Skip to main content
Download PDF

HbpA from Glaesserella parasuis induces an inflammatory response in 3D4/21 cells by activating the MAPK and NF-κB signalling pathways and protects mice against G. parasuis when used as an immunogen

Veterinary Research volume 55, Article number: 93 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Glaesserella parasuis is usually a benign swine commensal in the upper respiratory tract, but virulent strains can cause systemic infection characterized by pneumonia, meningitis, and fibrinous polyserositis. The intensive pulmonary inflammatory response following G. parasuis infection is the main cause of lung injury and death in pigs. Vaccination has failed to control the disease due to the lack of extended cross-protection. Accumulating evidence indicates that the heme-binding protein A (HbpA) is a potential virulence determinant and a promising antigen candidate for the development of a broader range of vaccines. However, it is not yet known whether HbpA contributes to G. parasuis virulence or has any potential immune protective effects against G. parasuis. Here, we show that HbpA can induce the transcription and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1) in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM, 3D4/31). The HbpA protein is recognized by Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 on 3D4/21 macrophages, resulting in the activation of MAP kinase and NF-κB signalling cascades and the transcription and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. HbpA contributes to virulence and bacterial pulmonary colonization in C57BL/6 mice and plays a role in adhesion to host cells and evasion of the bactericidal effect of pulmonary macrophages. In addition, mice immunized with HbpA were partially protected against challenge by G. parasuis SC1401. The results suggest that HbpA plays an important role in the pathogenesis of disease caused by G. parasuis and lay a foundation for the development of a subunit or chimeric anti-G. parasuis vaccine.

Introduction

Glaesserella parasuis, the etiological agent of Glässer’s disease, is a common inhabitant of the upper respiratory tract of healthy pigs [1]. In stressed or hypoimmune hosts, virulent strains can translocate to the lower respiratory tract, penetrate the mucosal barrier, and enter the bloodstream. The resulting infection causes severe systemic inflammation, characterized by pneumonia, arthritis, meningitis, and fibrinous polyserositis. Glässer’s disease is responsible for heavy economic losses in the pork-producing industry worldwide [2].

The innate immune system is the first line of defence against invading pathogens and relies on pattern recognition receptors to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns [3]. Once activated, the system initiates the production of cytokines, chemokines, and other inflammatory factors [4]. Porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) offer the first resistance to G. parasuis in the lungs. When infected with G. parasuis, PAMs recognize the pathogen via toll-like and NOD 1/2 receptors and then regulate the production of a series of cytokines and chemokines through the NF-κB and MAPK signalling pathways [5, 6]. PAMs can clear pathogens by activating a strong inflammatory response [7]. Alternately, macrophages and neutrophils are drawn to the infection site by chemotaxis, resulting in lung tissue damage caused by the excessive production of inflammatory cytokines [8].

To date, 15 serotypes of G. parasuis with varying degrees of virulence have been described, but approximately 10% of isolated strains are non-typable [9]. Due to the number of serotypes and the poor cross-protection offered by standard bacterin vaccines, current immunization strategies for controlling Glässer’s disease are inadequate. Additionally, bacterial coinfections such as G. parasuis and Mycoplasma hyorhinis are common in high-density pig herds [10, 11]. Treatment of Glässer’s disease now relies mostly on antibiotic therapy [2, 12], which is accompanied by a growing risk of antibiotic resistance. For these reasons, there is an urgent need to develop potent broad-acting vaccines against Glässer’s disease.

Antigen immunogenicity is an important consideration in vaccine design. One potentially attractive group of antigens is the various bacterial ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters that are responsible for transporting molecules through the cell membrane [13]. These proteins play vital roles in nutrient uptake and virulence and may act as immunogens [14]. Accumulating evidence suggests that they are effective targets for the development of vaccines for numerous bacterial pathogens [15]. Heme-binding protein A (HbpA) is an oligopeptide ABC transporter that was initially identified as a potential component of the heme acquisition pathway in Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae). The transporter is highly conserved among heme-dependent Haemophilus species [16, 17]. HbpA is localized to the periplasmic space and transports heme into the cytosol of H. influenzae subsequent to the initial binding steps at the cell surface. In addition, HbpA has been identified as a virulence determinant. When HbpA function is eliminated by hbpA knockout, the pathogenicity of H. influenzae is significantly weakened in mice [18], and heme utilization is decreased. This is also observed in other bacteria, such as Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae [19] and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [20]. Zhou et al. [21] identified HbpA in the serotype 5 strain SH0165 of G. parasuis. hbpA (locus tag: HAPS_0092) is 1596 bp in length and encodes a protein containing 531 amino acids. Zhang et al. [22] reported that HbpA is a differentially expressed virulence-related protein in G. parasuis, and Yu et al. [23] demonstrated that HbpA is a potential immunogenic antigen based on the immune response mounted against G. parasuis serotype 5 in immunized rabbits.

