Open Access

Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and the influence of strain type on infection and pathogenesis: a review

Veterinary Research201546:64

DOI: 10.1186/s13567-015-0203-2

Received: 12 September 2014

Accepted: 16 January 2015

Published: 19 June 2015

Abstract

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Map) is an important pathogen that causes a chronic, progressive granulomatous enteritis known as Johne’s disease or paratuberculosis. The disease is endemic in many parts of the world and responsible for considerable losses to the livestock and associated industries. Diagnosis and control are problematic, due mostly to the long incubation period of the disease when infected animals show no clinical signs and are difficult to detect, and the ability of the organism to survive and persist in the environment. The existence of phenotypically distinct strains of Map has been known since the 1930s but the genetic differentiation of Map strain types has been challenging and only recent technologies have proven sufficiently discriminative for strain comparisons, tracing the sources of infection and epidemiological studies. It is important to understand the differences that exist between Map strains and how they influence both development and transmission of disease. This information is required to develop improved diagnostics and effective vaccines for controlling Johne’s disease. Here I review the current classification of Map strain types, the sources of the genetic variability within strains, growth characteristics and epidemiological traits associated with strain type and the influence of strain type on infection and pathogenicity.

Table of contents

  1. 1.

    Introduction

     
  2. 2.

    Strain types of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis

     
  3. 3.
    Source of genetic variability
    1. 3.1
      Large sequence polymorphisms
      1. 3.1.1

        Genomic insertions

         
      2. 3.1.2

        Genomic deletions

         
      3. 3.1.3

        Genomic inversions

         
      4. 3.1.4

        Genomic duplications

         
       
    2. 3.2

      Insertion sequences

       
    3. 3.3

      Repeat sequences

       
    4. 3.4

      Single nucleotide polymorphisms

       
    5. 3.5

      Genome stability and mutation rate

       
     
  4. 4.

    Genetic variability and growth characteristics

     
  5. 5.

    Genetic variability and epidemiologic traits

     
  6. 6.

    Genetic variability and virulence

     
  7. 7.

    Genetic variability, infection and pathogenesis

     
  8. 8.

    Conclusions

     
  9. 9.

    Competing interests

     
  10. 10.

    Acknowledgements

     
  11. 11.

    References

     

1. Introduction

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Map) is an important pathogen that causes a chronic, progressive granulomatous enteritis known as Johne’s disease or paratuberculosis. The disease is endemic in many parts of the world and responsible for considerable losses to the livestock and associated industries. Diagnosis and control are problematic, due mostly to the long incubation period of the disease when infected animals show no clinical signs and are difficult to detect, and the ability of the organism to survive and persist in the environment.

Map has been isolated from a diverse range of both ruminant and non-ruminant hosts [13] but causes clinical disease only in ruminants, camelids [4,5], rabbits [6] and hares [7]. Map can infect humans and has been associated with Crohn’s disease, although there is no definitive evidence and it remains a highly controversial issue [8].

The existence of phenotypically distinct strains of Map has been known for more than eight decades but the genetic differentiation of Map strain types has been challenging and only recent technologies have proven sufficiently discriminative for strain comparisons, tracing the sources of infection and epidemiological studies. The history of Map typing and the techniques employed has been reviewed elsewhere and will not be covered in this review [9,10]. It is important to understand the differences that exist between Map strains and how they influence both development and transmission of disease. This information is required to develop improved diagnostics and effective vaccines for controlling Johne’s disease. Here I review the current classification of Map strain types, the sources of the genetic variability within strains, growth characteristics and epidemiological traits associated with strain type and the influence of strain type on infection and pathogenicity.

2. Strain types of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis

Over the past two decades various strain types of Map have been differentiated using different molecular techniques. As a result a complex nomenclature for Map strains has evolved and the phylogenetic relationships between these strain types has been clarified only recently by whole genome sequencing (J Bryant, K Stevenson, unpublished observations; Figure 1). There are two major groups of strains known as “Sheep-type” or “Type S” and “Cattle-type” or “Type C” originally named after the host species from which they were first isolated [11]. The Type C group is synonymous with the Type II strains as defined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and described by Stevenson et al. [12]. A third group of strains termed “intermediate” [11] or “Type III” [1315] was originally thought to be intermediate between Type S and Type C strains but whole genome sequencing has confirmed that it is actually a subtype of Type S strains (J Bryant, K Stevenson, unpublished observations; Figure 1). Similarly, the Type I pigmented ovine isolates from the UK described by Stevenson et al. [12] and the recently sequenced camelid isolates [4] also comprise sub-lineages of Type S (Figure 1).
Figure 1

The phylogeny of Map strain types. Maximum likelihood tree of Map strains based on whole genome SNPs. Next generation sequencing data from unpublished and published strains were mapped against Map K-10 reference genome, and SNPs called based on previously described filters [98]. The tree was built using RaXML vs 7.8.6 [99] with 100 bootstrap replicates. Branches were collapsed (indicated by triangles) and visualised using FigTree [100].

Another group of strains designated “Bison” or “B-type” has been described in the literature [16,17]. These strains were first differentiated on the basis of the number of copies with a C or a T at base pair 223 in the insertion sequence IS1311 [16]. All copies of IS1311 in B- Type strains have a T at position 223 whereas the Type S strains all have a C and the Type C strains have one or more copies with a C or a T at this position. Further analyses of B-type isolates revealed that the B-type isolates from animals in India were different from those isolated from US bison and these became known as “Indian Bison type” [18]. More recently, Indian Bison Type strains have been identified by a TG deletion at base pair positions 64 and 65 of IS1311 at locus 2 [19] and also by a number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified by whole genome sequencing (C Leão, unpublished observations). The Indian Bison type strains are a sub-lineage of the Type C strains [20] (Figure 1).

Genome sequencing of human Map isolates from patients with inflammatory bowel disease has shown that these do not comprise a distinct strain type and cluster with Type C cattle isolates following phylogenetic analysis [21,22, J Bryant, K Stevenson, unpublished observations].

Type S and Type C strains can be differentiated by most typing systems but distinguishing between isolates within these strain types is more difficult and requires the use of more than one typing method and for PCR-based systems the detection of multiple loci [9,10]. Whole genome sequencing provides the ultimate resolution and has revealed genetic diversity among closely related Map isolates [21,22]. Throughout this review the two major strain types will be referred to as Type S and Type C and the Type I and III classification for Type S subtypes.

3. Source of genetic variability

Microbial genomes are plastic changing over time as a result of spontaneous mutations and in response to changing selective pressures within the microenvironment. Spontaneous mutations arise due to the chemical instability of the purine and pyrimidine bases and errors during DNA replication. Natural exposure of an organism to certain environmental factors such as UV light also can induce mutations.

Genetic polymorphisms in Map strains have been determined by microarray comparisons and in silico analyses of whole genome sequence data. The first Map strain to be sequenced was a Type C strain, Map K-10 in 2005 [23]. Subsequent optical mapping revealed that the sequence contained an inversion due to mis-assembly [24] and the corrected sequence was published in 2010 [25]. Genome sequence data for M.avium hominissuis (Mah) strain 104 (Mah 104) is available in the NCBI Genbank (NC_008595). A draft sequence of a Type S strain (Map S397) was compiled following genome sequencing and optical mapping and published in 2012 [26]. These provide the reference genomes for sequence and genome comparisons and all variations are described relative to these.

