- Open Access
Administration of probiotics influences F4 (K88)-positive enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli attachment and intestinal cytokine expression in weaned pigs
© Daudelin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 23 September 2010
- Accepted: 23 May 2011
- Published: 23 May 2011
This study evaluated the effect of the probiotics Pediococcus acidilactici and Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii on the intestinal colonization of O149 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli harbouring the F4 (K88) fimbriae (ETEC F4) and on the expression of ileal cytokines in weaned pigs. At birth, different litters of pigs were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: 1) control without antibiotics or probiotics (CTRL); 2) reference group in which chlortetracycline and tiamulin were added to weanling feed (ATB); 3) P. acidilactici; 4) S. cerevisiae boulardii; or 5) P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii. Probiotics were administered daily (1 × 109 CFU per pig) during the lactation period and after weaning (day 21). At 28 days of age, all pigs were orally challenged with an ETEC F4 strain, and a necropsy was performed 24 h later. Intestinal segments were collected to evaluate bacterial colonization in the small intestine and ileal cytokine expressions. Attachment of ETEC F4 to the intestinal mucosa was significantly reduced in pigs treated with P. acidilactici or S. cerevisiae boulardii in comparison with the ATB group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). In addition, proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, were upregulated in ETEC F4 challenged pigs treated with P. acidilactici alone or in combination with S. cerevisiae boulardii compared with the CTRL group. In conclusion, the administration of P. acidilactici or S. cerevisiae boulardii was effective in reducing ETEC F4 attachment to the ileal mucosa, whereas the presence of P. acidilactici was required to modulate the expression of intestinal inflammatory cytokines in pigs challenged with ETEC F4.
- Mesenteric Lymph Node
- Intestinal Content
- Ileal Mucosa
- Probiotic Treatment
Antimicrobials are commonly used as growth promoters and to prevent or treat gastrointestinal infections in weaned pigs. In North America, postweaning diarrhea is a major health problem in swine that results in significant financial losses in pig production. Infection with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli harbouring the F4 (K88) fimbriae (ETEC F4) is one of the most important causes of postweaning diarrhea in pigs . This pathotype is characterized by the expression of an F4 fimbrial adhesin which induces bacterial attachment to specific F4 receptors located in the brush border of the swine intestine and secretion of enterotoxins that cause diarrhea . The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in the pig intestinal microflora and the risk of resistance gene transfer to pathogenic bacteria in humans have increased the pressure on pig producers to seek alternative strategies. Among the strategies that have been proposed, the use of probiotics has become quite attractive because of their potential to stimulate the intestinal immune system and to increase the production of antimicrobial peptides and cytokines in the intestinal tract [2, 3].
Some pig producers currently use probiotics to reduce antimicrobial use. For instance, the administration of lactic acid bacteria such as Pediococcus acidilactici or yeasts such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii improves intestinal defences against microbial infection and increases performance in different species of monogastric animals; P. acidilactici was shown to improve weight gain and reduce oocyst shedding in chickens challenged with coccidia  and S. cerevisiae boulardii was reported to improve postweaning daily weight gain in pigs and to increase the number of mucosal macrophages . Furthermore, Di Giancamillo et al.  demonstrated that the administration of P. acidilactici positively influences weight gain and results in increased villus height and crypt depth in weaned pigs. In a previous study, the present authors also observed, following an ETEC F4 challenge, a decrease in bacterial translocation to the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) in weaned pigs treated with P. acidilactici, S. cerevisiae boulardii or both probiotics , as well as a reduction in bacterial diversity in the intestine of pigs treated with P. acidilactici after weaning [8, 9].
The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of P. acidilactici, S. cerevisiae boulardii or a combination of both probiotics on the consistency of the intestinal contents, intestinal colonization and attachment of ETEC F4 bacteria, and expression of intestinal cytokines after an ETEC F4 challenge of weaned pigs and to evaluate the potential for use of these probiotics as an alternative to antibiotics added to the weanling diet.
Animals and treatments
The animal use protocol was reviewed and approved by the Dairy and Swine Research and Development animal care committee and followed the principle established by the Canadian council on animal care . A total of 40 Yorkshire-Landrace gilts obtained from La Coop fédérée (Montreal, QC, Canada) and housed at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre (Sherbrooke, QC, Canada) were used to carry out the experiment. Two batches of 20 gilts were constituted and each batch of gilts was used in two successive parities over a two-year period. Among a total of expected 80 litters, 40 were used as described below. Regu-Mate (Intervet Canada Ltd., Whitby, ON, Canada) was used to synchronize oestrus, and sows were inseminated twice with the same tested semen provided by the Centre d'insémination porcine du Québec inc. (St-Lambert-de-Lauzon, QC, Canada).