Virulence factor-related proteins are widely used in subunit vaccine research. However, whether HbpA regulates the virulence of G. parasuis and the potential of HbpA as a subunit vaccine candidate against G. parasuis have not been reported. Hence, a more thorough understanding of HbpA function during G. parasuis infection is necessary. Here, we first aimed to investigate the role of HbpA in the virulence of G. parasuis. We measured numerous virulence-related phenotypes, including adhesion ability in NPTr cells, evasion ability in iPAM cells, and the capacity to induce secretion of proinflammatory cytokines via TLR2 and TLR4 and the MAPK and NF-κB signalling pathways. Subsequently, mouse models have been used to evaluate the immunoprotective effects of HbpA protein against G. parasuis. Overall, our results lay a foundation for the development of a subunit or chimeric anti-G. parasuis vaccine.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and cell culture conditions

The G. parasuis field isolate strain SC1401 [24] (highly virulent, serotype 11) and its derivative SC1401-ΔhpbA were cultured in tryptic soy agar/broth (Difco) supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (Sigma Aldrich) and 5% newborn bovine serum (Solarbio) (TSB++ and TSA++). The E. coli expression strain BL21 containing HbpA-His (rHbpA) was subsequently grown in LB (Invitrogen). 3D4/21 porcine alveolar macrophages were preserved in our laboratory and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Invitrogen). Newborn porcine tracheal epithelial cells (NPTr) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Preparation of recombinant rHbpA and pET-32a His-tag proteins

Glaesserella parasuis hbpA (minus the 63 bp signal sequence) was amplified from SC1401 genomic DNA using primers P1 + P2 (all primers used in this study are listed in Table 1). The PCR products were ligated into pET-28a (+) (HANBIO), generating pET-hbpA. The plasmid was transfected into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells. Transformed cells were cultured to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5 to 0.6 and then induced with 0.2 mM IPTG for 8 h at 28 °C. HbpA-His (rHbpA) was purified using Ni+ affinity chromatography (Bio-Rad). Purified rHbpA was dialyzed in 8 L of PBS for 48 days at 4 °C. The protein was then assayed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. The preparation protocol used to purify the pET-32a His-tagged protein was similar to that used for rHbpA. Briefly, pET-32a His-tagged protein was expressed in the E. coli strain BL21(DE3). Transformed cells (containing pET-32a) were induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 8 h at 25 °C for optimum expression. The tagged protein was purified by Ni affinity chromatography (Bio-Rad).

Table 1 Primers used in this study
Full size table

SC1401ΔhbpA construction and growth analysis

SC1401ΔhbpA was constructed as previously described [25]. Briefly, SC1401ΔhbpA was generated via allelic exchange. The 946-bp upstream homologous region and the 933-bp downstream homologous region of the hbpA locus were amplified using primers P3 + P4 and P5 + P6, and the 735-bp erythromycin resistance cassette was amplified from plasmid pMG36e using primers P7 + P8. The three fragments were subsequently cloned and inserted into linearized pK18mobsacB to generate pK18-hbpA. pK18-hbpA was transformed into G. parasuis SC1401 using the natural transformation method. An optimized protocol for natural transformation was used as previously described [22]. The growth of the wild-type and SC1401ΔhbpA strains was assessed to exclude the possibility of virulence attenuation or enhancement resulting from altered growth characteristics. Briefly, a single colony from the TSA++ culture plate was inoculated into 5 mL of TSB++ culture medium and cultured in a shaker at 37 °C and 220 rpm until the culture reached an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) value of 1.0. A 5-µL aliquot of culture was then inoculated into 5 mL of fresh TSB++ culture medium, and growth was monitored by measuring the OD600 every hour. All tests were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.

Detection of proinflammatory cytokines using ELISA and qRT-PCR

ELISA and qRT-PCR were used to determine the ability of HbpA to stimulate cytokine synthesis. 3D4/21 cells were plated into 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well, cultured overnight, and then incubated with 0.2, 2, 20, or 40 μg/mL rHbpA or infected with G. parasuis (SC1401 or SC1401ΔhbpA) at MOIs of 1 or 10. For the positive control, cells were incubated with 200 ng/mL LPS (Solarbio), and for the negative control, cells were treated with 20 μg/mL pET-32a tag protein (MW: 19 kDa). The cells were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C, and the supernatants and cells were harvested. Cytokine levels in the supernatants were determined by ELISA following the manufacturer’s instructions (Multi Sciences, Hangzhou, China). Briefly, the ELISA plates were soaked in washing solution for 30 s, the wells were emptied, and then 50 μL of supernatant was aliquoted into the test wells. A standard curve was made by aliquoting 100 μL of sample standards into wells. Fifty microliters of diluted biotinylated antibody (anti-MCP-1, anti-IL-6, and anti-TNF-α) was added to all the wells. The plates were incubated for 2 h at room temperature and then washed 6 times with washing buffer. Next, 100 μL of streptavidin-HRP solution (1:100) was added to all the wells, including the blank. The plates were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and then washed 6 times. Finally, 100 μL of sulfuric acid was aliquoted into each well to stop the enzyme–substrate reaction; the optical density was measured by a full wavelength scanner (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 450 nm. The transcription levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 were measured by qRT-PCR. The primers used for qPCR are listed in Table 1. Total RNA was isolated from cells by using a Total RNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), and complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated from 1 μg of total RNA using HiScript III RT SuperMix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). To measure RNA expression, a 20 μL mixture containing diluted cDNA was assayed using ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, China) on a LightCycler 480 II (Roche, Switzerland). GAPDH expression was used as an internal control. These experiments were performed three times; in each experiment, there were three technical replicates per condition.

Western blot

HbpA-induced phosphorylation of p38, Erk1/2, JNK, and p65 (key proteins in the MAPK/NF-κB signalling pathway) and activation of TLR2 and TLR4 were analysed by Western blotting. 3D4/21 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well and cultured overnight, after which 20 μg/mL rHbpA or pET-32a tag protein was added, followed by incubation for 12 h. Supernatants and cell lysates were harvested and treated as described previously [26]. Briefly, the collected cells were suspended in cold RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors, serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitors, and tyrosine protein phosphatase inhibitors and incubated in an ice bath for 15 min. Fifty micrograms of protein from each sample was subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk for 1.5 h at 25 °C and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used are listed in Table 2. The membranes were washed again and incubated with HRP-linked goat anti-rabbit antibodies (1:5000) for 2 h at 25 °C. The bands were developed using ECL according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Bands were detected by the ChemiDocTM XRS+ system with Image LabTM software (Bio-Rad).

