Open Access

Early infections by myxoma virus of young rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) protected by maternal antibodies activate their immune system and enhance herd immunity in wild populations

  • Stéphane Marchandeau1Email author,
  • Dominique Pontier2, 3,
  • Jean-Sébastien Guitton1,
  • Jérôme Letty4,
  • David Fouchet2, 3,
  • Jacky Aubineau1,
  • Francis Berger1,
  • Yves Léonard1,
  • Alain Roobrouck^1,
  • Jacqueline Gelfi5, 6,
  • Brigitte Peralta5, 6 and
  • Stéphane Bertagnoli5, 6
^Deceased
Contributed equally
Veterinary Research201445:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-45-26

Received: 26 September 2013

Accepted: 20 February 2014

Published: 4 March 2014

Abstract

The role of maternal antibodies is to protect newborns against acute early infection by pathogens. This can be achieved either by preventing any infection or by allowing attenuated infections associated with activation of the immune system, the two strategies being based on different cost/benefit ratios. We carried out an epidemiological survey of myxomatosis, which is a highly lethal infectious disease, in two distant wild populations of rabbits to describe the epidemiological pattern of the disease. Detection of specific IgM and IgG enabled us to describe the pattern of immunity. We show that maternal immunity attenuates early infection of juveniles and enables activation of their immune system. This mechanism associated with steady circulation of the myxoma virus in both populations, which induces frequent reinfections of immune rabbits, leads to the maintenance of high immunity levels within populations. Thus, myxomatosis has a low impact, with most infections being asymptomatic. This work shows that infection of young rabbits protected by maternal antibodies induces attenuated disease and activates their immune system. This may play a major role in reducing the impact of a highly lethal disease when ecological conditions enable permanent circulation of the pathogen.

Introduction

A same infectious agent may induce in vertebrates a large range of clinical signs from asymptomatic to a severe disease that may even lead to death. A first factor usually involved in the severity of a disease is the immunological status of the host. Following a primo-infection, the duration of acquired immunity is highly variable [1, 2]. However, reinfections occurring before the acquired immunity has waned may lead to attenuated diseases if residual immunity is sufficient and reactivate the immune system, thereby extending the acquired immunity. Therefore, in situations where a pathogen circulates efficiently within the host population, individuals are steadily reinfected and maintain a high level of immunity. In these cases, individuals may develop only one event of severe disease at their first exposure to the pathogen, which is likely to occur early in life at a moment that is particularly critical because the newborn lack a fully efficient immune system. To limit the consequences of an early first infection, several mechanisms can attenuate its effect, in particular the transfer of maternal antibodies to the newborn [3].

Despite abundant literature on the evolution of host defense mechanisms against infectious agents (Review in [4]), the effect of the transfer of maternal immunity has attracted increasing attention only recently [511]. Several studies have demonstrated that maternal antibodies block the infection in the case of an early exposure to the parasite and inhibit the offspring immune response [12]. This blocking effect is responsible for unsuccessful vaccination in newborns [1315]. In this case maternal immunity postpones infection and may change the disease dynamics [16]. However, other studies have shown that, in cases of early infection, maternal antibodies can only reduce the severity of the disease, thereby enabling the host immune system to develop acquired immunity without the cost of a severe disease [1720], as initially proposed by Zinkernagel [21, 22]. Maternal immunity may also have long-term effects: even in the absence of early infection, individuals born with maternal antibodies may display an enhanced immune response when infection occurs after maternal immunity has waned [2325]. In addition, maternal immunity may even have positive trans-generational effects on offspring of females having received maternal antibodies from their own mother [25]. Most of these studies on maternal immunity have focused on the individual level but little is known about the potential effect of maternal immunity on disease dynamics and impact at the population level.

