Skip to main content

Research progress into the principles and methods underlying capsular typing of Glaesserella parasuis

Abstract

Glaesserella parasuis (GPS) is an important bacterial pathogen of swine. Serotype identification has presented a bottleneck in GPS research since it was first identified as the pathogen causing Glässer’s disease in pigs in 1910. This paper presents a systematic review of the history of the development and application of gel immunodiffusion (GID), indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) typing methods for GPS, and the discovery of their shared antigenic basis. It provides a systematic theoretical overview of the immunology and principles underlying the three typing methods and offers new ideas for research into the prevention and control of Glässer’s disease. In 1992, GPS was first classified into serotypes 1–15 using GID based on GPS heat-stable antigens, but about 25% of the strains were found to be non-typeable, and the composition of their antigens for serotyping was unclear. In 2003, the IHA method was established based on saline-extracted antigens of GPS, whose sensitivity and typing rate were higher than for GID, although about 15% of strains were still found to be non-typeable. The results of IHA and GID typing are roughly consistent, since they share the same GPS surface polysaccharide serotyping antigens, although whether these are capsular polysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, or other polysaccharides, remains to be determined. In 2013, the Capsular polysaccharide (CPS) synthetic gene clusters from GPS serotypes 1–15 were successfully analyzed, confirming that CPS is essential for the formation of antigens for serotyping. In 2015, primers were designed based on the specific target genes of GPS capsules to establish a PCR typing method (H-PCR) for GPS, which, however, could not identify serotypes 5 and 12. In 2017, a new PCR typing method (J-PCR) was established based on the specific target genes of GPS capsules, which could identify serotypes 5 and 12. A combination of the two PCR typing methods enables the typing of almost all GPS strains, and the consistency with GID and IHA was verified using molecular biological methods. The antigenic basis of the three typing methods was shown to involve the GPS capsule. PCR typing methods are characterized by simple operation, fast speed, and low cost, and can successfully solve many problems in GID and IHA serotyping, and so have become widely adopted.

1 Introduction

Glaesserella parasuis (GPS) is a Gram-negative bacterium in the Pasteurellaceae family that causes Glässer’s disease in pigs, by polyserositis, arthritis, and sepsis [1]. GPS has become a widespread worldwide pathogen in recent years, and is an important bacterial infectious disease in the swine industry [2, 3]. While pigs of all ages can become infected, weaned and nursery piglets are especially susceptible [4]. At present, vaccination is the major preventive measure for Glässer’s disease, and many inactivated vaccines are widely available commercially. However, due to the many GPS serotypes and the lack of cross-protection against them, the protective effect of vaccines varies [5,6,7].

Serotypes are microbial surface-specific antigenic types classified on the basis of serum antibody responses, and these antigens are usually important surface polysaccharides or proteins, including capsules, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), flagella, and pili. Serotyping is an important means of identifying the structural components and antigenic characteristics of pathogenic microbes, as well as an important tool in infectious disease surveillance, pathogen phylogenetic research, and the development of diagnostic reagents and vaccines [8,9,10]. The traditional methods of GPS serotyping include gel immunodiffusion (GID) and indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), both of which are based on the reactions between antisera and bacterial surface antigens. GPS has been classified into 15 serotypes using GID and IHA, but a considerable number of strains remain non-typeable [11, 12]. The antigenic component for GPS serotyping in the two methods has long been unclear, and while it has been speculated to be a polysaccharide, it is not known whether it is a capsular polysaccharide (CPS) or an LPS. Howell et al. analyzed this component in reference strains of GPS serotypes 1–15 and found that the region contained wza, wzb and wzc homologues encoding a class I capsular loci. They therefore concluded that this region actually encoded for a CPS, that the GPS capsule was a class I type, and that the type of capsular locus was highly correlated with the serotype of the isolate and was a primary determinant of the GPS serotype [7]. Howell et al. established a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) typing method based on the capsule-specific genes of 15 reference serotype strains, and found that this method was faster and more accurate than the GID and IHA methods, with a higher typing rate [13]. In this paper, we systematically review the history of the development and application of the GID, IHA, and PCR typing methods for GPS, as well as the discovery of their shared antigenic basis, to provide a theoretical overview of the immunological basis and principles of the three typing methods, and offer new ideas for research and development into the prevention and control of Glässer’s disease.

2 GID typing

In 1952, four different serotypes of GPS (A, B, C, and D) from 120 GPS isolates using precipitation tests with 37 °C surface extracts of GPS as antigens were identified [14]. Morozumi and Nicolet detected 32 GPS isolates from Japan and Switzerland using agglutination and GID tests with untreated somatic antigens and somatic supernatants treated at different temperatures (4 °C, 60 °C, 100 °C, and 121 °C) as antigens. The results showed that 26 isolates could be specifically identified as belonging to five different serotypes (serotypes 1–5) based on heat-stable antigens treated under high pressure at 121 °C. In the same year, they further identified serotypes 6 and 7 using the same method [11, 15]. This specific antigen was heat-stable, soluble, and not susceptible to pronase treatment, but could be extracted using phenol, suggesting that its main component could be a polysaccharide. Kielstein et al. identified 158 GPS isolates from Germany (including eight indole-positive GPS-like strains) using GID tests and the method established by Morozumi and Nicolet using the autoclaved somatic antigen of GPS. One hundred and fifteen strains (115/158, 72.8%) were successfully typed, of which 95 (95/158, 60.1%) were identified as the known serotypes 1–5 ([11]), and the remaining 20 (20/158, 12.7%) as seven novel serotypes (Jena 6–12). However, the five strains Jena 7–9 were later judged not to be of GPS since they were positive for indole, and were therefore eliminated [16]. Rapp-Gabrielson et al. detected 243 GPS isolates from North America using GID tests with the heat-stable autoclaved somatic antigen of GPS. A total of 14 serotypes were identified, nine of which were the known serotypes C, D, 1–7, and five of which were new serotypes (ND1–ND5) [17]. By this point, serotypes A–D, 1–7, Jena 6–12, and ND1–ND5 had been identified by GPS serotyping in independent studies by various scholars from different countries.