3.1 Large sequence polymorphisms

Whole genome comparisons have identified large sequence polymorphisms (LSPs) including insertions, deletions, inversions, translocations and duplications, all of which contribute to the unique genotypic composition of Map isolates. Large-scale DNA rearrangements can disrupt the integrity of a large number of coding and regulatory genes affecting their function, which can result in major phenotypic consequences. Large-scale insertions can also result in the acquisition of new genetic material such as virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes that confer a selective advantage and contribute to the fitness of a pathogen in specific microenvironments. Horizontal gene transfer has been detected in mycobacteria [27] and a recent study by Wang et al. [28] has shown that the genetic elements required for in vivo survival of Map comprise a mixture of Map-specific genes acquired via horizontal gene transfer and conserved mycobacterial virulence genes. A number of LSPs have been identified between Type S and Type C strains. However, the genome is remarkably homogeneous between isolates within each of these lineages [21,22,26].

3.1.1 Genomic insertions

Comparison of the whole genome sequences of Map S397 (Type S) and Map K-10 (Type C) reveals ten LSPs containing four or more open reading frames (ORFs) present in the Type S strain and Mah but absent from the Type C strain [26]. Four of these were identified previously by genomic hybridisation and microarray analyses [2932]. The largest of these is a 9 kb fragment comprising 13 ORFs, which encodes a number of proteins of particular interest that could have phenotypic consequences including a TetR transcriptional regulator, PPE proteins, HspR protein, PapA2 protein, ABC-2 type transporter and IS1311. The polymorphism also truncates MAP2178 involved in mycobactin synthesis. Another LSP insertion of particular note contains 14 ORFs predicted to encode proteins involved in the biosynthesis of glycopeptidolipids, which promote macrophage activation in a TLR2 and MyD88-dependent manner [26,31,33]. Overall a total of 70 ORFs are present in Map S397 but absent from Map K-10 and of these 57 are present in Mah 104 and 13 unique to Map S397 [26]. As more Map Type S strains are fully sequenced, it will be possible to confirm whether these ORFs are exclusive to all Type S strains.

3.1.2 Genomic deletions

Whole genome comparisons between Map S397 and Map K-10 also reveal 32 ORFs present in Map K-10 but absent from the genome of Map S397 [26]. These included the previously described deleted regions MAP1484c to MAP1491 [31,32,34] and MAP1728c to MAP1744 [3032,35]. Additionally, Castellanos et al. [32] reported the absence of MAP3584 from Type III strains compared with Type I strains. Other heterogenic loci identified in Type S strains include MAP1433c to MAP1438c [26,32], also known as VA15 [31] and MAP2325 [26,32,34,36]. Although discrepancies between microarray and genome sequence data cannot be ruled out, these differences may represent intra strain variations due to geographical differences or alternatively may have been derived through the process of host adaptation and reflect true functional differences between strains.

3.1.3 Genomic inversions

Genome sequencing and optical mapping of Map S397 revealed 14 inversions compared with the corrected genome sequence of Map K-10 [25,26]. These inversions vary in size from 22 to 1,174 kb and span a total of 2.4 Mb of the S397 genome. Seven of the inversions are larger than 22 kb and 13 have at least one IS element on the flanking regions. Inversions result in a change in genome synteny (gene order) and in mycobacteria appear to be mediated by insertion sequences. Mycobacteria may utilise inversions to change the expression of certain genes for the benefit of the bacterium during infection. It is possible that the large gene inversions could be responsible for antigenic variations between strain types, although this has to be verified at the transcriptomic and proteomic levels.

3.1.4 Genomic duplications

Two large tandem duplications designated variable Genomic Island −17 (vGI-17) and vGI-18 have been identified in human Map isolates by Wynne et al. [21]. These duplications span 63 and 109 ORFs, respectively and both are flanked by an IS4 element suggesting that transposon mediated recombination may be responsible for the heterogeneity of duplication between isolates. PCR screening of over 30 additional Map isolates of different provenance confirmed that the duplications are carried by many isolates. However, the proportion of cells containing vGI-17 varies between isolates leading the authors to hypothesise that the duplications are transient genomic arrangements that may confer a selective advantage for enhanced infection or persistence in a host.

3.2 Insertion sequences

Insertion sequences have proved to be important for distinguishing between mycobacterial species and subspecies. The Map K-10 strain contains 19 different IS elements with 58 total copies including IS1311 and the Map-specific elements IS900, ISMav2, IS_MAP02, IS_MAP04 and homologues of REP13E12. These IS elements are present in Map S397 in the same copy number as Map K-10 [26] and currently there is no evidence for IS elements unique to either Type S or Type C strains. However, copy number of IS900 varies between Type C strains [37] and this has been exploited in some typing techniques such as restriction fragment length polymorphism coupled with hybridisation to IS900. Insertion sequences may insert into regulatory or coding regions of the genome and disrupt gene function or into intergenic regions causing minimal disruption. Additionally, they can effect DNA rearrangements by transposon mediated recombination.

3.3 Repeat sequences

Repeat sequences are an important source of variation in bacterial genomes and are exploited by various typing methods for strain differentiation and molecular diagnosis. Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units (MIRUs) are repeat sequences present in the intergenic regions dispersed throughout mycobacterial genomes and are distinguished from other repeat sequences in that they do not contain dyad symmetries and comprise small ORFs whose extremities overlap those of the contiguous ORFs and are orientated in the same direction as these ORFs [38]. Variable Number Tandem Repeats (VNTRs) are tandem repeats of 15–100 bp dispersed at multiple loci in the genome. Short-sequence repeats (SSRs) consist of simple tracts of 2–5 bp tandem repeats. The total number of different repeat loci and the copy number of each repeat can vary between Map isolates. MIRU-VNTRs and SSRs have been used extensively for typing Map isolates and can distinguish both between Type S and Type C and within Type C strains to some extent [9,39,40].

3.4 Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the substitution of one nucleotide with another or an insertion or deletion of a single nucleotide. Single nucleotide substitutions in protein coding sequences can be synonymous where the substitution does not result in an amino acid change in the protein or nonsynonymous where the substitution results in an amino acid change that may have an impact on the function of the encoded protein. SNPs involving insertions or deletions in protein coding sequences result in frameshifts that lead to significant alterations in the encoding protein and the translation of downstream genes. SNPs in non-protein coding DNA can also have functional consequences if, for example, they affect a regulatory element. Also, SNPs in non-translated regions or synonymous SNPs may impact function by inducing alterations in RNA structure that influence RNA stability and/or small RNA-based post transcriptional regulation. Not all SNPs will result in phenotypic changes that affect epidemiologic or pathogenic traits but they are an important source of genetic variability. SNPs provide the greatest variation within the genome and are often thought of as the raw material of evolution. More than 3000 SNPs differ between Type S and Type C strains [26] but more importantly, SNPs provide intra-strain genetic variation. There are around 1000 SNPs between the camelid isolates and Map S397 [4] and around 1000 SNPs between Type I and Type III strains. The high resolution afforded by genome sequencing can distinguish Map isolates within a strain type that cannot be differentiated by standard typing procedures. Epidemiologically related isolates can differ by just ten SNPs.