The European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and myxomatosis system has been widely studied and is considered to be a classical example of coevolution [26, 27]. Myxomatosis is a viral disease due to a Leporipoxvirus, which is responsible for a lethal disease in European rabbits and was introduced in several countries in the 1950’s to fight against wild rabbit pullulations: in 1950 in Australia after several unsuccessful attempts [28] and in 1952 in France [29] from where it spread throughout south-western Europe. The initial impact of the disease in France was strong and mortality rates were estimated at 90-95% [28, 30]. Then, populations have steadily recovered as a result of a coevolution between the host and its pathogen [26, 27, 3133]. Today, the impact of myxomatosis varies a lot, with populations where mortalities due to the disease are high and others with permanent and strong immunity levels where the disease has a very low impact, characterizing epizootic and enzootic patterns of the disease, respectively [34, 35]. Changes in the virulence of myxoma virus (MYXV) were observed shortly after the introductions of the virus [36, 37], with multiples genes being involved in changes in virulence [38]. The development of rabbit genetic resistance to the disease has been suggested in Europe [39, 40] but it is controversial and anyway, of marginal effect [4143]. In addition, development of immunity in the populations, which may be part of the coevolution process [44], is the third factor that has led to a decrease of the impact of the disease [26]. However, the characteristics of immune response in wild rabbits remain poorly documented. Its length and intensity depend on rabbits, likely under genetic control [45], and viral strains [46]. In laboratory conditions, some rabbits show detectable residual antibodies one year after inoculation of the virus [46]. In wild populations, some studies have shown that rabbits may be seropositive over longer periods, up to 19–24 months, but these long immunities could be due to undetected natural reinfections [32, 47]. Maternal antibodies remain detectable up to 6 to 9 weeks after birth [47].

The persistence of high immunity levels in the populations, which is the result of an endemic pattern of the disease, has been shown in large populations [34, 35, 48]. In such populations, rabbits with symptoms of myxomatosis are observed throughout the year, with most of them showing mild clinical signs. These data suggest that most rabbits are partly protected at the time of their first exposure to the virus, otherwise some cases of severe disease should be observed. Modelling the mechanism described by Zinkernagel [21, 22] explains these observed patterns of the disease. The mean severity of the disease depends on the transmission rate of the virus: high transmission rates lead to early infections of juveniles, steady reinfections, and maintenance of high immunity levels in the populations throughout the year [9, 11]. In contrast, low transmission rates do not enable the maintenance of high immunity levels and lead to the epidemic pattern of the disease with a first infection occurring when maternal immunity has waned.

The aim of the present study was to highlight the Zinkernagel’s mechanism under natural conditions in the rabbit/myxomatosis system, which is a good model since juveniles are known to be highly susceptible to the disease and show severe disease even when infected by attenuated MYXV strains [49, 50]. To this end we caught rabbits over three years in two wild populations to analyse the pattern and the role of immunity, and especially of maternal immunity, on the epidemiology and impact of myxomatosis. For this purpose, we detected specific anti- MYXV IgM and IgG, which allowed us to characterize MYXV circulation in both populations and to describe its effect on immunity at both individual and population levels, IgM being an indicator of recent infection and IgG persisting over several months after infection [47]. In agreement with Zinkernagel [21, 22], we predict that if maternal immunity protects against severe myxomatosis while permitting to the juveniles to activate their own immune system, we should observe asymptomatic or mild myxomatosis in juveniles less than two months old before maternal immunity has waned. Alternatively, if maternal immunity has a blocking effect, then the first infection should lead rabbits to develop severe myxomatosis.

Materials and methods

Rabbit populations studied

The study was carried out on two study areas. Aubas (1°11′W, 45°4′N, Department of Dordogne) is situated in south-western France. The landscape is a cultivated open land constituted mainly of maize and walnut fields. Mean annual rainfall is 930 mm and mean annual temperature is 11.5 °C. Density is around 5 rabbits/ha in this population. Saint Benoist (1°53′ E, 48°42′ N, Department of Yvelines) is located in central France. The landscape is a cultivated open land with coppices. Farming practices, crops and field margin strips are managed for game. Mean annual rainfall is 630 mm and mean annual temperature is 10.1 °C. The density is lower (1–2 rabbits/ha) in Saint Benoist than in Aubas.

We trapped rabbits over three years to record data on myxomatosis events and on immunity (2002–2005 in Aubas, 2001–2004 in Saint Benoist). Trapping sessions were organized every five weeks and lasted two weeks each. Rabbits were caught in wire cage traps and individually marked. At each capture, each rabbit was weighed and a blood sample was taken on a strip of blotting paper [51, 52]. Clinical signs of myxomatosis were also recorded. If any, they were distributed into 3 classes: severe (tumours ≥ 5 mm, presence of secondary lesions), mild (tumours < 5 mm, no secondary lesion), recovered (tumours in healing or healed). Rabbits from Aubas were recorded as Axx and rabbits from Saint Benoist as SBxx, where xx is the rabbit number.