In 1992, GID tests were carried out using the specific rabbit antiserum and heat-stable antigen to further integrate and innovate the above GPS serotyping research results [12]. The previously defined serotypes 1–7 were preserved, while Jena and ND were designated as serotypes 8–15, thus rearranging the previously identified serotypes. GPS was now therefore classified into 15 serotypes (Table 1), with 15 identified reference strains, establishing the standard scheme for GPS serotyping (the Kielstein-Rapp-Gabrielson scheme, KRG) that is still in use today [12]. The study serotyped 214 isolates from Germany, in which 214 (214/290, 73.8%) strains were successfully serotyped, and the remaining 76 strains (76/290, 26.2%) could not be typed using this method (Table 4).

Table 1 Proposed reference strains for 15 serovars of Glaesserella parasuis [12]

With the establishment of the KRG scheme, the serotypes of GPS have been better clarified and a complete GID method for GPS serotyping was established, and this has become an important and widely used technique in GPS serotyping. For example, Blackall et al. serotyped 31 GPS isolates from Australia according to the KRG scheme using GID tests with the autoclaved somatic antigens, and successfully typed 26 strains (26/31, 83.8%) (Table 4). Using this method, the cross-reaction between serotypes 7 and 10 was found for the first time [18]. Rafiee and Blackall prepared antisera against 15 reference strains in the KRG scheme by autoclaving, the 15 reference strains in the KRG scheme were then tested using the GID test with the 15 kinds of antisera prepared. Fourteen kinds of specific antisera were obtained, antiserum type 4 being the exception, that underwent one-way cross-reaction with the type 14 antigen. However, they believed that the preparation of high-titer antisera in rabbits in the KRG scheme presented difficulties since four or more rabbit immunizations were required for each antigen serotype, and that, even then, the preparation sometimes failed, requiring new rabbits or new reference strains (types 1 and 7) for repeat preparations [19]. Luppi et al. serotyped 106 GPS isolates from northern Italy using the GID test with hyperimmune rabbit antisera and autoclaved somatic antigens, in which 77 (77/106, 72.7%) strains were successfully serotyped and the remaining 29 (29/106, 27.3%) were non-typeable [20].

The GID typing method for the serotyping of GPS in the KRG scheme requires simple equipment and can be routinely performed in most laboratories. It is widely performed worldwide and has become an internationally recognized serotyping method [11, 12, 19]. However, about 30.6% of the strains investigated were still non-typeable by this method, because of the difficulty of antiserum preparation and the occurrence of cross-reactions (Table 4) [19]. More importantly, the antigenic substance for GPS serotyping using the GID method remained unclear. It was speculated to be a polysaccharide, but its specific composition requires further study even today [12].

3 IHA typing

The KRG scheme has identified 15 GPS serotypes and is an internationally recognized serotyping method. However, some serotyping studies have shown that some GPS isolates cannot be typed using the KRG scheme, thus demonstrating its limitations [12, 19]. In addition, because the antigenic components for GPS serotyping remain unclear, other serotyping methods have been developed. In IHA tests, soluble antigens (generally polysaccharides) are first adsorbed onto the surface of granular carriers unrelated to immunity (such as red blood cells), and the resulting sensitized carriers are then bound to corresponding antibodies to connect and aggregate the red blood cells, resulting in agglutination reactions. IHA has been applied to the serotyping of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae [21, 22]. Del Río et al. prepared 15 serotype reference antisera for GPS, and serotyped GPS using IHA and sheep red blood cells (SRBC) as carriers and either “saline extract”, “boiled extract” or “autoclaved extract” as antigens [23]. The results showed that the antigens for serotyping adsorbed on SRBC are specific, and that saline extract exhibits the highest specificity and sensitivity, followed by boiled extract. Although autoclaved extracts are the preferred antigen in GID [11, 19], they exhibit the lowest serotype specificity in IHA, probably because heating for two hours at 121 °C alters the immunological activity of the target antigen, thus reducing or removing the adsorption capacity of SRBC. The use of saline extract without heat treatment has the highest specificity in serological reactions, suggesting that certain GPS surface antigens, not deep antigens, are associated with the specificity of antigens for serotyping, as in the case of the serotyping of A. pleuropneumoniae [24]. Finally, Del Río et al. serotyped 67 strains using IHA and GID with the saline extract of GPS as antigens, giving typing rates of 91.0% (61/67) and 62.7% (42/67), respectively, suggesting that IHA has a significantly higher GPS typing rate than GID (Table 4) [23].

