Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The DHAV-1 protein VP1 interacts with PI3KC3 to induce autophagy through the PI3KC3 complex

Veterinary Research volume 53, Article number: 64 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Duck hepatitis A virus type 1 (DHAV-1) is one of the main pathogens responsible for death in ducklings. Autophagy is a catabolic process that maintains cellular homeostasis, and the PI3KC3 protein plays an important role in the initiation of autophagy. DHAV-1 infection induces autophagy in duck embryo fibroblasts (DEFs) but the molecular mechanism between it and autophagy has not been reported. First, we determined that DHAV-1 infection induces autophagy in DEFs and that autophagy induction is dependent on the integrity of viral proteins by infecting DEFs with UV-inactivated or heat-inactivated DHAV-1. Then, in experiments using the pharmacological autophagy inducer rapamycin and the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine, autophagy inhibition was shown to reduce intracellular and extracellular DHAV-1 genome copies and viral titres. These results suggest that autophagy activated by DHAV-1 infection in DEFs affects DHAV-1 proliferation and extracellular release. Next, we screened the autophagy-inducing effects of the DHAV-1 structural proteins VP0, VP3, and VP1 and found that all DHAV-1 structural proteins could induce autophagy in DEFs but not the full autophagic flux. Finally, we found that VP1 promotes protein expression of PI3KC3 and Beclin1 by western blot experiments and that VP1 interacts with PI3KC3 by co-immunoprecipitation experiments; moreover, 3-MA-induced knockdown of PI3KC3 inhibited VP1 protein-induced autophagy in DEFs. In conclusion, the DHAV-1 structural protein VP1 regulates the PI3KC3 complex by interacting with PI3KC3 to induce autophagy in DEFs.

Introduction

Duck hepatitis A virus type 1 (DHAV-1), Avihepatovirus genus, Picornaviridae family, is one of the most common highly lethal hepatitis pathogens in ducklings [1,2,3]. The genome of DHAV-1 is a single, positive-stranded RNA and contains an open reading frame (ORF) that encodes an inactive precursor protein [4]. After multiple cleavage steps, the precursor protein produces the structural protein P1 region (capsid protein VP0, VP1 and VP3) and the nonstructural proteins P2 region (2A, 2B and 2C proteins) and P3 region (3A, 3B, 3C and 3D proteins) [5,6,7,8,9,10].

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved pathway involved in cellular homeostasis and organelle renewal in eukaryotes [11]. Under regulation by autophagy-related genes (ATGs), double membranes enclose damaged or dysfunctional cytoplasmic components to form autophagosomes, which eventually fuse with lysosomes to form autolysosomes, achieving autophagic degradation [12, 13]. The basal level of autophagy is quite low but essential in the normal physiological state; however, the autophagy mechanism is rapidly up-regulated under starvation, hypoxia, and microbial invasion, including by bacteria and viruses [11, 14]. Activated autophagy functions to identify and eliminate pathogen-associated molecular patterns for cellular defence. Additionally, autophagy provides conditions such as substances and sites for viral replication and viral extracellular release, thus promoting persistent viral infection [15,16,17]. Regarding the pathogenesis of DHAV-1 [18], the diagnosis [19,20,21,22], immune molecular epidemiology [23, 24] and some gene functions [25] have been reported, though the interplay between autophagy and DHAV-1 infection remains unexplored.

In the present study, we sought to elucidate the effect of DHAV-1 infection on autophagy, to assess whether autophagy induction affects viral replication, and to determine the molecular mechanism by which DHAV-1 induces autophagy in duck embryo fibroblasts (DEFs). First, we monitored autophagosome formation following DHAV-1 infection and examined DHAV-1 genome copies and viral titres after pharmacological autophagy induction and inhibition. The structural proteins of DHAV-1 were then examined for autophagosomes, autophagolysosomes and PI3KC3 complexes. The results of this study confirm that autophagy activation in DEFs is dependent on DHAV-1 viral replication, and that autophagy activation can promote DHAV-1 proliferation and viral particle release from the intracellular to the extracellular space. Furthermore, the DHAV-1 structural protein VP1 interacts with the PI3KC3 protein to induce autophagy in DEFs through the PI3KC3 complex.

Materials and methods

Cells, virus strain, serum samples and plasmids

DEFs were extracted from specific pathogen-free 9- to 11-day-old duck embryos and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, 11995065, GIBCO) containing 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, 10091148, GIBCO) to a cell density of approximately 90%. DHAV-1 strain H (GenBank Accession Number: JQ301467.1) is maintained in our laboratory, and its complete genome is available at GenBank. Duck anti-DHAV-1-VP3, rabbit anti-DHAV-1-VP1 or duck anti-DHAV-1 serum samples and DHAV-1 structural protein eukaryotic expression, GFP-LC3 and pmCherry-GFP-LC3 plasmids are also stored in our laboratory. To obtain a non-replicable DHAV-1 strain, DHAV-1 was inactivated at 100 °C for 1 h or exposed to UV light for 3 h with regular gentle shaking. Loss of infectivity was confirmed by detection of viral genome copies and titres.

Virus infection and drug treatment

DHAV-1 was propagated in DEFs in serum-free DMEM for 2 h; the cells were then washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and cultured in DMEM containing 2% FBS until harvest. For autophagy induction and inhibition assays, cells were pretreated with serum-free DMEM for 8 h, 100 nmol/L rapamycin (RAPA, V900930, Sigma) for 4 h or 50 μmol/L chloroquine (CQ, C6628, Sigma) for 24 h [26] or 3-methyladenine (3-MA, 110721, MedChemExpress) treatment for 12 h. An equal amount of DMEM was used as a control. Drug toxicity testing was performed using WST-1-Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (C0035, Beyotime).

