Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Phenotypic and genotypic assessment of iron acquisition in diverse bovine-associated non-aureus staphylococcal strains

Veterinary Research volume 55, Article number: 6 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Although the role of iron in bacterial infections has been well described for Staphylococcus (S.) aureus, iron acquisition in (bovine-associated) non-aureus staphylococci and mammaliicocci (NASM) remains insufficiently mapped. This study aimed at elucidating differences between four diverse bovine NASM field strains from two species, namely S. chromogenes and S. equorum, in regards to iron uptake (with ferritin and lactoferrin as an iron source) and siderophore production (staphyloferrin A and staphyloferrin B) by investigating the relationship between the genetic basis of iron acquisition through whole genome sequencing (WGS) with their observed phenotypic behavior. The four field strains were isolated in a previous study from composite cow milk (CCM) and bulk tank milk (BTM) in a Flemish dairy herd. Additionally, two well-studied S. chromogenes isolates originating from a persistent intramammary infection and from a teat apex were included for comparative purpose in all assays. Significant differences between species and strains were identified. In our phenotypical iron acquisition assay, while lactoferrin had no effect on growth recovery for all strains in iron deficient media, we found that ferritin served as an effective source for growth recovery in iron-deficient media for S. chromogenes CCM and BTM strains. This finding was further corroborated by analyzing potential ferritin iron acquisition genes using whole-genome sequencing data, which showed that all S. chromogenes strains contained hits for all three proposed ferritin reductive pathway genes. Furthermore, a qualitative assay indicated siderophore production by all strains, except for S. equorum. This lack of siderophore production in S. equorum was supported by a quantitative assay, which revealed significantly lower or negligible siderophore amounts compared to S. aureus and S. chromogenes. The WGS analysis showed that all tested strains, except for S. equorum, possessed complete staphyloferrin A (SA)-synthesis and export operons, which likely explains the phenotypic absence of siderophore production in S. equorum strains. While analyzing the staphyloferrin A and staphyloferrin B operon landscapes for all strains, we noticed some differences in the proteins responsible for iron acquisition between different species. However, within strains of the same species, the siderophore-related proteins remained conserved. Our findings contribute valuable insights into the genetic elements associated with bovine NASM pathogenesis.

Introduction

Bovine mastitis, an inflammation of the bovine mammary gland, is typically a result of bacterial intramammary infections (IMI), leading to important economic losses in dairy production worldwide [1]. Bovine-associated non-aureus staphylococci and the closely related mammaliicocci (NASM) [2] are traditionally considered to be commensals of the mammary gland or minor mastitis pathogens. Despite being the most prevalent group of bacteria cultured from aseptically collected milk samples of dairy cows, their role in the bovine mammary gland is under increasing scrutiny. Among and within bovine-associated NASM species, substantial variations have been observed on their effects on udder health and milk yield [3,4,5]. These include differences in virulence [6,7,8], potential beneficial properties [9, 10], host-interaction [11, 12], in vitro iron metabolism [8, 13], and epidemiological behavior [14, 15]. Additionally, differences have been reported regarding their ecology [15] culminating in the ecological categorization of specific NASM species as “host-adapted” (e.g., Staphylococcus chromogenes) or “environmental” (e.g., Staphylococcus equorum) [16]. However, there is also growing evidence of substantial strain-level variation within NASM species with some strains showing a greater propensity to adapt to specific hosts or even particular body sites [17].

Bacteria have a strict nutritional iron requirement for growth and pathogenesis (e.g., biofilm production). The concentration of free, bioavailable iron within the host, however, is restricted as a form of innate nutritional immunity against invading bacterial pathogens [18,19,20]. In response to iron-deplete conditions, staphylococci have developed multiple iron acquisition strategies from the extracellular environment including the secretion of siderophores. The latter are small (< 1 kDa) potent iron-chelating compounds with a high affinity for iron that compete with iron-binding host-derived glycoproteins such as lactoferrin (found in milk, mucosal secretions, and polymorphonuclear leucocytes) in the extracellular environment [21,22,23]. They are used by Staphylococcus aureus, a major mastitis pathogen, for iron acquisition [24,25,26,27]. Staphylococci can synthesize and secrete two hydroxycarboxylate type of siderophores, staphyloferrin A (SA) and staphyloferrin B (SB) encoded by a four-gene sfaABCD and nine-gene sbnABCDEFGHI operon, respectively [28]. Uptake of ferric-SA or ferric-SB is linked to non-interchangeable iron-regulated ABC-type transporters htsABC and sirABC, respectively, which are encoded by operons located near their respective siderophore biosynthetic genes [29, 30]. While the molecular basis of siderophore iron acquisition and its import into the cell has been studied extensively for S. aureus in vertebrate hosts [18, 20, 31], there is a paucity of information regarding siderophore production and the genetic basis of iron acquisition in (bovine-associated) NASM [32,33,34,35]. Also, as far as we know, only one report describes ferritin (an ubiquitous intracellular iron storage protein) as a potential staphylococcal iron acquisition mechanism (e.g., S. xylosus from meat) [36]. In this study, a three gene surface-associated reductase was implicated in iron ferritin acquisition rather than siderophore elaboration [36].

The competition for iron between a host and bacteria can determine the course and severity of the inflammatory reaction in response to the upcoming infection [23, 26]. In dairy cows, the concentration of lactoferrin in milk varies depending on udder health status, stage of lactation, and daily milk production [37]. An increase in milk ferritin concentrations during intramammary infection has been observed [38]. Still, bacterial iron scavenging in the mammary gland during an infection is not well understood [25]. Hence, elucidating iron acquisition mechanisms in bovine-associated NASM, including siderophore production and utilization of host-derived iron sources, will help better understand their role in udder health.

Substantial differences in iron acquisition have been observed between two different S. chromogenes strains: one originating from a persistent intramammary infection (the “IM” isolate) [39] and one from the teat apex of a dairy heifer (the “TA” isolate) [40]. The findings suggest S. chromogenes IM to be a true udder-adapted strain capable of acquiring iron to sustain growth in the mammary gland in contrast to S. chromogenes TA [13], and form the basis for further study of differences between and within other NASM species. Collectively, strain variation should be examined in complement to assessing the properties of different bovine-associated NASM to better understand their distribution across habitats and to elucidate their relevance for udder health and milk yield in dairy cows.