Tadjine et al. prepared rabbit antisera for 15 reference strains and serotyped 300 GPS isolates, with the boiled extracts of autoclaved bacterial solutions of the 15 reference strain antigens as common antigens for GID and IHA. The results showed that cross-reactions were frequent and that more than 30% of the strains could not be typed using GID, while no cross-reactions occurred using IHA and the typing rate was greater than 90% (Table 4) [25]. Bacterial LPS or capsule can be adsorbed directly onto the surface of SRBC, while protein antigens can only be adsorbed following pretreatment of red blood cells with tannic acid, diaminobenzidine, and chromium chloride [26]. Therefore, Tadjine et al. speculated that the heat-stable and serotype-specific antigens adsorbed on the surface of SRBC in the boiled extracts might be LPS (or capsule) rather than protein antigens. In addition, high concentrations of antigen and antibody were required to generate visible precipitation reactions using GID based on the agar reaction system, thus demonstrating low sensitivity, while antigens and antibodies bound directly to each other without the need for a medium using IHA, thus demonstrating high sensitivity. Therefore, Tadjine et al. argued that the sensitivity of IHA is far higher than that of GID in GPS serotyping [25]. Angen et al. successfully typed 30 out of 57 clinical isolates (30/57, 52.6%) using GID with autoclaved extracts as antigens, and successfully typed 49 clinical isolates (49/57, 85.9%) using IHA with boiled extracts as antigens (Table 4) [23]. The typing results of GID and IHA were therefore roughly consistent, and slight deviations were only found in three isolates, although the typing rate of IHA was much higher than GID [27]. Cai et al. successfully typed 178 out of 281 GPS isolates (178/281, 63.3%) using GID with the autoclaved extracts as antigens, and successfully typed 254 isolates (254/281, 90.4%) using IHA with the saline extracts as antigens. Similarly, it was shown that the typing results obtained using GID and IHA were roughly consistent, but that the typing rate using IHA was much higher than that using GID [28]. Zhang et al. first carried out serotype identification using GID with autoclaved extracts as antigens, and then performed IHA using the saline extracts as antigens. Eighty-nine of 112 clinical isolates were successfully typed, with a typing rate of 79.5%, and the remaining 23 strains could not be typed using either method [29].

In summary, the immunological principles and clinical applications of GID and IHA show that the two serotyping methods should share the same target antigen, but that IHA is more sensitive with a higher typing rate than GID (Table 4) [25]. However, even when GID and IHA were combined, a considerable proportion of strains could not be typed [27]. More importantly, the antigenic component for GPS serotyping remained unclear based on the studies carried out before Howell’s analysis of the GPS capsular gene cluster in 2013 [7]. It was thought to be a polysaccharide component, but whether it was a CPS or LPS remained in doubt. A number of problems persist regarding the use of GID and IHA for GPS serotyping: (1) the specific antisera are complicated to prepare and cumbersome to use; (2) the non-standardized antisera have different titers and their sensitivity often varies; (3) cross-reactions often occur in the serotyping of clinical isolates; and (4) the results need to be visually interpreted by the analysts, so that human error will always reduce the accuracy of typing [13].

4 Molecular biological basis of GPS capsular typing

The capsule is a viscous layer that surrounds the cell wall of some bacteria and consists of glycosaminoglycan (GAG; formerly known as mucopolysaccharide, aminopolysaccharide, or acidic polysaccharide). It is a crucial structural component of bacteria and a pathogenic factor and plays a key role in adhesion to host cells, resistance to phagocytosis, and immune escape [30,31,32,33]. Based on the reaction between serum antibodies and surface antigens, GPS has been classified into 15 serotypes using GID and IHA. While the antigen for serotyping is thought to be a polysaccharide, it is not known whether it is a CPS, LPS, or a different polysaccharide [12, 25]. PCR typing methods based on genes associated with the biosynthesis of bacterial surface polysaccharides such as CPS or LPS, have been successfully used to serotype a wide variety of bacteria [34,35,36,37]. CPS or LPS play a vital role in the interaction between GPS and its host, and a clear identification of the polysaccharide type is key to the analysis of antigenic components for GPS serotyping.

Williamson et al. isolated the GPS capsular substance for the first time and found that it consisted of α-galactose-α-N-acetylglucosamine repeating disaccharide units linked by phosphodiester bonds [38]. Morozumi et al. confirmed the presence of capsules in nine clinical isolates of GPS by morphological observation (iridescence in colony biofilms and capsule staining), the acridine yellow agglutination test, and Cetavlon electrophoresis, and verified that the GPS capsules were composed of acidic polysaccharides and characterized by their solubility, heat resistance, and protease hydrolysis resistance [39]. Xu et al. first reported the whole genome sequence of GPS serotype 5 strain SH0165 (accession number: CP001321), and found a 14 kb polysaccharide biosynthetic gene cluster (HAPS0039HAPS0052), which was annotated to encode O-antigen polysaccharides [7, 40].

Howell et al. conducted genomic sequencing on 15 serotype reference strains of GPS and compared their sequences with those of the gene cluster (HAPS0039HAPS0052) of SH0165 [7]. It was found that this gene cluster was split into R1 and R2 regions, in which the R1 region (HAPS0049HAPS0051) was a homologue of the wzawzc gene and a unique conserved gene for class I capsule synthesis and export. The results confirmed that this gene cluster encoded the class I capsule of GPS rather than O-antigen polysaccharides (Figure 1) [41, 42]. Wzx and wzy were involved in the biosynthesis of both class I CPS and LPS or lipo-oligosaccharides (LOS), whereas wza-wzc was implicated only in the biosynthesis of class I CPS [42,43,44,45]. The gene clusters and functions of group I capsule biosynthesis are shown in Table 2 [42, 45]. The HAPS0052 gene of GPS was located behind the R1 region and was a homologue of the iscR gene, and contained a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif where it bound to the promoter region of the CPS synthetic gene cluster, which positively regulated the transcription of the capsular GAG gene (Figures 1 and 2). The HAPS0039 gene was located in front of the R2 region, named funA (function unknown gene A) since it was the first gene with unknown functions discovered by Howell et al. There were also some genes with unknown functions in the R2 region, named funBfunZ (Figure 2). The R2 region was located between funA and wza, in which 13 serotype reference strains had different gene compositions, except serotypes 5 and 12, and included various genes involved in oligosaccharide repeat unit synthesis, which could synthesize CPS of different serotypes. Therefore, the R2 region was a potential serotype specific region and a target region for designing PCR typing primers (Figure 2) [7].

Figure 1
figure 1

Separation of the serovar 5 capsule locus into potential capsule regions, showing the details of their predicted functions, based on the published strain SH0165 [7].

