blackwell, 760-769. 10Google Scholar
- Oliveira S, Galina L, Pijoan C: Development of a PCR test to diagnose Haemophilus parasuis infections. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2001, 13: 495-501. 10.1177/104063870101300607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kielstein P, Rapp-Gabrielson VJ: Designation of 15 serovars of Haemophilus parasuis on the basis of immunodiffusion using heat-stable antigen extracts. J Clin Microbiol. 1992, 30: 862-865.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olvera A, Segales J, Aragon V: Update on the diagnosis of Haemophilus parasuis infection in pigs and novel genotyping methods. Vet J. 2007, 174: 522-529. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.10.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olvera A, Calsamiglia M, Aragon V: Genotypic diversity of Haemophilus parasuis field strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 3984-3992. 10.1128/AEM.02834-05.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olvera A, Ballester M, Nofrarias M, Sibila M, Aragon V: Differences in phagocytosis susceptibility in Haemophilus parasuis strains. Vet Res. 2009, 40: 24-10.1051/vetres/2009007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cerda-Cuellar M, Aragon V: Serum-resistance in Haemophilus parasuis is associated with systemic disease in swine. Vet J. 2008, 175: 384-389. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.01.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aragon V, Bouchet B, Gottschalk M: Invasion of endothelial cells by systemic and nasal strains of Haemophilus parasuis. Vet J. 2010, 186: 264-267. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vanier G, Szczotka A, Friedl P, Lacouture S, Jacques M, Gottschalk M: Haemophilus parasuis invades porcine brain microvascular endothelial cells. Microbiology. 2006, 152: 135-142. 10.1099/mic.0.28312-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frandoloso R, Martinez-Martinez S, Gutierrez-Martin CB, Rodriguez-Ferri EF: Haemophilus parasuis serovar 5 Nagasaki strain adheres and invades PK-15 cells. Vet Microbiol. 2012, 154: 347-352. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heinen P: Swine influenza: a zoonosis. 2002, Ed: V S TomorrowGoogle Scholar
- Horimoto T, Kawaoka Y: Pandemic threat posed by avian influenza A viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001, 14: 129-149. 10.1128/CMR.14.1.129-149.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lipatov AS, Govorkova EA, Webby RJ, Ozaki H, Peiris M, Guan Y, Poon L, Webster RG: Influenza: emergence and control. J Virol. 2004, 78: 8951-8959. 10.1128/JVI.78.17.8951-8959.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbe F, Atanasova K, Van Reeth K: Cytokines and acute phase proteins associated with acute swine influenza infection in pigs. Vet J. 2011, 187: 48-53. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.12.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinman RM: Linking innate to adaptive immunity through dendritic cells. Novartis Found Symp. 2006, 279: 101-109. discussion 109–113, 216–109View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu YJ: IPC: professional type 1 interferon-producing cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005, 23: 275-306. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Summerfield A, McCullough KC: The porcine dendritic cell family. Dev Comp Immunol. 2009, 33: 299-309. 10.1016/j.dci.2008.05.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freer G, Matteucci D: Influence of dendritic cells on viral pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5: e1000384-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000384.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fablet C, Marois C, Dorenlor V, Eono F, Eveno E, Jolly JP, Le Devendec L, Kobisch M, Madec F, Rose N: Bacterial pathogens associated with lung lesions in slaughter pigs from 125 herds. Res Vet Sci. 2012, 93: 627-630. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simon-Grifé M, Martin-Valls GE, Vilar MJ, Busquets N, Mora-Salvatierra M, Bestebroer TM, Fouchier RA, Martin M, Mateu E, Casal J: Swine influenza virus infection dynamics in two pig farms; results of a longitudinal assessment. Vet Res. 2012, 43: 24-10.1186/1297-9716-43-24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olvera A, Sibila M, Calsamiglia M, Segales J, Domingo M: Comparison of porcine circovirus type 2 load in serum quantified by a real time PCR in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome and porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome naturally affected pigs. J Virol Methods. 2004, 117: 75-80. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.12.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sibila M, Calsamiglia M, Segales J, Blanchard P, Badiella L, Le Dimna M, Jestin A, Domingo M: Use of a polymerase chain reaction assay and an ELISA to monitor porcine circovirus type 2 infection in pigs from farms with and without postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. Am J Vet Res. 2004, 65: 88-92. 