Age determination in juveniles

Rabbits were considered as juveniles until the beginning of the next breeding season, i.e. until the end of the calendar year of their birth. Afterwards individuals were considered as adults. To study maternal immunity, we considered maternal antibodies to be detectable up to 8 weeks. Indeed, it has been shown that they persist up to 6 to 9 weeks, depending on the individual and on the antibody titre of the mother [47]. We used the body weight to determine the age of the juveniles [53]. The mean weight of an 8 weeks old rabbit is about 430 g in females and 470 in males.

Serological tests

The serological responses against MYXV were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), as previously described [54]. Briefly, two 6 mm-diameter discs of blotting paper impregnated with blood were rehydrated in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in a 96-well microplate and stored at 4 °C overnight. The eluate was then used directly in serological tests as equivalent to a 1/20 dilution of fresh serum. ELISA plate wells (Falcon Probind, Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) were coated with 1 μg of semi purified MYXV. The specific MYXV antibody binding was visualized by incubating the plate wells with alkaline phosphatase antibody conjugates (Goat anti rabbit IgM or IgG, 1:4000, Sigma, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) at 37 °C during 60 mn. The absorbance of each sample was measured at a wavelength of 405 nm using a spectrophotometer 15 mn after addition of substrate solution (4-nitrophenyl phosphate disodium salt in 10% diethanolamine, pH 9.8) (Sigma). The eluate sample titre was expressed as the inverse of the highest dilution for which the optical density was greater than thrice the optical density of the negative serum standard. Titres ≥ 50 were considered as positive. The complete data set is given in Additional file 1.

Results

Early infections and immunity in juveniles

Most juveniles less than 8 weeks old carried IgG in both populations (57% in Aubas, 80% in Saint Benoist) (Figure 1). Among rabbits less than 8 weeks old with only IgG, none showed signs of disease or recovery (Table 1). Among those carrying both IgG and IgM (21% in Aubas, 60% in Saint Benoist) (Figure 1), which indicates a recent infection, only one showed clinical signs of myxomatosis and it developed a mild disease (Table 1).
Figure 1

Proportion of juveniles with IgG and IgM by weight. Aubas: a. St Benoist: b. Sample sizes are indicated above the bars. For rabbits caught several times in the same weight class the data from the first capture was taken into account.

Table 1

Anti MYXV-antibodies and early infection in juveniles weighing less than 600 g

Rabbit

Sex

Date

Weight (g)

Myxomatosis

IgM

IgG

SB89

F

25/06/2003

260

None

-

+

A34

M

23/05/2002

320

None

-

+

A58

F

24/09/2002

350

None

-

+

A149

F

21/11/2003

380

None

-

+

A143

M

16/10/2003

400

None

-

+

A147

F

18/11/2003

400

None

-

+

A148

M

20/11/2003

400

None

-

+

A169

M

17/03/2004

420

None

-

+

A144

M

17/10/2003

480

None

-

+

A185

M

11/05/2004

540

None

-

+

A100

F

19/03/2003

230

None

+

+

A47

M

23/07/2002

400

Mild

+

+

A48

M

23/07/2002

400

None

+

+

SB68

F

20/09/2002

400

None

+

+

SB88

F

25/06/2003

410

None

+

+

SB65

F

15/08/2002

490

None

+

+

A108

M

11/04/2003

500

None

+

+

A188

F

11/05/2004

500

None

+

+

SB48

M

23/07/2002

510

None

+

+

A164

F

15/03/2004

520

None

+

+

A184

F

11/05/2004

520

None

+

+

SB91

F

11/07/2003

550

None

+

+

In bold rabbits less than 8 weeks old, i.e. for which IgG likely have a maternal origin component.