Table 2 Genes involved in capsule biosynthesis [42, 45]
Figure 2
figure 2

Scheme of each capsule locus for all 15 reference strains of Glaesserella parasuis [7].

The CPS biosynthetic gene cluster of GPS serotypes 5 and 12 consisted of the same genes. However, a comparative analysis of the encoded amino acid sequence revealed 48 different amino acid sites in the remaining 12 coding sequences. Except for iscR and wzb in the R2 region, the most different sites were found in the genes wbgY, encoding for glycosyltransferase, and wzx, encoding for flippase, two of the key enzymes in CPS synthesis. Compared with serotype 12, the CPS biosynthetic gene cluster of serotype 5 contained an additional promoter [7], so that CPS of different serotypes could be synthesized. Moreover, the whole genomes of the reference strains of serotypes 5 and 12 were also significantly different, and the nucleotide sequence similarity between the two was only 81.7% [7].

Howell et al. compared the similarity of the capsular gene cluster sequences (funAiscR) among 117 GPS strains, and found that the position and composition of the capsular gene clusters were the same among the GPS strains of the same serotype, even though their relationships were distant, indicating that the capsular gene cluster was the major determinant of the GPS serotype. They also found that the similarity of the capsular gene cluster sequence of serotype 6 was above 85%, while it was more than 98% for serotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5/12, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 15 (only one strain was available for serotypes 10, 11, and 14, so their similarity could not be compared). In addition, 23 potential serotype-specific genes besides the capsular gene cluster were also identified in these strains, including five previously identified capsular genes, three phage genes, one transposase gene, one filamentous hemagglutinin gene, and 13 genes with unknown functions [46].

5 PCR typing methods for GPS and their application

The successful analysis of the GPS CPS synthetic gene cluster in preliminary studies showed that this gene cluster determines the formation of GPS capsular serotypes [7, 46]. The R2 region of the GPS capsular gene cluster was a specific region for the synthesis of antigens for serotyping, including transaminase genes, glycosyltransferase genes, flippase genes, and some genes with unknown functions (Figure 2), whose similarity was less than 51% at the nucleotide level [7, 46]. Therefore, the PCR typing method for GPS capsular antigen could be established based on type-specific genes in the GPS CPS synthetic gene cluster.

Howell et al. designed primers targeting the specific gene sequences in the R2 region of the GPS CPS gene cluster and established a PCR typing method (H-PCR) for identifying GPS capsular serotypes 1–15. However, GPS serotypes 5 and 12 could not be distinguished using H-PCR due to their having the same gene composition as the CPS gene clusters [7, 13]. The GPS serotypes 1, 2 and 11 also could not be directly distinguished using H-PCR due to the lack of sufficient specific target genes or differential genes in the capsular gene clusters of the GPS serotypes 1, 2 and 11. In H-PCR, the specific target gene of primers selected for serotype 1 was funB, but serotype 11 contained the same funB gene, and serotype 2 contained the homologous gene funE, with high similarity. Hence, when the serotype 1 strain was identified using H-PCR, positive results emerged in serotype 11 and weakly positive results in serotype 2. Therefore, serotypes 11 and 2 need to be further differentiated from serotype 1 using their specific primers (target genes for serotypes 11 and 2: amtA and wzx, respectively). The target gene of primers selected for serotype 2 was wzx. Many other serotypes also contained the wzx gene, but serotype 2 had significantly different genetic variation sequences in the wzx gene, compared with the other serotypes. Using H-PCR, Howell et al. obtained a typing rate of 100% among 150 clinical isolates, and these results were completely consistent with those of capsular gene cluster sequencing-based typing (Table 4). IHA achieved a typing rate of 84.0% (98/117) among 117 strains, and the results were consistent with those of PCR typing among 84 strains, with a coincidence rate of 85.7% (excluding the non-typeable strains in IHA). The typing rate was also 100% among another 84 GPS strains using H-PCR (without undergoing capsular gene cluster sequencing-based typing), and was 77% (51/66) among 66 strains using IHA, the results being consistent with those of PCR typing among 45 strains, with a coincidence rate of 88.2% (excluding non-typeable strains in IHA) (Table 4). In summary, Howell et al.’s H-PCR method is rapid, sensitive, and specific. It further reduces the non-typeable rate, cross-reactions, and detection costs, and can detect crude DNA extracts directly derived from a bacterial colony [13], and has become widely used.

Ma et al. carried out serotyping on 100 GPS strains using PCR and GID simultaneously (mPCR). The typing rates of the two methods were 93.0% and 73.0%, respectively, with a coincidence rate of 87.7% (64/73), it should be noted that in this paper, when calculating the coincidence rate, strains that could not be typed by both methods were excluded. But, Ma et al.’s article included strains that could not be typed and showed a concordance rate of 66.0%. Capsular gene cluster sequencing was performed on 11 GPS strains, including nine strains with different typing results (excluding strains that could be typed by PCR but could not be typed by GID) and two strains that could not be typed by either PCR or GID [47]. Gene deletion, insertion, mutation, and drift were found in the capsular gene clusters of these strains, suggesting that genetic instability was present in the GPS capsular gene cluster, similarly to the findings in other bacteria [47,48,49]. Wang et al. achieved a typing rate of 92.1% (234/254) among 254 GPS isolates (from Sichuan, China) by using mPCR, but the remaining 20 strains could not be typed [50]. Nubia et al. obtained a typing rate of 93.3% (886/950) among 950 GPS isolates (223 from the United States, 436 from Europe, 167 from China, 68 from Canada, and 56 from Vietnam) using mPCR, but the remaining 64 strains could not be typed [51]. Silva et al. used mPCR for typing of 105 GPS isolates (from Brazil), with a typing rate of 100.0% [52]. In summary, the mPCR method established by Howell et al. can achieve an overall GPS typing rate of over 92%, although traditional GID or IHA is still required to distinguish serotypes 5 and 12 [7, 13].