3.5 Genome stability and mutation rate

The fidelity of replication and the growth rate will affect the rate at which genetic variants can arise within a given pathogen species. Since Map replicates very slowly with a doubling time of 22–26 hours or more [41] and demonstrates low genomic diversity, the mutation rate is likely to be slow. A mutation rate of less than 0.3 SNPs per genome per year, which falls in the range reported for M.tuberculosis [42] has been estimated based on the analysis of more than 100 Map genomes using the Bayesian MCMC programme BEAST and different phylogenetic models (J Bryant, personal communication). The mutation rate and hence genetic variation is also influenced by selective pressures from the microenvironment such as the host immune system or presence of antibiotics. There have been few studies on genome stability although genetic changes occurring after in vitro passage of Map strains have been reported [11,4345]. In contrast to in vitro passage, no changes were detected by IS900-RFLP analysis following in vivo passage [45,46]. However, further studies using genome sequencing with greater resolution will give a better estimate of genome stability. With respect to the short term stability of genotyping target repeat sequences and their suitability for epidemiological studies, MIRU-VNTR loci tested thus far appear to be stable enough for use in Map epidemiology, but the SSR locus 2 has been reported to be too unstable for this purpose [45].

4. Genetic variability and growth characteristics

The existence of at least two Map strain types differing in their growth characteristics, colony pigmentation and disease presentation was suspected as early as the 1930s but not confirmed until appropriate media could be found to support growth of both strain types [47,48]. We now know these strain types to be Type S and Type C. Generally, Type C strains are relatively easy to isolate from clinical samples and grow more quickly than Type S strains producing visible colonies in 4–6 weeks depending on the initial inoculum and the medium used. Type S strains are more difficult to isolate, taking 16 to 52 weeks to produce detectable growth. Both strain types grow on media based on Middlebrook 7H9, 7H10 or 7H11. Middlebrook 7H11 supplemented with mycobactin J is probably the best solid medium for the primary isolation of Map isolates from small ruminants which may be infected by both strain types [49]. With the withdrawal of Bactec12B medium, Whittington et al. [50] have developed a new liquid culture medium (M7H9C) comprising a Middlebrook 7H9 base supplemented with casitone, albumin, dextrose, catalase, egg yolk, mycobactin J and a cocktail of antibiotics that is suitable for the primary cultivation of Type S and Type C Map. Mycobactin J is usually added to all types of culture media, although some researchers have reported growth on 7H11 without mycobactin [51,52]. Type S strains grow poorly if at all on Herrold’s Egg Yolk Medium (HEYM), in contrast to Type C strains [48,49,5255] and the addition of sodium pyruvate to the culture media can be inhibitory to Type S strains [49,52,56].

A recent study by Abendaño et al. [57] reported variable growth rates of low passage Type S and B-type isolates obtained from cattle, goat and wild animals but very similar growth rates for ovine isolates of Types S, C and B, although generally the Type S strains grew more slowly. The authors hypothesise that the isolates from sheep may have adapted to growth in this particular host by modifying the expression of some genes that might subsequently affect the strains’ ability to grow in liquid media. This may be reflected in the genotypes of these strains but whole genome sequencing and further investigations are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Culture environments certainly influence Map genome diversity when strains are propagated in vitro over long periods. Long term systematic subculture of vaccine strains has influenced Map genome diversity resulting in large tandem genomic duplications, deletions and transposable element activity [44]. The vaccine strain 316F has been propagated on different media in different laboratories. A large deletion (vGI-19) is uniquely present in a 316F strain maintained on Dubos medium with added pyruvate and it is possible that this medium has been selective in that the deleted region includes homologues of glyoxylate enzymes associated with pyruvate metabolism. Similarly, another 316F strain maintained exclusively on potato starch medium has a unique large tandem duplication (vGI-22) containing extra copies of 14 ORFs including genes required for cell wall and fatty acid biosynthesis.

Another study has reported specific epigenetic distinctions between Map isolates from tissue versus faeces [58]. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analyses of Map isolates revealed genetic regions unique to tissue-associated isolates which showed no differences in terms of DNA sequence between Map K-10 or faecal isolates. Further investigation demonstrated undigested AFLP restriction sites in the tissue-associated regions prompting the authors to speculate that methylation of these sites might be responsible. The discovery of a consensus sequence for possible methyltransferase recognition upstream of the undigested restriction site in the tissue-associated Map isolates would appear to support this hypothesis.

Colony phenotype does not appear to differ much between Map strain types, although the size and colour of colonies varies according to the media on which the strains are grown [49,52]. The exception to this are the distinctive pigmented strains that have been isolated from sheep, which produce a yellow or orange pigment that is stable during both in vitro and in vivo passage. The gut mucosa of sheep clinically infected with these strains is typically a brilliant yellow colour caused by the large number of pigmented bacteria present. Initially, pigmentation was thought to be a feature of Type I strains but a few pigmented strains have since been typed as Type III [40] and non-pigmented Type I strains identified (K Stevenson, unpublished results). No genetic polymorphisms or the presence or absence of any single gene which could be exclusively associated with the pigmented strains have been identified and the underlying reason for pigmentation in these strains remains unknown (J Bryant, personal communication).

Map, like other bacteria, emits volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during growth and a study by Trefz et al. [59] showed that 34 such compounds could be identified as biomarkers for Map growing on HEYM and that 2-ethylfuran, 2-methylfuran, 3-methylfuran, 2-pentylfuran, ethyl acetate, 1-methyl-1-H-pyrrole and dimethyldisulfide correlated with density of bacterial growth. Only a limited number of Map strains were investigated; a laboratory adapted Type C reference strain (ATCC 19689), one Type S (sub-type III) and 3 Type C field strains of different genotypes. However, the Map strains could be differentiated on the basis of their VOC emission patterns indicating that Map strains vary with respect to growth and metabolic activity. The Type C reference strain and Type S strain could be distinguished from the Type C field strains but the emissions from the Type C field strains were not markedly different.

5. Genetic variability and epidemiologic traits

Map strain differences in epidemiologic traits such as preferred host species and transmission factors have been suggested, but the results of past epidemiological studies have to be reviewed with caution since they did not always employ media that would support the growth of all strain types or sufficiently discriminative typing techniques.

Type C Map strains show no host preference and can be isolated from a broad range of domesticated, captive and free-living wildlife species, including non-ruminants [13]. They are usually the predominant strain type isolated from cattle. The Bison subtypes similarly are not restricted to Bison species and have been isolated from many domestic and wildlife species and humans [18,6062]. There is mounting evidence for interspecies transmission of Type C strains. The same strains have been found to infect wildlife species and domestic ruminants on the same property [63,64], between two species of farmed ruminants on the same farm [49,63], and between wildlife species on the same property [63]. High resolution genome sequencing will no doubt reveal many more.