Twenty-eight days before parturition (day -28), pregnant sows were allocated to one of the five treatment groups using a complete randomized block design. Three groups of sows and their litters were assigned to one of the following treatments: P. acidilactici (strain MA18/5M, Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Blagnac, France), S. cerevisiae boulardii (strain SB-CNCM I-1079, Lallemand Animal Nutrition), or P. acidilactici in combination with S. cerevisiae boulardii. The other two groups were used as reference and control groups respectively; piglets of the reference group received at weaning a diet medicated with chlortetracycline and tiamulin antibiotics (ATB) and those of the untreated control group (CTRL) were fed weanling basal diet without ATB or probiotics. For both groups, sows and their litters remained untreated throughout the gestation and lactation periods. The ATB group was included as a reference group because antibiotics are commonly added to the weanling feed of pigs in North America. The sows assigned to the probiotic treatments received 2.5 × 109 CFU from day -28 to day -14, 3.5 × 109 CFU from day -14 to day 0 (parturition), and 6 × 109 CFU from day 0 to day 21. In the P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii group, both probiotics were simultaneously given at the indicated concentrations above. The probiotic doses were mixed with 500 g of feed and given to the sows before the morning meal. The daily feed ration given to the sows was 2.5 kg from day -28 to day -14, 3.5 kg from day -14 to day 0, and ad libitum during the lactation period (day 0 to day 21). The groups of sows were housed in different pens located in different sections of the gestation room to prevent cross-contamination between the treatments. One week before farrowing, the sows were transferred to rooms allocated to different treatments in the maternity section. From each batch of 20 gilts, 10 gilts and their piglets (two litters per treatment) were randomly chosen. Within the first 24 h after parturition, litter size was adjusted to 12 piglets and, if necessary, adoptions were carried out from litters assigned to the same treatment.
Nutrient composition of the weaning diet (day 21 to 31).
Protein (Corn, wheat and soybean meal), %
Vitamin A, IU/kg
Vitamin D, IU/kg
Vitamin E, IU/kg
DNA marker-based test for detection of F4 receptor genes
Jugular blood samples were collected from the pigs at five days of age (day 5). The test for the detection of the F4 receptor genes was performed as described by Jensen et al. with minor modifications . Briefly, DNA was extracted from 100 μL blood using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada). The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was performed on 20 ng genomic DNA from each pig in a total volume of 20 μL using 1X Standard Taq Buffer (New England Biolabs Inc., Pickering, ON, Canada), 200 μM of each deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTP), 5.0 μM of each primer (5'-GTGCCTTGGGTGAGAGGTTA/5'-CACTCTGCCGTTCTCTTTCC), and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). The thermocycling conditions were 5 min of initial denaturation at 95°C, followed by 95°C for 30 s in the additional cycles. Extension was carried out at 72°C for 1 min. Touchdown was performed by lowering the annealing temperature by 1°C after each cycle in the first 10 cycles, starting at 59°C. The last 30 cycles were performed at an annealing temperature of 49°C. This test relies on an Xba I-polymorphism in intron 7 of the porcine Sus scrofa mucin 4 (MUC4) gene (Genbank accession no. GU983681). Ten μL of the 367 bp PCR product were used for digestion with Xba I (Invitrogen Canada Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada), as recommended by the supplier. The resistant allele is not digested by Xba I, whereas the susceptible allele is digested into 151- and 216-bp fragments. The PCR-RLFP assay permitted discrimination between F4 receptor positive (F4R+) and negative (F4R-) pigs. Blood from gilts was also examined by the PCR-RFLP and, when possible, F4R+ gilts were selected. On the other hand, boars from which semen was collected were not examined by the PCR RFLP and, therefore, susceptible heterozygous and homozygous F4R+ pigs were used for the challenge experiment (eight pigs per treatment). As all piglets of one litter of the S. cerevisiae boulardii group were F4R-, only seven pigs instead of eight were challenged for this group.
E. coli strain
The ETEC F4 strain ECL8559 (0149:LT:STa:STb:East1:paa:hemβ:F4) used in the challenge study was isolated at the E. coli Laboratory at the Faculté de médecine vétérinaire (Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada) of the Université de Montréal from the feces of a sick 42-day-old pig. A nalidixic acid-resistant (Nalr) variant of this strain was obtained by serial passage in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth containing concentrations of nalidixic acid from 0 to 60 μg/mL at 37°C for 24 h. This Nalr variant was used in the challenge studies. Moreover, this ETEC F4 strain showed acquired resistance to different antibiotics, including chlortetracycline and tiamulin.