Table 2 The details of primary antibodies used in the study
Full size table

Effects of MAPK and NF-κB inhibitors

To assess the roles of the p38, ERK1/2, JNK-MAPK, and NF-κB signalling pathways in the rHbpA-mediated production of cytokines, specific inhibitors against each pathway were used. We treated rHbpA-stimulated macrophages with an Erk1/2 inhibitor (U0126), a JNK inhibitor (SP600125), and an NF-κB inhibitor (PDTC) and then assayed the secreted IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1. The concentration of inhibitors in all cases was 10 μM, as in our previous study [26]. 3D4/21 cells were plated into 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well, cultured overnight, and then incubated with 10 μM SB203580 (p38 inhibitor), SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), U0126 (ERK1/2 inhibitor), or PDTC (NF-κB inhibitor) for 2 h at 37 °C prior to incubation with 20 μg/mL rHbpA for 12 h. Inhibitors for studying signalling pathways were obtained from MCE (10 mM each, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) and dissolved in DMSO. An equal volume of DMSO was added to the cells for the control. Culture supernatants were collected, and the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 were determined by ELISA using a commercial kit (Multi Sciences).

TLR blocking assay

To determine the pattern recognition receptors for HbpA on 3D4/21 macrophages, we blocked toll-like receptors 2 (TLR2) and 4 (TLR4) using Ultra-LEAF™-purified CD282 (TLR2) (BioLegend, Cat: 153,001) and LEAF™-purified anti-mouse TLR4 (CD284)/MD2 (BioLegend, Cat: 117617). Each antibody was used at a final concentration of 8 µg/mL. 3D4/21 cells were plated into 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well, cultured overnight, incubated for 2 h with a single antibody, and then incubated overnight with 20 μg/mL rHbpA protein. Cell culture supernatants were collected for detection of secreted cytokines using ELISA kits as described in “Detection of proinflammatory cytokines using ELISA and qRT-PCR” section.

Adhesion and macrophage phagocytosis

Adhesion and macrophage phagocytosis assays were used to investigate the possible reduction in the infection capacity of SC1401ΔhbpA. Assays were performed as previously described [27]. For the adhesion assay, newborn porcine tracheal epithelial cells (NPTr) were aliquoted into 6-well plates and incubated at 37 °C until they reached confluence (approximately 1 × 106 cells/well). SC1401 or SC1401ΔhbpA cells grown in TSB++ overnight were collected by centrifugation (3000 × g for 10 min) and resuspended in DMEM. Cells were infected with SC1401 or SC1401ΔhbpA at multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of 1:10 and 1:100 and then incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The cells were washed six times with sterile PBS to eliminate nonadherent bacteria. Adherent bacteria were quantified by spreading cells on TSA++ plates, incubating for 36 h at 37 °C, and then counting the number of colonies (CFU). The 3D4/21 cells used for the phagocytosis assay were subjected to identical procedures, except that the extracellular bacteria were killed by incubating the cell monolayer with RPMI 1640 containing 25 µg/mL chloromycetin for 1 h.

Animal challenge

Specific pathogen-free (SPF) C57BL/6 mice were utilized for in vivo experiments. All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University and were carried out accordingly. All experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (SYXK2019-187). To evaluate the virulence of SC1401 and ΔhbpA, thirty-nine 4-week-old female mice were allocated randomly to the SC1401, ΔhbpA, and PBS groups, each containing thirteen mice. All mice were intraperitoneally injected with 108 CFU/mouse (an absolute lethal dose). Virulence was evaluated daily for 72 h by careful monitoring of the mice. Three surviving mice were randomly selected for euthanasia 24 h post-infection, and lung tissues were collected for immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays to determine the extent of G. parasuis (wild-type strain or hbpA deletion mutant strain) colonization in the lungs. IHC was performed according to previous methods [28]. Briefly, harvested lung tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature overnight and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 4 μm sections, and 3% H2O2-methanol was applied to the sections to suppress endogenous peroxidase activity after dewaxing and hydration. IHC to detect the G. parasuis wild-type or ΔhbpA strains was optimized using an anti-PotD antibody (1:200 dilution) as the primary antibody, which was prepared in our laboratory [29]. IHC-stained slides were observed using an Olympus optical microscope (magnification: 400×). Positive IHC staining corresponded to yellow‒brown colouration, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. IHC staining of G. parasuis was quantified using the mean optical density (MOD = IOD SUM/area).

Immunization and challenge

To investigate the ability of rHbpA to protect against G. parasuis infection in vivo, we used forty 4-week-old female mice randomly divided into 4 groups (mock: unimmunized and unchallenged; PBS: immunized with PBS + challenge; adjuvant: immunized with adjuvant + challenge; rHbpA: 150 μg of rHbpA emulsified with adjuvant + challenge). The adjuvant was MONTANIDE™ GEL 01. All the mice were injected subcutaneously with 200 µL. Two booster injections were administered: the first 14 days after the initial immunization and the second 28 days after the initial injection. Seven days after the second booster, all mice (except those in the mock group) were intraperitoneally challenged with 108 CFU (0.2 mL) of the field isolate G. parasuis strain SC1401. At 72 h post-challenge, the surviving mice in all groups were humanely sacrificed, and lung tissues were collected to determine the extent of G. parasuis SC1401 colonization. Tissues were fixed in neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin for IHC investigation.