Type S strains have been predominantly isolated from sheep and goats in the past and this has led to a perception that they have a preference for these host species. However, Type S strains have been shown to produce clinical disease following experimental infection of cattle [65] or deer [66]. There has been one report of the isolation of a pigmented Map strain from a cow [67] and this strain was also experimentally transmitted to sheep. Experimental infections utilise high doses of in vitro grown Map and may not accurately reflect the situation in the field. In terms of natural infections, Type S infections of cattle [6870], farmed and wild deer [70,71] and Arabian camelids [4] have been reported. The most convincing evidence for interspecies transmission of Type S strains comes from the scenario following the importation of Karakul sheep from Germany to Iceland in 1938 [72]. The Icelandic strains were characterised retrospectively as Type S strains [69]. After their introduction in sheep they passed to the local cattle population and subsequently became endemic. The risk of natural transmission of Type S strains from sheep to cattle was believed to be low and to occur when susceptible animals were exposed to high doses [73]. However, a recent study by Verdugo et al. [70] suggests that interspecies transmission of Type S strains may not be such a rare event if there is close contact between different species at the farm level. This study reported that Type S strains are more frequent in New Zealand beef cattle than Type C and that the same S subtypes were present in beef cattle and sheep co-grazing on farms. Farming systems therefore have an impact on strain transmission with co-grazing two or more ruminant species increasing the risk of interspecies transmission. These studies [69,70, 73] do not differentiate between the different S subtypes I and III, which could differ in their ability for interspecies transmission.

The transmission of Map also depends on the ability of the bacterium to survive within the environment and there appears to have been only one study investigating environmental survival of different Map strains. A study by Eppleston et al. [74] reported the survival of a Type C Map strain was not affected by site but for a Type S strain the hazard of death was 2.3 times higher at arid zone sites compared with temperate sites in Australia. Map has the capacity to form spore-like morphotypes that are resilient to heat and could facilitate survival within the environment [75]. Information on the survival of the different Map strain types in soil, water, silage and manure is of significant importance for reducing transmission and requires further research.

The geographical distribution of Map strains has probably been influenced by many factors including animal movements, farming practices and strain virulence. Currently, whole genome sequencing has shown that there is little evidence for geographically distinct strains (J Bryant, K Stevenson unpublished observations). The pigmented Type I strains do appear to be geographically restricted to pockets within the UK and are rarely found elsewhere. Distinct Type C genotypes have been found for Canada [76] and the Azores, Portugal (C Leão, personal communication). However, the picture may change as more Map isolates are subjected to whole genome sequencing.

6. Genetic variability and virulence

There is a paucity of information on differences in the abilities of Map strains to cause disease due in part to the challenges of differentiating between strain types and assessing virulence both in the field and using animal models. Few data sets exist that combine information on Map genotype and the outcome or severity of disease in the field and virulence has mostly been determined for laboratory cultured strains using animal models. There appears to be differences between Type S and Type C strains with respect to their virulence in different host species. Experimental infection of deer with a Type C isolate established infection in 100% of the animals whereas the infection rate was 69% with the same dose of a Type S strain, suggesting that Type S strains may be less virulent for deer or alternatively deer may be more resistant to infection with this strain type [66]. A recent study assessed the influence of different Map strains on the pathogenesis of disease in sheep, through the evaluation of lesion development and peripheral immune responses [77]. The researchers found specific antibody and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production was significantly higher in lambs infected with Type C strains whereas no consistent IFN-γ responses were measured in those infected with Type S strains. In Type S infected lambs the granulomatous lesions were focal and restricted to lymphoid tissue with no differences in lesion intensity over time. In contrast, in lambs infected with Type C strains the lesions were more severe at 150 days post inoculation while at 390 days post infection lesions had decreased in severity and were characterised by well demarcated granulomas with fibrosis, suggesting lesion regression. Differences in lesion type were observed between a Type C field strain and Map K-10 at 150 days with the field strain producing diffuse lesions and the Map K-10 producing less severe multifocal lesions, suggesting that the Map K-10 may be less virulent possibly as a result of laboratory adaptation. No differences were observed between the two Type S (Type III) field strains in the study. The Type C lesions occurred in lymphoid tissue and in the lamina propria both associated with and not associated with lymphoid tissue. Infection with Type C strains was also characterised by the appearance of giant cells. These have been observed previously in leporine paratuberculosis [6] (also Type C strains), are common in natural bovine paratuberculosis and were reported in a previous infection study [78]. Since different Type C strains were used in these experimental infections, the presence of giant cells may be the consequence of Map strain type rather than host responses. Currently there are no published reports of similar experimental infections of calves to establish the effect of Map strain type on the pathogenesis of bovine paratuberculosis.

Differences in virulence between Map vaccine strains 316F, II and 2e (all Type C strains) with respect to a virulent Map Type C clinical isolate have been demonstrated using a mouse model of infection [44]. The vaccine strains were clearly attenuated with regard to their ability to survive and persist in mice as measured by a reduction in the numbers of bacteria recovered and numbers of leucocyte clusters containing acid fast bacteria in the livers. Strains 316F and 2e were also shown to be attenuated with respect to a virulent field strain in a calf model of infection [79]. Analyses of the genomes of these and other vaccine strains was accomplished using a pan Map/Mah microarray and multiple genomic variations specific for various vaccine strains and stocks were identified including deletions, tandem duplications, variable genomic islands and insertion sequence copy numbers [44]. These genomic variations give clues as to possible mechanisms of attenuation of these strains. Of particular interest is a deletion (vGI-20) spanning 34 ORFs, including ten Map-specific genes in vaccine strains 2e and II. This region includes part of the 38Kb pathogenicity island identified by Stratmann et al. [80] and the Map-specific genes could provide the basis for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA). The deleted region contains genes potentially involved in virulence and pathogenesis including PapA2 (involved in cell adhesion), genes encoding the anti-host killing factors glyoxalase and catalase, genes involved in cell internalisation and fatty acid metabolism. Strain II additionally contained a large 41 ORF tandem duplication (vGI-21) which included duplication of genes involved in benzoate and lipid metabolic pathways and it is tempting to speculate that this duplication arose to compensate for the loss of the genes involved in lipid biosynthesis and carbon usage in the vGI-20 deletion. The vGI-20 deletion and the vGI-21 duplication were not present in 316F suggesting that attenuation in this strain is due to different genetic polymorphisms.

7. Genetic variability, infection and pathogenesis

Disease is the outcome of a battle between host and pathogen involving a complex interplay between host defence mechanisms and attempts of the pathogen to circumvent these defences. Key determinants of bacterial virulence are those that facilitate adhesion, invasion and colonisation of host cells. Evidence is emerging that there are differences in the host-pathogen interactions that could be attributed to different Map strain types. The first stage of Map infection is the invasion of the intestinal barrier via both microfold (M) cells of Peyer’s patches and differentiated epithelial cells [81]. During these early infection events bacterial adhesions can play a crucial role. The heparin binding haemagglutinin (HBHG) is one such adhesion located on the surface of the mycobacterium, which has been shown to mediate the binding of the bacterium to epithelial cells and fibroblasts [82]. The C-terminal regions of the hbhA gene differ between Type S and Type C Map strains mainly in deletions or differences in the lysine-rich repeats, which are important for the binding of HBHA to HS-GAG [83]. No differences could be found between the Type S subtypes I and III. The HBHA proteins from Map Type S and Type C strains were found to exhibit different binding activity with sulphated glycoconjugates, with Type S strains having the highest binding affinity correlating with a greater number of lysine-rich repeats [83]. Since HS-GAG structures differ according to both hosts and organs, it is possible that mycobacterial pathogens use heparin-binding domain variability to define their host preference or tropism for the intestine. Further investigations are required to further elucidate the role of this protein in pathogenesis of Map strain types.