Western blot analysis

To assess whether DHAV-1 infection and the DHAV-1 protein induce autophagy and autophagic flux in DEFs, we investigated expression of the autophagy marker protein LC3 and the autophagy substrate protein SQSTM1/p62 by western blotting. DHAV-1-infected target cells were washed 3 times with pre-chilled PBS and lysed with cell lysis buffer (P0013, Beyotime) and protease inhibitors (ST506, Beyotime). The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration of the supernatant was determined using TaKaRa Bradford Protein Assay Kit (T9310A, Takara). Protein samples containing 2× loading buffer were boiled for 30 min, analysed by 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE), and transferred to 0.22-µm nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 2.5 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-LC3B (L7543, Sigma), rabbit anti-SQSTM1/p62 (P0067, Sigma), mouse anti-Flag monoclonal (M185-3, MBL), mouse anti-β-actin (58169, CST), duck anti-DHAV-1-VP3, rabbit anti-DHAV-1-VP1 or duck anti-DHAV-1 antibodies, overnight at 4 °C. After washing 3 times with Tris-buffered saline and Tween (TBST) buffer for 1 h, the membrane was incubated with secondary antibodies, including goat anti-rabbit IgG (e62218, KPL), goat anti-mouse IgG (8890, CST) or goat anti-duck IgG (042506, KPL), for 2 h at room temperature. Detection was performed using HRP chemiluminescence (T7101A, Takara) and the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP system. ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) was used to analyse and quantify the protein content.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

To observe the microstructure of autophagosomes, DEFs in 100-mm culture dishes were harvested at 48 h after DHAV-1 infection, and mock cells served as controls. The samples were harvested according to the processing method of Lilai Biotechnology for TEM. Images of ultrathin sections were observed and collected using an H-600IV TEM (Hitachi, Japan). The amount of GFP-LC3 puncta among 50 cells was counted for each group.

Fluorescence microscopy

To observe formation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes, the GFP-LC3 or pmCherry-GFP-LC3 plasmid was transfected into DEFs using Lipofectamine™ 2000 Transfection Reagent (11668019, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 24 h followed by treatment with DHAV-1 or the DHAV-1 structural protein or RAPA. Mock-infected cells were used as controls. The cell samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at 4 °C and then stained with 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride (DAPI, C1002, Beyotime) for 30 min at 37 °C. LC3 puncta were visualized under a Carl Zeiss confocal microscope (Axio Imager A2, Germany).

Real-time quantitative PCR (RT–qPCR)

Specific primers for the GenBank database DEF gene ATG5 (NW_004678004.1) were designed by Primer Premier 5.0; the upstream primer is 5′-GAAGCCGAGCCTTACTATTT-3′, and the downstream primer is 5′-AAACCAATCGGGTAATGCCA-3′. Primers for qRT-PCR detection of virus copy number and the internal reference gene of DEFs are as described in the reference [20]. RNA was extracted using RNAiso Plus (9109, Takara) and reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript™ RT kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047A, Takara). The target gene was amplified by RT–qPCR using the above specific primers.

To examine the effect of DHAV-1 infection on ATG5 transcript levels, DEFs were treated with starvation (medium without FBS), CQ, or DHAV-1, as described above. Cell samples were harvested and ATG5 transcript levels were detected using relative RT-qPCR. To examine the effect of autophagy on DHAV-1 proliferation, DEFs were treated with RAPA, CQ, or equivalent medium, as described, before DHAV-1 infection. RNA was extracted and reverse-transcribed by RT–qPCR for detection of viral genome copies. RT–qPCR was performed using CFX ConnectTM Optical Module Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA).

Tissue culture infective dose

The effect of autophagy induction on DHAV-1 proliferation was measured by using the TCID50 method. In a 96-well plate (AB0751, Thermo Fisher Scientific), DEFs were infected with serially diluted DHAV-1 from 10–1 to 10–10 and cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2, and lesions were observed continuously. Eight replicates were established for each dilution. Viral titres were calculated according to the Reed-Muench method.

Coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) analysis

For Co-IP assays, cell lysates were incubated with anti-HA-Tag or anti-Flag-Tag mAb overnight in a rolling incubator at 4 °C. The mixture was then incubated with protein A + G agarose gel (purchased from Bio-Rad) at 4 °C for 4 h, washed 5 times with 1% Triton PBS buffer, and subjected to immunoblot analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Three biological replicates were performed for each experiment. Differences between two groups were analysed using Student’s t test, and results are presented as P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**) or P < 0.001 (***); “ns” indicates no significant difference.

Results

Autophagy is induced by DHAV-1 infection in DEFs

Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3; also known as MAP1LC3) is an autophagy marker that exists in two forms: cytoplasmic LC3-I and membrane-bound LC3-II [16, 27, 28]. Under ATGs regulation, LC3 precursors are first processed into LC3-I with exposed glycine residues at the carboxyl end, which bind to LC3-II with phosphatidylethanolamine [29]. Therefore, LC3-II anchored at the autophagosome membrane is an index of autophagy. After culturing DEFs with DHAV-1 at various multiplicities of infection (MOIs) for a given period of time, lipidation of the LC3 protein and expression of the DHAV-1 VP3 protein were detected by western blot using appropriate antibodies. The VP3 protein results suggested that DHAV-1 infection was successful and proportional to the amount of virus added. The LC3 protein results suggested that LC3-I could be induced to become lipidated to LC3-II; the greatest effect was observed at 1 MOI of DHAV-1 (Figure 1A, B). The relative expression level of LC3-II in the DHAV-1 infection group was much higher than that in the control group at 48 h after infection, but there was no significant difference between these groups at the other designated times (Figure 1C, D). The infection condition of 1 MOI DHAV-1 for 48 h was used for subsequent experiments. Single- and double-membrane autophagosome-like vesicles were observed in DHAV-1-infected DEFs by TEM, whereas mock-infected cells showed no such cytoplasmic vesicles (Figure 1E). To verify autophagy activation in DHAV-1-infected cells, the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-LC3 plasmid was transfected into DEFs infected with DHAV-1, with uninfected cells used as controls, and the dot formation of the GFP-LC3 fusion protein was investigated. Unlike the GFP-LC3 distribution in control cells, the GFP-LC3 protein in the DHAV-1-infected cells aggregated into bright dots (Figure 1F, G), indicating that DHAV-1 infection induced formation of autophagosomes.