The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the capacity of two diverse S. chromogenes (ecologically classified as a “host-adapted” species) strains and two diverse S. equorum (ecologically classified as an “environmental” species) strains, originating from composite cow milk or bulk-tank milk, respectively, in utilizing different sources of iron; (2) to assess their siderophore production; and (3) to perform whole genome sequencing to identify their iron acquisition genes in descriptive comparison with their phenotypic behavior.

Materials and methods

Bacterial isolates

Four field NASM strains obtained from a previous study [41] and identified through matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) were included. The strains originated from composite cow milk (CCM) samples (one S. chromogenes CCM strain and one S. equorum CCM strain) and from bulk tank milk (BTM) samples (one S. chromogenes BTM strain and one S. equorum BTM strain), collected in tandem in one commercial dairy herd [41]. Isolates obtained in this previous study have been strain-typed by random amplification of polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR). In the current study, the CCM and BTM strains from each species were selected based on having the lowest internal similarity scores (75.6% for isolates of both species), as calculated using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA; Bionumerics software version 7.6.3).

Additionally, two well-studied S. chromogenes isolates originating from a persistent IMI lasting over 11 months (“IM”) [39] and from the teat apex of a dairy heifer (“TA”) [40] were included for comparative purpose in all assays as these two strains were previously used in iron assays in vitro and presented clear strain differences in multiple aspects [8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 40, 42, 43].

Quality control reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25923 [13, 26, 44] and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 [45] served as positive controls for the phenotypical iron assay and the qualitative/quantitative siderophore production assay, respectively. Streptococcus dysgalactiae ATCC 43078 was used as a negative control for the qualitative siderophore production assay [26].

Assays

Phenotypical iron test

The phenotypical iron test, in which the ability to acquire iron from host-binding proteins (ferritin and lactoferrin) is evaluated, was performed as described in Reydams et al. [13]. Briefly, the isolates were cultured overnight at 37 °C on Colombia blood agar with 5% sheep blood (CBA, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After reaching a density of 0.5 McFarland in separate 0.85% NaCl solution (Biomerieux), the bacterial cultures were diluted in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (dPBS). The isolates were subsequently grown in four different media including, trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Thermo Fisher Scientific), TSB deprived of iron by adding a final concentration of 0.5 mM of iron chelating agent 2–2’bipyridyl (dTSB) (Sigma Aldrich) [46], iron-deprived TSB supplemented with a final concentration of 50 μM ferritin from equine spleen (dTSBF) (Sigma Aldrich) [26, 36], and 0.4 mg/mL iron saturated recombinant human lactoferrin (dTSBL) (Sigma Aldrich) [13]. A 96-well microplate (Novolab) covered with a transparent seal was used for isolate growth in the different media for 24 h without agitation in a MultiSkan Go apparatus (Thermo Fisher Scientific). This allowed to measure the optical density (OD, 600 nm) 25 times with 1 h intervals to assess and quantify the bacterial growth. The incubation temperature was set at 37 °C for all isolates except for S. equorum, which showed optimal growth at 32 °C. Two replicates were taken for each isolate in the 96 well plate. The SkanIt 4.1 for Microplate Readers software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for protocol input and recording of the results. The phenotypical iron-test was performed in duplicate on two independent days.

Qualitative siderophore production assay

The overlay (O) technique with chrome azurol S (CAS) medium (O-CAS) for siderophore detection was performed with some modifications [47]. In short, the blue CAS dye was prepared beforehand as described by Louden et al. [45] based on the original assay [48]. In preparation of O-CAS procedures, isolates were cultured for 24 h at 37 °C on CBA. After overnight incubation, pure colonies of each isolate were added to separate sterile 0.85% NaCl solution (Biomerieux) until a turbidity equivalent of 0.5 McFarland density was reached. With a sterile cotton swab, the inoculum was streaked on a quarter of two tryptic soy agar (TSA; Oxoid) plates. One of the plates was supplemented with 200 μM 2–2’ bipyridyl, while the other plate was not (serving as a negative control). Both plates were incubated overnight. Several concentrations of 2–2’bipyridyl were added to the TSA to determine optimal siderophore production without causing bacterial death. The medium for a liter of overlay was prepared according to Shin et al. [49]. In short, under stirring, 12 mL of 50% NaOH was added to 900 mL of ddH2O to dissolve 30.2 g of piperazine-N–N’bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES). After complete dissolution of PIPES in the overlay, 15 g of agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) was added and the overlay was autoclaved. Finally, 100 mL of the autoclaved blue CAS dye was mixed with the autoclaved overlay (under stirring) and applied over the TSA plates with(out) 200 μM 2–2’bipyridyl containing the cultivated isolates to be tested for siderophore production. After a minimum period of 15 min, a change in color (blue to yellow) was observed in the overlaid medium. This assay was performed twice on two independent days with two replicates (plates) for each isolate.

Quantitative siderophore production assay (modified microplate method)

Analysis of siderophore production were performed using the modified microplate method with some modifications [50]. Briefly, 50 μL of 0.5 McFarland of each isolate was placed in 5 mL of Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h to induce maximal siderophore production. Afterwards, the supernatant was obtained by centrifugation at 10 000 rpm (12 298 × g) for 10 min. and filter sterilized (pore size 0.2 μm) (Puradisc Whatman FP30 CA-S, Avantor Life Sciences). Supernatant (100 μL) of each bacterial culture was added in separate wells of a 96 microplate followed by the addition of 20 μL of autoclaved CAS dye as described above. After a 20 min incubation period, the optical density of each sample was recorded at 660 nm using the Multiskan Go microplate reader. Three replicates were taken for each isolate in the 96 well plate and siderophore production, in percent siderophore unit (psu), was measured according to the following formula [50]:

$${\text{Siderophore}}\,{\text{production }}\left( {{\text{psu}}} \right){\text{ }} = \,\frac{{\left( {A_{r} - ~A_{s} } \right)~\,x\,~100}}{{A_{r} }}$$

where Ar = absorbance of reference (CAS solution with uninoculated broth), and As = absorbance of sample (CAS solution with cell-free supernatant of sample). The assay was performed four times in four independent days.