Reinfections and reactivation of the immune system

Several rabbits showed evidence of reinfection in both populations (Table 2). For example, rabbit A132 (adult) had only IgG on 23 September 2003, which means that it had recovered from a previous infection, and had both IgM and IgG on 17 December 2003, which means that it had been recently reinfected. It did not show any clinical sign of myxomatosis, showing that this reinfection was asymptomatic. Rabbit A92 (adult) had only IgG on 21 February 2003 and had both IgM and IgG on 21 November 2003 and on 20 January 2004. Since IgM are detectable during about 3 weeks, it is likely that this rabbit had been reinfected twice with about 2 months between the two reinfections. Among the 9 cases of reinfection proved by the data, only one showed clinical signs of mild myxomatosis and two were considered recovered. These reinfections were therefore asymptomatic or with symptoms of attenuated myxomatosis.
Table 2

Changes in the serological status of rabbits caught several times during the study

Rabbit

Sex

Date

Weight (g)

Clinical signs

IgM

IgG

Reinfection

A103

F

21/03/2003

1760

None

-

-

 
  

13/05/2003

1700

None

-

+

 
  

19/03/2004

1900

Mild

+

+

Yes

A132

F

23/09/2003

1760

None

-

+

 
  

17/12/2003

1700

None

+

+

Yes

A135

M

24/09/2003

1200

None

-

+

 
  

16/12/2003

1350

None

+

+

Yes

  

20/01/2004

1200

None

+

+

Possible

A136

F

24/09/2003

1400

None

-

+

 
  

14/05/2004

1300

Recovered

+

+

Yes

A144

M

16/10/2003

480

None

-

+

 
  

17/12/2003

1100

None

+

+

 
  

20/01/2004

1120

None

+

+

Possible

A55

M

21/08/2002

1400

None

+

+

 
  

12/09/2002

1400

None

+

+

Possible

A92

M

21/02/2003

1360

None

-

+

 
  

21/11/2003

1400

None

+

+

Yes

  

20/01/2004

1430

None

+

+

Yes

SB34

F

26/06/2002

1500

None

+

+

 
  

17/07/2002

1500

None

+

+

Possible

SB40

M

05/07/2002

1200

None

-

+

 
  

27/01/2004

1480

None

+

+

Yes

SB74

F

30/09/2002

1400

None

+

+

 
  

21/11/2002

1300

None

+

+

Yes

SB78

M

21/01/2003

1440

Mild

+

+

 
  

13/01/2004

1550

Recovered

+

+

Yes

SB87

M

24/06/2003

600

None

+

+

 
  

22/07/2003

920

None

+

+

Possible

When rabbits carried IgM at two consecutive captures we considered that it was the same infection if the time interval between the captures was less than 1 month. It was considered as a reinfection when the time interval between the captures was more than 1.5 month. In the other cases it was considered as a possible reinfection.

Herd immunity and circulation of the virus

Due to small sample sizes, data on immunity in adults were pooled in six-month periods for both areas. We observed that the immunity level in the adult population was permanently high on the two areas. Between July 2002 and June 2005, the proportion of adults with antibodies varied between 83 and 100% in Aubas. Between January 2002 and June 2004, it varied from 50 to 100% in Saint Benoist (Figure 2). We used the proportion of IgM positive rabbits, both juveniles and adults, as an indicator of the virus circulation by three-month periods (Figure 3). We recorded numerous cases of recent infection that were distributed throughout the study period since some rabbits were caught with IgM in all seasons of all years. However the proportion of rabbits with IgM changed over time, which shows that the intensity of virus circulation was not constant.
Figure 2

Temporal changes in the proportion of adults with IgG. Aubas: a. St Benoist: b. Data are pooled in six-month periods. Sample sizes are indicated above the bars. For rabbits caught several times during the same period the data from the first capture was taken into account.

Figure 3

Temporal changes in the proportion of rabbits with IgM. Aubas: a. St Benoist: b. Data are pooled in three-month periods. Sample sizes are indicated above the bars. No rabbit was caught in 2004–2 in St Benoist.

Low prevalence of the disease

Overall, in Aubas, only 6.0% of adults (8/133) and 1.1% of juveniles (1/91) were caught with clinical signs of myxomatosis: three adults had signs of mild disease, the five others had recovered and the juvenile showed signs of mild myxomatosis. In Saint Benoist, 7.7% of adults (3/39) were caught with clinical signs: two had severe myxomatosis and one had recovered. No juvenile among 41 was caught with clinical signs in Saint Benoist.