Figure 1
figure 1

DHAV-1 infection induced autophagy in DEFs. A DEFs were or were not infected with 0.01–10 MOI DHAV-1, as described in Materials and methods. Samples were harvested from three biological replicates at the indicated times, and LC3, VP3 and β-actin protein expression was detected by western blot with specific antibodies. B Relative expression levels of targeted proteins were quantified and analysed. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Differences between two groups were analysed using Student’s t test and are presented as P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**) and P < 0.001 (***). C DEFs were or were not infected with 1 MOI DHAV-1 for 12 h, 24 h or 48 h and harvested to detect expression of targeted proteins by western blot with specific antibodies. Three biological replicates were performed and tested. D Protein expression ratios of LC3-II/β-actin were quantified and analysed. Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Differences between two groups were analysed using Student’s t test and are presented as P < 0.05 (*) and P < 0.001 (***). E DEFs were or were not infected with 1 MOI DHAV-1 for 48 h and observed by TEM. The blue arrows indicate single- or double-membrane autophagosome-like vesicles. F DEFs transfected with GFP-LC3 plasmid were mock infected or infected with DHAV-1 in the absence or presence of 100 nmol/L RAPA, and GFP-LC3 puncta were observed by fluorescence microscopy. Blue, DAPI staining of nuclei; green, GFP-LC3 puncta. Scale bar, 25 μm. G The number of LC3-positive puncta per cell was calculated and is presented as the mean ± SD of three replicates per group. Differences between two groups were analysed using Student’s t test and are presented as P < 0.001 (***). H The relative transcription level of the ATG5 gene was detected by RT–qPCR in the absence or presence of NBS, CQ (50 μmol/L) or DHAV-1 (MOI = 1) for the indicated times, with three replicates per group. RAPA, rapamycin; CQ, chloroquine.

Full size image

Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy restrains DHAV-1 proliferation and viral release

The effects of the drugs used in this study on cell viability were detected by the WST-1 assay. The viability of DEFs treated with drugs and drug solvents was not significantly different from that of the mock-treated cells (Figure 2A), suggesting that the pharmacological treatment did not affect cell viability. Autophagic cells can produce extracellular microvesicles (EMVs) through the action of ATG5 and provide sites for replication of picornavirus and related proteins, thus promoting viral replication and proliferation. To explore the relationship between autophagy and DHAV-1 replication, an RT–qPCR standard curve of the DHAV-1 structural protein VP0 was established to detect the effects of an autophagy inhibitor and an agonist on the number of DHAV-1 viral copies. Compared with DHAV-1 infection alone, RAPA treatment increased the number of intracellular and extracellular viral copies, though CQ treatment significantly reduced the number (Figure 2B, C), suggesting that autophagy induction promotes DHAV-1 replication and that autophagy inhibition decreases DHAV-1 replication. Additionally, autophagy promoted DHAV-1 release, as evidenced by the contrasting numbers of intracellular and extracellular viral proteins in each group (Figure 2B–D). When CQ-treated or untreated DEFs were cultured for 6 h, 12 h, 18 h, 24 h, 36 h, or 48 h, the viral titres of the CQ-treated group were always lower than those of the untreated group, as determined by the TCID50 method. The numerical difference was related to the length of DHAV-1 infection and was greatest at 36 h after DHAV-1 infection (Figure 2E, F).

Figure 2
figure 2

Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy restrained DHAV-1 proliferation and viral release. A Pharmacology did not affect cell viability. After DEFs were treated with 100 nmol/L RAPA, 50 μmol/L CQ or the solvent DMSO, as described in Materials and methods, the cell viability of each group was assessed by the WST-1 assay. The optical density of sample wells was determined at 450 nm (OD450) and normalized to the optical density of the blank well. Data shown represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. “ns” indicates no significant difference, P > 0.05. B–D After pretreatment with CQ (50 μmol/L) or RAPA (100 nmol/L) or no pretreatment, DEFs were infected with DHAV-1, and the number of extracellular and intracellular DHAV-1 viral copies was detected by RT–qPCR. All data were derived from three separate sets of experiments. E, F DEFs were treated with 50 μmol/L CQ before DHAV-1 infection, the cells were observed, and cytotoxic effects were recorded. Viral titres were calculated and are expressed as TCID50 per mL. Differences between two groups were analysed using Student’s t test and are presented as P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**) and P < 0.001 (***).

Full size image

A DHAV-1 structural protein promotes induction of autophagy but not intact autophagic flux in DEFs

It has been demonstrated that DHAV-1 can induce autophagy in DEFs. To further explore the molecular mechanism by which autophagy is induced in DEFs, we evaluated the DHAV-1 structural protein. First, conversion of LC3 was detected by western blot, and the structural proteins VP0, VP1 and VP3 of DHAV-1 promoted LC3 conversion from LC3-I to LC3-II (Figure 3A, B). The results of IFA experiments showed that VP0, VP1 and VP3 promote GFP-LC3, with obvious punctate aggregation (Figure 3C), indicating that DHAV-1 structural proteins induce autophagy in DEFs.

Figure 3
figure 3

The DHAV-1 structural protein promotes induction of autophagy but not intact autophagic flux in DEFs. A VP0, VP3 and VP1 proteins were expressed in DEFs, and expression of the SQSTM1/p62 protein and transformation of the LC3 protein were detected by western blot. B Grey value analysis of changes in LC3 conversion levels after VP0, VP3 and VP1 proteins were expressed in DEFs, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. C GFP-LC3 was co-transfected with the VP0, VP3 and VP1 protein plasmids into DEFs. After samples were collected and fixed, protein expression levels of VP0, VP3 and VP1 were detected by labelling antibodies, and punctate aggregation of LC3 was observed by microscopy. D Using the pmCherry-GFP-LC3 dual-fluorescence system, the VP0, VP3 and VP1 proteins were expressed in DEFs, and green fluorescence and red fluorescence were observed under a microscope. E Grey value analysis of changes in SQSTM1/p62 protein levels after expression of VP0, VP3 and VP1 proteins in DEFs; ns indicates no difference, **P < 0.01.

Full size image

Autophagy flux is a dynamic and continuous process that involves formation of autophagosomes, transfer of autophagy substrates to lysosomes and substrate degradation in lysosomes in vivo [26, 30]. Both autophagy activation and autolysosome formation inhibition can result in autophagosome accumulation, and we detected autophagic flux to explore the cause of autophagy in DHAV-1-infected DEFs.