ETEC F4 challenge
At 25 days of age, one F4R+ pig from each litter was transferred to a level 2 biosecurity containment facility (Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Saint-Hyacinthe Laboratory, QC, Canada). The pigs were housed in groups (one pen per treatment group). Three days after transfer (day 28), the 10 pigs were orally challenged with 1 × 109 CFU ETEC F4 strain ECL8559 in 5 mL Trypticase soy broth (Difco Laboratories, Inc., Detroit, MI, USA) following the administration of 10 mL CaCO3 1.2% to neutralize gastric acid. Both inocula were administered through an intra-oesophageal tube. The pigs were evaluated for general appearance, attitude, dehydration, food and water intake, and presence of diarrhea, in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, and were euthanized 24 h post-challenge (hpc), on day 29. Necropsies were performed, and intestinal contents and various tissues were collected always at the same location for all the pigs for further analysis. The non-challenged pigs, (one randomly chosen pig per litter) receiving the same treatments and kept at the Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, were euthanized on day 31.
Microbiological analysis of intestinal contents, ileal mucosa, and MLN
Following euthanasia, intestinal contents from the ileum and proximal colon were sampled for enumeration of the probiotics and of the ETEC F4 challenge strain. Plates containing LAMVAB agar  were used for the detection of the bacterium P. acidilactici. The plates were incubated aerobically for 48 h at 37°C. Potato dextrose agar (BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON, Canada) was used for the detection of the yeast S. cerevisiae boulardii. To inhibit bacterial growth, the medium was acidified by adding sterile tartaric acid (10% solution) until a pH of 3.5 was reached. The yeast plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h. To enumerate the ETEC F4 strain in the intestinal contents, samples were serially diluted and plated on MacConkey agar No. 2 (Oxoid Company, Nepean, ON, Canada) supplemented with nalidixic acid at 50 μg/mL (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd., Oakville, ON, Canada). The plates were incubated aerobically for 24 h at 37°C.
For the detection of viable ETEC F4 on the ileal mucosa and in ileocecal MLN, 300-400 mg of tissue, lightly washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), was homogenized for 5 s using a Polytron homogenizer (Kinematica Inc., Bohemia, NY, USA) in 3-4 mL sterile PBS.
Intestinal content consistency scores
Ileal, cecal and colon content consistency scores, representing fluid accumulation in the intestine, were assigned by the same person and assessments were performed in a blinded fashion. Consistency scores were ranked using the following scale: 0, normal, solid contents; 1, soft intestinal contents, and looser contents than normal; 2, semi-liquid intestinal contents; and 3, liquid contents.
ETEC F4 attachment to ileal mucosa
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
At necropsy, the ileal slices were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed. Briefly, the ileal slices were homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Canada) using a Polytron homogenizer (Kinematica). Total RNA was extracted following the manufacturer's recommendations. The RNA was resuspended in 50 μL ultrapure water (Invitrogen Canada) containing SUPERase•In at 1 U/μL (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Total RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop spectrometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) at a wavelength of 260 nm. The RNA integrity was confirmed by examination of the presence of the 18S and 28S ribosomal bands on agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide before proceeding to gene expression analysis. Aliquots of RNA were treated with DNase I (Invitrogen Canada) and precipitated in 100 μL containing 50 μL ammonium acetate (7.5 M) (Sigma-Aldrich Canada), 3 μL linear acrylamide (5 mg/mL) (Applied Biosystems), and 300 μL anhydrous ethyl alcohol (200 HP) (Commercial Alcohols Inc., Brampton, ON, Canada). Purity was assessed by determining the ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A260/A280). All samples had a ratio between 1.7 and 2.0. A 1 μg aliquot of total RNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Canada) using oligo(dT)12-18 primer (Invitrogen Canada) in a final volume of 20 μL, according to the supplier's instructions. The cDNA samples were diluted 1:20 in nuclease-free water and aliquots were stored at -20°C prior to real-time PCR analysis. All the cDNA samples in this experiment were analyzed for the expression of three different reference genes: β-actin (ACTB), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and cyclophilin A (PPIA). These three reference genes are commonly used in in vivo experiments similar to that of our study [13–15]. Statistical analyses were performed and results indicated that ACTB was the most stable reference gene for use in our experiment, as its expression was not altered by the treatments administered to pigs in contrast to the two other tested reference genes (data not shown).