Discussion

Our data highlight early infections without severe disease in juveniles, which gives support to Zinkernagel’s mechanism regarding the role of maternal immunity. Indeed, despite being constrained by the difficulty of sampling in wild populations and by some uncontrolled factors, such as the viral strains circulating in the populations, they allowed us to study the relevance of our predictions on the mechanisms of establishment of immunity in juveniles and to describe the pattern of virus circulation and the impact of the disease to the individual and population levels under natural conditions [55].

One may assume that the low prevalence of the disease, i.e. the proportion of individuals showing clinical signs of myxomatosis, was due to the low virulence of MYXV strains that have circulated in both of the rabbit populations studied. Since there is no genetic characteristic of MYXV related to virulence [38], strain virulence is classically determined by in vivo experiments [26]. We did not conduct these experiments for ethical and biological reasons. First, obtaining a complete inventory of circulating MYXV strains in both populations would have required inoculating a huge number of rabbits. Second, since myxomatosis was mainly asymptomatic in most cases, it was not possible to identify rabbits to sample in order to collect the virus. However, since lowly virulent strains (grade V according to Fenner and Fantini [26]) represent less than 5% of the MYXV strains circulating in wild rabbits in Europe [26], it is unlikely that such strains have circulated alone over three years in two distant rabbit populations. Therefore, we dismiss this hypothesis and we conclude that the low prevalence of the disease is linked to rabbit immunity and to the permanent circulation of MYXV.

Rabbits less than 8 weeks old carrying IgM, which indicates a recent infection, only developed an asymptomatic or a mild disease, suggesting that they were partly protected by maternal antibodies when infected. Juveniles are known to be highly susceptible to myxomatosis and show severe disease whatever the MYXV strain involved [49, 50]. These observations show that, in the rabbit/myxomatosis system, maternal antibodies do not prevent rabbits from being infected but attenuate infection and do not prevent an immune response from infected juveniles. Our data therefore support Zinkernagel’s hypothesis in accordance with similar observations made on other host/parasite systems [1720, 2325].

Moreover, these data point out that most juveniles had maternal antibodies. The proportion of rabbits less than 400 g with IgG is high in both populations. If these IgG were only acquired, one would have expected to observe juveniles with signs of severe myxomatosis, which was not the case. This indicates that either they had not been infected, implying that these IgG are of maternal origin, or they had been infected without showing any clinical sign because they were protected by maternal antibodies when infected. One cannot exclude that some severe cases of myxomatosis remained undetected in juveniles before their emergence from the nest since wild rabbits cannot be captured at this age. However, these severe cases are probably quite rare because of the high proportion of immune adults and consequently of the high proportion of maternally protected juveniles.

In addition, we showed that infections and reinfections occur in all seasons, and that reinfections reactivate the immune system of rabbits without any severe disease. These reinfections may explain some results obtained in other studies where rabbits remained seropositive over periods up to 36 months [34]. Our results also confirm that secondary exposures to a poxvirus may induce an IgM response, as previously observed during the 2003 North American outbreak of Monkeypox for people who were vaccinated against smallpox as children [56].

These observations enable us to account for the epidemiological pattern of the disease in the populations studied. They validate the expectations of the models developed by Fouchet et al. [9, 11] for analysing the relationship between virus persistence and impact of myxomatosis in wild populations under Zinkernagel’s scenario. They show that when the virus continuously circulates, individuals are steadily infected and develop mild or asymptomatic diseases that enable the reactivation of their immune system. As soon as the proportion of immune adults is high, numerous young are born with maternal antibodies. If infected before maternal immunity wanes, which is frequent with the steady circulation of the virus, they also develop an attenuated disease that leads to the development of their own specific immune response. In such endemic conditions, the disease has a low impact. In addition to the mechanisms described by Fouchet et al. [9, 11], one cannot rule out that long-term effects of maternal immunity [2325] have contributed to establish a strong herd immunity and to reduce the impact of the disease in the two populations studied.

