Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of oral administration of microcin Y on growth performance, intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota of chicks challenged with Salmonella Pullorum

Veterinary Research volume 55, Article number: 66 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

The lasso peptide microcin Y (MccY) effectively inhibits various serotypes of Salmonella in vitro, but the antibacterial effect against S. Pullorum in poultry is still unclear. This study was the first to evaluate the safety and anti-S. Pullorum infection of MccY in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chicks. The safety test showed that the body weight, IgA and IgM levels of serum, and cecal microbiota structure of 3 groups of chicks orally administrated with different doses of MccY (5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg) for 14 days were not significantly different from those of the control group. Then, the chicks were randomized into 3 groups for the experiment of anti-S. Pullorum infection: (I) negative control group (NC), (II) S. Pullorum-challenged group (SP, 5 × 108 CFU/bird), (III) MccY-treated group (MccY, 20 mg/kg). The results indicated that compared to the SP group, treatment of MccY increased body weight and average daily gain (P < 0.05), reduced S. Pullorum burden in feces, liver, and cecum (P < 0.05), enhanced the thymus, and decreased the spleen and liver index (P < 0.05). Additionally, MccY increased the jejunal villus height, lowered the jejunal and ileal crypt depth (P < 0.05), and upregulated the expression of IL-4, IL-10, ZO-1 in the jejunum and ileum, as well as CLDN-1 in the jejunum (P < 0.05) compared to the SP group. Furthermore, MccY increased probiotic flora (Barnesiella, etc.), while decreasing (P < 0.05) the relative abundance of pathogenic flora (Escherichia and Salmonella, etc.) compared to the SP group.

Introduction

Pullorum disease (PD), caused by Salmonella Pullorum (S. Pullorum) infection, has caused grievous economic harm to the poultry industry in developing countries [1]. S. Pullorum infection induces systemic infection and white diarrhea symptoms, resulting in extremely high rates of morbidity and mortality among chicks aged 2–3 weeks. Some S. Pullorum-tolerant chicks become long-term carriers and eventually develop into subclinical and persistent infections, causing horizontal and vertical transmission with a negative economic impact on the poultry industry [2]. In recent years, epidemiological surveys in China have identified S. Pullorum as the most prevalent Salmonella serotype on large-scale chicken farms [3, 4]. Antibiotics, including beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and quinolones, have a historical application in preventing and treating Salmonella infections. However, the widespread use of antibiotics in the poultry industry for growth promotion and treating bacterial infections has led to the evolution of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and the challenge of drug residues [5,6,7]. “Antibiotic-free” feed has become an inevitable trend in the development of the international livestock industry, with many countries restricting the use of antibiotics [8, 9]. Therefore, the development of safe and effective alternatives to antibiotics to prevent bacterial infections and reduce the incidence rate of intestinal diseases in poultry is one of the critical issues that need to be urgently addressed in animal husbandry.

Microcin are low-molecular-weight, ribosomally synthesized, bacterial-inhibitory peptides that provide a competitive advantage among Enterobacteriaceae in the gut [10]. They have been shown to selectively remove pathogenic bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract and inhibit the growth of intestinal pathogens [11]. Microcin J25 (MccJ25) effectively reduced intestinal Streptococcus colonization, and enhanced growth capability and gut health in poultry and weaned piglets [12]. Additionally, MccJ25 markedly downregulated the serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in chicks infected with Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella [13]. In the mouse gut, microcin I47 (MccI47) reduces the colonization of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae [14]. These findings suggest that microcin has the potential to improve animal performance while reducing intestinal pathogen development.

Microcin Y (MccY), encoded by a gene cluster isolated from Salmonella Enteritidis, is a class I microcin containing 21 amino acids with strong antimicrobial action against Salmonella and Shigella [15]. The recognition and absorption of MccY involves the outer membrane protein FhuA, the inner membrane protein SbmA, and the Ton complex [15, 16]. One of these, the structural variation of FhuA, caused the differences in the biological antibacterial activity between MccY and MccJ25, and as a result, MccY significantly expanded the antimicrobial spectrum of MccJ25 against Salmonella [15]. Our previous research showed that MccY regulates intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota to attenuate S. Typhimurium-induced intestinal inflammation in mice [17]. However, studies utilizing the protective effects of MccY to reduce Salmonella infection in chickens have not been reported.

In this study, we hypothesized that MccY might have a beneficial effect on S. Pullorum infection in chicks; therefore, the current study was devoted to investigating the regulatory effects of oral administration of MccY on the growth performance, intestinal barrier function, and gut microbiota of chicks challenged with S. Pullorum.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers

All strains, plasmids and primers used in this study can be found in Additional files 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Preparation of MccY

MccY was produced by E. coli (YL01) and MccJ25 was produced by E. coli (YL02) after 24 h of incubation in M9 medium with 30 μg/mL kanamycin and 0.5 mM IPTG. Next, following centrifugation, MccY or MccJ25 from the supernatant was enriched by reversed-phase solid-phase extraction (SPE), and then purified and quantified by LC-QQQ-MS as described previously [15, 17]. MccY and MccJ25 were finally obtained by lyophilization and resuspension at a concentration of 5 mg/mL.

Antimicrobial activity test

As described in our previous study [16], a single colony of S. Pullorum was selected and cultured in LB broth at 37 °C and 200 rpm until OD600 = 0.8. The culture was added to LB medium containing 0.5% agar at a ratio of 1:1000 to prepare plates. Next, 50 μL of 2 mg/mL MccY was spotted on the plate surface, or MccY was continuously diluted from 250 μM to 0.5 μM, and subsequently, 50 μL of the diluted solution was sequentially spotted on the plate surface. After allowing for drying, the plates were cultured at 37 °C for 24 h to observe the antibacterial zones as an activity indicator. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

MIC assay

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of MccY was determined using a 96-well plate as described in our previous study [15]. Strains were cultured overnight on MH agar plates, then a single colony was inoculated in MH broth and cultivated at 200 rpm and 37 ℃ to OD600 = 0.8. After that, 50 μL culture was diluted 1000-fold to the 96-well plate. Then, 50 μL of different concentrations of MccY from 250 μM to 0.0125 μM were added into the previous culture successively. The mixed cultures were co-incubated at 37 ℃ for 24 h, and the MIC values were determined by measuring A600. All experiments were repeated three times.