Quantification of cytokine gene expression by real-time PCR
List of genes and sequences of the primers used for real-time PCR1.
Primers (5' → 3')2
Product size (bp)
Final concentration (nM)3
Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with the litter as the experimental unit. The MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform statistical analyses on the different variables, and the model included the treatment effect (five groups). Treatment comparisons were done by testing the probiotic treatments (three groups) against the control and reference groups (CTRL and ATB) using a Dunnett's test for multiple testing. Comparisons were also done between challenged (day 29) and non-challenged (day 31) pigs. Consistency score data were analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, a non-parametric method for testing equality of population medians among groups.
Reduced attachment of ETEC F4 to the ileal mucosa of weaned pigs with administration of P. acidilactici or S. cerevisiae boulardii
Content consistency in the ileum and colon and presence of ETEC F4 in different tissues of F4-receptor-positive pigs treated with probiotics or antibiotics 24 h post-challenge with ETEC F41.
PA + SCB
Ileal consistency score4
Colon consistency score4
Despite the differences observed by IFA (Figure 2), the treatments had no effect on intestinal colonization by ETEC F4 or on ETEC F4 absolute count in the ileum, colon and MLN (Table 3). Finally, in our experimental conditions, ETEC F4 challenge did not influence P. acidilactici or S. cerevisiae boulardii absolute count in the ileum or colon of pigs treated with either probiotic or both in comparison to non-challenged pigs of the probiotic groups (data not shown).
Modulation of cytokine gene expression by probiotics in the ileum of ETEC F4-challenged weaned pigs
Cytokines mRNA expression levels normalized to ACTB in non-challenged and 24 hpc ETEC F4 pigs treated with probiotics or antibiotics1.
Mean cytokine mRNA expression level in the ileum
PA + SCB
IL-6 (10 -4 )
TNF-α- (10 -3 )
IFN-γ- (10 -4 )
In addition, trends toward increased cytokine expression in the ileum were observed for tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii vs. CTRL; P = 0.08), IL-12p35 (P. acidilactici vs. CTRL; P = 0.07), and for porcine β-defensin 2 (pBD-2) (P. acidilactici vs. CTRL; P = 0.09). In contrast, no differences between groups were observed in the ileal expression of the interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IL-10 and IL-8 genes after ETEC F4 challenge. Moreover, the IL-4, IL-12p40 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) genes were weakly expressed or could not be detected 24 hpc in the ileum of the pigs (data not shown).
Modulation of IL-8 and IFN-γ gene expression in the ileum of weaned pigs after ETEC F4 challenge
Expression of IL-8 in the ileum was significantly greater in the pigs challenged with ETEC F4 than in the non-challenged animals (P = 0.003) (Table 4). However, in non-challenged pigs treated with S. cerevisiae boulardii or P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii, IL-8 gene expression was significantly increased compared to the pigs in the CTRL group (P = 0.04). Finally, the ileal expression of pBD-2 tended to be greater in non-challenged pigs treated with S. cerevisiae boulardii than in the CTRL pigs (P = 0.09).
In contrast, the expression of IFN-γ in the ileum tended to be lower in the challenged pigs than in the non-challenged pigs (P = 0.07). No other effects of ETEC F4 infection were observed on the expression of the other tested cytokines.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact in weaned pigs of administering the probiotics P. acidilactici, S. cerevisiae boulardii or both on the early events following ETEC F4 challenge, including intestinal colonization and attachment of ETEC F4 and the expression of intestinal cytokines involved in the activation and regulation of the innate and acquired immune responses. All piglets used for the ETEC F4 challenge were in good health and the growth of piglets treated with probiotics or antibiotics was comparable to that of the control piglets (unpublished results). These results were similar to those reported in a previous study .