Statistical analysis

ImageJ (version 1.8.0) was used to quantify the grayscale values of the Western blots. IHC images were captured with CaseViewer and evaluated using ImageJ software. The results of the study were analysed and graphed using GraphPad Prism 8, and the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between two groups were analysed using Student’s t tests. The data from more than two groups were analysed by two-way ANOVA. Significant differences between groups are indicated using asterisks: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001; ns indicates not significant.

Results

Preparation of biological materials

Sequence analysis revealed that HbpA is highly conserved among different serotype strains of G. parasuis, indicating that this protein has the potential to serve as a candidate subunit vaccine against this species (Figure 1A). rHbpA and pET-32a tag proteins were expressed with an N-terminal 6×His-tag and purified by Ni-affinity chromatography. The pET-32a His-tag was a recombinant consisting of the 109 amino acids Trx tag thioredoxin protein fused to a 6-histidine tag and was used as the negative control to exclude the possibility of LPS contamination in our study. SDS-PAGE revealed two bands with molecular masses of approximately 58 kDa and 29 kDa, corresponding to the predicted masses of HbpA or thioredoxin protein plus the His tag (Figure 1B). Western blot was performed to detect proteins extracted from the G. parasuis ΔhbpA and WT strains; HbpA was not detected in SC1401ΔhbpA, demonstrating the successful construction of G. parasuis ΔhbpA. Compared with SC1401, SC1401ΔhbpA displayed subtle growth defects, but the difference in their in vitro growth curves was not significant (data not shown).

Figure 1
figure 1

Expression of recombinant proteins and construction of SC1401ΔhbpA. A Sequence identity analysis between different serotype strains. The strain codes used in the present study were as follows: SC1401: field isolate strain Serovar 11; S1 (Serovar 1): 12939, field isolate strain Serovar 1; S2 (Serovar 2): SW140, reference strain; S3 (Serovar 3): SW114, reference strain; S4 (Serovar 4): HPS-1, field isolate strain; S5 (Serovar 5): Nagasaki, reference strain; S6 (Serovar 6):131, reference strain; S7 (Serovar 7):174, reference strain; S8 (Serovar 8): field isolate strain; S9 (Serovar 9):D74, reference strain; S11 (Serovar 11):H465, reference strain; S12 (Serovar 12):ZJ0906, field isolate strain; S13 (Serovar 13):IA-84-17975, reference strain; and S15 (Serovar 15):SD-84-15995, reference strain. There was no genome sequence for serovars 10 and 14. B SDS-PAGE of purified HbpA and pET-32a His-tagged protein M: Protein marker. C Western blot showing hbpA-deficient G. parasuis.

Full size image

rHbpA stimulates the production of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1

qRT-PCR revealed that infection with the wild-type (WT) and ΔhbpA strains resulted in increased transcription of proinflammatory cytokines in 3D4/21 cells at 12 h post-infection, although the response to SC1401ΔhbpA was significantly less than the response to the wild type (Figures 2A–C). Compared to treatment with the pET-32a His-tag protein, treatment with rHbpA resulted in a dose-dependent increase in cytokine transcription (Figures 2D–F). Figures 2G–I show the levels of secreted cytokines stimulated by rHbpA, as determined by ELISA; the increasing trend in secretion was consistent with that observed for transcription.

Figure 2
figure 2

HbpA induces the secretion of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1. A–C 3D4/21 macrophages were incubated with SC1401 or SC1401ΔhbpA at an MOI of 10. The bar graphs show the relative IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 mRNA levels. D–F 3D4/21 macrophages were incubated with 2, 20, or 40 µg/mL rHbpA protein; 100 ng/mL LPS was used as the positive control, and 20 µg/mL pET-32a His-tag protein was used as the negative control. The bar graphs show the relative IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 mRNA levels. The fold change in expression on the y-axis was calculated as the experimental group/negative control. G–I 3D4/21 macrophages were incubated with 0.2, 2, 20, or 40 µg/mL rHbpA protein; 100 ng/mL LPS was used as the positive control, and 20 µg/mL pET-32a His-tag protein was used as the negative control. The bar graphs show the secreted IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 levels as determined by ELISA. All assays were performed three times.

Full size image

rHbpA induces the expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 via the MAPK and NF-κB signalling pathways

Western blot assays revealed that macrophages incubated with 20 μg/mL rHbpA for 12 h had significantly increased levels of phosphorylated JNK, ERK1/2 and p65 (a signalling molecule in the NF-κB pathway) compared with those in the negative control group (p < 0.05) (Figures 3A–C). As shown in Figures 3D–F, Erk1/2 pathway inhibition resulted in significantly lower secretion of each cytokine tested than that in rHbpA-stimulated/unblocked macrophages. JNK pathway inhibition resulted in decreased secretion of TNF-α and MCP-1, and NF-κB pathway inhibition resulted in significantly decreased secretion of TNF-α.

Figure 3
figure 3

Identification of the signalling molecules involved in proinflammatory cytokine secretion. A–C 3D4/21 macrophages were incubated with 20 µg/mL HbpA protein or pET-32a tag protein for 12 h. A Western blot of total protein. B Gray values. C Ratios of phosphorylated signal molecules to total signal molecules. D–F Effect of inhibitors on cytokine secretion induced by HbpA. 3D4/21 macrophages were treated with 10 μM U0126 (Erk1/2 inhibitor), 10 μM SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), or 10 μM PDTC (NF-κB inhibitor) and then incubated with 20 µg/mL HbpA protein or His-tag protein for 12 h. The secretion levels of D IL-6, E TNF-α, and F MCP-1 in the culture supernatants were determined by ELISA.