The dual fluorescence system pmCherry-GFP-LC3 is a more reliable method for quantitative autophagy analysis than the GFP-LC3 system. EGFP is sensitive to a low-pH environment, whereas the pmCherry protein is resistant to an acidic environment. When autophagy is induced, pmCherry-GFP-LC3 is expressed in cells anchored to autolysosomes, and EGFP is quenched; thus, yellow-labelled autophagosomes and red-labelled autolysosomes are observed [30, 31]. The number of these yellow and red spots increases when autophagic flux increases. Samples were collected for indirect immunofluorescence experiments at 36 h after co-transfection with pmCherry-GFP-LC3 and DHAV-1 structural protein plasmids. Microscopy observation showed that RAPA promoted LC3 punctate aggregation and more red fluorescence; however, the DHAV-1 structural protein promoted LC3 punctate aggregation but more yellow fluorescence than red fluorescence (Figure 3D). This indicates that the DHAV-1 structural protein may not promote complete autophagic flow in DEFs.

The SQSTM1/p62 protein, an autophagy degradation substrate, targets ubiquitinated substrates to autophagosomes via LC3, resulting in autolysosome-mediated degradation of SQSTM1/p62 proteins and ubiquitinated substrates and maintaining cellular homeostasis [32]. Therefore, expression of SQSTM1/p62 protein indicates autophagy flux. The DHAV-1 structural protein was transfected into DEFs; RAPA treatment and pCAGGS transfection were used as controls. The expression level of SQSTM1/p62 protein was then determined by western blot (Figure 3A, E). RAPA treatment down-regulated SQSTM1/p62 protein expression. However, transfection of pCAGGS with DHAV-1 structural protein led to no significant changes in the SQSTM1/p62 protein. These results suggest that the DHAV-1 structural protein has no effect on the level of autophagic flux in DEFs.

The DHAV-1 VP1 protein induces autophagy in DEFs via the PI3KC3 complex

The PI3KC3 complex, which is mainly composed of Vps34, p150 and Beclin1 proteins, is crucial for regulation of autophagy [33, 34]. Hence, we examined the effects of DHAV-1 structural proteins on expression of PI3KC3 and Beclin1 proteins and observed that VP3 protein had no significant effect (Figure 4B, E), indicating that VP3 induces autophagy in DEFs without PI3KC3 complex involvement. Although the VP0 protein increased expression of PI3KC3, it had no effect on Beclin1 (Figure 4A, D), indicating that VP0 induces autophagy in DEFs independent of the PI3KC3 complex. VP1 also increased expression levels of PI3KC3 and Beclin1 proteins (Figure 4C, F), indicating that VP1 induces autophagy in DEFs through the PI3KC3 complex.

Figure 4
figure 4

The DHAV-1 VP1 protein induces autophagy in DEFs via the PI3KC3 complex. A–C VP0, VP3 and VP1 protein plasmids were transfected into DEFs, and protein expression levels of p-AKT, AKT, PI3KC3 and Beclin1 were detected by western blot. D–F Grey value analysis of western blot results of p-AKT, AKT, PI3KC3 and Beclin1 in DEFs after transfection of VP0, VP3 and VP1 protein plasmids; ns indicates no significant difference, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Full size image

The VP1 protein interacts with the PI3KC3 protein

DHAV infection up-regulates PI3KC3 protein expression, but its molecular mechanism has not been reported [35]. As our experiments demonstrate that the VP1 protein induces autophagy through the PI3KC3 complex, we constructed a pCAGGS-PI3KC3-HA eukaryotic expression plasmid and explored the interaction between VP1 protein and PI3KC3 protein by Co-IP experiments. The results showed an interaction between these proteins (Figure 5A, B).

Figure 5
figure 5

The VP1 protein interacts with the PI3KC3 protein. A VP1-Flag and PI3KC3-HA plasmids were co-transfected into DEFs, cell lysates were subjected to Co-IP assays with a Flag-tagged antibody or normal IgG as negative controls, and co-immunoprecipitated proteins were detected by western blot analysis. B VP1-Flag and PI3KC3-HA plasmids were co-transfected into DEFs, cell lysates were subjected to a Co-IP assay with an HA-labelled antibody or normal IgG as negative controls, and co-immunoprecipitated proteins were detected by western blot analysis. C DEFs were treated with 3-MA, and transformation of the PI3KC3 complex and LC3 were detected by western blotting. D Grey value analysis of transformation changes of the PI3KC3 complex and LC3 after 3-MA drug treatment; ns indicates no difference, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Full size image

To further study the effect of PI3KC3 protein on VP1 protein-induced autophagy in DEFs, cells were treated with the PI3KC3 protein inhibitor 3-MA drug and transfected with a VP1 protein plasmid. Western blot assays were used to detect transformation of the PI3KC3 protein, Beclin1 protein and LC3. The results showed that 3-MA treatment significantly reduced expression of PI3KC3 and Beclin1; transformation of LC3 was also inhibited (Figure 5C, D), indicating that 3-MA-mediated knockdown of PI3KC3 inhibits VP1 protein-induced DEF self-regulation.

Discussion

Autophagy is a highly conserved eukaryotic biological process that maintains cellular homeostasis through self-repair and renewal; as a host defence mechanism, autophagy promotes resistance to pathogen infection [36,37,38]. On the other hand, autophagy provides pathogen replication sites, materials and release pathways to promote pathogen proliferation as well as persistent infection [39, 40]. DHAV-1 is one of the most common highly lethal hepatitis pathogens in ducklings, with serious consequences [3]. However, the molecular mechanistic relationship between autophagy and DHAV-1 infection has remained unclear. In this study, we first demonstrated that DHAV-1 infection induces autophagy in DEFs and that pharmacological inhibition of autophagy inhibits DHAV-1 proliferation and extracellular release. We then showed that the DHAV-1 structural protein can induce autophagy in DEFs, and it was found that VP1 affects the PI3KC3 complex by interacting with the PI3KC3 protein, thereby inducing autophagy in DEFs.