Preparation of S. Pullorum-challenged solution

A single colony of S. Pullorum was cultured in LB broth at 200 rpm and 37 ℃ for 6–8 h until it reached the logarithmic phase of growth. After centrifuging the culture liquid at 5000 rpm and 4 ℃ for 10 min and removing the supernatant, the cells were washed thrice with PBS and suspended in PBS until the final concentration reached 1 × 109 CFU/mL.

Model design of Pullorum disease

All of the specific pathogen-free (SPF) White Leghorn chicks were acquired from Xinxing DahuaNong Poultry Egg Co., Ltd., raised in cages with free access to feed and water. A total of 45 one-day-old SPF chicks with similar body weight (BW) were randomly divided into three groups, each consisting of 15 chickens. At day 3 and day 5, the three groups were orally challenged with 0.5 mL (1 × 109 CFU/mL) of different bacterial solutions (S. Pullorum 284, 429 and CVCC 526), respectively. The growth of chicks was observed every day, and the fecal bacterial load was continuously monitored on 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 days post-infection (dpi). Chicks were euthanized on dpi 3, 7 and 14, and liver and cecum samples were collected and counted for bacterial load.

Safety evaluation of MccY in chicks

A total of 40 one-day-old SPF chicks were randomized into four groups (control group, 5 mg/kg MccY group, 10 mg/kg MccY group and 20 mg/kg MccY group, n = 10). The four groups of chicks were orally administered MccY diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg and an equal volume of PBS from day 5 for 14 days continuously. The growth of chickens was observed daily. After 14 days of giving MccY (day 19), the body weight of the chickens was measured, and anticoagulant blood was collected through the jugular vein. The chickens were dissected and four chickens were randomly selected to collect the cecal contents.

Experimental design of treating S. Pullorum- infected chicks with MccY

A total of 90 one-day-old SPF were randomized into three treatment groups with five replicates of six chickens per replicate. The experimental treatments included a negative control group (NC, neither S. Pullorum infection nor treatment), a positive control group (SP, S. Pullorum infection but without treatment) and an MccY-treated group (MccY, S. Pullorum infection but with MccY treatment).

At days 3 and 5, chicks in the SP, and MccY groups were orally challenged with 0.5 mL (1 × 109 CFU/mL) of S. Pullorum solution, while chicks in the NC group were orally administered the same volume of PBS (Figure 1). On dpi 1, chicks in MccY were treated with 20 mg/kg MccY diluted in PBS, while chicks in NC and SP were given the same volume of PBS.

Figure 1
figure 1

Experimental design of MccY treatment in chicks infected with S. Pullorum. dpi: days post-infection. NC: negative control group, SP: positive control group, MccY: MccY-treated group.

Full size image

Sample collection

Body weight was weighed for each chick to calculate its average daily gain (ADG). Feces, liver and cecum samples were collected from each group for Salmonella enumeration. Blood samples were collected jugular vein and centrifuged at 3000 rpm and 4 °C for 5 min, and then the serum was collected and stored at −80 °C until analysis. After euthanasia for cervical dislocation, we weighed and recorded the immune organs, including the thymus, spleen, bursa of Fabricius and liver, and finally calculated the immune organ index. Two middle segments of the jejunum and ileum (approximately 1 cm in length) were cut separately, and one segment was rinsed with PBS and then fixed in 4% (w/vol) paraformaldehyde solution for further morphological analysis. The other jejunal and ileal samples were placed into sterile tubes, rapidly snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at −80 °C until mRNA expression was determined. The cecum contents (approximately 500 mg) of four chicks per group were gathered, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and preserved at −80 °C for the bioinformatic analysis of the gut microbiota. Cecum content (approximately 500 mg) samples were collected for Salmonella load counting.

Cytokine production measurement

The IgA and IgM of serum from the different groups were determined by using ELISA kits (Enzyme-linked Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the concentrations were calculated from standard curves.

Determination of S. Pullorum load in feces, liver and cecum

Similar to the previous study on MccJ25 [18], feces, liver and cecum samples (500 mg) were homogenized with 5 mL of sterile PBS in tubes, diluted to 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5, and 100 µL of each dilution, evenly spread on 1.5% XLT-4 agar plates and cultured at 37 °C for 48 h to count colonies. All counts were repeated in triplicate.

Morphological analysis of the jejunum and ileum

The paraformaldehyde-fixed intestinal samples were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, sectioned about 5 µm and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for histological analysis. After scanning the stained sections with the Pannoramic DESK pathology scanner, the villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD) were measured at 100× magnification using Slide Viewer software, and then the ratio of villus height to crypt depth (V/C) was computed. Five intact villi from each section were selected for five repeated measurements to calculate the average value.

RNA-Seq analysis of the jejunum and ileum

Following the instructions, total RNA (50 mg) from the intestinal tissues was extracted using RNAiso Reagent (Fast Gene, Shanghai, China), and the purity and concentration of total RNA were determined at 260 and 280 nm, respectively. Then, cDNA was constructed using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+ gDNA wiper) (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China). The expression of target genes, including interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-6, IL-10, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), zonula occludin-1 (ZO-1), Occludin (OCLN), Claudin-1 (CLDN-1) and Mucin-2 (MUC-2) was measured by using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reactions in duplicate performed with 2 × Real Star Fast SYBR qPCR Mix (Genstar, Beijing, China) in the Bio-Rad-CFX Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad, USA). The GAPDH gene served as an internal control in this study, and Additional file 3 displays the sequences of gene primers synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The 2−ΔΔCt method was utilized to standardize the relative expression level of target genes, and all tests were performed in triplicate.

16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing of the cecal microbiome

Based on previous studies, microbial metagenomic DNA was extracted from cecal contents (approximately 200 mg of each sample), and then the concentration, purity and integrity were detected [19]. The 16S rRNA genes V3 to V4 region were amplified by PCR using primers 338F and 806R [20], and then the PCR amplicons were purified, quantified and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform using the NovaSeq 6000 SP Reagent Kit (Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). Microbiome bioinformatics analyses, including α-diversity indices [21, 22], and species composition analysis were performed with QIIME2 2019.4 and R packages (v3.2.0) [23].