Whole genome sequencing, phylogenetic trees, and siderophore-related operon landscapes

The six NASM isolates (four field strains: S. chromogenes CCM, S. chromogenes BTM, S. equorum CCM, S. equorum BTM; two comparative strains: S. chromogenes IM, and S. chromogenes TA) were inoculated on CBA and delivered to the PathoSense laboratory at Ghent University for processing. The samples were processed to isolate High-Molecular Weight DNA as previously described [51,52,53]. Samples were multiplexed on an R9.4.1 flow cell (ONT) and sequenced using a GridION device [52]. Final genome assemblies were obtained using Trycycler (v.0.5.3) [54], minimap2 (v2.20) [55], and medaka (v.1.7.3; ONT) as described already for staphylococci before [56]. Resulting bacterial genome assemblies were used in a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic inference using csi phylogeny [57] and IQtree (v.1.6.12) [58, 59] with –bb 1000 and -m GTR + R + I settings. The Bioproject for this study is PRJNA1008278 and the associated NCBI accession numbers are: CP133240-CP133241 (S. chromogenes CCM), CP133242-CP133243 (S. chromogenes BTM), CP133235-CP133239 (S. equorum CCM), CP133229-CP133234 (S. equorum BTM), CP133244-CP133246 (S. chromogenes IM), and CP133247-CP133248 (S. chromogenes TA).

This analysis was supplemented with complete S. chromogenes (n = 89) and S. equorum (n = 60) genome sequences as available from Naushad et al. [35], a Canadian database. Also, the S. aureus ATCC 25923 (CP009361) was included for comparison. All genomes were screened for siderophore and iron-uptake associated genes using a custom protein database adapted from Naushad et al. [35] and Vermassen et al. [36] (see Additional file 1) in Abricate (v.1.0.1) [69] with minimal query coverage and amino acid homology set to 30 and 50%, respectively. The protein sequences for siderophore-related and ferritin iron acquisition were obtained from Naushad et al. [35] and Vermassen et al. [36] with S. aureus and S. xylosus as reference, respectively. The first genomic hits that met the minimum cutoff for each individual query were selected. Trees and identified proteins were visualized in iTOL (v.5) [60]. To study the siderophore-related operon landscape, flanking regions (20 000 bp up- and downstream) of target genes were extracted using flanker (v.0.1.5) [61]. Subsequent sequences were annotated with Bakta (v.1.7.0) [62] and visualized with Clinker (v.0.0.26) [63].

Statistical analysis

Phenotypical iron test

The growth of the four field strains (S. chromogenes CCM, S. chromogenes BTM, S. equorum CCM, and S. equorum BTM), the comparative strains (S. chromogenes IM, S. chromogenes TA), and the positive control S. aureus ATCC25923, in the different growth media was expressed as the area under the curve (AUC) [13]. The association between the AUC (outcome variable) and the different growth media (categorical predictor variable: TSB, dTSB, dTSBF, and dTSBL) and the bacterial strains (categorical predictor variable) was determined fitting a linear mixed regression model (PROC MIXED, SAS version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The interaction term between the growth media and strains was tested and isolate was added as random effect to account for the correlation among the duplicates in the experiment.

Quantitative siderophore production assay

The expression of siderophores (psu; outcome variable) during incubation with different bacterial strains (the four field strains S. chromogenes CCM, S. chromogenes BTM, S. equorum CCM, S. equorum BTM and the two comparative strains: S. chromogenes IM, S. chromogenes TA; and the positive controls S. aureus ATCC 25923 and E. coli ATCC 25922; categorical predictor variable of main interest) was studied by fitting a linear regression model (PROC MIXED, SAS version 9.4) considering the triplicates and rounds as fixed effects.

The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05 for both analyses. In all analyses, a Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons.

Results

Phenotypical iron assay

Bacterial growth differed significantly between strains (P < 0.001) and media (P < 0.001) (Table 1). Overall, both S. chromogenes field strains, CCM and BTM, presented a better growth across all media [Least-square means (LSM) of the AUC = 5.00 and 4.79, respectively] when compared to the S. equorum strains CCM and BTM (LSM = 3.51 and 4.15, respectively). When comparing the field strains with the comparative NASM strains, S. chromogenes IM presented the highest growth across all media that was not significantly different from the positive control S. aureus ATCC 25923 strain (LSM = 8.55; P = 0.92). On the other hand, S. chromogenes TA, presented lower growth than S. chromogenes CCM and BTM, while overall higher growth than both S. equorum strains (LSM = 4.47) was observed. Strains grew the best on TSB (LSM = 7.45; Table 1). Media with ferritin as an iron source (LSM = 5.71) resulted in significantly better growth than dTSB (LSM = 4.35; Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.001) and dTSBL (LSM = 4.80; Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.001) across all species. Still, growth of the strains was influenced by the type of media (interaction term between media and strains: P < 0.001; Table 1, Figure 1, and Additional file 2) with both S. chromogenes field strains, CCM and BTM, presenting significantly improved growth recovery with ferritin as an added iron source (Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.001 and Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.003, respectively), but not with lactoferrin (Bonferroni-corrected P = 1.000, both) (Figures 1A, B). Growth of both S. equorum field strains (Figures 1C, D) are not significantly influenced by the different media, except for S. equorum CCM when comparing growth in TSB to dTSB (Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.0002) (Figure 1C). Regarding the comparative strains, both S. chromogenes IM and TA showed significant reduction in maximum growth in dTSB (Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.001, both) when compared to growth in TSB and growth was not significantly recovered when ferritin (Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.49 and P = 1.000, respectively) or lactoferrin (Bonferroni-corrected P = 1.000, both) was added as an iron source (Figures 1E, F).

Table 1 Linear mixed regression model for the area under the curve (AUC) of the phenotypical iron assay
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

Overview of strain growth (optical density, OD600) over 24 h in different growth media. The four field strains, Staphylococcus chromogenes from composite cow milk (CCM) and from bulk tank milk (BTM) (A, B) and S. equorum from CCM and BTM (C, D), and the two comparative strains, Staphylococcus chromogenes isolates from a persistent intramammary infection (IM) and from the teat apex of a dairy heifer (TA) (E, F), are grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB, solid line), deferrated tryptic soy broth (dTSB, dotted line), deferrated tryptic soy broth with ferritin from equine spleen (dTSBF, short-dash line), and deferrated tryptic soy broth with human recombinant lactoferrin (dTSBL, long-dash line). All experiments were performed in duplicate. Different letters within each figure (A–C) indicate significant differences when applying the Bonferroni correction between growth media within strains (P ≤ 0.05).