Full size image

TLR2 and TLR4 receptors from 3D4/21 cells recognize HbpA

The TLR2 and TLR4 levels were significantly greater in the HbpA-treated macrophages than in the negative control macrophages (p < 0.05) (Figures 3A and B). As shown in Figures 4A–C, the secreted levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly lower in TLR2-blocked cells (p < 0.01) than in unblocked cells. The secreted levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were also significantly lower in TLR4-blocked cells (p < 0.05).

Figure 4
figure 4

Analysis of the pattern recognition receptors of HbpA. A total of 1 × 106 3D4/21 cells were incubated with 10 µg/mL anti-TLR2 or anti-TLR4 monoclonal antibodies for 2 h and then incubated with HbpA for 12 h. The levels of secreted A IL-6, B TNF-α, and C MCP-1 in the culture supernatants were determined by ELISA.

Full size image

HbpA affects bacterial adhesion and host cell survival

With respect to NPTr cells incubated with G. parasuis (at MOIs of 10 and 100 for 2 h), we found significantly less SC1401ΔhbpA attached than to the WT strain (Figures 5A and B). Additionally, for 3D4/21 macrophages incubated with G. parasuis (MOI of 10 or 100 for 2 h), significantly fewer SC1401ΔhbpA-expressing cells than WT cells survived after phagocytosis by macrophages (Figures 5C and D).

Figure 5
figure 5

Adherence of G. parasuis to NPTr and viability of phagocytosed bacteria. A, B Adherence of SC1401 and SC1401ΔhbpA to NPTr cells. The data display the average number of adherent bacteria in each well of a 6-well plate. C, D Survival of bacteria after phagocytosis by 3D4/21 macrophages. The data display the average number of bacteria in each well of a 6-well plate. Error bars represent the standard errors from three independent experiments.

Full size image

ΔhbpA displays attenuated virulence in vivo

Mice were injected with 108 CFU/mouse (0.2 mL) of wild-type or ΔhbpA SC1401 and observed for 72 h. Injection with WT resulted in 100% lethality within 48 h (10/10); in contrast, injection with ΔhbpA resulted in only 50% lethality (5/10) over 72 h (Figure 6A). Animal challenge experiments were also conducted to verify colonization by G. parasuis strains. IHC was used to detect colonized G. parasuis in the lung. The IHC results demonstrated that wild-type strains colonized at significantly greater levels than did the hbpA deletion strains (Figures 6B and C).

Figure 6
figure 6

Survival of mice and bacterial colonization after challenge with a lethal dose (1 × 109 CFU/mouse) of G. parasuis. Images are shown at ×200 and ×400. In each treatment group, ten C57BL/6 mice were challenged with a lethal dose (108 CFU/mouse) of G. parasuis. A At 48 hpc, all the mice in the SC1401-infected group died, and 50% of the mice in the ΔhbpA-infected group died. B G. parasuis immunohistochemistry showed that SC1401 colonized the lungs of C57BL/6 mice at a relatively high density. Brown dots represent G. parasuis or its deletion derivative. C The Mean optical density of HbpA was analyzed according to the IHC assays.

Full size image

rHbpA protects against G. parasuis in challenged mice

We tested the protective effect of rHbpA vaccination against G. parasuis SC1401 challenge in mice. As shown in Figure 7A, 100% of the mice in the PBS group and 90% of the mice in the adjuvant alone group died 24 h after challenge. In contrast, in the rHbpA+ adjuvant group, 20% of the mice died after 24 h, and 50% of the mice died after 48 h (hereafter, there was no further mortality). IHC was used to detect colonized G. parasuis in the lungs of the mice in each group. The IHC results demonstrated that SC1401 in the mock and adjuvant groups colonized at significantly greater levels than in the rHbpA-adjuvant group, indicating an increase in the bacterial clearance capacity of the rHbpA-vaccinated mice (Figures 7B and C).

Figure 7
figure 7

rHbpA protects mice from G. parasuis. In each experimental group, ten C57BL/6 mice were challenged with a lethal dose (108 CFU/mouse) of G. parasuis SC1401. A At 24 hpc, all the mice in the PBS group died, 90% of the mice in the adjuvant alone group died, and 20% of the mice in the rHbpA+ adjuvant group died. At 48 hpc, 50% of the mice in the rHbpA+ adjuvant group died, and the surviving mice survived until they were euthanized at 72 hpc. B G. parasuis immunohistochemistry showed that SC1401 colonized at a greater density in the mock and adjuvant groups. Brown dots represent G. parasuis. Lung tissues were collected at 24 hpc and prepared for the IHC assay. C The Mean optical density of HbpA was analyzed according to the IHC assays.