Statistical analysis

Dates were detected using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in GraphPad Prism 9.0 and SPSS 20.0. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 or extremely significant at P < 0.01. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Results

Antibacterial activity of MccY in vitro

In this study, 3 strains of S. Pullorum isolated from diseased chickens and 1 standard strain were selected for the bacterial inhibition test of MccY in vitro. As shown in Additional file 4, S. Pullorum 284, 429, 433 and CVCC 526 were exhibited sensitivity to MccY, but resistant to MccJ25. Additionally, the spot-on-lawn results (Figure 2A) visually demonstrated the difference in sensitivity of S. Pullorum strains towards MccY. Simultaneously, the MIC assays (Figure 2B) revealed that the MIC values for isolates 284, 429, and 433 were determined as 0.125 μM, and that of CVCC 526 reached 2.5 μM. The above results showed that both clinical isolates and standard strain were highly sensitive to MccY, thereby supporting its potential use for establishing a model of Pullorum disease.

Figure 2
figure 2

Sensitivity of S. Pullorum to MccY. A Spot-on-lawn assay of MccY against S. Pullorum isolates 284, 429, 433 and CVCC 526. Serial dilutions from 250 μM (spot 1) to 0.5 μM (spot 6) were tested. B MIC assays of S. Pullorum.

Full size image

Model of Pullorum disease

3 strains of S. Pullorum were used to induce infection in chickens, and the bacterial loads in feces and organs were monitored to identify a suitable model of Pullorum disease. On dpi 1, chicks challenged S. Pullorum 284 exhibited lethargy without signs of white diarrhea; whereas chicks challenged S. Pullorum 429 displayed both mental depression and a 100% incidence of white diarrhea. Additionally, partial chicks infected with CVCC 526 developed white diarrhea. These observations were consistent with the results on fecal bacterial load presented in Additional file 5. The fecal Salmonella load of S. Pullorum 429 was monitored up to 7 days after the challenge, whereas those of CVCC 526 could only be maintained for 3 days after the challenge. Furthermore, only S. Pullorum 429 exhibited stable detection in liver and cecum tissues. Based on these findings, S. Pullorum 429 is more suitable for establishing a chicken model of Pullorum disease.

Effect of MccY on chicks

The safety of MccY on chicks remains uncertain; therefore, this study initially examined the effects of different concentrations of orally administered MccY on body weight, immune factor, and intestinal flora in chicks for 14 consecutive days. As shown in Figure 3A, compared to the control group, chickens given 20 mg/kg MccY tended to increase body weight, but there were no significant differences among the four groups.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of oral administration of MccY on chicks. A Body weight (BW) in MccY-given chicks at d 19, n = 10. B IgA and IgM expression of chick serum at day 19, n = 5. C–E The relative abundance of cecal microbiota at the genus levels at d 19, n = 4. Dates were shown as the means ± SEM. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01.

Full size image

The levels of IgA and IgM in chicken serum exhibited no significant alteration after oral administration of low, medium and high concentrations of MccY compared with the control group (Figure 3B), suggesting a low immunogenic response elicited by MccY.

The cecum contents collected on the 14th day of oral MccY were subjected to analysis of intestinal flora. The results revealed that there was a total of 395 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) across the four groups, with the unique OTUs ranked in descending order as follows: 5 mg/kg MccY group, control group, 20 mg/kg MccY group, and 10 mg/kg MccY group (see Additional file 6). The index of Simpson, Shannon, Chao1, and Observed species did not exhibit any significant differences between the four groups (see Additional file 6), suggesting that there was no substantial alteration in the richness and diversity of communities among different doses of MccY-given groups compared to the control group. The relative abundance of the flora at the genus level is depicted in Figure 3C, with Alistipes, Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Barnesiella, and Lachnoclostridium being the top five genera. Compared to the control group, the 5 mg/kg MccY group showed a 3.93% increase in the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium; the 10 mg/kg MccY group exhibited an increase in the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium by 12.64%, Lachnoclostridium by 2.48%, Lactobacillus by 4.77% and a decrease in Bacteroides by 13.04%; and the 20 mg/kg MccY group showed an increase in the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Prevotella by 2.90% and 2.22%. Compared with the 10 mg/kg MccY group, the 20 mg/kg MccY group showed significant increases in the relative abundance of Bacteroides (P < 0.01) and Prevotella (P < 0.05), while the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) (Figures 3D, E).

Oral administration of 20 mg/kg MccY did not exert a significant impact on the body weight and serum immune factor levels of chickens. Despite inducing alterations in the relative abundance of certain beneficial genera, it did not disrupt the normal intestinal microecology. Based on the above results, a dose of 20 mg/kg MccY was administered for the treatment of chickens infected with S. Pullorum to ensure optimal therapeutic efficacy.

Growth performance on chicks challenged with S. Pullorum

At dpi 1, All chickens except the chicks in the NC group showed symptoms of white diarrhea (Figure 4A). The survival curve (Figure 4B) exhibited that the survival rate of chickens in the SP group was 83.33% (25/30), while it reached 100% (30/30) in the NC group (blank control group), and achieved a rate of 96.67% (29/30) in the MccY group, indicating that administration of MccY could improve chicken survival. The effects of different experimental groups on BW and ADG are shown in Figures 4C, D. Compared to the NC group, the chicks in the SP group showed a significant decrease in the BW (P < 0.05), while no statistical differences were seen in the BW of the MccY groups at dpi 7, 14 and 21. In addition, the ADG of the chicks in the SP group was lower than that of the chicks in the NC group (P < 0.05) from dpi 0 to 7, dpi 14 to 21 and dpi 1 to 21, and that of the chicks in the MccY group (P < 0.05) from dpi 0 to 7, dpi 7 to 14 and dpi 1 to 21. There was no significant difference in the BW and ADG between the NC and MccY groups during the whole experiment. The above results indicated that oral administration of MccY can alleviate weight loss in chicks infected with S. Pullorum.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of MccY on the growth performance of chicks challenged with S. Pullorum. A Symptoms of white diarrhea at dpi 1. B Survival curve. C Body weight changes in S. Pullorum infection. D Average daily gain change in S. Pullorum infection. Dates were shown as the means ± SEM. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. dpi: days post-infection. NC: negative control group, SP: positive control group; MccY: MccY-treated group.

Full size image

Bacterial load

The S. Pullorum burden in feces, liver and cecum was presented in Figure 5. Compared to the SP group, a significant decrease by 99.3%, 99.8%, 99.8% and 91.3% in fecal S. Pullorum load was observed in the MccY-treated group at dpi 3, 5, 7 and 9 (P < 0.05) (Figure 5A). Moreover, MccY treatment markedly reduced S. Pullorum load in the liver by 61.3%, 85.8% and 76.0% compared with the SP group, respectively (P < 0.05) (Figure 5B) at dpi 7, 14, and 21. Additionally, at dpi 7, 14, and 21, MccY treatment resulted in a substantial decrease of S. Pullorum levels in the cecum by 97.4%, 99.4%, and 92.7% correspondingly (P < 0.01) (Figure 5C). The administration of MccY resulted in a 70% reduction in Salmonella colonization in the liver and a more than 90% decrease in Salmonella colonization in the gut.