Enteropathogens such as ETEC F4 must colonize the intestine to cause diarrhea. With regard to the development of ETEC F4 infection, attachment to the intestinal mucosa is the first step in the pathogenesis of diarrhea due to this pathogen . The results of the present study showed that the administration of P. acidilactici or S. cerevisiae boulardii reduced ETEC F4 attachment to the ileal mucosa in comparison with the ATB treatment. The reduction of ETEC F4 adherence did not seem to be due to a probiotic bactericidal effect, given that the total ETEC F4 count in the ileum was not reduced. Moreover, little is known about the genes and external factors influencing F4 receptor expression. Nevertheless, it has been shown that diet can influence F18 receptor expression in pigs . Therefore, we cannot exclude that probiotics could influence intestinal receptor expression such as F4, although this assumption is not yet supported in the literature. It seems more likely that P. acidilactici and S. cerevisiae boulardii reduced ETEC F4 attachment to the ileal mucosa through other mechanisms, such as competition, modulation of intestinal bacterial populations, and increased barrier function, that can impair the potential of ETEC F4 to bind to its F4 receptor. Indeed, an in vitro study demonstrated that E. coli attachment to porcine intestinal IPEC-1 epithelial cells is inhibited by probiotics . Interestingly, when P. acidilactici and S. cerevisiae boulardii were administered together in our study, no significant difference in the attachment of ETEC F4 was observed, although there was a tendency to a decrease. This result suggests that there is no synergistic effect and possibly an antagonistic effect between the two probiotics with respect to their potential to reduce ETEC F4 attachment. In a previous study carried out with both probiotics  and in the present study , we also observed an antagonistic effect of S. cerevisiae boulardii on the capacity of P. acidilactici to modulate bacterial diversity after weaning. In both studies, ileal bacterial diversity was reduced in piglets treated with the P. acidilactici alone whereas this effect was abrogated when the two probiotics were administered together. Further studies are needed to elucidate the interaction between S. cerevisiae boulardii and P. acidilactici and its antagonistic effect on microbial populations in the gut.
Many studies carried out with different animal models, including pigs, also demonstrate the potential of probiotics to improve intestinal barrier function and reduce intestinal bacterial translocation [7, 19]. In the present study, the probiotic treatments had no effect on ETEC F4 translocation through the intestinal mucosa, as determined by the ETEC F4 count in the MLN. This result contrasts with our previous observations indicating that the administration of antibiotics, P. acidilactici, S. cerevisiae boulardii and P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii to pigs reduces translocation of facultative anaerobic bacteria to the MLN, as compared to the control group, after a challenge with the ETEC F4 strain . The difference in the results could be explained to some extent by the challenge model used in both studies, the age of the pigs, and the difference in the culture media used for the enumeration of bacteria. In the previous study , bacterial translocation was measured 24 h after three consecutive days of ETEC challenge in 52-day-old pigs, and the enumeration of bacteria in the MLN was performed using blood agar growth medium, which supports the growth of a wide range of organisms. In the present study, in contrast, a one-day challenge was used in 28-day-old pigs, and bacterial counts were performed 24 hpc using MacConkey agar No. 2 supplemented with nalidixic acid at 50 μg/mL, a medium that is selective for coliform organisms, specifically the Nalr variant of the ETEC F4 strain used in this study.
In the literature, there is also clear evidence that certain probiotics reduce the severity of diarrhea caused by different pathogens, including E. coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and rotavirus; these studies support the potential of probiotics to attenuate the host response to infectious organisms [20, 21]. In the present study, although the accumulation of fluid in different sites of the intestine and the ETEC F4 count at the mucosal level were not affected by probiotic treatments, our results suggest that P. acidilactici and S. cerevisiae boulardii may interfere in certain conditions with ETEC F4 attachment to its receptor. In fact, the attachment of ETEC to specific F4 receptors in the ileum brings bacterial enterotoxins into close proximity with specific receptors on intestinal epithelial cells . Moreover, other research recently showed in vitro that different strains of Pediococcus have the potential to down regulate Shiga toxin 2 gene expression in enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 . In a further study, it would be interesting to determine whether P. acidilactici could modulate ETEC F4 enterotoxin gene expression and diarrhea severity over a longer period of time post-challenge.