Following invasion of the intestine, Map is then translocated to the submucosal macrophages where the bacterium encounters a hostile environment evolved to destroy and internalise pathogens. The survival of internalised Map depends upon its ability to inhibit phagosome acidification and phagolysosome fusion to avoid hydrolysis and oxidation. There is some evidence that different Map strains have different capacities for entry and survival in macrophages. Several studies have reported increased uptake and survival of Map Type C strains by bovine monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) compared with a Type S strain [84,85]. Furthermore, no effect of the origin of MDMs (Johne’s disease positive or control animals) on bacterial survival irrespective of Map strain type could be observed, suggesting that previous exposure of MDMs to Map had no impact on bacterial survival in vitro [85]. These studies employed very few strains and a more recent study investigating a larger panel of genotypically distinct strains from six different host species concluded that survival of Map isolates in bovine macrophages is associated with the specific host from which the isolates were initially isolated rather than genotype [86]. This study also reported that Map growth was less variable in BoMac cells (a SV40-transformed bovine peritoneal macrophage cell line) than MDMs. The discrepancies between these studies could possibly be explained by the variable results obtained using MDMs, the limited number of strains employed by the earlier studies or the difference in methodology used for enumerating survival of Map in macrophage cells. The importance of this methodology has been recognised and is now being addressed [86,87]. Clearly more research is needed in terms of entry and survival of different genotypically distinct Map strains of both Type C and Type S in macrophages especially in vivo.

Studies have been undertaken to investigate the response of different Map strains to the macrophage environment. Zhu et al. [88] used selective capture of transcribed sequences to investigate the responses of the same strain types used by Janagama et al. [84] and Gollnick et al. [85] within MDMs. Despite variations in the genes identified, in general the different Map strains responded in a similar fashion to the macrophage environment upregulating genes in cell wall biosynthesis and pathways that combat oxidative stress, metabolic and nutritional starvation and cell survival. Transcription of four genes was upregulated exclusively in Type C strains; MAP1728 (encoding YfnB, a predicted hydrolase), MAP1738 (MmpL5), MAP1729c and MAP1730 (hypothetical proteins) suggesting that these may be strain specific responses for survival within macrophages. These genes are located within one of the deleted genomic regions characteristic of Type S strains. Protein expression profiles of one Type S and one Type C strains under oxidative and nitrosative stress and the stressors of temperature flux, hypoxia, nutrient starvation mimicking the environment of macrophages have also been investigated [8991]. Some proteins were found to be differentially regulated between Map C and S Types; 10 in response to oxidative stress [91], nine to nitrosative stress [91], 27 to temperature flux [90], 21 to hypoxia [89] and 26 to starvation [89]. Seven of these proteins were differentially regulated in Type S and Type C strains in response to several stressors: DesA2 to oxidative and thermal stress; AhpC to oxidative, nitrosative stress and starvation; AhpD to hypoxia, oxidative and nitrosative stress; Ppa to oxidative, nitrosative and thermal stress, hypoxia and starvation; FabG to nitrosative, thermal stress and starvation; hypothetical protein MAP2411 to oxidative stress and starvation and hypothetical protein MAP1885c to nitrosative stress and starvation. In terms of strain specificity, AhpD and FabG were only identified in the Type C strain under stress, suggesting that the regulation of these proteins is a general response to stress by Type C strains. Nutrient starvation inhibited the growth of both strain types but was lethal for the Type S strain after 12 weeks [89].

Another stressor encountered by Map infecting macrophages is the initial low availability of iron. Iron is essential for growth and a key cofactor in many enzymatic pathways including those involved in energy production and nucleic acid synthesis and is part of the active centre of stress-resistance proteins such as superoxide dismutase. Although Map requires exogenous mycobactin for in vitro growth, this may not necessarily be the case in vivo since the mycobactin synthesis genes (mbt) are upregulated inside bovine MDMs [88]. In addition, the concentration of iron within macrophages increases between one and 24 h following infection by pathogenic mycobacteria, suggesting that these bacteria possess mechanisms to acquire and concentrate iron in the phagosome [92]. Evidence is accumulating to suggest that the Type S and Type C Map strains differ in their iron regulatory mechanisms. Both Map strain types possess the iron-dependent global regulator IdeR, which binds to a 19 bp consensus sequence (the “iron box”) and regulates a repertoire of genes involved in iron acquisition (mbt) and storage ( bacterioferritin bfrA) in response to iron concentration [93]. Both the Type C and Type S IdeR repress transcription of the mbt genes involved in iron acquisition at high iron concentrations and relieve repression at low iron concentrations but polymorphisms within the promoter of bfrA in Type S compared with Type C affect gene expression resulting in defective iron storage in this strain type [93]. Janagama et al. [94] investigated the iron-sparing response of Map strain types by transcriptional and proteomic profiling under iron-deplete and –replete conditions. Under iron-deplete conditions, there was upregulation of siderophore synthesis and transport genes (mbt, esx-3, irtA and irtB) in both Map strain types but differential expression of aconitase, succinate dehydrogenase and superoxide dismutase, which were downregulated in Type C and upregulated in Type S. Under iron-replete conditions, there was an upregulation of bfr, Mycobacterial heme degrader, ribosomal proteins and the Antigen 85 complex in Type C strains but not in Type S strains. These results suggest that Type C strains have an efficient iron-sparing response in contrast to Type S strains, which potentially could give them a survival advantage. Interestingly, Type C strains also exclusively upregulated MAP2325 under iron-deplete conditions, which may also confer a survival advantage. This gene is an ortholog of the enhanced intracellular survival gene (eis) described in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) that enhances survival in macrophages.

In addition to killing intracellular pathogens, macrophages are key players in antigen processing and presentation and orchestrating host inflammatory and immune processes. Different Map strain types appear to have varying influences on these host responses. Studies by Janagama et al. [84] and Borrmann et al. [95] investigated cytokine responses to different Map strain types in bovine MDMs and the human monocyte cell line THP-1, respectively by RT-PCR. Both studies reported that the Type S strain produced less IL-10 and more TNF-α than the Type C strains but obtained different results with respect to IL-1β, which could reflect further strain or host differences. The observed effects in THP-1 cells were also influenced by challenge dose and infection time [95]. Motiwala et al. [96] performed a genome-wide transcriptional analysis of THP-1 cells exposed to different Map strains and found that Type C strains induced anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic pathways in the cells without causing significant alterations in pro-inflammatory genes, which would favour bacterial survival and persistence. Conversely, Type S strains significantly up-regulated pro-inflammatory genes related to IL-6, T-cell receptor, B-cell receptor and death receptor signalling within THP-1 cells similar to Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium. Additional genotypically distinct isolates from cattle, human, bison and sheep were analysed by quantitative RT-PCR for seven differentially expressed genes for consistency. The trends were the same but there were differences in the relative amounts of the transcripts, suggesting more subtle intra-strain type differences.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a critical role in the innate immune response and many other cellular processes important to mycobacterial pathogenesis including phagosomal maturation. Activation of TLR9 initiates responses crucial for defence against mycobacterial infection, whereas activation of TLR2 induces responses that suppress immune defence against mycobacteria. Thirunavukkarasu et al. [97] reported significant up-regulation of TLR2 in the peripheral blood cells of sheep experimentally infected with a Type S Map strain but in cattle experimentally infected with a Type C strain TLR2 was significantly down-regulated. At later stages of infection, TLR4 was significantly up-regulated in the Type S exposed sheep but no significant differences observed in the Type C exposed cattle. No differences in TLR9 expression were observed in either infected sheep or cattle. While these results may suggest Map strain related differences, the differences in expression could equally be due to the different host responses to infection.