Within a certain range, autophagy induction is directly proportional to the dose and duration of viral infection [41, 42]. For instance, autophagy in DEFs is consistently enhanced with 0.1–10 MOI of duck plague virus (DPV). Intracellular vesicle acidification promotes maturation of infectious poliovirus particles. The gene ICP34.5 of herpes simplex virus 1 inhibits autophagy in host cells, whereas autophagy is activated with high-dose virus infection [43, 44]. In this study, the level of autophagy continued to increase in DEFs within the range of DHAV-1 MOI 0.01–1, but the degree of increase in autophagy was reduced at 10 MOI. Autophagy induction also correlates with viral infection time. Autophagy induced by DPV infection showed a change with prolonged infection, gradually increasing from 12 to 48 h post infection but decreasing from 48 to 72 h [26]. Diverse picornaviruses, including foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), invade by specifically recognizing and binding with cell surface receptors and rely on the ATG5 pathway to induce autophagy at the early stage of infection [45]. Our study showed that the transcriptional level of the ATG5 gene was increased during DHAV-1 infection, indicating high levels of autophagy. As anti-LC3 antibodies recognize LC3-II more efficiently than LC3-I, LC3-II expression values are often used to indicate autophagy levels after Western blot scanning and band quantification [46, 47]. LC3 became lipidated from LC3-I to LC3-II at 48 h after DHAV-1 infection compared to the preinfection period. In the presence of DHAV-1 infection, fluorescently labelled GFP-LC3 proteins aggregated as bright spots. During this process, the autophagosome precursor continues to extend, wrapping cytoplasmic components in the membrane to form a closed spherical structure called the autophagosome [32]. In this study, single- and double-membrane autophagosome vesicles were observed in DHAV-1-infected DEFs. In conclusion, DHAV-1 infection can induce autophagy in DEFs.

Viral infection in host cells comprises three stages: the infection stage of adsorption and penetration; the proliferation stage of uncoating and biosynthesis; and the mature stage of assembly and release [48, 49]. Identifying the stage at which viral infection induces autophagy has long been a hot research topic. High-temperature treatment and UV irradiation are the two most common methods to inactivate pathogens [50, 51]. A series of studies determined that heat-inactivated virus cannot induce autophagy and concluded that autophagy induction depends on viral replication [12, 17, 52]. However, these studies did not involve any experiments with UV-inactivated virus [44, 53]. In this study, UV-inactivated DHAV-1 still induced autophagy in host cells, though heat-inactivated DHAV-1 did not, and the structure and function of DHAV-1 viral proteins was thus associated with autophagy induction rather than viral activity. The causes and mechanisms need to be further explored.

The role of autophagy in viral replication has always been controversial. In addition to its role as a natural barrier against pathogenic infection, autophagy benefits viral replication, proliferation and extracellular release [54,55,56,57,58]. Our results showed that an autophagy inducer could increase the number of extracellular and intracellular viral genome copies. Cell lysis is a traditional viral release pathway. However, autophagosome-mediated exit without lysis represents a new release pathway for enteroviruses such as PV and CV [39, 49, 58]. Compared with the control group and DHAV-1-infected group, RAPA treatment resulted in the largest differences in intracellular and extracellular viral genome copies and the closest extracellular and the total cellular (intracellular plus extracellular) genome copies; thus, autophagy promotes intracellular to extracellular viral particle release. Berryman et al. [12] reported that inhibition of autophagy caused by knocking down the ATG5 gene restrains FMDV replication. In our study, we blocked autophagy via CQ treatment, which inhibited fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, after which we then infected cells with replication-competent DHAV-1. The TCID50 results showed that viral titres were significantly decreased by CQ treatment, indicating that autophagy inhibition indeed restrains DHAV-1 proliferation. These results suggest that autophagy induction benefits DHAV-1 proliferation and extracellular release.

The structural proteins of picornaviruses can activate autophagy rapidly; the VP1 protein is currently the most widely reported such protein. VP1 of picornaviruses induces LC3-I lipidation to LC3-II and thus colocalizes with LC3-II in autophagosomes, suggesting that the VP1 protein induces autophagy in host cells such as EV71 [15, 59]. In this study, expression of the DHAV-1 structural proteins VP0, VP1 and VP3 increased LC3 lipidation and induced autophagosome formation. When determining the cause of autophagosome accumulation, autophagy flux is a more accurate indicator than autophagosome detection. Among tracer proteins, GFP is very sensitive, and when autolysosomes form, the internal acidity quenches the green fluorescence of GFP. Our results indicate that the fluorescence of the pmCherry protein remained unchanged but that GFP was quenched in DEFs transfected with the pmCherry-GFP-LC3 plasmid. In this study, the DHAV-1 structural protein and pmCherry-GFP-LC3 plasmids were co-transfected. Microscopic observation showed that GFP expressed with the DHAV-1 structural protein was not significantly quenched, indicating that autophagy–lysosome formation was blocked. During autolysosomal degradation, the SQSTM1/p62 protein targets ubiquitinated substrates to autophagosomes through LC3, ultimately leading to degradation of SQSTM1/p62 and ubiquitinated substrates in autophagosomes, thereby maintaining the intracellular steady state [32]. Therefore, the level of SQSTM1/p62 protein expression can be used to monitor autophagic flux. We found that the DHAV-1 structural protein blocks degradation of SQSTM1/p62. These results suggest that the DHAV-1 structural protein induces autophagy but not full autophagic flux in DEFs.