Colonization of ETEC F4 and its attachment to the ileal mucosa are implicated in the stimulation of the host's innate immune response. In the present study, it was observed that ETEC F4 challenge stimulated cytokine expression and that probiotics could modulate the expression of cytokines involved in innate immune defence against ETEC F4. For instance, P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii significantly increased the expression of IL-6, a proinflammatory cytokine, in the ileum of the ETEC F4-challenged pigs. A tendency toward an increase in the expression of the IL-6 gene was also observed in the P. acidilactici group in comparison to the CTRL pigs but not in the S. cerevisiae boulardii group, suggesting that the effect obtained when the two probiotics were combined was primarily due to P. acidilactici. These results support those of another study reporting that probiotic bacteria such as Bifidobacterium lactis BB12 stimulated IL-6 production in primary murine intestinal epithelial cells . In addition, this cytokine plays an important role in the regulation of intestinal immune response, barrier fortification, activation of neutrophils and B cell IgA isotype switching, important components in the defence against enteric infections . Similarly, ileal TNF-α gene expression tended to be upregulated in the P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii group in comparison with the CTRL group, whereas there was no difference between the ATB and CTRL groups; these observations suggest that the administration of probiotics induced a stronger inflammatory reaction than the feeding of an ATB-enriched diet. However, these results also suggest that the presence of P. acidilactici was required to upregulate TNF-α gene expression as, in pigs treated with S. cerevisiae boulardii alone, expression of that gene was not increased and remained similar to that of the CTRL pigs. Other studies reported that lactic acid bacteria could induce innate cytokines, such as TNF-α, in leukocyte sensitized Caco-2 cells . The expression of pBD-2, an antimicrobial peptide displaying broad antimicrobial activity against several pathogenic intestinal bacteria , and of IL-12p35, which is involved in the activation of mucosal innate immunity against enteric pathogens , also tended to be increased in the P. acidilactici group only in comparison to the CTRL pigs following ETEC F4 challenge. These results support in vitro studies indicating that lactobacillus strains and VSL#3, a probiotic cocktail of four lactobacilli, three bifidum and one streptococcus species, have the potential to induce the secretion of the BD-2 peptide by Caco-2 cells  and of IL-12 by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells . As mentioned above, the trends observed in the present study in the expression of genes involved in innate immunity should not be ignored, because there are wide individual variations in the expression of these genes following exposure to infectious pathogens. Taken together, these results indicated that P. acidilactici either alone or in combination with S. cerevisiae boulardii had the potential to stimulate innate immune defence in ETEC F4-challenged pigs. However, further studies are required to evaluate whether the modulation of innate immune response by P. acidilactici is beneficial to the host in regard to controlling infections caused by ETEC F4.
A notable finding of this study was the significant increase in IL-8 gene expression in the ileum of the pigs challenged with ETEC F4 as compared to the non-challenged pigs. These results are in agreement with other in vitro studies that indicate an increase in IL-8 production following the stimulation of porcine intestinal epithelial cells, Caco-2 cells or a porcine macrophage cell line (3D4/31) with ETEC F4 [29–31]. Surprisingly, IFN-γ expression tended to be decreased in the ileum of the ETEC F4-challenged pigs in comparison to the non-challenged pigs. However, it was reported that oxidative or nitrosative stress occurring in different tissues is capable of inhibiting the production of IFN-γ, with that inhibition playing a key role in regulating early gene expression during gram-negative bacterial infection . It is therefore possible that oxidative stress induced by ETEC F4 was still inhibiting the expression of IFN-γ at 24 hpc.
Finally, the different treatments in the non-challenged animals had no effect on the expression of ileal cytokines, with the exception of IL-8 and pBD-2. The increased IL-8 expression following the S. cerevisiae boulardii, P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii and ATB treatments is in contrast with in vitro results in human intestinal epithelial cells, where a different strain of S. cerevisiae boulardii exerted an anti-inflammatory effect by producing a low molecular weight soluble factor that blocks NF-κB-mediated IL-8 expression . It could be hypothesized that S. cerevisiae boulardii interacts with molecules at the surface of intestinal epithelial cells, leading to IL-8 secretion in the present in vivo model, but further study is needed to confirm such a hypothesis. As an upregulation of this cytokine was not observed in the P. acidilactici animals, it can be assumed that the effect observed in the P. acidilactici + S. cerevisiae boulardii pigs was primarily due to the action of S. cerevisiae boulardii. Moreover, there was a trend (although not statistically significant) toward an upregulation of pBD-2 expression in the non-challenged S. cerevisiae boulardii animals. The upregulation of antimicrobial peptides is a well-known mechanism of action for bacterial probiotics but a new one for yeast probiotics .
In conclusion, the administration of P. acidilactici or S. cerevisiae boulardii limited the attachment of ETEC F4 to the ileal mucosa, a key step in the pathogenesis of disease due to this pathogen. As expected, the antibiotics used in this study had no direct effect on ETEC F4 attachment or colonization since the E. coli strain showed acquired resistance to the antibiotics added to the weanling feeds in the ATB group (chlortetracycline and tiamulin). The antibiotics used in this study are commonly used by pig producers in North America in weanling feed to improve performance and to prevent enteric and respiratory diseases. Therefore, the ATB group was considered as a reference group. In addition, P. acidilactici, but not S. cerevisiae boulardii, influenced the expression of cytokines involved in the intestinal immune defence against ETEC F4. Taken together, these results indicated that P. acidilactici, through its potential to modulate intestinal immune functions and to influence host interaction with ETEC F4, could be a complementary approach to consider in strategies to improve intestinal health and reduce the use of antibiotics in weanling feed.