To conclude, this work highlights the role of maternal antibodies in the establishment of strong herd immunity in wild populations. It describes the mechanism whereby, together with changes in virulence of MYXV and with the increase of genetic resistance in rabbits, the development of immunity in rabbit populations is responsible for a decrease of the impact of myxomatosis [26]. The relevance of Zinkernagel’s mechanism for the rabbit/myxomatosis system gives strength to the predictions of Fouchet et al. [911]: population size, population structure but also demographic parameters such as the length of the breeding season play a major role in virus persistence, which enables the maintenance of high immunity levels. This means that the variability of impact of myxomatosis among populations is not only driven by the coevolution between the virus and its host, but also by population dynamics and the large scale spatial structure of the populations.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the managers of St Benoist and Aubas estates who allowed us to work in these study areas. We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank the ANR SEST program “Pathocénoses et emergence des maladies transmissibles: un concept unificateur mis à l'épreuve sur des maladies exemplaires” for financial support. This work was performed within the framework of the LABEX ECOFECT (ANR-11-LABX-0048) of the Université de Lyon, within the program “Investissements d’Avenir” (ANR-11-IDEX-0007) operated by the French National Research Agency (ANR).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Direction des études et de la recherche
(2)
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR5558-CNRS, Université de Lyon
(3)
LabEx ECOFECT - Eco-evolutionary dynamics of infectious diseases, Université de Lyon
(4)
Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Direction des études et de la recherche
(5)
INRA, UMR 1225 Interactions Hôtes-Agents Pathogènes
(6)
Université de Toulouse, INP-ENVT