Figure 5
figure 5

S. Pullorum load in feces (A), liver (B) and cecum (C). Dates were shown as the means ± SEM (n = 5), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. dpi: days post-infection. NC: negative control group; SP: positive control group; MccY: MccY-treated group.

Full size image

Immune organ index on chicks challenged with S. Pullorum

The immune organ indies of the chicks in the three groups were presented in Figure 6. The thymus index of the chicks in the SP group was lower than that of the NC and MccY group at dpi 14 (P < 0.05), and with a downward trend at dpi 7 and 21 (Figure 6A). The spleen index of the SP group was markedly higher than that of the NC group (P < 0.001) and the MccY group (P < 0.01) at dpi 7, whereas no obvious differences were shown among the three groups at dpi 14 and 21 (Figure 6B). The bursa of Fabricius index in the SP group demonstrated a significant decrease compared to the NC group at dpi 21 (P < 0.05) (Figure 6C). The liver index of the SP group exhibited an increase compared to the NC group at dpi 7 (P < 0.05), and the NC and MccY groups at dpi 14 (P < 0.05) (Figure 6D). The above results suggested that MccY treatment alleviates the suppressive effects on the thymus and bursa of Fabricius, as well as the splenomegaly and hepatomegaly induced by S. Pullorum infection.

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of MccY on the immune organ index of chicks challenged with S. Pullorum. A Thymus index. B Spleen index. C Bursa of Fabricius index. D Liver index. Dates were shown as the means ± SEM (n = 5). *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.001. dpi: days post-infection. NC: negative control group; SP: positive control group; MccY: MccY-treated group.

Full size image

Intestinal morphology on chicks challenged with S. Pullorum

The jejunal and ileal morphological structures of chicks at dpi 21 are shown in Figure 7A. After S. Pullorum infection, inflammatory cell infiltration, uneven crypt arrangement and epithelial cell detachment were observed in the mucosal layers of the jejunum and ileum in the SP group, indicating that S. Pullorum infection caused intestinal mucosal damage, but these injuries were not found in the MccY-treated group. On further analysis, compared with the NC group, S. Pullorum infection significantly increased the jejunal (Figure 7C) and ileal (Figure 7F) crypt depth (P < 0.001), obviously reduced the jejunal (Figure 7D) and ileal (Figure 7G) V/C (P < 0.05) t. Interestingly, compared with the SP group, MccY treatment significantly decreased the jejunal (Figure 7C) and ileal (Figure 7F) crypt depth (P < 0.01), increased the jejunal villus height (Figure 7B), and jejunal V/C (Figure 7D) (P < 0.05). These results showed that the addition of MccY could prevent intestinal villus shedding and improve gut integrity to a certain extent.

Figure 7
figure 7

The morphology of the jejunum and ileum at dpi 21. A Jejunal and ileal morphological structure (scale bar: 200 μm). Jejunal villus height (B), crypt depth (C) and the ratio of villus height to crypt depth (V/C) (D). Ileal villus height (E), crypt depth (F) and the ratio of villus height to crypt depth (V/C) (G). Dates were shown as means ± SD (n = 20). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. C: negative control group; SP: positive control group; MccY: MccY-treated group.

Full size image

Gene expression in the intestinal mucosa on chicks challenged with S. Pullorum

The mRNA expression levels of the target genes related to the inflammatory factors and tight junction proteins in the jejunal and ileal mucosa of chicks at dpi 21 are shown in Figure 8. Compared to the NC group, the mRNA expressions of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6 and TNF-α in the jejunum of the SP and MccY group infected with S. Pullorum were significantly up-regulated (P < 0.05) (Figure 8A), and IFN-γ displayed an up-regulated trend, indicating that inflammatory responses in chickens infected with S. Pullorum. Notably, expressions of the anti-inflammatory factors IL-4 and IL-10 in the jejunum of the MccY group exhibited significantly higher levels compared to those observed in the other two groups (P < 0.05) (Figure 8A). Additionally, the expressions of IL-4 and IL-10 in the ileum of the MccY group were significantly increased when compared to the SP group (Figure 8B), suggesting that MccY regulated intestinal mucosal immunity by secreting more anti-inflammatory factors, thereby improving the chicks’ defenses against S. Pullorum infections.

Figure 8
figure 8

The mRNA expression of inflammatory factors and tight junction proteins at dpi 21. Expression of inflammatory factors in the jejunum (A) and ileum (B). Expression of tight junction proteins in the jejunum (C) and ileum (D). Dates were shown as the means ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. NC: negative control group, SP: positive control group, MccY: MccY-treated group.

Full size image

The mRNA expression of gut barrier genes in chicks was further determined. The mRNA expressions of OCLD and MUC-2 in the ileum of the SP group were significantly lower than those of the NC group (P < 0.05) (Figure 8D), indicating that S. Pullorum infection disrupts the integrity of ileal tight junctions. Furthermore, compared to both the NC and SP groups, oral administration of MccY significantly upregulated ZO-1 and CLDN-1 mRNA expressions in the jejunum, as well as ZO-1 expression in the ileum (P < 0.05) (Figures 8C, D), suggesting that MccY enhanced intestinal barrier function by upregulating the mRNA expression of genes related to tight junction proteins.

