Figure 6From: Differences in immune responses to Haemonchus contortus infection in the susceptible Ile de France and the resistant Santa Ines sheep under different anthelmintic treatments regimensImmunohistochemical labelling of abomasum mucosa sections showing positive cells. A, B POU2F3+ cells; C, D CD3+ T cells; E, F CD79α+ B cells (×400 magnification). The micrographics A, C, E show tissue from the Santa Ines lamb with no detectable Haemonchus contortus worm; while B, D, F show tissue from Ile de France lamb with a H. contortus burden of 1860.Back to article page