The PI3KC3 family is divided into three categories, among which the class I lipid kinase class (PI3KC1) is the upstream activator of protein kinase B (Akt) and forms PI3K/AKT/mTOR with the downstream gene mTOR of AKT to inhibit autophagy [60]. Class III lipid kinase (PI3KC3, also known as VPS34) forms a PI3KC3 complex with the autophagy-related protein Beclin-1, which is essential for autophagosome formation [61]. 3-MA has been used in the study of autophagy as a broad inhibitor of PI3KC3. In this study, AKT, PI3KC3 and Beclin1 were detected, and the DHAV-1 structural protein did not affect the protein level or phosphorylation level of AKT, indicating that it induces autophagy in DEFs without AKT-related signalling. The structural protein VP1 of DHAV-1 promotes expression of PI3KC3 and Beclin1 proteins, whereas the structural proteins VP0 and VP3 do not affect the PI3KC3 complex, indicating that VP1 induces autophagy through the PI3KC3 complex but that VP0 and VP3 do not. The complex induces autophagy in DEFs, and we continued to explore the molecular mechanism of VP1 protein-induced autophagy in DEFs. Co-IP experiments showed that the VP1 protein interacts with the PI3KC3 protein. Using 3-MA treatment, VP1-induced LC3 conversion was also blocked after PI3KC3 was inhibited. These results suggest that the host protein PI3KC3 interacts with the VP1 protein and promotes VP1 protein-induced autophagy in DEFs.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that autophagy induction is dependent on the integrity of the DHAV-1 viral protein and promotes the proliferation and extracellular release of DHAV-1 in DEFs. It was also found that the DHAV-1 structural protein VP1 induces autophagy in DEFs by interacting with the host protein PI3KC3 to regulate the PI3KC3 complex. This study provides a new perspective for basic research materials on DHAV-1-host interactions and antiviral strategies and drug control.

References

  1. Ou X, Mao S, Cao J, Ma Y, Ma G, Cheng A, Wang M, Zhu D, Chen S, Jia R, Liu M, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen X (2017) The neglected avian hepatotropic virus induces acute and chronic hepatitis in ducks: an alternative model for hepatology. Oncotarget 8:81838–81851

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie J, Wang M, Cheng A, Zhao XX, Liu M, Zhu D, Chen S, Jia R, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhang S, Liu Y, Yu Y, Zhang L, Sun K, Chen X (2020) Author correction: cytokine storms are primarily responsible for the rapid death of ducklings infected with duck hepatitis A virus type 1. Sci Rep 10:5672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie J, Zeng Q, Wang M, Ou X, Ma Y, Cheng A, Zhao XX, Liu M, Zhu D, Chen S, Jia R, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhang S, Liu Y, Yu Y, Zhang L, Chen X (2018) Transcriptomic characterization of a chicken embryo model infected with duck hepatitis A virus type 1. Front Immunol 9:1845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wen X, Cheng A, Wang M, Jia R, Zhu D, Chen S, Liu M, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen X (2015) Recent advances from studies on the role of structural proteins in enterovirus infection. Future Microbiol 10:1529–1542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao Q, Cheng A, Wang M (2013) Bioinformatic analysis of the 3D polyprotein from duck hepatitis a virus strain h isolated in china. Adv Mat Res 647:396–402

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cao J, Ou X, Zhu D, Ma G, Cheng A, Wang M, Chen S, Jia R, Liu M, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen X (2016) The 2A2 protein of duck hepatitis A virus type 1 induces apoptosis in primary cell culture. Virus Genes 52:780–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun D, Chen S, Cheng A, Wang M (2016) Roles of the picornaviral 3C proteinase in the viral life cycle and host cells. Viruses 8:82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun D, Wang M, Wen X, Cheng A, Jia R, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhu D, Chen S, Liu M, Zhao X, Chen X (2017) Cleavage of poly(A)-binding protein by duck hepatitis A virus 3C protease. Sci Rep 7:16261

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang X, Cheng A, Wang M, Jia R, Sun K, Pan K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhu D, Chen S, Liu M, Zhao XX, Chen X (2017) Structures and corresponding functions of five types of picornaviral 2A proteins. Front Microbiol 8:1373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y, Cao Q, Wang M, Jia R, Chen S, Zhu D, Liu M, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhao X, Chen X, Cheng A (2017) The 3D protein of duck hepatitis A virus type 1 binds to a viral genomic 3′ UTR and shows RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity. Virus Genes 53:831–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu TT, Li WM, Yao YM (2016) Interactions between autophagy and inhibitory cytokines. Int J Biol Sci 12:884–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Berryman S, Brooks E, Burman A, Hawes P, Roberts R, Netherton C, Monaghan P, Whelband M, Cottam E, Elazar Z, Jackson T, Wileman T (2012) Foot-and-mouth disease virus induces autophagosomes during cell entry via a class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent pathway. J Virol 86:12940–12953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu H, Zhai X, Chen Y, Wang R, Lin L, Chen S, Wang T, Zhong X, Wu X, Wang Y, Zhang F, Zhao W, Zhong Z (2016) Protein 2B of coxsackievirus B3 induces autophagy relying on its transmembrane hydrophobic sequences. Viruses 8:131

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Y, Yu S, Ding N, Meng C, Meng S, Zhang S, Zhan Y, Qiu X, Tan L, Chen H, Song C, Ding C (2014) Autophagy benefits the replication of Newcastle disease virus in chicken cells and tissues. J Virol 88:525–537

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu Y, Xu W, Chen D, Feng C, Zhang L, Wang X, Lv X, Zheng N, Jin Y, Wu Z (2015) Enterovirus 71 induces autophagy by regulating has-miR-30a expression to promote viral replication. Antiviral Res 124:43–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li C, Fu X, Lin Q, Liu L, Liang H, Huang Z, Li N (2017) Autophagy promoted infectious kidney and spleen necrosis virus replication and decreased infectious virus yields in CPB cell line. Fish Shellfish Immunol 60:25–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Li Z, Ge X, Guo X, Yang H (2011) Autophagy promotes the replication of encephalomyocarditis virus in host cells. Autophagy 7:613–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Song C, Yu S, Duan Y, Hu Y, Qiu X, Tan L, Sun Y, Wang M, Cheng A, Ding C (2014) Effect of age on the pathogenesis of DHV-1 in pekin ducks and on the innate immune responses of ducks to infection. Arch Virol 159:905–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng A, Wang M, Xin H, Zhu D, Li X, Chen H, Jia R, Yang M (2009) Development and application of a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction to detect Chinese isolates of duck hepatitis virus type 1. J Microbiol Methods 76:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu Q, Zhu D, Ma G, Cheng A, Wang M, Chen S, Jia R, Liu M, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen X (2016) A one-step duplex rRT-PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of duck hepatitis a virus genotypes 1 and 3. J Virol Methods 236:207–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mao S, Ou X, Zhu D, Chen S, Ma G, Wang M, Jia R, Liu M, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen X, Cheng A (2016) Development and evaluation of indirect ELISAs for the detection of IgG, IgM and IgA1 against duck hepatitis a virus 1. J Virol Methods 237:79–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Cao Y, Wang M, Cheng A, Ou X, Mao S, Sun D, Liu M, Zhang S, Zhao XX, Jia R, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhu D, Chen S, Huang J, Gao Q, Tian B (2022) Development of an indirect ELISA method based on the VP4 protein for detection antibody against duck hepatitis A virus type 1. J Virol Methods 300:114393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mao S, Wang M, Ou X, Sun D, Cheng A, Zhu D, Chen S, Jia R, Liu M, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhao X, Chen X (2017) Virologic and immunologic characteristics in mature ducks with acute duck hepatitis A virus 1 infection. Front Immunol 8:1574