Full size image

Qualitative siderophore production assay

Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, S. chromogenes IM, S. chromogenes TA, and both S. chromogenes isolates from CCM and BTM exhibited yellow coloration indicative for the production of iron chelators. For both S. equorum isolates, no iron chelator activity was observed.

Quantitative siderophore production assay

There was a significant strain effect (P < 0.001; Table 2) with S. aureus ATCC 25923 producing significantly higher amounts of siderophores [Least-square means (LSM) of the psu = 74.5] when compared to all NASM strains (Bonferroni corrected P < 0.0001). The difference in psu between S. aureus ATCC 25923 and positive control E. coli 25922 borders on significance (LSM = 62.5; P = 0.06). Overall, the S. chromogenes strains from CCM and BTM produced a higher amount of siderophores (LSM = 29.8 and 14.7, respectively) when compared to the S. equorum strains from CCM and BTM (LSM = 3.66 and 3.11, respectively). Staphylococcus chromogenes from CCM presented a higher siderophore production when compared to both S. equorum strains (Bonferroni corrected P = 0.007 and Bonferroni corrected P = 0.005 from CCM and BTM, respectively; see Additional file 3) and S. chromogenes TA (Bonferroni corrected P = 0.004). Both S. chromogenes (Bonferroni corrected P = 0.58) and S. equorum (Bonferroni corrected P = 1.000) from CCM had a higher psu when compared to strains of the same species from BTM although differences between the two strains of the same species were insignificant. Staphylococcus chromogenes IM siderophore production (LSM = 21.9; Bonferroni corrected P = 0.09) was not significantly different from S. chromogenes TA (LSM = 2.1).

Table 2 Linear mixed regression model for the percentage siderophore units (psu) of the quantitative microplate analysis
Full size table

Whole-genome sequencing

Phylogenetic analysis

The SNP-based WGS phylogenetic analysis (Figure 2; Additional file 4) including our field strains (S. chromogenes CCM, S. chromogenes BTM, S. equorum CCM, and S. equorum BTM), our comparative strains (S. chromogenes IM and S. chromogenes TA), and the Canadian S. chromogenes and S. equorum isolates [40] divided our four field isolates and two comparative isolates into two distinct clades: S. chromogenes TA in a separate clade from the other three S. chromogenes isolates (IM, CCM, and BTM] and the two S. equorum isolates (CCM and BTM] in one clade but still divergent.

Figure 2
figure 2

Siderophore-associated protein homology in diverse NASM isolates. Presence of siderophore-associated proteins within S. chromogenes isolates [from a persistent intramammary infection (IM), the teat apex of a dairy heifer (TA), composite cow milk (CCM) and bulk tank milk (BTM)] and S. equorum isolates (from CCM and BTM) highlighted in pink, including 100 isolates (S. chromogenes = 83, S. equorum = 17) from the Mastitis Pathogen Collection of the Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network (CBMQRN) [35], and quality control reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25923. An ML tree (1000 ultrafast bootstraps) representing phylogenetic relationship of S. chromogenes, S. equorum, and quality control strain S. aureus ATCC 25923 on whole genome SNP level with the S. aureus ATCC 25923 (CP009361) as reference. The final phylogenetic tree was annotated with the presence of siderophore- and ferritin-related protein hits across genomes. Color coded (blue-red) represents amino acid homology of the identified proteins as compared to the NCBI siderophore- and ferritin-related protein hits. Only hits with amino acid homology above 30% and 50% query coverage are shown.

Full size image

Identification of siderophore-associated genes and operon landscapes

Based on the WGS data of the four field strains and two comparative strains (Figures 2, 3), it was observed that all S. chromogenes and S. equorum strains, including the reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25923, contained all SA receptor hts operon proteins (htsABC). Both S. equorum isolates did not have a complete SA synthesis related sfa operon (sfaABCD) embedded in their genomes in contrast to the four S. chromogenes isolates (and reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25923). Similar to S. aureus ATCC 25923, both S. equorum isolates showed the presence of both SB receptor sir operon proteins (sirABC) and SB synthesis-related sbn operon proteins (sbnABCDEFGHI) in contrast to all the S. chromogenes isolates.

Figure 3
figure 3

Siderophore-related sfa-hts (A) and sbn-sir(B) operon landscapes. Operon landscapes for the four field strains, Staphylococcus chromogenes from composite cow milk (CCM) and from bulk tank milk (BTM) and S. equorum from CCM and BTM, the two comparative strains, S. chromogenes isolated from a persistent intramammary infection (IM) and from the teat apex of a dairy heifer (TA), and positive control, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923.

Full size image

Regarding the potential ferritin reductive pathway for iron acquisition, when using S. xylosus as reference strain, the four S. chromogenes isolates had protein hits for the three genes encoding proteins potentially contributing to ferritin iron acquisition: a putative oxidoreductase protein, mono-oxygenase protein, and probable membrane protein showing a mean of 55.4% (standard deviation, SD ± 0.15%), 58.7% (± 0.31%), and 66.6% (± 0.00%) amino acid homology, respectively. Both S. equorum isolates did not have a hit for the putative oxidoreductase while both other hits (mono-oxygenase protein and probable membrane protein) showed higher protein homologies when compared to the S. chromogenes isolates (mono-oxygenase protein and probable membrane protein showing a mean of 79.8% (± 0.00%) and 77.62% (± 0.00%) AA homology, respectively). In the S. aureus ATCC 25923 genome, only one protein hit (putative oxidoreductase) was identified (60.36% AA homology).

When taking a closer look at the sfa-hts (Figure 3A) and sbn-sir (Figure 3B) operon landscape, we observed a lower protein homology between species (~50%) but near 100% protein match between strains of the same species. Interestingly, a zinc-binding hydrogenase, metal-dependent hydrolase, and iron-sulfur cluster carrier protein were identified in the vicinity of the hts-sfa operons. Ferrous iron transport-related proteins (Feo A and FeoB) [64] were identified in S. chromogenes TA (Figure 3B) and in the S. equorum genomes also a heme oxygenase was identified (Figure 3A). Even though the sir-sbn operons were only complete in S. aureus and S. equorum strains, the four S. chromogenes genomes also showed protein homologs of both sirB and sirC. The latter proteins showed again the presence of various iron-associated proteins, including hrtA, hrtB, and ferichrome transport ATP-binding protein (Figure 3B).