This work was supported by La Coopérative fédérée du Québec, La Fédération des producteurs de porcs du Québec, the Institut Rosell-Lallemand, and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's Matching Investment Initiative (MII). The authors would like to thank Steve Méthot, the statistician at the Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, for performing all the statistical analysis, as well as Mireille Pilote from Transbiotech, Jade-Pascale Prévost, Brigitte Lehoux and Clarisse Desautels from EcL laboratory, and all the employees who took care of the animals and collected data during the project.
- Fairbrother JM, Nadeau E, Gyles CL: Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: an update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim Health Res Rev. 2005, 6 (1): 17-39. 10.1079/AHR2005105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Delcenserie V, Martel D, Lamoureux M, Amiot J, Boutin Y, Roy D: Immunomodulatory effects of probiotics in the intestinal tract. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2008, 10 (1-2): 37-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlee M, Harder J, Koten B, Stange EF, Wehkamp J, Fellermann K: Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte β-defensin 2. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008, 151 (3): 528-535. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03587.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SH, Lillehoj HS, Dalloul RA, Park DW, Hong YH, Lin JJ: Influence of Pediococcus-based probiotic on coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2007, 86 (1): 63-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bontempo V, Di Giancamillo A, Savoini G, Dell'orto V, Domeneghini C: Live yeast dietary supplementation acts upon intestinal morpho-functional aspects and growth in weanling piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2006, 129 (3-4): 224-236. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.12.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Di Giancamillo A, Vitari F, Savoini G, Bontempo V, Bersani C, Dell'Orto V, Domeneghini C: Effects of orally administered probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici on the small and large intestine of weaning piglets. A qualitative and quantitative micro-anatomical study. Histol Histopathol. 2008, 23 (6): 651-664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lessard M, Dupuis M, Gagnon N, Nadeau E, Matte JJ, Goulet J, Fairbrother JM: Administration of Pediococcus acidilactici or Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii modulates development of porcine mucosal immunity and reduces intestinal bacterial translocation after Escherichia coli challenge. J Anim Sci. 2009, 87 (3): 922-934.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gagnon N, Talbot G, Ward P, Roy D, Dupuis M, Farnworth E, Tompkins TA, Lessard M: Evaluation of bacterial diversity in the gut of piglets supplemented with probiotics using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. Can J Anim Sci. 2007, 87 (2): 207-219. 10.4141/A06-065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brousseau JP, Beaudoin F, Lauzon K, Talbot G, Roy D, Lessard M: Effets de Pediococcus acidilactici et Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii sur le microbiote iléal du porcelet sevré. 6th International Symposium on Probiotics: October 2010; Montreal. 2010, (in French)Google Scholar
- CCAC: Guidelines on the care and use of farm animal in research, teaching and testing. 2009, Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Jensen GM, Frydendahl K, Svendsen O, Jorgensen CB, Cirera S, Fredholm M, Nielsen JP, Moller K: Experimental infection with Escherichia coli O149:F4ac in weaned piglets. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 115 (1-3): 243-249. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartemink R, Domenech VR, Rombouts FM: LAMVAB-A new selective medium for the isolation of lactobacilli from faeces. J Microbiol Methods. 1997, 29 (2): 77-84. 10.1016/S0167-7012(97)00025-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bosi P, Casini L, Finamore A, Cremokolini C, Merialdi G, Trevisi P, Nobili F, Mengheri E: Spray-dried plasma improves growth performance and reduces inflammatory status of weaned pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. J Anim Sci. 2004, 82 (6): 1764-1772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duncker SC, Lorentz A, Schroeder B, Breves G, Bischoff SC: Effect of Orally Administered probiotic E. coli strain Nissle 1917 on intestinal mucosal immune cells of healthy young pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006, 111 (3-4): 239-250. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.01.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collado-Romero M, Arce C, Ramirez-Boo M, Carvajal A, Garrido JJ: Quantitative analysis of the immune response upon Salmonella typhimurium infection along the porcine intestinal gut. Vet Res. 2010, 41 (2): 23-10.1051/vetres/2009072.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- IDT SciTools PrimerQuest Software. [http://www.idtdna.com/Scitools/Applications/Primerquest]
- Bosworth B, Ridpath J, Wiseman B: Interactions between genotype and diet in swine that prevent E. coli associated intestinal disease. USA: United States Biotechnology Research and Development Corporation (Peoria, IL), Volume 6355859, The United States of America as represented by the Department of Agriculture (Washington, DC). 2002Google Scholar