References

  1. Naniche D: Human immunology of measles virus infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009, 330: 151-171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hosamani M, Scagliarini A, Bhanuprakash V, McInnes CJ, Singh RK: Orf: an update on current research and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009, 7: 879-893. 10.1586/eri.09.64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brambell FWR: The transmission of passive immunity from mother to young. 1970, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  4. Boots M, Best A, Miller MR, White A: The role of ecological feedbacks in the evolution of host defence: what does theory tell us?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009, 364: 27-36. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0160.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulinier T, Staszewski V: Maternal transfer of antibodies: raising immuno-ecology issues. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008, 23: 282-288. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grindstaff JL, Brodie ED, Ketterson ED: Immune function across generations: integrating mechanism and evolutionnary process in maternal antibody transmission. Proc Biol Sci. 2003, 240: 2039-2319.Google Scholar
  7. Hasselquist D, Nilsson J-Å: Maternal transfer of antibodies in vertebrates: trans-generational effects on offspring immunity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009, 364: 51-60. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Addison B, Klasing KC, Robinson WD, Austin SH, Ricklefs RE: Ecological and life-history factors influencing the evolution of maternal antibody allocation: a phylogenetic comparison. Proc Biol Sci. 2009, 276: 3979-3987. 10.1098/rspb.2009.1296.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fouchet D, Guitton J-S, Marchandeau S, Pontier D: Impact of myxomatosis in relation to local persistence in wild rabbit populations: the role of waning immunity and the reproductive period. J Theor Biol. 2008, 250: 593-605. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.10.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fouchet D, Marchandeau S, Bahi-Jaber N, Pontier D: The role of maternal antibodies in the emergence of severe disease as a result of fragmentation. J R Soc Interface. 2007, 4: 479-489. 10.1098/rsif.2006.0189.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fouchet D, Marchandeau S, Langlais M, Pontier D: Waning of maternal immunity and the impact of diseases: the example of myxomatosis in natural rabbit populations. J Theor Biol. 2006, 242: 81-89. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Siegrist C-A: Mechanisms by which maternal antibodies influence infant vaccine responses: review of hypotheses and definition of main determinants. Vaccine. 2003, 21: 3406-3412. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00342-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Staszewski V, Gasparini J, McCoy KD, Tveraa T, Boulinier T: Evidence of an interannual effect of maternal immunization on the immune response of juveniles in a long-lived colonial bird. J Anim Ecol. 2007, 76: 1215-1223. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01293.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pertmer TM, Oran AE, Moser JM, Madorin CA, Robinson HL: DNA vaccines for influenza virus: differential effects of maternal antibody on immune responses to hemagglutinin and nucleoprotein. J Virol. 2000, 74: 7787-7793. 10.1128/JVI.74.17.7787-7793.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glezen WP: Effect of maternal antibodies on the infant immune response. Vaccine. 2003, 21: 3389-3392. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00339-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kallio ER, Poikonen A, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O, Henttonen H, Koskela E, Mappes T: Maternal antibodies postpone hantavirus infection and enhance individual breeding success. Proc Biol Sci. 2006, 273: 2771-2776. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3645.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Husseini RH, Sweet C, Overton H, Smith H: Role of maternal immunity in the protection of newborn ferrets against infection with a virulent influenza virus. Immunology. 1984, 52: 389-394.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackwood DJ: Viral competition and maternal immunity influence the clinical disease caused by very virulent infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis. 2011, 55: 398-406. 10.1637/9671-012811-Reg.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Loeffen WLA, Heinen PP, Bianchi ATJ, Hunneman WA, Verheijden JHM: Effect of maternally derived antibodies on the clinical signs and immune response in pigs after primary and secondary infection with an influenza H1N1 virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2003, 92: 23-35. 10.1016/S0165-2427(03)00019-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinquier D, Lécuyer A, Levy C, Gagneur A, Pradat P, Soubeyrand B, Grimprel E, Pediatricians WG: Inverse correlation between varicella severity and level of anti-Varicella Zoster Virus maternal antibodies in infants below one year of age. Hum Vaccin. 2011, 7: 534-538. 10.4161/hv.7.5.14820.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zinkernagel RM: Maternal antibodies, childhood infections, and autoimmune diseases. New Engl J Med. 2001, 345: 1331-1335. 10.1056/NEJMra012493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zinkernagel RM: On natural and artificial vaccinations. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003, 21: 515-546. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Navarini AA, Krzyzowska M, Lang KS, Horvath E, Hengartner H, Niemialtowski MG, Zinkernagel RM: Long-lasting immunity by early infection of maternal-antibody-protected infants. Eur J Immunol. 2010, 40: 113-116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Reid JM, Arcese P, Keller LF, Hasselquist D: Long-term maternal effect on offspring immune response in song sparrows Melospiza melodia. Biol Lett. 2006, 2: 573-576. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0544.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundin BS, Dahlman-Höglund A, Pettersson I, Dahlgren UIH, Hanson A, Telemo E: Antibodies given orally in the neonatal period can affect the immune response for two generations: evidence for active maternal influence on the newborn’s immune system. Scand J Immunol. 1999, 50: 651-656. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00651.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fenner F, Fantini B: Biological control of vertebrate pests. The history of myxomatosis, an experiment in evolution. 1999, Oxon: CABI PublishingGoogle Scholar
  27. Woolhouse MEJ, Webster JP, Domingo E, Charlesworth B, Levin BR: Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nat Genet. 2002, 32: 569-577. 10.1038/ng1202-569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fenner F, Ross J: Myxomatosis. The European rabbit: The history of a successful colonizer. Edited by: Thompson HV, King CM. 1994, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205-239.Google Scholar