8. Conclusions

It is clear that the Map genome is plastic and that genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic differences exist between Map strains. The number and scale of genomic polymorphisms are greater between Type S and Type C strains and this is reflected in the marked differences seen in phenotype affecting growth, virulence, infection, pathogenesis and epidemiological traits. Genetic diversity within each of these strain types is less easy to detect using conventional typing systems but genome sequencing has revealed genetic polymorphisms and SNP-based technologies will open the door to more discriminative strain differentiation. Currently, little data is available on the characteristics of individual genotypically distinct Map isolates of both Type S and Type C with respect to virulence, persistence, dormancy and associated host and clinical information. Genome wide association studies that focus on Map isolates for which this data is available would improve the identification of genes likely to be involved in strain-specific phenotypes.

Whilst it is often difficult to determine if a phenotype is due to the infecting Map strain or the host, overall there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the Map strain types influence host-pathogen interactions and the outcome of disease. This can occur at all stages from invasion of epithelial cells, uptake and survival in macrophages to the formation of pathological lesions. The two major strain groups, Type S and C, appear to have adapted differently to their microenvironments in order to survive and persist in the host. Survival outside the host in different environments is also an important prerequisite for Map and a key factor for transmission. The literature reviewed here hints that possibly Type C strains may be better at this than Type S strains, which do not survive well in arid conditions or when subjected to starvation. There is a dearth of information concerning the abilities of the different Map strain types to form spore-like structures and their survival in soil, water, silage and manure.

The genetic variability of different Map strains and their influence on infection and pathogenesis has important implications for diagnosis and control of Johne’s disease. Since the Map strains are not host-specific, it is important to be able to detect and control infection by either strain type in a single species and in other susceptible species. Diagnostic tests either detect the pathogen or the host response to the pathogen. Detection of the Map bacillus is routinely accomplished by culture and/or PCR. It is therefore necessary to ensure that a medium capable of supporting the growth of both Map strain types is employed and that the primers selected for PCR target either common genes or sequences such as IS900 or use a combination of strain-specific genes if strain differentiation is required. Similarly, vaccines for Johne’s disease need to be effective against infections caused by both Map strain types and the selection of vaccine candidates needs to be done with care. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms of immune evasion and pathogenesis of both Map strain types is required to develop an effective vaccine. Current vaccines include heat inactivated formulations of the vaccine strain 316F and one of the disadvantages of the vaccine is that it is not possible to differentiate between infected and vaccinated animals. The genetic polymorphisms in 316F could be exploited to develop a DIVA diagnostic test to circumvent this problem. Information on Map strain virulence determinants and the immune profiles induced by the different Map strains is important for the rational design of novel vaccines. A number of genetic polymorphisms have been identified in both strain types that could have consequences with regard to their virulence and pathogenesis. Targeted studies are now required to determine the functional impact of these natural polymorphisms between strains.

Declarations

10. Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Josephine Bryant for providing Figure 1 and Sri Sreevatsan and Ynte Schukken for critical evaluation of the manuscript. The author is funded by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park