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wen X, Zhu D, Cheng A, Wang M, Chen S, Jia R, Liu M, Sun K, Zhao X, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen X (2018) Molecular epidemiology of duck hepatitis A virus types 1 and 3 in China, 2010–2015. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:10–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang X, Zeng Q, Wang M, Cheng A, Pan K, Zhu D, Liu M, Jia R, Yang Q, Wu Y, Chen S, Zhao X, Zhang S, Liu Y, Yu Y, Zhang L (2018) DHAV-1 2A1 peptide—a newly discovered co-expression tool that mediates the ribosomal “skipping” function. Front Microbiol 9:2727

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yin HC, Zhao LL, Li SQ, Niu YJ, Jiang XJ, Xu LJ, Lu TF, Han LX, Liu SW, Chen HY (2017) Autophagy activated by duck enteritis virus infection positively affects its replication. J Gen Virol 98:486–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ding N, Zhao K, Lan Y, Li Z, Lv X, Su J, Lu H, Gao F, He W (2017) Induction of atypical autophagy by porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus contributes to viral replication. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li M, Li J, Zeng R, Yang J, Liu J, Zhang Z, Song X, Yao Z, Ma C, Li W, Wang K, Wei L (2018) Respiratory syncytial virus replication is promoted by autophagy-mediated inhibition of apoptosis. J Virol 92:e02193-e2217

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li X, He S, Ma B (2020) Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in cancer. Mol Cancer 19:12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B (2010) Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140:313–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Klionsky DJ, Abdel-Aziz AK, Abdelfatah S, Abdellatif M, Abdoli A, Abel S, Abeliovich H, Abildgaard MH, Abudu YP, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adamopoulos IE, Adeli K, Adolph TE, Adornetto A, Aflaki E, Agam G, Agarwal A, Aggarwal B, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Agrewala JN, Agrotis A, Aguilar PV, Ahmad ST, Ahmed ZM, Ahumada-Castro U, Aits S, Aizawa S, Akkoc Y, Akoumianaki T et al (2021) Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition). Autophagy 17:1–382

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hou L, Ge X, Xin L, Zhou L, Guo X, Yang H (2014) Nonstructural proteins 2C and 3D are involved in autophagy as induced by the encephalomyocarditis virus. Virol J 11:156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Funderburk SF, Wang QJ, Yue Z (2010) The beclin 1-VPS34 complex—at the crossroads of autophagy and beyond. Trends Cell Biol 20:355–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Itakura E, Kishi C, Inoue K, Mizushima N (2008) Beclin 1 forms two distinct phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes with mammalian Atg14 and UVRAG. Mol Biol Cell 19:5360–5372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ming K, Yuan W, Chen Y, Du H, He M, Hu Y, Wang D, Wu Y, Liu J (2019) PI3KC3-dependent autophagosomes formation pathway is of crucial importance to anti-DHAV activity of chrysanthemum indicum polysaccharide. Carbohydr Polym 208:22–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oh JE, Lee HK (2014) Pattern recognition receptors and autophagy. Front Immunol 5:300

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pei J, Zhao M, Ye Z, Gou H, Wang J, Yi L, Dong X, Liu W, Luo Y, Liao M, Chen J (2014) Autophagy enhances the replication of classical swine fever virus in vitro. Autophagy 10:93–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Romao S, Gasser N, Becker AC, Guhl B, Bajagic M, Vanoaica D, Ziegler U, Roesler J, Dengjel J, Reichenbach J, Münz C (2013) Autophagy proteins stabilize pathogen-containing phagosomes for prolonged MHC II antigen processing. J Cell Biol 203:757–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bird SW, Maynard ND, Covert MW, Kirkegaard K (2014) Nonlytic viral spread enhanced by autophagy components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:13081–13086