Discussion

Our study integrated the phenotype and genotype of different bovine-associated NASM strains when assessing their iron metabolism. By doing so, we observed substantial differences between species and strains. In the phenotypical iron assay, ferritin was an effective iron source for growth recovery in iron-deficient media for the S. chromogenes CCM and BTM strains. This finding was further supported by the examination of potential ferritin iron acquisition genes based on WGS data, as all S. chromogenes strains displayed hits for all three proposed ferritin reductive pathway genes. For the qualitative siderophore production assay, a color change was observed in all strains except for S. equorum, suggesting the latter species does not produce siderophores. This observation is further supported by the quantitative assay, in which this species produced little or negligible amounts of siderophores when compared to S. aureus and S. chromogenes. The WGS analysis revealed that all tested strains, except for S. equorum, possess complete SA-synthesis and export sfa operons, which could explain the phenotypic absence of siderophore production in both S. equorum strains. When analyzing the sfa-hts and sbn-sir operon landscapes for all strains, some interspecific variation in protein identities responsible for iron acquisition were observed but between strains of the same species the siderophore-related proteins are conserved. The results contribute to the currently limited understanding of the genetic elements associated with bovine NASM pathogenesis.

Importantly, the iron-metabolism related virulence genes profiles of our six NASM isolates (four field strains and two comparative strains) coincides with the virulence gene profiles of S. chromogenes and S. equorum isolates from a vast collection of Canadian [65] bovine isolates based on comprehensive WGS data. It must however, be taken into consideration that the protein sequences for iron acquisition reported in this study were based on specific criteria described in a previous study (i.e., applying a minimum of 30% amino acid identity and 50% query coverage) [35]. This means that the results obtained from these isolates may not be the same as when applying a higher cut-off for protein sequence homology as done in other studies [53, 56, 66]. Nevertheless, our findings combined with in vitro phenotypical iron assays offer novel insights into iron acquisition of ecologically different bovine-associated NASM species.

When assessing the growth curves of the four field strains, S. chromogenes CCM, S. chromogenes BTM, S. equorum CCM, and S. equorum BTM, and the two comparative strains, S. chromogenes IM and TA, in the four different growth media, all strains appear to have distinct phenotypic growth patterns. This observation is supported by the reported significant strain effect on bacterial growth and aligns with a previous study initially reporting significant strain differences between S. chromogenes IM and TA in the phenotypical iron assay [13]. Interestingly, both S. chromogenes strains from CCM and BTM demonstrated a significant ability to utilize ferritin for growth recovery, which was not observed in the S. equorum strains and the two comparative S. chromogenes strains. Although the initial differences in growth in different media may seem negligible, we observed phenotypic variations in the lag phase of S. equorum from CCM, suggesting a potential adaptation to utilizing iron-bound proteins to support growth. On the other hand, comparative strain S. chromogenes IM did not show significant growth recovery with iron supplementation under iron-deprived conditions this time, indicating that this specific strain might be less adaptable to iron-deprived circumstances than previously hypothesized [13]. However, it is worth noting that the AUC for S. chromogenes IM in dTSB media was higher than in the aforementioned study, suggesting that our strain was indeed able to adapt to iron-deprived media to a certain degree, possibly by sufficiently maintaining intracellular iron levels for proliferation [36]. As for S. chromogenes TA, our findings once again demonstrated the strain’s inability to exploit multiple iron sources.

It is generally accepted that the siderophore SA synthesis and transport related operons are found in most staphylococcal genomes, while the siderophore SB synthesis and transport related operons are predominantly found in the genomes of S. aureus [18]. The presence of the sfa operon was confirmed for all S. chromogenes and S. equorum isolates; however our S. equorum isolates appear to contain a deletion of the sfaA gene, an efflux transporter responsible for the export of SA into the extracellular milieu [67]. Interestingly, in contrast to the S. chromogenes strains, for all S. equorum strains, a complete 9-gene-sfa-operon was identified. When examining siderophore production, phenotypically S. aureus ATCC 25923 and all S. chromogenes isolates were positive for siderophore production in the qualitative assay with S. aureus producing the highest amount of siderophores followed by the S. chromogenes isolates in the quantitative assay. This was expected for S. aureus as they are known siderophore producers with SB the most robustly upregulated within the iron-restricted host [18]. In our study, 100% AA hits was found for all studied iron acquisition genes in the genotype of the quality control strain S. aureus ATCC 25923 when compared to the S. aureus reference strain used in WGS. Staphylococcus chromogenes in general presented quantitatively a lower and higher siderophore production than S. aureus and S. equorum, respectively. This was expected, because the S. chromogenes strains are considered to be “host-adapted” in an ecological context and carry all SA-related genes, including the sfaA gene for SA export. It is speculated that SA synthesis has a limited ability to transport iron into the cells [21] and in contrast to SB, its production is severely hampered in iron-limited, glucose-containing media [18]. Serum has a lower iron and higher glucose content when compared to, for example, the skin, which would elucidate the lower siderophore production of our NASM strains when compared to S. aureus ATCC25923 and support the general consensus of NASM species as commensals rather than invasive. Interestingly, both S. chromogenes isolates from IM and CCM appear to have a higher siderophore production when compared to the isolates from TA and BTM. Even though these differences were statistically not significant, when taking a closer look at the sfa-hts operon landscape, we again see variation in genes around the siderophore-associated genes for S. chromogenes TA when compared to the other S. chromogenes strains from IM, CCM, and BTM. This variation could be part of the reason this strain has presented different characteristics when compared with the IM strain in multiple assays [8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 40, 42, 43]. Notably, the S. equorum strains had hits for all SB genes and consequently, one would anticipate that the strains within this species would be strong siderophore producers similar to S. aureus ATCC 25923. However, based on our findings, S. equorum isolates did not exhibit high production of siderophores. It is conceivable that the in vitro assay might lack the required sensitivity to detect SB synthesis effectively or that the sbn-sir operon is not being expressed under the current experimental conditions. Additionally, it is also plausible that these proteins related to SB production have undergone functional divergence in these strains. The latter however, seems unlikely because although we can see an evolutionary change based on the phylogenetic hits (% AA identity), the sfa-hts and sbn-sir operons are likely to share significant functional similarities. When considering the proteins adjacent to the sbn-sir operon protein, there is significant variation in genes present between S. aureus ATCC 25923 and both S. equorum isolates which could explain our observed lack of siderophore production in S. equorum.