Jia et al. performed a comparative analysis of the GPS CPS synthetic gene cluster sequences and found that serotype 12 contained a hypothetical gene with unclear functions. Serotype 5 and some other serotypes did not contain this hypothetical gene, and they designed primers for use with a new complete PCR typing method (J-PCR) to distinguish GPS serotypes 1–15 and identify serotypes 5 and 12 (Table 3) [53]. In J-PCR, the target genes of primers of serotypes 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 14 were the same as those used in H-PCR, but with different primer sequences. Both of the target genes of primers and primer sequences of other serotypes were different between J-PCR and H-PCR (Table 3) [53]. Jia et al. serotyped 298 GPS strains using J-PCR and IHA simultaneously. The typing rates of the two methods were 94.3% (281/298) and 76.5% (228/298), respectively, with a coincidence rate of 98.2% (224/228) [53], which was slightly lower than that of H-PCR (85.7% and 88.2%) [13]. J-PCR is usually used in combination with H-PCR, because serotypes 5 and 12 that cannot be distinguished by H-PCR can be identified by serotype 12-specific primers in J-PCR [13, 53]. Li et al. serotyped 148 GPS isolates (from eastern China) using H-PCR plus J-PCR, and achieved a typing rate of 97.3% (144/148), with four non-typeable strains [54].

Table 3 Serotyping multiplex primers and estimated product sizes [13, 53]

Schuwerk et al. successfully serotyped 297 out of 308 GPS strains (from Germany) using H-PCR, with a typing rate of 96.4% (Table 4) [55]. Moreover, 46 strains identified as serotypes 5/12 were further distinguished using J-PCR into 16 strains of serotype 5, and 28 strains of serotype 12, as well as two non-typeable strains. However, when using the primers for serotypes 5/12, among the 28 strains identified as serotype 12 using J-PCR, only 10 strains were PCR positive, the remaining 18 strains being PCR negative, suggesting that Jia et al.’s universal primers for serotypes 5/12 were prone to false negative results. Therefore, the universal primers for serotypes 5/12 designed by Howell et al. based on the target gene wcwK can be used for GPS PCR typing. Among the other 251 serotyped strains, only 20 strains were inconsistent in the serotyping results of H-PCR and J-PCR, and were restricted to serotypes 1, 2, and 11. Specifically, 16 strains were identified by H-PCR as serotype 2 (target gene of primer: wzx), although weakly positive bands also emerged when primers for serotype 1 (target gene: funB) were used for identification, since the serotype 2 capsular gene cluster also contained the funB homologous gene funE [13]. However, these 16 strains were all specifically identified using J-PCR as serotype 2 since their primers originated from variant sequences completely different from funB in funE. Therefore, the primers designed by Jia et al. based on the target gene funE can be selected preferentially for identification of GPS serotype 2. Two other strains were identified as serotype 11 by both H-PCR and J-PCR (target genes of primers: amtA and actA), and positive bands also emerged when primers for serotype 1 (target gene: funB) were used for identification, since the serotype 11 capsular gene cluster also contained funB [13, 53]. Another two strains could not be serotyped by the two PCR methods, which were positive for serotypes 1, 2, and 11 using H-PCR, and positive for serotypes 2 and 11 using J-PCR. As mentioned above, gene deletion, insertion, mutation, and drift may have occurred in their capsular gene clusters, indicating genetic instability. In addition, many scholars have used these two PCR typing methods to serotype large numbers of GPS strains, achieving good serotyping results and demonstrating their suitability for wide use [55,56,57,58,59].

Table 4 Comparison of three typing methods of GID, IHA, and PCR for GPS

6 Summary and prospects

Glässer’s disease is one of the most important bacterial infectious diseases threatening the swine industry worldwide, and GPS serotyping is a key to understanding Glässer’s disease epidemics and achieving their prevention and control [4]. The GPS serotyping method (serotypes 1–15) established by Kielstein and Rapp-Gabrielson in 1992 was the first use of a GID test using heat-stable antigens but failed to identify about 25% of the strains, and the composition of their antigens for serotyping remains unclear [12]. The GPS IHA method, established by Del Río et al. based on saline-extracted antigens in 2003, was characterized by simple antigen preparation and higher sensitivity and typing rates than GID, and has gradually become the gold standard for GPS serotyping, and made a significant contribution to GPS serotyping [23]. The typing results were roughly consistent between IHA and GID, and use the same surface GPS polysaccharides as serotyping antigens, but whether these were CPS or LPS (or LOS), or even other polysaccharide substances, remains to be shown [12, 16, 23, 25].

The successful analysis of the CPS synthetic gene cluster from GPS serotypes 1–15 by Howell et al. in 2013 confirmed that this gene cluster is essential for the formation of the GPS capsular serotype [7]. Howell et al. designed primers based on the specific target genes of GPS capsules and established the H-PCR typing method for GPS, which, however, could not identify serotypes 5 and 12. They also verified the consistency between GID and IHA typing results, and proved that the GPS capsule is the antigenic basis of the GID, IHA, and PCR typing methods [13]. The similar J-PCR typing method established by Jia et al. in 2017, based on the specific target genes of GPS capsules, could identify serotypes 5 and 12 [53]. The combination of the two PCR typing methods enabled typing of almost all GPS strains, and is characterized by a simple operation, fast speed, and low cost, and successfully solves many problems in GID and IHA serotyping, such that the two methods have been widely applied in combination [55,56,57,58,59].