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Richards AL, Jackson WT (2012) Intracellular vesicle acidification promotes maturation of infectious poliovirus particles. PLoS Pathog 8:e1003046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, Abedin MJ, Abeliovich H, Acevedo Arozena A, Adachi H, Adams CM, Adams PD, Adeli K, Adhihetty PJ, Adler SG, Agam G, Agarwal R, Aghi MK, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Aguilar PV, Aguirre-Ghiso J, Airoldi EM, Ait-Si-Ali S, Akematsu T, Akporiaye ET, Al-Rubeai M, Albaiceta GM, Albanese C, Albani D, Albert ML, Aldudo J, Algül H et al (2016) Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). Autophagy 12:1–222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Meng S, Jiang K, Zhang X, Zhang M, Zhou Z, Hu M, Yang R, Sun C, Wu Y (2012) Avian reovirus triggers autophagy in primary chicken fibroblast cells and vero cells to promote virus production. Arch Virol 157:661–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. English L, Chemali M, Duron J, Rondeau C, Laplante A, Gingras D, Alexander D, Leib D, Norbury C, Lippé R, Desjardins M (2009) Autophagy enhances the presentation of endogenous viral antigens on MHC class I molecules during HSV-1 infection. Nat Immunol 10:480–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mcfarlane S, Aitken J, Sutherland JS, Nicholl MJ, Preston VG, Preston CM (2011) Early induction of autophagy in human fibroblasts after infection with human cytomegalovirus or herpes simplex virus 1. J Virol 85:4212–4221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Alirezaei M, Flynn CT, Whitton JL (2012) Interactions between enteroviruses and autophagy in vivo. Autophagy 8:973–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Engedal N, Seglen PO (2016) Autophagy of cytoplasmic bulk cargo does not require LC3. Autophagy 12:439–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Szalai P, Hagen LK, Sætre F, Luhr M, Sponheim M, Øverbye A, Mills IG, Seglen PO, Engedal N (2015) Autophagic bulk sequestration of cytosolic cargo is independent of LC3, but requires gabaraps. Exp Cell Res 333:21–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Andersson P, Alm S, Edman K, Lindberg AM (2005) A novel and rapid method to quantify cytolytic replication of picornaviruses in cell culture. J Virol Methods 130:117–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Claridge JK, Headey SJ, Chow JY, Schwalbe M, Edwards PJ, Jeffries CM, Venugopal H, Trewhella J, Pascal SM (2009) A picornaviral loop-to-loop replication complex. J Struct Biol 166:251–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu H, Cao W, Li Y, Feng M, Wu X, Yu K, Liao M (2013) Subgroup J avian leukosis virus infection inhibits autophagy in DF-1 cells. Virol J 10:196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Nuanualsuwan S, Cliver DO (2003) Capsid functions of inactivated human picornaviruses and feline calicivirus. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:350–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Huang SC, Chang CL, Wang PS, Tsai Y, Liu HS (2009) Enterovirus 71-induced autophagy detected in vitro and in vivo promotes viral replication. J Med Virol 81:1241–1252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Shelly S, Lukinova N, Bambina S, Berman A, Cherry S (2009) Autophagy is an essential component of drosophila immunity against vesicular stomatitis virus. Immunity 30:588–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Alirezaei M, Flynn CT, Wood MR, Harkins S, Whitton JL (2015) Coxsackievirus can exploit LC3 in both autophagy-dependent and -independent manners in vivo. Autophagy 11:1389–1407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Conway KL, Kuballa P, Khor B, Zhang M, Shi HN, Virgin HW, Xavier RJ (2013) ATG5 regulates plasma cell differentiation. Autophagy 9:528–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Mauthe M, Langereis M, Jung J, Zhou X, Jones A, Omta W, Tooze SA, Stork B, Paludan SR, Ahola T, Egan D, Behrends C, Mokry M, De Haan C, Van Kuppeveld F, Reggiori F (2016) An siRNA screen for ATG protein depletion reveals the extent of the unconventional functions of the autophagy proteome in virus replication. J Cell Biol 214:619–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Richards AL, Jackson WT (2013) That which does not degrade you makes you stronger: infectivity of poliovirus depends on vesicle acidification. Autophagy 9:806–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Robinson SM, Tsueng G, Sin J, Mangale V, Rahawi S, Mcintyre LL, Williams W, Kha N, Cruz C, Hancock BM, Nguyen DP, Sayen MR, Hilton BJ, Doran KS, Segall AM, Wolkowicz R, Cornell CT, Whitton JL, Gottlieb RA, Feuer R (2014) Coxsackievirus B exits the host cell in shed microvesicles displaying autophagosomal markers. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004045

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Su W, Huang S, Zhu H, Zhang B, Wu X (2020) Interaction between PHB2 and enterovirus A71 VP1 induces autophagy and affects EV-A71 infection. Viruses 12:414

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang S, Wuniqiemu T, Tang W, Teng F, Bian Q, Yi L, Qin J, Zhu X, Wei Y, Dong J (2021) Luteolin inhibits autophagy in allergic asthma by activating PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling and inhibiting Beclin-1-PI3KC3 complex. Int Immunopharmacol 94:107460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wirth M, Joachim J, Tooze SA (2013) Autophagosome formation-the role of ULK1 and beclin1-PI3KC3 complexes in setting the stage. Semin Cancer Biol 23:301–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our laboratory members who helped us to improve the research and the manuscript, with their skilful technical assistance, invaluable comments, and suggestions.

Funding

This work was supported by China Agricultural Research System (CARS-42-17), the Sichuan Veterinary Medicine and Drug Innovation Group of China Agricultural Research System (SCCXTD-2020- 18).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mingshu Wang and Shan Zhou contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Juan Li, Mingshu Wang, Shan Zhou, Anchun Cheng, Xuming Ou, Di Sun, Ying Wu, Qiao Yang, Qun Gao, Juan Huang, Bin Tian, Sai Mao, Shaqiu Zhang, Xinxin Zhao, Renyong Jia, Mafeng Liu, Shun Chen, Yunya Liu, Yanling Yu, Ling Zhang & Leichang Pan

  2. Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Juan Li, Mingshu Wang, Shan Zhou, Anchun Cheng, Xuming Ou, Di Sun, Ying Wu, Qiao Yang, Qun Gao, Juan Huang, Bin Tian, Sai Mao, Shaqiu Zhang, Xinxin Zhao, Renyong Jia, Mafeng Liu, Dekang Zhu, Shun Chen, Yunya Liu, Yanling Yu, Ling Zhang & Leichang Pan

  3. Avian Disease Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Juan Li, Mingshu Wang, Shan Zhou, Anchun Cheng, Xuming Ou, Di Sun, Ying Wu, Qiao Yang, Qun Gao, Juan Huang, Bin Tian, Sai Mao, Shaqiu Zhang, Xinxin Zhao, Renyong Jia, Mafeng Liu, Dekang Zhu, Shun Chen, Yunya Liu, Yanling Yu, Ling Zhang & Leichang Pan

Authors
  1. Juan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingshu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anchun Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xuming Ou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Di Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ying Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qun Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Juan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Bin Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sai Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Shaqiu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xinxin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Renyong Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Mafeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Dekang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Shun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Yunya Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Yanling Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Ling Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Leichang Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JL performed the experiments and analysed viral structural protein-induced autophagy detection, the screening of pathways, and the interaction with autophagy-related genes, as well as the writing and editing of the manuscript. MW performed the funding acquisition, draft revisions and editing. SZ performed the detection of virus-induced autophagy, electron microscope observations, and detection and analysis of the effect of autophagy on virus replication. AC performed the funding acquisition, participated in the analysis of data, and the writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anchun Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Wang, M., Zhou, S. et al. The DHAV-1 protein VP1 interacts with PI3KC3 to induce autophagy through the PI3KC3 complex. Vet Res 53, 64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01081-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01081-6

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716