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrasco CP, Rigden RC, Schaffner R, Gerber H, Neuhaus V, Inumaru S, Takamatsu H, Bertoni G, McCullough KC, Summerfield A: Porcine dendritic cells generated in vitro: morphological, phenotypic and functional properties. Immunology. 2001, 104: 175-184. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01299.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mussa T, Rodriguez-Carino C, Pujol M, Cordoba L, Busquets N, Crisci E, Dominguez J, Fraile L, Montoya M: Interaction of porcine conventional dendritic cells with swine influenza virus. Virology. 2011, 420: 125-134. 10.1016/j.virol.2011.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morozumi T, Nicolet J: Some antigenic properties of Haemophilus parasuis and a proposal for serological classification. J Clin Microbiol. 1986, 23: 1022-1025.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- ImageJ v1.42k software:http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij,
- Rodriguez-Carino C, Duffy C, Sanchez-Chardi A, McNeilly F, Allan GM, Segales J: Porcine circovirus type 2 morphogenesis in a clone derived from the l35 lymphoblastoid cell line. J Comp Pathol. 2011, 144: 91-102. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2010.07.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kekarainen T, Montoya M, Dominguez J, Mateu E, Segales J: Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) viral components immunomodulate recall antigen responses. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2008, 124: 41-49. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.01.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inaba K, Metlay JP, Crowley MT, Witmer-Pack M, Steinman RM: Dendritic cells as antigen presenting cells in vivo. Int Rev Immunol. 1990, 6: 197-206. 10.3109/08830189009056630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lecours MP, Segura M, Lachance C, Mussa T, Surprenant C, Montoya M, Gottschalk M: Characterization of porcine dendritic cell response to Streptococcus suis. Vet Res. 2011, 42: 72-10.1186/1297-9716-42-72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banks KE, Humphreys TL, Li W, Katz BP, Wilkes DS, Spinola SM: Haemophilus ducreyi partially activates human myeloid dendritic cells. Infect Immun. 2007, 75: 5678-5685. 10.1128/IAI.00702-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khatri M, Dwivedi V, Krakowka S, Manickam C, Ali A, Wang L, Qin Z, Renukaradhya GJ, Lee CW: Swine influenza H1N1 virus induces acute inflammatory immune responses in pig lungs: a potential animal model for human H1N1 influenza virus. J Virol. 2010, 84: 11210-11218. 10.1128/JVI.01211-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kapsenberg ML: Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003, 3: 984-993. 10.1038/nri1246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu J, Yamane H, Paul WE: Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*). Annu Rev Immunol. 2010, 28: 445-489. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101212.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bouchet B, Vanier G, Jacques M, Gottschalk M: Interactions of Haemophilus parasuis and its LOS with porcine brain microvascular endothelial cells. Vet Res. 2008, 39: 42-10.1051/vetres:2008019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bouchet B, Vanier G, Jacques M, Auger E, Gottschalk M: Studies on the interactions of Haemophilus parasuis with porcine epithelial tracheal cells: limited role of LOS in apoptosis and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. Microb Pathog. 2009, 46: 108-113. 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Garra A, Murphy KM: From IL-10 to IL-12: how pathogens and their products stimulate APCs to induce T(H)1 development. Nat Immunol. 2009, 10: 929-932. 10.1038/ni0909-929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martínez-Moliner V, Soler-Llorens P, Moleres J, Garmendia J, Aragon V: Distribuition of genes involved in sialic acid utilization in traisn of Haemophilus parasuis. Microbiology. 2012, 158: 2117-2124. 10.1099/mic.0.056994-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura S, Davis KM, Weiser JN: Synergistic stimulation of type I interferons during influenza virus coinfection promotes Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011, 121: 3657-3665. 10.1172/JCI57762.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Negishi H, Yanai H, Nakajima A, Koshiba R, Atarashi K, Matsuda A, Matsuki K, Miki S, Doi T, Aderem A, Nishio J, Smale ST, Honda K, Taniguchi T: Cross-interference of RLR and TLR signaling pathways modulates antibacterial T cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2012, 13: 659-666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.