Regarding ferritin iron acquisition, we observed significant growth recovery for both S. chromogenes field strains and visually, a shortened lag phase for S. equorum CCM, which would suggest that a mechanism is present to access ferritin iron. The phylogenetic protein hits for the proposed model responsible for ferritin iron acquisition, would appear to support the phenotypes we observed. Although we did not observe complete hits for S. equorum and S. aureus ATCC 25923, our findings do not necessarily exclude the capability of these isolates to acquire ferritin iron. Either the reference strain was not sufficient to make comparisons or other mechanisms for ferritin iron acquisition might be employed.

Performing SNP-based phylogenetic inference and supplementing the current data with WGS data of bovine-associated S. chromogenes and S. equorum isolates from a Canadian study provided new insights in the genetic diversity and strain-relatedness of bovine-associated S. chromogenes and S. equorum. The S. chromogenes isolates, specifically IM and TA were, in line with previous studies applying MLST strain typing schemes [68], confirmed to be two unique strains, as well as belonging to two distinct genomic clades when including the collection of Canadian bovine S. chromogenes isolates. The two S. chromogenes isolates from CCM and BTM were found to belong to the same clade as the S. chromogenes IM isolate. Similar to a previous study that utilized RAPD strain typing [41], it was confirmed that these isolates are distinct strains with a significant distance in the phylogenetic tree between them. For the S. equorum isolates, WGS confirmed the isolates to be of two different strain types previously determined with RAPD-PCR [41] albeit with a closer relationship in the phylogenetic tree than the S. chromogenes isolates.

Collectively, our study emphasizes the importance of complementing the analysis of putative virulence factor genes with phenotypic testing. While our findings mainly highlight differences at the species level, we observed distinct interstrain growth and we still believe it is essential to consider strain-level variation within species when assessing NASM. Although our sample size was limited, we believe our findings provide a groundwork for future research on the importance of NASM for udder health and by extension, animal and public health. Furthermore, it is crucial to understand the mechanism of iron acquisition in NASM and the genetic basis underlying it. There are other iron acquisition mechanisms worth exploring, such as the uptake of heme–iron from hemoglobin, an important iron source for S. aureus and contributes significantly to pathogenesis (34). Our preliminary data on heme–iron acquisition genes (data not shown) for the strains in our study suggests that this mechanism is unlikely to be utilized by them. However, a different NASM species, (human-associated) Staphylococcus lugdunensis, was recently discovered having a functional heme–iron uptake system (34). These findings underscores the variability in iron acquisition strategies among different staphylococcal species and could have implications for their ecological niches and pathogenic potential. This knowledge is essential for understanding the relevance of these organisms to udder health and for addressing the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance, as these pathways may provide an alternative avenue for therapeutic approaches in treating mastitis.

References

  1. Hogeveen H, Steeneveld W, Wolf CA (2019) Production diseases reduce the efficiency of dairy production: a review of the results, methods, and approaches regarding the economics of mastitis. Annu Rev Resour Econ 11:289–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Madhaiyan M, Wirth JS, Saravanan VS (2020) Phylogenomic analyses of the Staphylococcaceae family suggest the reclassification of five species within the genus Staphylococcus as heterotypic synonyms, the promotion of five subspecies to novel species, the taxonomic reassignment of five Staphylococcus species to Mammaliicoccus gen. nov., and the formal assignment of Nosocomiicoccus to the family Staphylococcaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5926–5936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Valckenier D, Piepers S, De Visscher A, Bruckmaier RM, De Vliegher S (2019) Effect of intramammary infection with non-aureus staphylococci in early lactation in dairy heifers on quarter somatic cell count and quarter milk yield during the first 4 months of lactation. J Dairy Sci 102:6442–6453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Valckenier D, Piepers S, De Visscher A, De Vliegher S (2020) The effect of intramammary infection in early lactation with non-aureus staphylococci in general and Staphylococcus chromogenes specifically on quarter milk somatic cell count and quarter milk yield. J Dairy Sci 103:768–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Valckenier D, Piepers S, Schukken YH, De Visscher A, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2021) Longitudinal study on the effects of intramammary infection with non-aureus staphylococci on udder health and milk production in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 104:899–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Franca A, Gaio V, Lopes N, Melo LDR (2021) Virulence factors in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Pathogens 10:170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanderhaeghen W, Piepers S, Leroy F, Van Coillie E, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2014) Invited review: effect, persistence, and virulence of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species associated with ruminant udder health. J Dairy Sci 97:5275–5293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wuytack A, De Visscher A, Piepers S, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2019) Non-aureus staphylococci in fecal samples of dairy cows: first report and phenotypic and genotypic characterization. J Dairy Sci 102:9345–9359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beuckelaere L, De Visscher A, Souza FN, Meyer E, Haesebrouck F, Piepers S, De Vliegher S (2021) Colonization and local host response following intramammary Staphylococcus chromogenes challenge in dry cows. Vet Res 52:137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Toledo-Silva B, De Souza FN, Piepers S, Mertens K, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2021) Metabolites of bovine-associated non-aureus staphylococci influence expression of Staphylococcus aureus agr-related genes in vitro. Vet Res 52:62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Piccart K, Verbeke J, De Visscher A, Piepers S, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2016) Local host response following an intramammary challenge with Staphylococcus fleurettii and different strains of Staphylococcus chromogenes in dairy heifers. Vet Res 47:56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Simojoki H, Salomäki T, Taponen S, Iivanainen A, Pyörälä S (2011) Innate immune response in experimentally induced bovine intramammary infection with Staphylococcus simulans and S. epidermidis. Vet Res 42:49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Reydams H, Wuytack A, Piepers S, Mertens K, Boyen F, de Souza FN, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2022) Genetic diversity and iron metabolism of Staphylococcus hominis isolates originating from bovine quarter milk, rectal feces, and teat apices. Dairy Sci 105:9995–10006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Souza FN, Piepers S, Della Libera A, Heinemann MB, Cerqueira M, De Vliegher S (2016) Interaction between bovine-associated coagulase-negative staphylococci species and strains and bovine mammary epithelial cells reflects differences in ecology and epidemiological behavior. J Dairy Sci 99:2867–2874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanderhaeghen W, Piepers S, Leroy F, Van Coillie E, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2015) Identification, typing, ecology and epidemiology of coagulase negative staphylococci associated with ruminants. Vet J 203:44–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Adkins PRF, Placheta LM, Borchers MR, Bewley JM, Middleton JR (2022) Distribution of staphylococcal and mammaliicoccal species from compost-bedded pack or sand-bedded freestall dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 105:6261–6270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leuenberger A, Sartori C, Boss R, Resch G, Oechslin F, Steiner A, Moreillon P, Graber HU (2019) Genotypes of Staphylococcus aureus: on-farm epidemiology and the consequences for prevention of intramammary infections. J Dairy Sci 102:3295–3309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheldon JR, Heinrichs DE (2015) Recent developments in understanding the iron acquisition strategies of gram-positive pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:592–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Skaar EP (2010) The battle for iron between bacterial pathogens and their vertebrate hosts. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000949