As the history of the establishment and application of GPS typing methods shows, non-specific reactions often occur during GPS serotyping using GID based on heat-stable antigens [18, 19], presumably due to the interference of the heat-stable LPS (or LOS) antigen. CPS can be purified, its antigen titer can be calibrated, and the standard serum antibodies prepared from purified CPS can be used during GPS serotyping using GID, thus reducing or eliminating the interference of LPS (or LOS) and other antigens, and the occurrence of non-specific reactions. Similarly, non-specific reactions in IHA typing could also be attributed to LPS (or LOS) antigens, since they have similar characteristics in adsorbing SRBC to CPS [26]. Therefore, non-specific reactions can also be reduced or eliminated in this way. Future studies should further analyze the composition and structure, gene clusters and functions, and molecular synthesis mechanisms of GPS CPS to better understand the molecular immune response mechanism of CPS typing [60].

Regarding GPS typing using PCR methods, H-PCR can be used in conjunction with J-PCR. Combining J-PCR with H-PCR further achieves the identification of serotypes 5 and 12 [13, 53]. However, Jia et al.’s universal primers for serotypes 5 and 12 were prone to give false negative results. Therefore, the universal primers for serotypes 5 and 12, designed by Howell et al. based on the target gene wcwK, should be used first, followed by application of the primers for serotype 12 designed by Jia et al. [55]. Since non-specific positive bands of serotype 1 also emerge in serotype 2 strains in H-PCR, the primers designed by Jia et al., based on the target gene funE, should be preferentially selected for identification of GPS serotype 2 [13, 53]. In addition, GPS capsular gene clusters demonstrate some genetic instability, and gene deletion, insertion, mutation, and drift may occur, resulting in a small number of non-typeable strains, which can be further analyzed using DNA sequencing to discover their structural characteristics [47,48,49, 55].

CPS and LPS (or LOS) are two vital surface antigen substances for serotyping Gram-negative bacteria. Studies have shown that GPS, like other bacteria of the Pasteurellaceae family, contain LOS antigens as well as CPS antigens [60,61,62,63,64,65]. To better understand the basic structure and serotypes of GPS, it is necessary to systematically analyze the serotype, composition and structure, and biosynthetic gene clusters and functions of GPS LOS [60].

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials will be available upon request.

Abbreviations

GPS:

Glaesserella parasuis

GID:

gel immunodiffusion

IHA:

indirect hemagglutination assay

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

CPS:

capsular polysaccharide

LPS:

lipopolysaccharides

KRG:

Kielstein-Rapp-Gabrielson scheme

SRBC:

sheep red blood cells

GAG:

glycosaminoglycan

LOS:

lipo-oligosaccharides

funA :

function unknown gene A

funBfunZ :

function unknown gene B–function unknown gene Z

H-PCR:

Howell et al.(2015)’s [13] PCR

J-PCR:

Jia et al. (2017)’s [53]PCR

References

  1. Olvera A, Segalés J, Aragón V (2007) Update on the diagnosis of Haemophilus parasuis infection in pigs and novel genotyping methods. Vet J 174:522–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aragon V, Cerdà-Cuéllar M, Fraile L, Mombarg M, Nofrarías M, Olvera A, Sibila M, Solanes D, Segalés J (2010) Correlation between clinico-pathological outcome and typing of Haemophilus parasuis field strains. Vet Microbiol 142:387–393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smart NL, Miniats OP, Rosendal S, Friendship RM (1989) Glasser’s disease and prevalence of subclinical infection with Haemophilus parasuis in swine in southern Ontario. Can Vet J 30:339–343

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliveira S, Pijoan C (2004) Haemophilus parasuis: new trends on diagnosis, epidemiology and control. Vet Microbiol 99:1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smart NL, Miniats OP (1989) Preliminary assessment of a Haemophilus parasuis bacterin for use in specific pathogen free swine. Can J Vet Res 53:390–393

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi K, Naga S, Yagihashi T, Ikehata T, Nakano Y, Senna K, Maruyama T, Murofushi J (2001) A cross-protection experiment in pigs vaccinated with Haemophilus parasuis serovars 2 and 5 bacterins, and evaluation of a bivalent vaccine under laboratory and field conditions. J Vet Med Sci 63:487–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Howell KJ, Weinert LA, Luan SL, Peters SE, Chaudhuri RR, Harris D, Angen O, Aragon V, Parkhill J, Langford PR, Rycroft AN, Wren BW, Tucker AW, Maskell DJ; BRaDP1T Consortium (2013) Gene content and diversity of the loci encoding biosynthesis of capsular polysaccharides of the 15 serovar reference strains of Haemophilus parasuis. J Bacteriol 195:4264–4273

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Frasch CE (1994) Serogroup and serotype classification of bacterial pathogens. Methods Enzymol 235:159–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fratamico PM, DebRoy C, Liu Yh, Needlema DS, Baranzoni GM, Feng P (2016) Advances in molecular serotyping and subtyping of Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 7:644

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Banerji S, Simon S, Tille A, Fruth A, Flieger A (2020) Genome-based Salmonella serotyping as the new gold standard. Sci Rep 10:4333

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Morozumi T, Nicolet J (1986) Some antigenic properties of Haemophilus parasuis and a proposal for serological classification. J Clin Microbiol 23:1022–1025

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kielstein P, Rapp-Gabrielson VJ (1992) Designation of 15 serovars of Haemophilus parasuis on the basis of immunodiffusion using heat-stable antigen extracts. J Clin Microbiol 30:862–865

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Howell KJ, Peters SE, Wang J, Hernandez-Garcia J, Tucker AW (2015) Development of a multiplex PCR for rapid molecular serotyping of Haemophilus parasuis. J Clin Microbiol 53:3812–3821

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakos K, Nilsson A, Thal E (1952) Untersuchungen über Haemophilus suis. Nord Vet-Med 4:241–255

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolet J, Morozumi T, Bloch I (1986) Proposal for a serological classification of Haemophilus parasuis. In Proc 9th Int Pig Vet Soc Congr Barcelona, Spain. p 260