Cecal microbiota analysis on chicks challenged with S. Pullorum

The regulatory impact of MccY on the gut microbiota of chicks infected with S. Pullorum was analyzed by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics, and a Venn diagram (Additional file 7) of the shared and unique OTUs indicated that 366 OTUs were shared among the three groups, the number of unique OTUs decreased in the order of NC group (2818) > SP group (2534) > MccY group (2191). Further analysis of the relative abundance of microbiota at the genus level was illustrated in Figure 9. The composition of intestinal flora changed significantly between different treatment groups. Compared with the NC group, S. Pullorum challenge increased (P < 0.05) (Figure 9B) the relative abundance of Escherichia, Raoultella, Salmonella, Citrobacter and Klebsiella by 37.93%, 6.75%, 3.21%, 3.01% and 1.49%, respectively, while significantly decreasing (P < 0.05) (Figure 9C) the relative abundance of Bacteroides, Lachnoclostridium and Ruminococcus by 26.69%, 1.96% and 0.40%. Notably, MccY treatment showed a reduction in the relative abundance of Escherichia by 39.31% (P < 0.05), Raoultella by 6.75% (P < 0.05), Salmonella by 3.20, Citrobacter by 2.96%, and Klebsiella by 1.38% (Figure 9B), but an increase in the relative abundance of Barnesiella by 11.05% (P < 0.05), Blautia by 1.75% (P < 0.05), Bacteroides by 17.70%, Lachnoclostridium by 1.77%, Ruminococcus by 0.31%, when compared with the SP group (Figure 9C). The results demonstrated that S. Pullorum colonized the intestines of chickens, causing an increase in the abundance of the Salmonella genus. Following treatment with MccY, 99.55% of Salmonella was effectively eliminated from the cecum, as evidenced by a decrease in its relative abundance from 3.2165% in the SP group to 0.0145% in the MccY group, indicating that MccY effectively mitigated the colonization of Salmonella in the gut compared to the SP group. MccY promotes intestinal ecological balance by reducing the relative abundance of harmful microbial communities, such as Salmonella and increasing the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, in S. Pullorum-infected chicks.

Figure 9
figure 9

Effects of MccY treatment on the cecal microbiota structure in chicks infected with S. Pullorum. A The relative abundance of cecal microbiota of chicks at the genus level at dpi 21. B The relative abundance of Escherichia, Raoultella, Salmonella, Citrobacter, and Klebsiella in cecal microbiota. C The relative abundance of Barnesiella, Bacteroides, Lachnoclostridium, Blautia, and Ruminococcus in cecal microbiota. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. NC: negative control group; SP: positive control group; MccY: MccY-treated group.

Full size image

Discussion

Chickens are extremely vulnerable to S. pullorum infection during their early growth stages, leading to white diarrhea and a high mortality rate or asymptomatic persistent infection [24]. Salmonella Pullorum colonizes the cecum of chicks, destroys the intestinal mucosa, and invades the liver, causing lesions in the liver and intestinal tissue lesions, leading to weight loss in poultry [25]. Microcin MccY is a novel lasso peptide, which has high antibacterial activity against various Salmonella serotypes, including S. Pullorum [15]. In this study, the antibacterial activity of MccY against clinical isolates of S. Pullorum was determined. The results showed that MccY had high antibacterial activity against S. Pullorum isolates, with a MIC of 0.125 μM, among which the antibacterial activity against the standard strain CVCC 526 reached 2.5 μM. Consistent with the related studies on MccJ25, the antibacterial concentration of MccJ25 against the S. Enteritidis CMCC 50336, a standard strain of Salmonella, was 2 μg/mL, while it had a lower MIC value against clinical isolates [18]. Subsequently, an oral challenge method was employed by administering a bacterial solution containing 5 × 108 CFU on days 3 and 5 to establish a Pullorum disease model, which was consistent with the symptom pattern of horizontal transmission infection in production [26]. After infection, all chickens exhibited symptoms of white diarrhea, and S. Pullorum was isolated from the feces for nearly two weeks, while a small amount of S. Pullorum was also found in the liver and cecum without causing systemic infection or acute mortality. In other studies, injection of S. Pullorum CCVC 526 into 22-week-old chickens resulted in its detection in the liver, spleen, and cecum; however, this observation was not made in our experiment which may be attributed to the oral challenge method employed here [27], but it was not observed in this experiment, which may be related to the oral challenge method selected in this experiment. Different invasion methods of the strain affect its colonization in chickens and produce different infection results. In summary, the clinical S. Pullorum isolate 429 was selected in this study to construct a naturally infected chicken model of Pullorum disease, which helped explore the antibacterial effect of MccY in livestock production.

Due to the recent discovery of MccY, there has been a lack of research on its application in poultry. Similarly, MccJ25, which was identified in E. coli, has been utilized as a feed additive in broiler production due to its potent antibacterial activity against most strains of E. coli and certain Salmonella, as well as its robust resistance to heat and acid [13]. However, it should be noted that Yu et al. observed intestinal inflammation in mice following prolonged exposure to high doses of MccJ25 [28]; thus, caution must be exercised when implementing MccJ25 within safe thresholds. Consequently, prior evaluation of the safety profile of MccY in vivo is imperative before considering its application in poultry.

Following a two-week administration of different doses of MccY and PBS, weight monitoring results revealed no significant differences in body weight and daily gain between the 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 20 mg/kg MccY groups compared to the control group. Notably, at day 19, the body weight of the 20 mg/kg MccY group exhibited an upward trend when compared with the control group. These findings align with a previous study on MccC7 chicks which reported similar results; no difference in daily gain was observed during the breeding stage (1–21 days old) upon the addition of MccC7 to their feed. However, during the fattening stage (21–42 days old), daily gain significantly surpassed that of the control group while also exhibiting a lower feed-to-gain ratio [29]. The results demonstrated that the administration of 20 mg/kg MccY did not exert any detrimental impact on the growth of chicks, and there were no discernible disparities in serum IgA and IgM levels across all experimental groups. These findings align with previous observations regarding the application of MccC7. Intestinal microbial analysis revealed that oral administration of 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg MccY effectively enhanced the chicken intestinal flora and increased the relative abundance of probiotics. Therefore, the optimal dosage range is between 10 and 20 mg/kg for clinical application. However, it should be noted that this study primarily focused on the safety evaluation of MccY with a relatively short test duration, thus failing to include monitoring of production performance such as feed-to-meat ratio and feed conversion rate in chickens. This limitation highlights the need for simulated clinical trials at different stages of growth to validate the impact on production performance if MccY is developed as an animal growth-promoting product. Intestinal microbial analysis revealed that oral administration of 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg MccY effectively enhanced the chicken intestinal flora and increased the relative abundance of probiotics. Therefore, for clinical application, the optimal dosage range is between 10 and 20 mg/kg. However, it should be noted that this study primarily focused on the safety evaluation of MccY with a relatively short test duration, thus failing to include monitoring of production performance such as feed-to-meat ratio and feed conversion rate in chickens. This limitation highlights the need for simulated clinical trials at different stages of growth to validate the impact on production performance if MccY is developed as an animal growth-promoting product.

In the present study, chicks challenged with S. Pullorum 429 exhibited depression, lethargy, poor growth, and white diarrhea, which was consistent with a previous study [2]. However, MccY treatment reinstated the BW and ADG of chicks to the level of the NC group, which is similar to former studies where MccJ25 alleviated weight loss caused by intestinal pathogenic bacterial infections [13].

When chicks are infected with S. Pullorum, this bacterium colonizes the intestine and spreads horizontally through fecal excretions [26]. This study evaluated the sterilizing efficacy of MccY against S. Pullorum in chickens by determining the quantity of S. Pullorum in feces, liver and cecal tissues. The results showed that MccY significantly reduced the S. Pullorum load in feces, liver and cecal tissue. Although S. pullorum was successfully colonized in the intestines of chicks during this experiment, it was difficult to monitor the bacterial load in the feces after two weeks of infection. This was related to the fact that after 3–5 days of intestinal colonization, the fecal load of S. pullorum gradually decreased after reaching its peak, making it difficult to monitor [26]. Interestingly, S. Pullorum was still present in the cecum at lower concentrations, although it was not detected in the feces of the MccY-treated group at dpi 14 and 21. This could be attributed to the limited ability of MccY to eradicate S. Pullorum from intestinal cells, as it was constrained by its inability to traverse the gut barrier and instead remained confined to the intestinal surface, exerting its bactericidal function. Similarly, it is hypothesized that MccY cannot effectively cross the blood barrier to fully eliminate Salmonella from the liver. Thus, studies on the prevention of S. Pullorum infections by MccY have been consequently taken into consideration to eradicate the bacteria in the earliest phases of the pathogen infection and achieve better treatment. In conclusion, MccY was able to resist S. Pullorum infection in chickens, thereby alleviating gut invasion, reducing intestinal colonization, and decreasing the possibility of horizontal transmission in chicks.

The immune organ index is an important measure of immunological health in poultry [30]. The weights of the thymus and bursa of Fabricius are used to assess the immunological status of chickens, and the larger the proportional weight of the organs is, the stronger the cellular and humoral immunity [31]. The bursa of Fabricius, a unique immune organ, helps chicks develop B lymphocytes, which are essential for the adaptive immune response [32]. Salmonella infection causes changes in immune organs; for example, the thymus volume decreases when S. Typhimurium invades the thymus [33]. In the present study, the thymus index showed a downward trend during the period of S. Pullorum infection, indicating that Salmonella infection harmed thymus development, whereas treatment with MccY restored the volume of the thymus and the bursa of Fabricius to preinfection levels, suggesting that MccY improved immune function in the chicks infected with S. Pullorum. This finding was similar to another study in which the probiotic Lactobacillus was used to advance the growth and development of the thymus and bursa of Fabricius to alleviate S. Pullorum infection in chickens [34, 35].

The intestinal barrier is the first line of defense against invading pathogens, and the integrity of the intestinal epithelium is important for the digestive, absorptive, and protective functions of the intestine, as well as serving as a barrier to prevent pathogens and their products from entering the body [36]. S. Pullorum attacks the intestinal mucosa of chicks and produces toxins, causing damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier. Moreover, it caused an increase in the crypt depth of the intestinal villus and a decrease in the V/C, which is responsible for weight loss and low feed conversion in chicks [25]. In this study, after infection with S. Pullorum, there was inflammatory damage to the jejunal and ileal tissues in the SP group, along with a significant increase in the jejunal and ileal crypt depth and a statistical decrease in the V/C compared to the NC group. This impaired intestinal morphology reduced the absorptive area of the small intestine and decreased the ability to absorb nutrients, which might have contributed to the significantly lower body weight in the SP group. In contrast, compared to the SP group, oral administration of MccY increased the jejunal villus height, decreased the jejunal and ileal crypt depth, and returned the V/C to the level of the NC group. This finding was comparable to earlier microcin studies, where feeding MccC7 raised the villus heights of the duodenum and jejunum, reduced the crypt depths of the duodenum and ileum crypt depths, and increased the V/C of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum [29].

Cytokines are vital for the regulation of the immune system, and anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-10 can hinder the development of inflammatory responses [37]. A previous study reported that adding MccJ25 to the diet significantly increased the cytokine IL-10 in the serum of weaned piglets [12]. In this study, MccY was found to upregulate the mRNA expression of IL-4 and IL-10 in chicks compared to the SP group, which may be beneficial in reducing the negative effects of S. Pullorum infection in chickens.

The tight junctions between intestinal epithelial cells, consisting of adhesion molecules, the transmembrane proteins Occludin, the Claudin family, and connexins, which can regulate intestinal permeability, are an essential part of the gut barrier. Disruption of tight junctions results in intestinal inflammation, tissue injury, and nutrient loss [38]. Additionally, intestinal mucus, which contains mainly Mucin-2, is another important part of the gut barrier that covers the surface of the intestinal epithelium, keeps the intestinal surface clean, and resists pathogens [39]. Similar to the upregulation effect of MccC7 [29], MccY significantly upregulated the mRNA expression of ZO-1 in the jejunum and ileum and CLDN-1 in the jejunum compared to the SP group, indicating that MccY may enhance intestinal tight junctions and improve the intestinal barrier to resist S. Pullorum infection.

The intestinal microbiota, known as the “invisible organ”, can enhance intestinal feed digestion and nutrient absorption, improve animal growth performance, promote body health, and strengthen intestinal barrier function [40]. The imbalance of the gut microbiota can trigger metabolic, autoimmune, and inflammatory diseases, and disrupt intestinal function [41]. For this reason, helping chicks establish a stable gut flora is crucial to preventing intestinal pathogenic bacterial infections. This study further investigated the relative abundance of the gut microbiome at the genus level. In this study, chicks infected with S. Pullorum reduced the relative abundance of Bacteroides, Lachnoclostridium and Ruminococcus, as well as increased the relative abundance of Escherichia, Raoultella, Citrobacter, Salmonella and Klebsiella. The decreased abundance of Bacteroides and Lachnoclostridium, which are related to the nutrient absorption and decomposition abilities of poultry, could be one of the reasons for weight loss in the SP group. A previous study found that microcin primarily resides in the animal gut and maintains the balance of the gut microbiota by increasing the probiotic flora and inhibiting intestinal pathogens [42]. In this study, the addition of MccY significantly reduced the relative abundance of Escherichia and Raoultella. The relative abundance of Salmonella in the SP group was 3.2165%, whereas it decreased to 0.0145% in the MccY group, demonstrating an elimination rate of 99.55% for Salmonella within the intestinal microbiota, which aligns with previous findings on fecal and cecal bacterial loads. This indicated that MccY inhibited the colonization of Salmonella and had a promising therapeutic effect on infected chicks. Li et al. discovered that using antibiotics infrequently and at high doses caused some bacteria to become resistant, which disrupts the intestinal ecology [43]. In contrast, following MccY therapy, the structure of the gut microbiota was closer to that of the NC group, as evidenced by a decline in the relative richness of pathogenic bacteria and an increase in the relative abundance of probiotics, which mitigated the dysbiosis induced by S. Pullorum infection and improved the health of the intestinal flora in chicks. Further studies on anti-inflammatory mechanisms and modifications in bacterial metabolism are needed to better understand the mechanism of MccY.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ADG:

average daily gain

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

BW:

body weight

CD:

crypt depth

CLDN-1:

Claudin-1

CFU:

colony forming unit

dpi:

days post-infection

IFN-γ:

interferon-γ

IL-4:

interleukin-4

IL-6:

interleukin-6

IL-10:

interleukin-10

LEfSe:

linear discriminant analysis effect size

MUC-2:

Mucin-2

OCLN:

Occludin

OTUs:

operational taxonomic units

PBS:

phosphate buffer saline

PCoA:

principal coordinate analysis

SEM:

standard error of mean

TNF-α:

tumor necrosis factor-α

VH:

Villus height

V/C:

the ratio of villus height to crypt depth

ZO-1:

zonula occludin-1

References

  1. Barrow PA, Jones MA, Smith AL, Wigley P (2012) The long view: Salmonella—the last forty years. Avian Pathol 41:413–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow PA, Neto OCF (2011) Pullorum disease and fowl typhoid–new thoughts on old diseases: a review. Avian Pathol 40:1–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu YH, Zhou X, Jiang ZH, Qi YR, Ed-dra A, Yue M (2020) Epidemiological investigation and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolated from breeder chicken hatcheries in Henan, China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10:13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lv QB, Ran XH, Qiu HY, Zhao SM, Hu ZR, Wang J, Ni HB, Wen XB (2022) Seroprevalence of pullorum disease in chicken across mainland China from 1982 to 2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Vet Sci 152:156–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jajere SM (2019) A review of Salmonella enterica with particular focus on the pathogenicity and virulence factors, host specificity and antimicrobial resistance including multidrug resistance. Vet World 12:504–521

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan ZM, Wang XQ, Zhang XM, Geng SZ, Chen X, Pan WJ, Cong QX, Liu XX, Jiao XA, Liu XF (2009) Changes in antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Pullorum isolates in China from 1962 to 2007. Vet Microbiol 136:387–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Castro-Vargas RE, Herrera-Sanchez MP, Rodriguez-Hernandez R, Rondon-Barragan IS (2020) Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry: a global overview. Vet World 13:2070–2084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Allen HK, Levine UY, Looft T, Bandrick M, Casey TA (2013) Treatment, promotion, commotion: antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals. Trends Microbiol 21:114–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mak PHW, Rehman MA, Kiarie EG, Topp E, Diarra MS (2022) Production systems and important antimicrobial resistant-pathogenic bacteria in poultry: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 13:148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Baquero F, Lanza VF, Baquero MR, del Campo R, Bravo-Vázquez DA (2019) Microcins in Enterobacteriaceae: peptide antimicrobials in the eco-active intestinal chemosphere. Front Microbiol 10:2261

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C (2013) Bacteriocins—a viable alternative to antibiotics? Nat Rev Microbiol 11:95–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu HT, Ding XL, Li N, Zhang XY, Zeng XF, Wang S, Liu HB, Wang YM, Jia HM, Qiao SY (2017) Dietary supplemented antimicrobial peptide microcin J25 improves the growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility, fecal microbiota, and intestinal barrier function of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci 95:5064–5076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang G, Song QL, Huang S, Wang YM, Cai S, Yu HT, Ding XL, Zeng XF, Zhang J (2020) Effect of antimicrobial peptide microcin J25 on growth performance, immune regulation, and intestinal microbiota in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Animals 10:345

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mortzfeld BM, Palmer JD, Bhattarai SK, Dupre HL, Mercado-Lubio R, Silby MW, Bang C, McCormick BA, Bucci V (2022) Microcin MccI47 selectively inhibits enteric bacteria and reduces carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization in vivo when administered via an engineered live biotherapeutic. Gut Microbes 14:2127633

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Y, Han Y, Zeng ZW, Li WJ, Feng SX, Cao WS (2021) Discovery and bioactivity of the novel lasso peptide microcin Y. J Agric Food Chem 69:8758–8767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Han Y, Li Y, Zeng ZW, Li WJ, Feng SX, Cao WS (2022) Resistance mechanism and physiological effects of microcin Y in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Microbiol Spectr. 10:e0185922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Li WJ, Zeng ZW, Han Y, Chen QX, Dong XY, Wang ZP, Feng SX, Cao WS (2023) Lasso peptide MccY alleviates non-typhoidal salmonellae-induced mouse gut inflammation via regulation of intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0178423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu HT, Shang LJ, Yang GX, Dai ZQ, Zeng XF, Qiao SY (2022) Biosynthetic microcin J25 exerts strong antibacterial, anti-inflammatory activities, low cytotoxicity without increasing drug-resistance to bacteria target. Front Immunol 13:811378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gong HZ, Wang TP, Wu M, Chu QR, Lan HA, Lang WY, Zhu LY, Song Y, Zhou YJ, Wen QY, Yu J, Wang BL, Zheng X (2023) Maternal effects drive intestinal development beginning in the embryonic period on the basis of maternal immune and microbial transfer in chickens. Microbiome 11:41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang X, Tai YR, Ma YH, Xu ZH, Hao JQ, Han DP, Li JY, Deng XM (2022) Cecum microbiome and metabolism characteristics of Silky Fowl and White Leghorn chicken in late laying stages. Front Microbiol 13:984654

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R (2006) UniFrac: an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinform 7:371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, Knight R (2007) Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1576–1585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J et al (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kogut MH, Arsenault RJ (2017) Immunometabolic phenotype alterations associated with the induction of disease tolerance and persistent asymptomatic infection of Salmonella in the chicken intestine. Front Immunol 8:372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie S, Li YC, Zhao SY, Lv YJ, Yu QH (2020) Salmonella infection induced intestinal crypt hyperplasia through Wnt/β-catenin pathway in chicken. Res Vet Sci 130:179–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen XH, Zhang AY, Gu J, Zhao RH, Pan XC, Dai Y, Yin L, Zhang QH, Hu XM, Wang HM, Zhang DJ (2022) Evaluating Salmonella pullorum dissemination and shedding patterns and antibody production in infected chickens. BMC Vet Res 18:240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cui K, Li P, Huang J, Lin F, Li R, Cao D, Hao G, Sun S (2023) Salmonella phage CKT1 effectively controls the vertical transmission of Salmonella pullorum in adult broiler breeders. Biology 12:312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu H, Shang L, Zeng X, Li N, Liu H, Cai S, Huang S, Wang G, Wang Y, Song Q, Qiao S (2018) Risks related to high-dosage recombinant antimicrobial peptide microcin J25 in mice model: intestinal microbiota, intestinal barrier function, and immune regulation. J Agric Food Chem 66:11301–11310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dai ZQ, Shang LJ, Wang FM, Zeng XF, Yu HT, Liu L, Zhou JC, Qiao SY (2022) Effects of antimicrobial peptide microcin C7 on growth performance, immune and intestinal barrier functions, and cecal microbiota of broilers. Front Vet Sci 8:813629

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Heckert RA, Estevez I, Russek-Cohen E, Pettit-Riley R (2002) Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poultry Sci 81:451–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rivas AL, Fabricant J (1988) Indications of immunodepression in chickens infected with various strains of Marek’s disease virus. Avian Dis 32:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Alten PJ, Meuwissen HJ (1972) Production of specific antibody by lymphocytes of the bursa of Fabricius. Science 176:45–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Leyva-Rangel JP, de Los Angeles Hernandez-Cueto M, Galan-Enriquez CS, Lopez-Medina M, Ortiz-Navarrete V (2015) Bacterial clearance reverses a skewed T-cell repertoire induced by Salmonella infection. Immun Inflamm Dis. 3:209–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang YM, Li JY, Xie YH, Zhang HX, Jin JH, Xiong LX, Liu H (2021) Effects of a probiotic-fermented herbal blend on the growth performance, intestinal flora and immune function of chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. Poultry Sci 100:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Deng ZT, Han DP, Wang YY, Wang QZ, Yan X, Wang SJ, Liu XL, Song WP, Ma YF (2021) Lactobacillus casei protects intestinal mucosa from damage in chicks caused by Salmonella Pullorum via regulating immunity and the Wnt signaling pathway and maintaining the abundance of gut microbiota. Poultry Sci 100:101283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Turner JR (2009) Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9:799–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Neurath MF (2014) Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol 14:329–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Suzuki T (2013) Regulation of intestinal epithelial permeability by tight junctions. Cell Mol Life Sci 70:631–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pelaseyed T, Bergström JH, Gustafsson JK, Ermund A, Birchenough GMH, Schütte A, van der Post S, Svensson F, Rodríguez-Piñeiro AM, Nyström EEL, Wising C, Johansson MEV, Hansson GC (2014) The mucus and mucins of the goblet cells and enterocytes provide the first defense line of the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the immune system. Immunol Rev 260:8–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cao GT, Zhan XA, Zhang LL, Zeng XF, Chen AG, Yang CM (2018) Modulation of broilers’ caecal microflora and metabolites in response to a potential probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 102:E909–E917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Silva MJB, Carneiro MBH, Pultz BD, Silva DP, Lopes MED, dos Santos LM (2015) The multifaceted role of commensal microbiota in homeostasis and gastrointestinal diseases. J Immunol Res 2015:321241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Shang LJ, Yu HT, Liu HB, Chen MX, Zeng XF, Qiao SY (2021) Recombinant antimicrobial peptide microcin J25 alleviates DSS-induced colitis via regulating intestinal barrier function and modifying gut microbiota. Biomed Pharmacother 139:111127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Li J, Hao HH, Cheng GY, Liu CB, Ahmed S, Shabbir MAB, Hussain HI, Dai MH, Yuan ZH (2017) Microbial shifts in the intestinal microbiota of Salmonella infected chickens in response to enrofloxacin. Front Microbiol 8:1711

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Professor Shuhong Sun (Shandong Agriculture University, College of Animal Science and Technology, China) for providing some Salmonella 284 strains.

Funding

This work was supported by the Poultry Industry Technology System of Guangdong Province (2023KJ128), the earmarked fund for the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-41), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1800904) and the Guangdong Province Enterprise Science and Technology Commissioner Project (GDKTP2021017300).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wenjing Li and Zhiwei Zeng are contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Wenjing Li, Zhiwei Zeng, Di Zhou, Guyao Wang, Zepeng Wang, Yu Li, Yu Han, Miaomiao Qin, Changqi Luo, Saixiang Feng & Weisheng Cao

  2. Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Saixiang Feng & Weisheng Cao

  3. Key Laboratory of Zoonosis of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Saixiang Feng & Weisheng Cao

  4. Key Laboratory of Veterinary Vaccine Innovation of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Saixiang Feng & Weisheng Cao

  5. National and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonosis Prevention and Control, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Saixiang Feng & Weisheng Cao

Authors
  1. Wenjing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhiwei Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Di Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guyao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zepeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yu Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Miaomiao Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Changqi Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Saixiang Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Weisheng Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WL conceived and designed the study; WL, ZZ, DZ, GW, ZW, YL, YH, MQ, and CL performed the experiments; WL and ZZ analyzed the data and wrote this manuscript; SF and WC revised this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Saixiang Feng or Weisheng Cao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were approved by the South China Agricultural University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Guangdong, P. R. China (approval number: 2022C009).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling editor: Tina Dalgaard.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Strains used in this study.

Additional file 2

. Plasmids used in this study.

Additional file 3

. Primers used in this study.

Additional file 4

. Sensitivity of S. Pullorum to MccY and MccJ25.

Additional file 5

. S. Pullorum load in feces, liver, and cecum. A S. Pullorum load in feces. B S. Pullorum load in liver. C S. Pullorum load in cecum. Dates were shown as the means ± SEM (n = 3). dpi: days post-infection.

Additional file 6

. Effects of oral administration of MccY on the α-diversity indices of cecal microbiota at day 19. A Venn diagram showing the shared and unique OTUs in different groups. B Simpson index, Simpson index, Chao index and Observed species.

Additional file 7

. Venn diagram showing the shared and unique OTUs in chicks infected with S. Pullorum.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Zeng, Z., Zhou, D. et al. Effect of oral administration of microcin Y on growth performance, intestinal barrier function and gut microbiota of chicks challenged with Salmonella Pullorum. Vet Res 55, 66 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01321-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-024-01321-x

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716