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Verstraete MM, Morales LD, Kobylarz M, Loutet SA, Laakso HA, Pinter TB, Stillman MJ, Heinrichs DE, Murphy MEP (2019) The heme-sensitive regulator SbnI has a bifunctional role in staphyloferrin B production by Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem 294:11622–11636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill PJ, Cockayne A, Landers P, Morrissey JA, Sims CM, Williams P (1998) SirR, a novel iron-dependent repressor in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun 66:4123–4129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez JL, Delgado-Iribarren A, Baquero F (1990) Mechanisms of iron acquisition and bacterial virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 6:45–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wooldridge KG, Williams PH (1993) Iron uptake mechanisms of pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12:325–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beasley FC, Heinrichs DE (2010) Siderophore-mediated iron acquisition in the staphylococci. J Inorg Biochem 104:282–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carlson SK, Erickson DL, Wilson E (2020) Staphylococcus aureus metal acquisition in the mastitic mammary gland. Microb Pathog 144:104179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Diarra MS, Petitclerc D, Lacasse P (2002) Response of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis to exogenous iron sources. J Dairy Sci 85:2141–2148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Madigan CA, Martinot AJ, Wei JR, Madduri A, Cheng TY, Young DC, Layre E, Murry JP, Rubin EJ, Moody DB (2015) Lipidomic analysis links mycobactin synthase K to iron uptake and virulence in M. tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004792

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dale SE, Doherty-Kirby A, Lajoie G, Heinrichs DE (2004) Role of siderophore biosynthesis in virulence of Staphylococcus aureus: identification and characterization of genes involved in production of a siderophore. Infect Immun 72:29–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Beasley FC, Vines ED, Grigg JC, Zheng Q, Liu S, Lajoie GA, Murphy ME, Heinrichs DE (2009) Characterization of staphyloferrin A biosynthetic and transport mutants in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 72:947–963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheung J, Beasley FC, Liu S, Lajoie GA, Heinrichs DE (2009) Molecular characterization of staphyloferrin B biosynthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 74:594–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheldon JR, Laakso HA, Heinrichs DE (2016) Iron acquisition strategies of bacterial pathogens. Microbiol Spectr 4:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Åvall-Jääskeläinen S, Taponen S, Kant R, Paulin L, Blom J, Palva A, Koort J (2018) Comparative genome analysis of 24 bovine-associated Staphylococcus isolates with special focus on the putative virulence genes. PeerJ 6:e4560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fergestad ME, Touzain F, De Vliegher S, De Visscher A, Thiry D, Ngassam Tchamba C, Mainil JG, L’Abee-Lund T, Blanchard Y, Wasteson Y (2021) Whole genome sequencing of staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples. Front Microbiol 12:715851

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Flannagan RS, Brozyna JR, Kumar B, Adolf LA, Power JJ, Heilbrornner S, Heinrichs DE (2022) In vivo growth of Staphylococcus lugdunensis is facilitated by the concerted function of heme and non-heme iron acquisition mechanisms. J Biol Chem 298:101823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Naushad S, Naqvi SA, Nobrega D, Luby C, Kastelic JP, Barkema HW, De Buck J (2019) Comprehensive virulence gene profiling of bovine non-aureus staphylococci based on whole-genome sequencing data. mSystems 4:e00098-e118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Vermassen A, Talon R, Leroy S (2016) Ferritin, an iron source in meat for Staphylococcus xylosus? Int J Food Microbiol 225:20–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hyvönen P, Haarahiltunen T, Lehtolainen T, Heikkinen J, Isomäki R, Pyörälä S (2010) Concentrations of bovine lactoferrin and citrate in milk during experimental endotoxin mastitis in early- versus late-lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Res 77:474–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Orino K, Watanabe S, Ohtsuka H, Kohiruimaki M, Watanabe K (2006) Technical note: measurement of ferritin in bovine milk and its clinical significance. J Dairy Sci 89:3842–3845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Supré K, Haesebrouck F, Zadoks RN, Vaneechoutte M, Piepers S, De Vliegher S (2011) Some coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species affect udder health more than others. J Dairy Sci 94:2329–2340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. De Vliegher S, Opsomer G, Vanrolleghem A, Devriese LA, Sampimon OC, Sol J, Barkema HW, Haesebrouck F, de Kruif A (2004) In vitro growth inhibition of major mastitis pathogens by Staphylococcus chromogenes originating from teat apices of dairy heifers. Vet Microbiol 101:215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Reydams H, Toledo-Silva B, Mertens K, Piepers S, de Souza FN, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2023) Comparison of non-aureus staphylococcal and mammaliicoccal species found in both composite milk and bulk-tank milk samples of dairy cows collected in tandem. J Dairy Sci 106:7974–7990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Breyne K, De Vliegher S, De Visscher A, Piepers S, Meyer E (2015) Technical note: a pilot study using a mouse mastitis model to study differences between bovine associated coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Dairy Sci 98:1090–1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Piessens V, Van Coillie E, Verbist B, Supré K, Braem G, Van Nuffel A, De Vuyst L, Heyndrickx M, De Vliegher S (2011) Distribution of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species from milk and environment of dairy cows differs between herds. J Dairy Sci 94:2933–2944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Treangen TJ, Maybank RA, Enke S, Friss MB, Diviak LF, Karaolis DK, Koren S, Ondov B, Phillippy AM, Bergman NH, Rosovitz MJ (2014) Complete genome sequence of the quality control strain Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus ATCC 25923. Genome Announc 2:e01110-e1114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Louden BC, Haarmann D, Lynne AM (2011) Use of blue agar CAS assay for siderophore detection. J Microbiol Biol Educ 12:51–53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Samaniego-Barron L, Luna-Castro S, Pina-Vazquez C, Suarez-Guemes F, de la Garza M (2016) Two outer membrane proteins are bovine lactoferrin-binding proteins in Mannheimia haemolytica A1. Vet Res 47:93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Perez-Miranda S, Cabirol N, George-Tellez R, Zamudio-Rivera LS, Fernandez FJ (2007) O-CAS, a fast and universal method for siderophore detection. J Microbiol Methods 70:127–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shin SH, Lim Y, Lee SE, Yang NW, Rhee JH (2001) CAS agar diffusion assay for the measurement of siderophores in biological fluids. J Microbiol Methods 44:89–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Arora NK, Verma M (2017) Modified microplate method for rapid and efficient estimation of siderophore produced by bacteria. 3 Biotech 7:381