  29. Armand-Delille PF: Une méthode nouvelle permettant à l’agriculture de lutter efficacement contre la pullulation du lapin. C R Acad Agric Fr. 1953, 13: 638-639. (in French)Google Scholar
  30. Giban J: Répercussion de la myxomatose sur les populations de lapin de garenne en France. Terre Vie. 1956, 103: 179-187. (in French)Google Scholar
  31. Arthur CP, Chapuis J-L, Pages MV, Spitz F: Enquêtes sur la situation et la répartition écologique du lapin de garenne en France. Bull Mens ONC. 1980, 1980: 37-90. (in French)Google Scholar
  32. Fenner F, Marshall ID, Woodroofe GM: Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. I. Recovery of Australian wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from myxomatosis under field conditions. J Hyg. 1953, 51: 225-244. 10.1017/S0022172400015655.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerr PJ: Myxomatosis in Australia and Europe: a model for emerging infectious diseases. Antiviral Res. 2012, 93: 387-415. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.01.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marchandeau S, Boucraut-Baralon C: Epidémiologie de la myxomatose et des caliciviroses apparentées à la VHD au sein d’une population sauvage de lapins de garenne (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Gibier Faune Sauvage, Game Wildl. 1999, 16: 65-80. (in French)Google Scholar
  35. Ross J, Tittensor AM, Fox AP, Sanders MF: Myxomatosis in farmland rabbit populations in England and Wales. Epidemiol Infect. 1989, 103: 333-357. 10.1017/S0950268800030703.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fenner F: Changes in the mortality rate due to myxomatosis in the Australian wild rabbit. Nature. 1953, 172: 228-10.1038/172228a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fenner F, Marshall ID: A comparison of the virulence for European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) of strains of myxoma virus recovered in the field in Australia, Europe and America. J Hyg. 1957, 55: 149-191. 10.1017/S0022172400037098.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kerr PJ, Ghedin E, DePasse JV, Fitch A, Cattadori IM, Hudson PJ, Tscharke DC, Read AF, Holmes EC: Evolutionary history and attenuation of myxoma virus on two continents. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8: e1002950-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002950.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross J, Sanders MF: Innate resistance to myxomatosis in wild rabbits in England. J Hyg. 1977, 79: 411-415. 10.1017/S0022172400053262.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ross J, Sanders MF: The development of genetic resistance to myxomatosis in wild rabbits in Britain. J Hyg. 1984, 92: 255-261. 10.1017/S0022172400064494.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sobey WR, Conolly D: Myxomatosis: non-genetic aspects of resistance to myxomatosis in rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Aust Wildl Res. 1986, 13: 177-187. 10.1071/WR9860177.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Marshall ID, Douglas GW: Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. VIII. Further observations on changes in the innate resistance of Australian wild rabbits exposed to myxomatosis. J Hyg. 1961, 59: 117-122. 10.1017/S0022172400038766.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall ID, Fenner F: Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. V. Changes in the innate resistance of Australian wild rabbits exposed to myxomatosis. J Hyg. 1958, 56: 288-302. 10.1017/S0022172400037773.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Garnier R, Boulinier T, Gandon S: Evolution of the temporal persistence of immune protection. Biol Lett. 2013, 9: 20130017-10.1098/rsbl.2013.0017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ardia DR, Parmentier HK, Vogel LA: The role of constraints and limitation in driving individual variation in immune response. Funct Ecol. 2011, 25: 61-73. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01759.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Saurat P, Chantal J, Ganière J-P, Gilbert Y, Picavet D, Lefort C: La réponse immunitaire dans la myxomatose. Etude de la réponse humorale. Bull Mens ONC. 1980, 1980: 297-309. (in French)Google Scholar
  47. Kerr PJ: An ELISA for epidemiological studies of myxomatosis: persistence of antibodies to myxoma virus in European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Wildl Res. 1997, 24: 53-65. 10.1071/WR96058.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ross J, Tittensor AM: Influence of myxomatosis in regulating rabbit numbers. Mammal Rev. 1986, 16: 163-168. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1986.tb00038.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Fenner F, Marshall ID: Passive immunity in myxomatosis of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): the protection conferred on kittens born by immune does. J Hyg. 1954, 52: 321-336. 10.1017/S0022172400027534.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Joubert L, Leftheriosis E, Mouchet J: La myxomatose, Tomes I et II. 1973, Paris: L’expansion scientifique française, (in French)Google Scholar
  51. Bertagnoli S: Myxomatosis. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccine for terrestrial animals. Volume II. Edited by: OIE. 2008, Paris, France, 937-946. 6Google Scholar
  52. Gilbert Y, Picavet DP, Chantal J: Diagnostic de la myxomatose: mise au point d’une méthode d’immunofluorescence indirecte. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epizoot. 1989, 8: 209-220. (in French)Google Scholar
  53. Marchandeau S, Guenezan M, Chantal J: Utilisation de la croissance pondérale pour la détermination de l’âge de jeunes lapins de garenne (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Gibier Faune Sauvage, Game Wildl. 1995, 12: 289-302. (in French)Google Scholar
  54. Gelfi J, Chantal J, Phong TT, Boucraut-Baralon C: Development of an ELISA for detection of myxoma virus-specific rabbit antibodies: test evaluation for diagnostic applications on vaccinated and wild rabbit sera. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1999, 11: 240-245. 10.1177/104063879901100306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Gilbert A, Fooks AR, Hayman DTS, Horton DL, Müller T, Plowright R, Peel AJ, Bowen R, Wood JLN, Mills J, Cunningham AA, Rupprecht CE: Deciphering serology to understand the ecology of infectious diseases in wildlife. Ecohealth. 2013, 10: 298-313. 10.1007/s10393-013-0856-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Karem KL, Reynolds M, Braden Z, Lou G, Bernard N, Patton J, Damon IK: Characterization of acute-phase humoral immunity to monkeypox: use of immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of monkeypox infection during the 2003 north american outbreak. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005, 12: 867-872.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Marchandeau et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement