Skip to main content

Table 2 Proportion of modification ofR. microplussuitability to climate change scenarios according to zoogeographic regions and livestock abundance categories worldwide [54, 55] for 2050 scenarios

From: Climate change implications for the distribution of the babesiosis and anaplasmosis tick vector, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

Scenarios

Regions

Cattle abundance (individuals/10 km2)

0–1

1–5

5–10

10–20

20–50

50–100

> 100

All categories (average)

RCP 4.5

Afrotropic

1.57

5.78

6.47

6.23

5.86

6.93

7.75

5.80

Australasia

6.26

6.10

0.91

1.41

9.94

7.81

3.99

5.20

Indo-Malayan

3.02

2.82

3.55

3.27

5.64

11.44

31.55

8.76

Nearctic

16.09

3.62

2.87

4.52

4.40

2.46

25.48

8.49

Neotropic

9.42

5.71

4.87

5.61

5.70

4.44

8.95

6.39

Palearctic

9.05

2.83

3.22

4.32

3.13

0.79

0.49

3.40

RCP 8.5

Afrotropic

0.60

1.96

1.33

2.19

1.98

1.23

1.72

1.57

Australasia

1.53

0.50

0.06

0.16

0.61

0.00

0.00

0.41

Indo-Malayan

3.39

2.34

4.24

4.36

6.04

6.54

6.28

4.74

Nearctic

33.12

2.50

1.90

1.62

5.65

32.89

134.87

30.36

Neotropic

2.69

2.68

2.40

2.33

1.90

1.29

0.59

1.99

Palearctic

22.88

26.74

12.78

10.35

6.61

4.80

1.78

12.28

Both

Afrotropic

4.58

10.21

14.19

11.24

7.80

7.77

9.97

9.39

Australasia

13.65

5.97

8.18

7.26

9.26

7.92

2.91

7.88

Indo-Malayan

25.17

12.77

11.14

11.91

18.24

20.53

34.57

19.19

Nearctic

50.34

4.25

2.50

1.68

2.35

8.62

3.01

10.39

Neotropic

29.87

13.68

12.14

9.71

7.82

5.44

8.87

12.50

Palearctic

32.03

40.84

18.65

15.71

13.09

8.95

4.51

19.11

  1. Values with increases greater than 10% are shown in italics.