Full size image

Discussion

Glaesserella parasuis is a common inhabitant of the upper respiratory tract in swine, but under certain circumstances, it can cause a systemic infection called Glässer’s disease, characterized by fibrinous polyserositis and pneumonia. At present, disease control depends mainly on herd management, followed by the use of antimicrobial agents and immunization via vaccination. Many pig farms have management problems, such as early weaning, transportation of weaned pigs, inappropriate indoor temperature and humidity, or infection of animals with pathogens that can trigger the onset of Glässer’s disease if virulent G. parasuis is present [30]. Antimicrobials are widely used for treating Glässer’s disease, resulting in drug and multidrug resistance in G. parasuis isolates [31]. Additionally, antimicrobial agents can prevent the development of an effective protective immune response against future infections caused by virulent G. parasuis. The use of antimicrobials around the time of colonization of the upper respiratory tract can interfere with the colonization by G. parasuis, and importantly with the onset of immunity and posterior protection of the piglets [32]. Vaccination is another strategy to reduce the potential increase in Glässer’s disease caused by antibiotic-resistant G. parasuis. Vaccination with sole-serotype inactivated bacterins has eased the losses associated with Glässer’s disease, but because of serovar type heterogeneity, these vaccines do not produce broad immunity against the disease [33]. There is, in fact, a significant difference in protection against homologous serovars such as 4 and 5 (the most frequently identified serovars) [34]. Subunit vaccines that contain specific antigenic molecules of G. parasuis have the potential to solve this problem. To date, multiple recombinant proteins from G. parasuis have been identified as highly immunoreactive, but there are no subunit vaccines that provide effective protection [10]. In light of this, the identification of conserved surface antigenic proteins has become a focus in the development of more effective vaccines, particularly ABC transporters, which are found exclusively in prokaryotes [35]. Moreover, numerous virulence factors, such as the outer membrane protein OmpP2, have been reported to have an immune-protective effect against G. parasuis [36]. OmpP2 can induce cells to secrete proinflammatory cytokines [37]; it is a dominant antigen that can rapidly induce the production of high-titre, specific antibodies. HbpA, an ABC transporter, is also highly conserved in G. parasuis, so we evaluated its role in virulence and its effectiveness as an immune-protective antigen.

Huang et al. reported that excessive and persistent production of proinflammatory cytokines was responsible for severe pulmonary injury sustained by the host [38]. To investigate the effect of HbpA on the inflammatory response in PAMs, IL-6, TNFα, and MCP-1 transcript levels were quantified in cells induced by SC1401, SC1401hbpA, and rHbpA. The results showed that HbpA of G. parasuis induces the transcription and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1, in PAM cells. Western blot analysis and TLR blocking assays demonstrated that HbpA is a ligand of TLR2 and TLR4 in 3D4/21 cells. Our results are consistent with a previous study of the YfeA protein in G. parasuis, whose receptors are TLR4 and TLR2 [26]. However, a report describing the PotD protein in G. parasuis, whose receptor is TLR4 [29], suggested that the proinflammatory response in 3D4/21 cells is specific for the HbpA protein and not only due to a general proinflammatory response produced by macrophages towards any bacterial protein/LPS. We found that after HbpA was recognized by TLR2 and TLR4, the ERK1/2, JNK-MAPK, and NF-κB signalling pathways were activated to prime proinflammatory cytokine production. Previous studies have shown that G. parasuis induces the activation of the NF-κB and MAP kinase signalling pathways via Toll-like receptors [5].

In this study, we found that HbpA-deficient G. parasuis (ΔhbpA) was significantly less adherent to NPTr cells than was the wild-type pathogen. The adherence of bacteria to host cell surfaces is an essential determinant of bacterial pathogenicity. Adhesion is the initial step in colonization and cellular invasion, leading to persistence in the host, invasion into deeper tissues, and ultimately systemic disease [39]. Although HbpA is not involved in resistance to phagocytosis by PAMs, we found that G. parasuis ΔhbpA was significantly less viable than the WT strain after phagocytosis by 3D4/21. PAM is a vital line of defence against G. parasuis infection [40]. Once bacteria are phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages and internalized to mature phagolysosomes, they are exposed to damaging reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, low pH, and an array of hydrolytic enzymes [41]. Our results suggest that HbpA plays a role in evading the bactericidal effect of pulmonary macrophages.

Animal infection experiments were performed to assess the contribution of the HbpA protein to bacterial virulence in vivo. The results showed that mortality was greater and faster in WT-infected mice than in ΔhbpA-infected mice. IHC showed that wild-type G. parasuis colonized the lungs of mice to a statistically greater extent than did ΔhbpA. In addition, the results of bacterial phagocytosis and mouse challenge assays showed that fewer ΔhbpA bacteria were recovered. These results indicate that fewer bacteria interact with 3D4/21 cells, which might indirectly decrease the induction of cytokines.

Numerous studies have shown that mice, including C57BL6 and BALB/c mice, are a relevant animal model for studying G. parasuis pathogenesis. Prior to testing the immune efficacy of the HbpA vaccine in pigs, we tested its protective effect in G. parasuis-challenged BALB/c mice. The survival rate of mice immunized with the rHbpA+ adjuvant against G. parasuis infection was 50%, whereas that of unimmunized mice was 0%. Additionally, the lungs of unimunized mice contained significantly more G. parasuis than did those of rHbpA+ adjuvant-immunized mice, indicating that the ability of rHbpA+ adjuvant-immunized mice to clear bacteria significantly increased. These results demonstrated that rHbpA+ adjuvant vaccination protects mice against a lethal challenge of G. parasuis. Because some recombinant proteins that have displayed protection in mice have failed to do so in pigs [42], further investigation on the efficacy of HbpA vaccination in pigs is needed. As adjuvant selection impacts the efficacy of immunogens (38), the 50% survival rate in mice treated with rHbpA+ adjuvant (MONTANIDE™ GEL 01) may be improved with a different adjuvant. An improvement in survival may also be achieved by vaccines containing multiple antigens, including HbpA. In addition, a vaccine that provides protection against G. parasuis and some porcine respiratory viruses and/or bacteria may be a research project in the future.

In summary, we have demonstrated that the HbpA protein is a potential virulence factor in G. parasuis: it is recognized by TLR2 and TLR4, promotes the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines via the ERK1/2, JNK-MAPK, and NF-κB signalling pathways, and contributes to survival in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, immunization with HbpA provides G. parasuis-challenged mice with moderate protection (50% protection) against the pathogen.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as the article and no additional source data is required.

References

  1. Olvera A, Segalés J, Aragón V (2007) Update on the diagnosis of Haemophilus parasuis infection in pigs and novel genotyping methods. Vet J 174:522–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hau SJ, Eberle KC, Brockmeier SL (2021) Importance of strain selection in the generation of heterologous immunity to Glaesserella (Haemophilus) parasuis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 234:110205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu H, Mazmanian SK (2013) Innate immune recognition of the microbiota promotes host-microbial symbiosis. Nat Immunol 14:668–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fu S, Liu H, Xu L, Qiu Y, Liu Y, Wu Z, Ye C, Hou Y, Hu CA (2018) Baicalin modulates NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling in porcine aortic vascular endothelial cells infected by Haemophilus parasuis causing Glässer’s disease. Sci Rep 8:807

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Liu T, Langford P, Hua K, Zhou S, Zhai Y, Xiao H, Luo R, Bi D, Jin H, Zhou R (2015) Haemophilus parasuis induces activation of NF-κB and MAP kinase signaling pathways mediated by toll-like receptors. Mol Immunol 65:360–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma B, Hua K, Zhou S, Zhou H, Chen Y, Luo R, Bi D, Zhou R, He Q, Jin H (2018) Haemophilus parasuis infection activates NOD1/2-RIP2 signaling pathway in PK-15 cells. Dev Comp Immunol 79:158–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou S, He X, Xu C, Zhang B, Feng S, Zou Y, Li J, Liao M (2014) The outer membrane protein P2 (OmpP2) of Haemophilus parasuis induces proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in porcine alveolar macrophages. Vet J 199:461–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Liu C, Fang Y, Liu X, Li W, Liu S, Liu Y, Liu Y, Charreyre C, Audonnet JC, Chen P, He Q (2012) Transcription analysis on response of porcine alveolar macrophages to Haemophilus parasuis. BMC Genom 13:68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai X, Chen H, Blackall PJ, Yin Z, Wang L, Liu Z, Jin M (2005) Serological characterization of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from China. Vet Microbiol 111:231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa-Hurtado M, Barba-Vidal E, Maldonado J, Aragón V (2020) Update on Glässer’s disease: how to control the disease under restrictive use of antimicrobials. Vet Microbiol 242:108595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Salogni C, Lazzaro M, Giovannini S, Vitale N, Boniotti MB, Pozzi P, Pasquali P, Alborali GL (2020) Causes of swine polyserositis in a high-density breeding area in Italy. J Vet Diagn Invest 32:594–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nielsen R (1993) Pathogenicity and immunity studies of Haemophilus parasuis serotypes. Acta Vet Scand 34:193–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bale S, Rajashankar KR, Perry K, Begley TP, Ealick SE (2010) HMP binding protein ThiY and HMP-P synthase THI5 are structural homologues. Biochemistry 49:8929–8936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hensel M, Shea JE, Gleeson C, Jones MD, Dalton E, Holden DW (1995) Simultaneous identification of bacterial virulence genes by negative selection. Science 269:400–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garmory HS, Titball RW (2004) ATP-binding cassette transporters are targets for the development of antibacterial vaccines and therapies. Infect Immun 72:6757–6763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Morton DJ, Madore LL, Smith A, Vanwagoner TM, Seale TW, Whitby PW, Stull TL (2005) The heme-binding lipoprotein (HbpA) of Haemophilus influenzae: role in heme utilization. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:193–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanson MS, Slaughter C, Hansen EJ (1992) The hbpA gene of Haemophilus influenzae type b encodes a heme-binding lipoprotein conserved among heme-dependent Haemophilus species. Infect Immun 60:2257–2266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Morton DJ, Seale TW, Bakaletz LO, Jurcisek JA, Smith A, VanWagoner TM, Whitby PW, Stull TL (2009) The heme-binding protein (HbpA) of Haemophilus influenzae as a virulence determinant. Int J Med Microbiol 299:479–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Archambault M, Labrie J, Rioux CR, Dumas F, Thibault P, Elkins C, Jacques M (2003) Identification and preliminary characterization of a 75-kDa hemin- and hemoglobin-binding outer membrane protein of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 1. Can J Vet Res 67:271–277

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitra A, Ko YH, Cingolani G, Niederweis M (2019) Heme and hemoglobin utilization by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun 10:4260

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou M, Zhang A, Guo Y, Liao Y, Chen H, Jin M (2009) A comprehensive proteome map of the Haemophilus parasuis serovar 5. Proteomics 9:2722–2739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang L, Wen Y, Li Y, Wei X, Yan X, Wen X, Wu R, Huang X, Huang Y, Yan Q, Liu M, Cao S (2014) Comparative proteomic analysis of the membrane proteins of two Haemophilus parasuis strains to identify proteins that may help in habitat adaptation and pathogenesis. Proteome Sci 12:38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu Y, Wu G, Zhai Z, Yao H, Lu C, Zhang W (2015) Fifteen novel immunoreactive proteins of Chinese virulent Haemophilus parasuis serotype 5 verified by an immunoproteomic assay. Folia Microbiol 60:81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dai K, Jin J, Wen Y, Wen X, He L, Cao S, Huang X, Wu R, Zhao Q (2016) Complete genome sequence of highly virulent Haemophilus parasuis serotype 11 strain SC1401. Genome Announc 4:e00628-16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang X, Yang Z, Dai K, Liu G, Chang YF, Tang X, Wang K, Zhang Y, Hu B, Cao S, Huang X, Yan Q, Wu R, Zhao Q, Du S, Lang Y, Han X, Huang Y, Wen X, Wen Y (2022) The molecular diversity of transcriptional factor TfoX is a determinant in natural transformation in Glaesserella parasuis. Front Microbiol 13:948633

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Z, Tang X, Wang K, Dai K, Chang YF, Du S, Zhao Q, Huang X, Wu R, Yan Q, Cao S, Wen Y (2022) Metal ion periplasmic-binding protein YfeA of Glaesserella parasuis induces the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines of macrophages via MAPK and NF-κB signaling through TLR2 and TLR4. Int J Mol Sci 23:9627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dai K, Yang Z, Ma X, Chang YF, Cao S, Zhao Q, Huang X, Wu R, Huang Y, Xia J, Yan Q, Han X, Ma X, Wen X, Wen Y (2021) Deletion of polyamine transport protein PotD exacerbates virulence in Glaesserella (Haemophilus) parasuis in the form of non-biofilm-generated bacteria in a murine acute infection model. Virulence 12:520–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Z, Zhang Y, Du S, Zhao Q, Huang X, Wu R, Yan Q, Han X, Cao S, Chang YF, Wen Y (2023) Upregulation of occludin by cytolethal distending toxin facilitates Glaesserella parasuis adhesion to respiratory tract cells. Infect Immun 91:e0035123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dai K, Ma X, Yang Z, Chang Y, Cao S, Zhao Q, Huang X, Wu R, Huang Y, Yan Q, Han X, Ma X, Wen X, Wen Y (2019) PotD protects mice against Haemophilus parasuis and elevates the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines of macrophage via JNK-MAPK and NF-κB signal pathways through TLR4. Vaccines 7:216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pereira DA, Dalla Costa FA, Ferroni LB, Moraes CN, Schocken-Iturrino RP, Oliveira LG (2017) The challenges with Glasser’s disease in technified pig production. Austral J Vet Sci 49:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang P, Zhang C, Aragón V, Zhou X, Zou M, Wu C, Shen Z (2019) Investigation of Haemophilus parasuis from healthy pigs in China. Vet Microbiol 231:40–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Macedo N, Cheeran MC, Rovira A, Holtcamp A, Torremorell M (2017) Effect of enrofloxacin on Haemophilus parasuis infection, disease and immune response. Vet Microbiol 199:91–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu H, Xue Q, Zeng Q, Zhao Z (2016) Haemophilus parasuis vaccines. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 180:53–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao Z, Liu H, Xue Y, Chen K, Liu Z, Xue Q, Wang C (2017) Analysis of efficacy obtained with a trivalent inactivated Haemophilus parasuis serovars 4, 5, and 12 vaccine and commercial vaccines against Glässer’s disease in piglets. Can J Vet Res 81:22–27

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Higgins CF (1992) ABC transporters: from microorganisms to man. Annu Rev Cell Biol 8:67–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu J, Nan W, Peng G, Hu H, Xu C, Huang J, Xiao Z (2023) Screening of linear B-cell epitopes and its proinflammatory activities of Haemophilus parasuis outer membrane protein P2. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13:1192651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou Y, Feng S, He X, Zhou Q, Wang Y, Yue H, Tang C, Zhang B (2019) Surface-exposed loops L7 and L8 of Haemophilus (Glaesserella) parasuis OmpP2 contribute to the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in porcine alveolar macrophages. Vet Res 50:105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395:497–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Vahle JL, Haynes JS, Andrews JJ (1997) Interaction of Haemophilus parasuis with nasal and tracheal mucosa following intranasal inoculation of cesarean derived colostrum deprived (CDCD) swine. Can J Vet Res 61:200–206

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Olvera A, Ballester M, Nofrarías M, Sibila M, Aragón V (2009) Differences in phagocytosis susceptibility in Haemophilus parasuis strains. Vet Res 40:24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Fatimah MMN, Febriani ADB, Hatta M, Permatasari TAE, Hidayati E, Hamidah KMA, Akaputra R, Turrahmi H, Anggraini RP (2021) Effect of breastfeeding on children’s health and its relationship to NRAMP1 expression: a cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg 71:103017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Álvaro Á-E, Sonia M-M, Gutiérrez MC-B, María-José G-I, Claudia P-M, Sheila YD, Nio GJO, Rafael F, Elías-Fernando R-F (2018) Immunogenic characterization of vaccines based on Haemophilus parasuis Nagasaki strain, OmpP2, OmpP5 and OmpD15, in colostrum-deprived pigs experimentally challenged with the same strain. Res Vet Sci 119:292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Xiaoyu Ma for help with reagent ordering and Ke Dai for helping with the animal challenge experiments.

Funding

This work was funded by the Key R & D Support Plan of the Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (No. 2022-YF05-00817-SN), and we would like to express our sincere gratitude for your support.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhen Yang and Yiwen Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center of Swine Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

    Zhen Yang, Yiwen Zhang, Qin Zhao, Senyan Du, Xiaobo Huang, Rui Wu, Qigui Yan, Xinfeng Han, Yiping Wen & San-Jie Cao

Authors
  1. Zhen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yiwen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Senyan Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaobo Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rui Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qigui Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xinfeng Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yiping Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. San-Jie Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZY and YZ performed most of the experiments in the manuscript, and ZY wrote the article. QZ, SD, XH and RW analysed the data. QY and XH corrected the manuscript. YW and SC provided expertise and designed the study. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yiping Wen or San-Jie Cao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Vincent Béringue.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Q. et al. HbpA from Glaesserella parasuis induces an inflammatory response in 3D4/21 cells by activating the MAPK and NF-κB signalling pathways and protects mice against G. parasuis when used as an immunogen. Vet Res 55, 93 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01344-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01344-4

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716