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bokma J, Vereecke N, Nauwynck H, Haesebrouck F, Theuns S, Pardon B, Boyen F (2021) Genome-wide association study reveals genetic markers for antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma bovis. Microbiol Spectr 9:e0026221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Vereecke N, Botteldoorn N, Brosse C, Bonckaert C, Nauwynck H, Haesebrouck F, Boyen F, Maes D, Theuns S (2023) Predictive power of long-read whole-genome sequencing for rapid diagnostics of multidrug-resistant Brachyspira hyodysenteriae strains. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0412322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vereecke N, Vandekerckhove A, Theuns S, Haesebrouck F, Boyen F (2023) Whole genome sequencing to study antimicrobial resistance and RTX virulence genes in equine Actinobacillus isolates. Vet Res 54:33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Meric G, Vezina B, Wyres KL, Holt KE (2021) Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 22:266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Li H (2018) Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Belhout C, Boyen F, Vereecke N, Theuns S, Taibi N, Stegger M, de la Fe-Rodriguez PY, Bouayad L, Elgroud R, Butaye P (2023) Prevalence and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) and mammaliicocci (MRM) in dromedary camels from Algeria: first detection of SCCmec-mecC hybrid in methicillin-resistant Mammaliicoccus lentus. Antibiotics 12:674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kaas RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O (2014) Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms. PLoS One 9:e104984

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 35:518–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh.Q, (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Letunic I, Bork P (2021) Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Matlock W, Lipworth S, Constantinides B, Peto TEA, Walker AS, Crook D, Hopkins S, Shaw LP, Stoesser N (2021) Flanker: a tool for comparative genomics of gene flanking regions. Microb Genom 7:000634

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, Goesmann A (2021) Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 7:000685

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gilchrist CLM, Chooi YH (2021) Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 37:2473–2475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lau CK, Krewulak KD, Vogel HJ (2016) Bacterial ferrous iron transport: the Feo system. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:273–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Naushad S, Barkema HW, Luby C, Condas LA, Nobrega DB, Carson DA, De Buck J (2016) Comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of bovine non-aureus staphylococci species based on whole-genome sequencing. Front Microbiol 7:1990

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. De Witte C, Vereecke N, Theuns S, De Ruyck C, Vercammen BT, Boyen F, Nauwynck H, Haesebrouck F (2021) Presence of broad-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in zoo mammals. Microorganisms 9:834

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Hannauer M, Sheldon JR, Heinrichs DE (2015) Involvement of major facilitator superfamily proteins SfaA and SbnD in staphyloferrin secretion in Staphylococcus aureus. FEBS Lett 589:730–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Huebner R, Mugabi R, Hetesy G, Fox L, De Vliegher S, De Visscher A, Barlow JW, Sensabaugh G (2021) Characterization of genetic diversity and population structure within Staphylococcus chromogenes by multilocus sequence typing. PLoS One 16:e0243688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. GitHub - tseemann/abricate: Mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial and virulence genes. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sieglinde Coppens (PathoSense BV, Lier, Belgium) for the technical support.

Funding

The matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer was financed by the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) as part of Hercules Project G0H2516N (grant no. AUGE/15/05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. M-Team and Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Helena Reydams, Bruno Toledo-Silva, Kristien Mertens, Sofie Piepers & Sarne De Vliegher

  2. Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Nick Vereecke

  3. PathoSense BV, Lier, Belgium

    Nick Vereecke

  4. Veterinary Clinical Immunology Research Group, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of São Paulo, Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva Av. 87, São Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil

    Fernando Nogueira Souza

  5. Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium

    Freddy Haesebrouck

Authors
  1. Helena Reydams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruno Toledo-Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristien Mertens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sofie Piepers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nick Vereecke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fernando Nogueira Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Freddy Haesebrouck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sarne De Vliegher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HR and SDV designed the study. HR and KM performed the experiments; NV supervised the WGS methodology and provided technical/software support; SP analyzed the results; HR drafted the paper. BT-S, KM, SP, NV, FNS, FH, and SDV revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Reydams.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Marcelo Gottschalk.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Sequences of virulence factors data set of staphylocococcal siderophore- and ferritin-related iron acquisition.

Additional file 2

: Multiple comparisons for the interaction term of the statistical analysis for medium * strain. This includes four field strains: S. chromogenes CCM (SCH CCM), S. chromogenes BTM (SCH BTM), S. equorum CCM (SEQ CCM), and S. equorum BTM (SEQ BTM); two comparative strains: S. chromogenes IM (SCH IM) and S. chromogenes TA (SCH TA); one positive control: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (SA). All isolates are grown in 4 different types of media: an iron-rich medium namely trypticase soy broth (TSB), TSB deprived of iron by adding an iron chelating agent 2-2’bipyridyl (dTSB), iron-deprived TSB supplemented with ferritin derived from equine spleen (dTSBF) and iron saturated recombinant human lactoferrin (dTSBL).

Additional file 3

: Multiple comparisons for the strains from the statistical analysis for strain effect. This includes four field strains: S. chromogenes CCM (SCH CCM), S. chromogenes BTM (SCH BTM), S. equorum CCM (SEQ CCM), and S. equorum BTM (SEQ BTM); two comparative strains: S. chromogenes IM (SCH IM) and S. chromogenes TA (SCH TA); two positive controls: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (EC) and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (SA).

Additional file 4

: Comparative genomic analysis of the four field strains and two comparative strains, an overview.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reydams, H., Toledo-Silva, B., Mertens, K. et al. Phenotypic and genotypic assessment of iron acquisition in diverse bovine-associated non-aureus staphylococcal strains. Vet Res 55, 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01260-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01260-z

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716