- Roselli M, Finamore A, Britti MS, Konstantinov SR, Smidt H, de Vos WM, Mengheri E: The novel porcine Lactobacillus sobrius strain protects intestinal cells from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 infection and prevents membrane barrier damage. J Nutr. 2007, 137 (12): 2709-2716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zareie M, Johnson-Henry K, Jury J, Yang PC, Ngan BY, McKay DM, Soderholm JD, Perdue MH, Sherman PM: Probiotics prevent bacterial translocation and improve intestinal barrier function in rats following chronic psychological stress. Gut. 2006, 55 (11): 1553-1560. 10.1136/gut.2005.080739.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casey PG, Gardiner GE, Casey G, Bradshaw B, Lawlor PG, Lynch PB, Leonard FC, Stanton C, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Hill C: A five-strain probiotic combination reduces pathogen shedding and alleviates disease signs in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73 (6): 1858-1863. 10.1128/AEM.01840-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shu Q, Qu F, Gill HS: Probiotic treatment using Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 reduces weanling diarrhea associated with rotavirus and Escherichia coli infection in a piglet model. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001, 33 (2): 171-177. 10.1097/00005176-200108000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carey CM, Kostrzynska M, Ojha S, Thompson S: The effect of probiotics and organic acids on Shiga-toxin 2 gene expression in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Microbiol Methods. 2008, 73 (2): 125-132. 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.01.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz PA, Hoffmann M, Szcesny S, Blaut M, Haller D: Innate mechanisms for Bifidobacterium lactis to activate transient pro-inflammatory host responses in intestinal epithelial cells after the colonization of germ-free rats. Immunology. 2005, 115 (4): 441-450. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02176.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodrich ME, McGee DW: Effect of intestinal epithelial cell cytokines on mucosal B-cell IgA secretion: enhancing effect of epithelial-derived IL-6 but not TGF-β on IgA+ B cells. Immunol Lett. 1999, 67 (1): 11-14. 10.1016/S0165-2478(98)00112-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haller D, Bode C, Hammes WP, Pfeifer AMA, Schiffrin EJ, Blum S: Non-pathogenic bacteria elicit a differential cytokine response by intestinal epithelial cell/leucocyte co-cultures. Gut. 2000, 47 (1): 79-87. 10.1136/gut.47.1.79.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veldhuizen EJ, Rijnders M, Claassen EA, van Dijk A, Haagsman HP: Porcine β-defensin 2 displays broad antimicrobial activity against pathogenic intestinal bacteria. Mol Immunol. 2008, 45 (2): 386-394. 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simmons CP, Goncalves NS, Ghaem-Maghami M, Bajaj-Elliott M, Clare S, Neves B, Frankel G, Dougan G, MacDonald TT: Impaired resistance and enhanced pathology during infection with a noninvasive, attaching-effacing enteric bacterial pathogen, Citrobacter rodentium, in mice lacking IL-12 or IFN-gamma. J Immunol. 2002, 168 (4): 1804-1812.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miettinen M, Matikainen S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Pirhonen J, Varkila K, Kurimoto M, Julkunen I: Lactobacilli and Streptococci induce interleukin-12 (IL-12), IL-18, and gamma interferon production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infect Immun. 1998, 66 (12): 6058-6062.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moue M, Tohno M, Shimazu T, Kido T, Aso H, Saito T, Kitazawa H: Toll-like receptor 4 and cytokine expression involved in functional immune response in an originally established porcine intestinal epitheliocyte cell line. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1780 (2): 134-144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavlova B, Volf J, Alexa P, Rychlik I, Matiasovic J, Faldyna M: Cytokine mRNA expression in porcine cell lines stimulated by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 132 (1-2): 105-110. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.04.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roselli M, Finamore A, Britti MS, Mengheri E: Probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis MB5 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protect intestinal Caco-2 cells from the inflammation-associated response induced by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. Br J Nutr. 2006, 95 (6): 1177-1184. 10.1079/BJN20051681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang G, Nichols RD, Taniguchi M, Nakayama T, Parmely MJ: Gamma interferon production by hepatic NK T cells during Escherichia coli infection is resistant to the inhibitory effects of oxidative stress. Infect Immun. 2003, 71 (5): 2468-2477. 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2468-2477.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sougioultzis S, Simeonidis S, Bhaskar KR, Chen X, Anton PM, Keates S, Pothoulakis C, Kelly CP: Saccharomyces boulardii produces a soluble anti-inflammatory factor that inhibits NF-κB-mediated IL-8 gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 343 (1): 69-76. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.02.080.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.