  16. Kielstein P, Rosner H, Müller W (1991) Typing of heat-stable soluble Haemophilus parasuis antigen by means of agargel precipitation and the dot-blot procedure. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 38:315–320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rapp-Gabrielson VJ, Gabrielson DA (1992) Prevalence of Haemophilus parasuis serovars among isolates from swine. Am J Vet Res 53:659–664

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blackall P, Rapp-Gabrielson V, Hampson D (1996) Serological characterisation of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from Australian pigs. Aust Vet J 73:93–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rafiee M, Blackall PJ (2000) Establishment, validation and use of the Kielstein-Rapp-Gabrielson serotyping scheme for Haemophilus parasuis. Aust Vet J 78:172–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luppi A, Bonilauri P, Dottori M, Iodice G, Gherpelli Y, Merialdi G, Maioli G, Martelli P (2013) Haemophilus parasuis serovars isolated from pathological samples in Northern Italy. Transbound Emerg Dis 60:140–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gutierrez CB, Tascon RI, Vazquez JA, Ferri EFR (1991) Cross-reactivity between Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotypes comparing different antigens and serological tests. Res Vet Sci 50:308–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mittal KR, Higgins R, Lariviere S (1983) Determination of antigenic specificity and relationship among Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae serotypes by an indirect hemagglutination test. J Clin Microbiol 17:787–790

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Del Río ML, Gutierrez CB, Rodriguez Ferri EF (2003) Value of indirect hemagglutination and coagglutination tests for serotyping Haemophilus parasuis. J Clin Microbiol 41:880–882

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mittal KR, Higgins R, Lariviere S (1982) Evaluation of slide agglutination and ring precipitation tests for capsular serotyping of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 15:1019–1023

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tadjine M, Mittal K, Bourdon S, Gottschalk M (2004) Development of a new serological test for serotyping Haemophilus parasuis isolates and determination of their prevalence in North America. J Clin Microbiol 42:839–840

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyden SV (1951) The adsorption of proteins on erythrocytes treated with tannic acid and subsequent hemagglutination by antiprotein sera. J Exp Med 93:107–111

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Angen O, Svensmark B, Mittal K (2004) Serological characterization of Danish Haemophilus parasuis isolates. Vet Microbiol 103:255–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai X, Chen H, Blackall PJ, Yin Z, Wang L, Liu Z, Jin M (2005) Serological characterization of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from China. Vet Microbiol 111:231–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang J, Xu C, Guo L, Shen H, Deng X, Ke C, Ke B, Zhang B, Li A, Ren T, Liao M (2012) Prevalence and characterization of genotypic diversity of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from southern China. Can J Vet Res 76:224–229

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Eberle KC, Hau SJ, Luan SL, Weinert LA, Stasko JA, Wang J, Peters SE, Langford PR, Rycroft AN, Wren BW, Maskell DJ, Tucker AW, Brockmeier SL (2020) Generation and evaluation of a Glaesserella (Haemophilus) parasuis capsular mutant. Infect Immun 88:e00879-19

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Matiašková K, Kavanová L, Kulich P, Gebauer J, Nedbalcová K, Kudláčková H (2021) The role of antibodies against the crude capsular extract in the immune response of porcine alveolar macrophages to in vitro infection of various serovars of Glaesserella (Haemophilus) parasuis. Front Immunol 12:e635097

    Google Scholar 

  32. Litschko C, Oldrini D, Budde I, Berger M, Meens J, Gerardy-Schahn R, Berti F, Schubert M, Fiebig T (2018) A new family of capsule polymerases generates teichoic acid-like capsule polymers in gram-negative pathogens. mBio 9:e00641-18

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeidan AA, Poulsen VK, Janzen T, Buldo P, Derkx PMF, Øregaard G, Neves AR (2017) Polysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: from genes to industrial applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:S168–S200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bossé JT, Li Y, Angen O, Weinert LA, Chaudhuri RR, Holden MT, Williamson SM, Maskell DJ, Tucker AW, Wren BW, Rycroft AN, Langford PR; BRaDP1T consortium (2014) Multiplex PCR assay for unequivocal differentiation of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serovars 1 to 3, 5 to 8, 10, and 12. J Clin Microbiol 52:2380–2385

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Falla TJ, Crook DW, Brophy LN, Maskell D, Kroll JS, Moxon ER (1994) PCR for capsular typing of Haemophilus influenzae. J Clin Microbiol 32:2382

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Poly F, Serichatalergs O, Schulman M, Ju J, Cates C, Kanipes M, Mason C, Guerry P (2011) Discrimination of major capsular types of campylobacter jejuni by multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 49:1750–1757

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pai R, Limor J, Beall B (2005) Use of pyrosequencing to differentiate Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 6A and 6B. J Clin Microbiol 43:4820–4822

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Williamson A, Zamenhof S (1964) Studies on the type-specific substances of Hemophilus parasuis. J Biol Chem 239:963–966

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Morozumi T, Nicolet J (1986) Morphological variations of Haemophilus parasuis strains. J Clin Microbiol 23:138–142

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu Z, Yue M, Zhou R, Jin Q, Fan Y, Bei W, Chen H (2011) Genomic characterization of Haemophilus parasuis SH0165, a highly virulent strain of serovar 5 prevalent in China. PLoS One 6:e19631

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Whitfield C, Roberts I (1999) Structure, assembly and regulation of expression of capsules in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 31:1307–1319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitfield C (2006) Biosynthesis and assembly of capsular polysaccharides in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Biochem 75:39–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Drummelsmith J, Whitfield C (2010) Gene products required for surface expression of the capsular form of the group 1 K antigen in Escherichia coli (O9a:K30). Mol Microbiol 31:1321–1332

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kong F, Wang W, Tao J, Wang L, Gilbert GL (2005) A molecular-capsular-type prediction system for 90 Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes using partial cpsAcpsB sequencing and wzy- or wzx-specific PCR. J Med Microbiol 54:351–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Reeves P (1996) Bacterial polysaccharide synthesis and gene nomenclature. Trend Microbiol 4:495–503

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Howell KJ, Weinert LA, Chaudhuri RR, Luan SL, Bossé JT (2014) The use of genome wide association methods to investigate pathogenicity, population structure and serovar in Haemophilus parasuis. BMC Genomics 15:1179

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ma L, Wang L, Chu Y, Li X, Cui Y, Chen S, Zhou J, Li C, Lu Z, Liu J, Liu Y (2016) Characterization of Chinese Haemophilus parasuis isolates by traditional serotyping and molecular serotyping methods. PLoS One 11:e0168903

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lacouture S, Gottschalk M (2020) Distribution of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (from 2015 to June 2020) and Glaesserella parasuis (from 2017 to June 2020) serotypes isolated from diseased pigs in Quebec. Can Vet J 61:1261–1263

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Zheng H, Qiu X, Roy D, Segura M, Du P, Xu J, Gottschalk M (2017) Genotyping and investigating capsular polysaccharide synthesis gene loci of non-serotypeable Streptococcus suis isolated from diseased pigs in Canada. Vet Res 48:10

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang Z, Zhao Q, Wei H, Wen X, Wen Y (2017) Prevalence and seroepidemiology of Haemophilus parasuis in Sichuan province. China PeerJ 5:e3379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Macedo N, Gottschalk M, Strutzberg-Minder K, Van CN, Zhang L, Zou G, Zhou R, Marostica T, Clavijo MJ, Tucker A, Aragon V (2021) Molecular characterization of Glaesserella parasuis strains isolated from North America, Europe and Asia by serotyping PCR and LS-PCR. Vet Res 52:68

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Silva G, Moreno L, Matajira C, Silva A, Araújo K, Gomes V, Barbosa M, Sato M, Moreno A (2022) Glaesserella parasuis serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of isolated from diseased swine in Brazil. Pathogens 11:1443

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Jia A, Zhou R, Fan H, Yang K, Liao M (2017) Development of serotype-specific PCR assays for typing of Haemophilus parasuis circulating in southern China. J Clin Microbiol 55:3249–3257

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Li J, Xu L, Su F, Yu B, Yuan X (2019) Association between iscR-based phylogeny, serovars and potential virulence markers of Haemophilus parasuis. PeerJ 7:e6950

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Schuwerk L, Hoeltig D, Waldmann KH, Strutzberg-Minder K, Valentin-Weigand P, Rohde J (2020) Serotyping and pathotyping of Glaesserella parasuis isolated 2012–2019 in Germany comparing different PCR-based methods. Vet Res 51:137

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sun Q, Yu X, He D, Ku X, Hong B, Zeng W, Zhang H, He Q (2022) Investigation and analysis of etiology associated with porcine respiratory disease complex in China from 2017 to 2021. Front Vet Sci 9:960033

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Yu X, Su Q, Ku X, He D, Li Z, Ghonai AH, Fan S, He Q (2020) The epidemiological investigation of co-infection of major respiratory bacteria with pseudorabies virus in intensive pig farms in China. Vet Med Sci 7:175–183

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu CF, Chen SH, Chou CC, Wang CM, Huang SW, Kuo HC (2023) Serotype and multilocus sequence typing of Streptococcus suis from diseased pigs in Taiwan. Sci Rep 13:e8263

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lee CY, Ong HX, Tan CY, Low SE, Phang LY, Lai J, Ooi PT, Fong MWC (2023) Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of outer membrane protein P2 (OmpP2) of Glaesserella (Haemophilus) parasuis isolates in central state of peninsular Malaysia. Pathogens 12:308

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Perry MB, Maclean LL, Gottschalk M, Aragon V, Vinogradov E (2013) Structure of the capsular polysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides from Haemophilus parasuis strains ER-6P (serovar 15) and Nagasaki (serovar 5). Carbohydr Res 378:91–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bouchet B, Vanier G, Jacques M, Gottschalk M (2008) Interactions of Haemophilus parasuis and its LOS with porcine brain microvascular endothelial cells. Vet Res 39:42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bouchet B, Vanier G, Jacques M, Auger E, Gottschalk M (2009) Studies on the interactions of Haemophilus parasuis with porcine epithelial tracheal cells: limited role of LOS in apoptosis and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. Microb Pathog 46:108–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Feng S, Chen A, Wang X, Pan Z, Xu S, Yu H, Zhang B, Liao M (2020) The Glaesserella parasuis phosphoglucomutase is partially required for lipooligosaccharide synthesis. Vet Res 51:97

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Zeng X, Chen H, Yue H, He Y, Ren C (2018) The effect of rfaD and rfaF of Haemophilus parasuis on lipooligosaccharide induced inflammation by NF-κB/MAPKs signaling in porcine alveolar macrophages. J Vet Med Sci 80:842–845

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zeng Z, Zhang B, He H, Chen X, Ren Y, Yue H, Tang C (2017) lgtF effects of Haemophilus parasuis LOS induced inflammation through regulation of NF-κB and MAPKs signaling pathways. Microb Pathog 110:380–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank International Science Editing for editing this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1704117 and 32072899).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZZ designed the concept of the review article. YZ, LG, JZ, YX contributed to writing the manuscript. ZZ critically read and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhanqin Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Marcelo Gottschalk.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Guan, L., Zhang, J. et al. Research progress into the principles and methods underlying capsular typing of Glaesserella parasuis. Vet Res 55, 137 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01395-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01395-7

Keywords