11. References

  1. Motiwala AS, Amonsin A, Strother M, Manning EJ, Kapur V, Sreevatsan S (2004) Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates recovered from wild animal species. J Clin Microbiol 42:1703–1712PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ghadiali AH, Strother M, Naser SA, Manning EJ, Sreevatsan S (2004) Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains isolated from Crohn’s disease patients and animal species exhibit similar polymorphic locus patterns. J Clin Microbiol 42:5345–5348PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hutchings MR, Stevenson K, Greig A, Davidson R, Marion G, Judge J (2010) Infection of non-ruminant wildlife by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. In: Behr MA, Collins DM (eds) Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control. MA: CAB International, Cambridge, pp 188–200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ghosh P, Hsu C, Alyamani EJ, Shehata MM, Al-Dubaib MA, Al-Naeem A, Hashad M, Mahmoud OM, Alharbi KBJ, Al-Busadah K, Al-Swailem AM, Talaat AM (2012) Genome-wide analysis of the emerging infection with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in the Arabian camels (Camelus dromedarius). PLoS One 7:e31947
  5. Mackintosh C, Griffin JF (2010) Paratuberculosis in deer, camelids and other ruminants. In: Behr MA, Collins DM (eds) Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control. CAB International, Cambridge MA, pp 179–187View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Beard PM, Rhind S, Buxton D, Daniels MJ, Henderson D, Pirie A, Rudge K, Greig A, Hutchings MR, Stevenson K, Sharp JM (2001) Natural paratuberculosis infection in rabbits in Scotland. J Comp Pathol 124:290–299PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Salgado M, Monti G, Sevilla I, Manning E (2014) Association between cattle herd Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) infection and infection of a hare population. Trop Anim Health Prod 46:1313–1316PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Naser SA, Sagramsingh SR, Naser AS, Thanigachalam S (2014) Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis causes Crohn’s disease in some inflammatory bowel disease patients. World J Gastroenterol 20:7403–7415PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins DM (2010) Strain characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. In: Behr MA, Collins DM (eds) Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control. CAB International, Cambridge, MA, pp 294–305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bannantine JP, Li L-L, Sreevatsan S, Kapur V (2013) How does a Mycobacterium change its spots? Applying molecular tools to track diverse strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Lett Appl Microbiol 57:165–173PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins DM, Gabric DM, de Lisle GW (1990) Identification of two groups of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis strains by restriction endonuclease analysis and DNA hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 28:1591–1596PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Stevenson K, Hughes VM, de Juan L, Inglis NF, Wright F, Sharp JM (2002) Molecular characterization of pigmented and non-pigmented isolates of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 40:1798–1804PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. de Juan L, Mateos A, Domínguez L, Sharp JM, Stevenson K (2005) Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolates from goats detected by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Vet Microbiol 106:249–257PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Castellanos E, Alvarez J, Aranaz A, Romero B, de Juan L, Bezos J, Rodríguez S, Stevenson K, Mateos A, Domínguez L (2007) Use of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in inh-A gene to characterize Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis into Types I, II and II. In: Nielsen SS (ed) Proceedings of the Ninth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis: 29 October - 2 November 2007. International Association for Paratuberculosis, Tsukuba, pp 6–8Google Scholar
  15. Castellanos E, Aranaz A, Romero B, de Juan L, Àlvarez J, Bezos J, Rodríguez S, Stevenson K, Mateos A, Domínguez L (2007) Polymorphisms in gyrA and gyrB genes among Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Type I, II, and III isolates. J Clin Microbiol 45:3439–3442PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Whittington RJ, Marsh IB, Whitlock RH (2001) Typing of IS1311 polymorphisms confirms that bison (Bison bison) with paratuberculosis in Montana are infected with a strain of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis distinct from that occurring in cattle and other domesticated livestock. Mol Cell Probes 15:139–145PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sohal JS, Singh SV, Singh PK, Singh AV (2010) On the evolution of “Indian Bison type” strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Microbiol Res 165:163–171PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sevilla I, Singh SV, Garrido JM, Aduriz G, Rodríguez S, Geijo MV, Whittington RJ, Saunders V, Whitlock RH, Juste RA (2005) Molecular typing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains from different hosts and regions. Sci Tech Rev 24:1061–1066Google Scholar
  19. Sohal JS, Singh SV, Singh PK, Singh AV, Kumar N (2013) A new marker IS1311 L2 PCR-REA for identification of ‘Indian Bison’ type Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Indian J Biotechnol 12:204–207Google Scholar
  20. Thibault VC, Bryant J, Harris S, Bentley S, Smith DGE, McLuckie J, Parkhill J, Stevenson K (2012) Genome sequencing to identify phylogenetic diversity and single nucleotide polymorphisms in Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. In: Nielsen SS (ed) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis: 5–10 February. International Association for Paratuberculosis, Sydney, p 267Google Scholar
  21. Wynne JW, Bull TJ, Seeman T, Bulach DM, Wagner J, Kirkwood CD, Michalski WP (2011) Exploring the zoonotic potential of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis through comparative genomics. PLoS One 6:e22171
  22. Hsu C-Y, Wu C-W, Talaat AM (2011) Genome-wide sequence variation among Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolates: a better understanding of Johne’s disease transmission dynamics. Front Microbiol 2:236PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Li L, Bannantine JP, Zhang Q, Amonsin A, May BJ, Alt D, Banerji N, Kanjilal S, Kapur V (2005) The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12344–12349PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu CW, Schramm TM, Zhou S, Schwartz DC, Talaat AM (2009) Optical mapping of the Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis genome. BMC Genomics 10:25PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wynne JW, Seeman T, Bulach D, Coutts SA, Talaat AM, Michalski WP (2010) Re-sequencing the Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis K10 genome: improved annotation and revised genome sequence. J Bacteriol 192:6319–6320PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Bannantine JP, Wu C-W, Hsu C, Zhou S, Schwartz DC, Bayles DO, Paustian ML, Alt DP, Sreevatsan S, Kapur V, Talaat AM (2012) Genome sequencing of ovine isolates of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis offers insights into host association. BMC Genomics 13:89PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Veyrier F, Pletzer D, Turenne C, Behr MA (2009) Phylogenetic detection of horizontal gene transfer during the step-wise genesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMC Evol Biol 9:196PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang J, Pritchard JR, Kreitmann L, Montpetit A, Behr MA (2014) Disruption of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis-specific genes impairs in vivo fitness. BMC Genomics 15:415PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Semret M, Turenne CY, de Haas P, Collins DM, Behr MA (2006) Differentiating host-associated variants of Mycobacterium avium by PCR for detection of large sequence polymorphisms. J Clin Microbiol 44:881–887PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu CW, Glasner J, Collins M, Naser S, Talaat AM (2006) Whole-genome plasticity among Mycobacterium avium subspecies: Insights from comparative genomic hybridizations. J Bacteriol 188:711–723PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Alexander DC, Turenne CY, Behr MA (2009) Insertion and deletion events that define the pathogen Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. J Bacteriol 191:1018–1025PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Castellanos E, Aranaz A, Gould KA, Linedale R, Stevenson K, Àlvarez J, Domínguez L, de Juan L, Hinds J, Bull TJ (2009) Discovery of stable and variable differences in the Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Types I, II and III genomes by pan-genome microarray analysis. Appl Env Microbiol 75:676–686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Schorey JS, Sweet L (2008) The mycobacterial glycolipids: structure, function and their role in pathogenesis. Glycobiology 18:832–841PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Marsh IB, Bannantine JP, Paustian ML, Tizard ML, Kapur V, Whittington RJ (2006) Genomic comparison of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis sheep and cattle strains by microarray hybridization. J Bacteriol 188:2290–2293PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsh IB, Whittington RJ (2005) Deletion of an mmpL gene and multiple associated genes from the genome of the S strain of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis identified by representational difference analysis and in silico analysis. Mol Cell Probes 19:371–384PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Paustian ML, Zhu XC, Sreevatsan S, Robbe-Austerman S, Kapur V, Bannantine JP (2008) Comparative genomic analysis of Mycobacterium avium subspecies obtained from multiple host species. BMC Genomics 9:135PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Green EP, Tizard ML, Moss MT, Thompson J, Winterbourne DJ, McFadden JJ, Hermon-Taylor J (1989) Sequence and characteristics of IS900, an insertion element identified in a human Crohn’s disease isolate of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Nucleic Acids Res 17:9063–9073PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Supply P, Magdalena J, Himpens S, Locht C (1997) Identification of novel intergenic repetitive units in a Mycobacterial two-component system operon. Mol Microbiol 26:991–1003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Thibault VC, Grayon M, Boschiroli ML, Willer E, Allix C, Stevenson K, Biet F, Supply P (2008) Combined multilocus short sequence repeat and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates. J Clin Microbiol 46:4091–4094PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Biet F, Sevilla IA, Cochard T, Lefrançois LH, Garrido JM, Heron I, Juste RA, McLuckie J, Thibault VC, Supply P, Collins D, Behr MA, Stevenson K (2012) Inter and intra-subtype genotypic differences that differentiate Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains. BMC Microbiol 12:264PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Bannantine JP, Zhang Q, Li LL, Kapur V (2003) Genomic homogeneity between Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis belies their divergent growth rates. BMC Microbiol 3:10PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bryant JM, Schürch AC, van Deutekom H, Harris SR, de Beer JL, de Jager V, Kremer K, van Hijum SA, Siezen RJ, Borgdorff M, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, van Soolingen D (2013) Inferring patient to patient transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from whole genome sequencing data. BMC Infect Dis 13:110PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Thibault VC, Grayon M, Boschiroli ML, Hubbans C, Overduin P, Stevenson K, Gutierrez MC, Supply P, Biet F (2007) New variable number tandem repeat markers for typing Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium strains: comparison with IS900 RFLP and IS1245 RFLP typing. J Clin Microbiol 45:2404–2410PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Bull TJ, Schock A, Sharp JM, Greene M, McKendrick IJ, Sales J, Linedale R, Stevenson K (2013) Genomic variations associated with attenuation in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis vaccine strains. BMC Microbiol 13:11PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kasnitz N, Köhler H, Weigoldt M, Gerlach GF, Möbius P (2013) Stability of genotyping target sequences of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis upon cultivation on different media, in vitro- and in vivo passage, and natural selection. Vet Microbiol 167:573–583PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Whipple D, Kapke P, Vary C (1990) Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in DNA from Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 28:2561–2564PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor AW (1945) Ovine paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease of sheep). J Comp Pathol 55:41–44View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor AW (1951) Varieties of Mycobacterium johnei from sheep. J Pathol Bacteriol 63:333–336PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Dimareli-Malli Z, Mazaraki K, Stevenson K, Tsakos P, Zdragas A, Giantzi V, Petridou E, Heron I, Vafeas G (2013) Culture phenotypes and molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates from small ruminants. Res Vet Sci 95:49–53PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Whittington RJ, Whittington AM, Waldron A, Begg DJ, de Silva K, Purdie AC, Plain KM (2013) Development and validation of a liquid medium (M7H9C) for routine culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis to replace modified Bactec 12B medium. J Clin Microbiol 51:3993–4000PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Aduriz JJ, Juste RA, Cortabarria N (1995) Lack of mycobactin dependence of mycobacteria isolated on Middlebrook 7H11 from clinical cases of ovine paratuberculosis. Vet Microbiol 45:211–217PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Whittington RJ, Marsh IB, Saunders V, Grant IR, Juste R, Sevilla IA, Manning EJB, Whitlock RH (2011) Culture phenotypes of genomically and geographically diverse Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates from different hosts. J Clin Microbiol 49:1822–1830PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Whittington RJ, Marsh I, McAllister S, Turner MJ, Marshall DJ, Fraser CA (1999) Evaluation of modified BACTEC 12B radiometric medium and solid media for culture of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from sheep. J Clin Microbiol 37:1077–1083PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. de Juan L, Àlvarez J, Romero B, Bezos J, Castellanos E, Aranaz A, Mateos A, Domínguez L (2006) Comparison of four different culture media for isolation and growth of Type II and Type I/III Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains isolated from cattle and goats. Appl Env Microbiol 72:5927–5932View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Florou M, Leontides L, Kostoulas P, Billinis C, Sofia M (2008) Strain-specific sensitivity estimates of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis culture in Greek sheep and goats. Zoonoses Public Health 56:1–5Google Scholar
  56. Juste RA, Marco JC, Saez-de-Ocariz C, Aduriz JJ (1991) Comparison of different media for the isolation of small ruminant strains of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Vet Microbiol 28:385–390PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Abendaño N, Sevilla I, Prieto JM, Garrido JM, Juste RA, Alonso-Hearn M (2012) Quantification of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis strains representing distinct genotypes and isolated from domestic and wildlife animal species by use of an automatic liquid culture system. J Clin Microbiol 50:2609–2616PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Shea B, Khare S, Klein P, Roussel A, Adams LG, Ficht TA, Rice-Ficht AC (2011) Amplified fragment length polymorphism reveals specific epigenetic distinctions between Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolates of various isolation types. J Clin Microbiol 49:2222–2229PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Trefz P, Köhler H, Klepik K, Möbius P, Reinhold P, Schubert JK, Miekisch W (2013) Volatile emissions from Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis mirror bacterial growth and enable distinction of different strains. PLoS One 8:e76868
  60. Yadav D, Singh SV, Singh AV, Sevilla I, Juste RA, Singh PK, Sohal JS (2008) Pathogenic 'Bison-type' Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis genotype characterized from riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in North India. Comp Immunol Microbial Infect Dis 31:373–387View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Kumar S, Singh SV, Singh AV, Singh PK, Sohal JS (2008) Inter-species transmission of 'Bison type' genotype of MAP between Boselaphus tragocamelus (blue bulls) and small ruminant population in India. Ind J Anim Sci 78:1186–1191Google Scholar
  62. Singh SV, Sohal JS, Singh PK, Singh AV (2009) Genotype profiles of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolates recovered from animals, commercial milk, and human beings in North India. Int J Infect Dis 13:e221–e227PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevenson K, Àlvarez J, Bakker D, Biet F, de Juan L, Denham S, Dimareli Z, Dohmann K, Gerlach G-F, Heron I, Kopecna M, May L, Pavlik I, Sharp JM, Thibault VC, Willemsen P, Zadoks R, Greig A (2009) Occurrence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis across host species and European countries with evidence for transmission between wildlife and domestic ruminants. BMC Microbiol 9:212PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Fritsch I, Luyven G, Köhler H, Lutz W, Möbius P (2012) Suspicion of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis transmission between cattle and wild-living red deer (Cervus elaphus) by multitarget genotyping. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1132–1139PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor AW (1953) The experimental infection of cattle with varieties of Mycobacterium johnei isolated from sheep. J Comp Pathol 63:368–373PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. O'Brien R, Mackintosh CG, Bakker D, Kopecna M, Pavlik I, Griffin JFT (2006) Immunological and molecular characterization of susceptibility in relationship to bacterial strain differences in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in the red deer (Cervus elaphus). Infect Immun 74:3530–3537PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Watt JAA (1954) Johne’s disease in a bovine associated with the pigmented strain of Mycobacterium johnei. Vet Rec 66:387Google Scholar
  68. de Juan L, Àlvarez J, Aranaz A, Rodríguez A, Romero B, Bezos J, Mateos A, Domínguez L (2006) Molecular epidemiology of Types I/III strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolated from goats and cattle. Vet Microbiol 115:102–110PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Whittington RJ, Taragel CA, Ottaway S, Marsh I, Seaman J, Fridriksdottir V (2001) Molecular epidemiological confirmation and circumstances of occurrence of sheep (S) strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cases of paratuberculosis in cattle in Australia and sheep and cattle in Iceland. Vet Microbiol 79:311–322PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Verdugo C, Pleydell E, Price-Carter M, Prattley D, Collins D, de Lisle G, Vogue H, Wilson P, Heuer C (2014) Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolated from sheep, cattle and deer on New Zealand pastoral farms. Prev Vet Med 117:436–446PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Machackova M, Svastova P, Lamka J, Parmova I, Liska V, Smolik J, Fischer OA, Pavlik I (2004) Paratuberculosis in farmed and free-living wild ruminants in the Czech Republic (1999–2001). Vet Microbiol 101:225–234PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Fridriksdottir V, Gunnarsson E, Sigurdarson S, Gudmundsdottir KB (2000) Paratuberculosis in Iceland: epidemiology and control measures, past and present. Vet Microbiol 77:263–267PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Moloney BJ, Whittington RJ (2008) Cross species transmission of ovine Johne’s disease from sheep to cattle: an estimate of prevalence in exposed susceptible cattle. Aust Vet J 86:117–123PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Eppleston J, Begg DJ, Dhand N, Watt B, Whittington RJ (2014) Environmental survival of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in different climatic zones of Eastern Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2337–2342PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Lamont EA, Bannantine JP, Armién A, Ariyakumar DS, Sreevatsan S (2012) dentification and characterization of a spore-like morphotype in chronically starved Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis cultures. PLoS One 7:e30648
  76. Ahlstrom C, Barkema HW, Stevenson K, Zadoks R, Biek R, Kao R, Trewby H, Hendrick S, Haupstein D, Kelton D, Fecteau G, Labrecque O, McKenna S, Keefe G, De Buck J (2014) Phylogenomic analyses elucidate Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis diversity at a global, national and provincial scale. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis: 22–26 June 2014. International Association for Paratuberculosis, Parma, p 226Google Scholar
  77. Fernández M, Benavides J, Sevilla IA, Fuertes M, Castaño P, Delgado L, García Marín JF, Garrido JM, Ferreras MC, Pérez V (2014) Experimental infection of lambs with C and S-type strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis: immunological and pathological findings. Vet Res 45:5PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Verna AE, Garcia-Pariente C, Munoz M, Moreno O, Garcia-Marín JF, Romano MI, Paolicchi F, Pérez V (2007) Variation in the immuno-pathological responses of lambs after experimental infection with different strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Zoonoses Public Health 54:243–252PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Watkins C, Schock A, May L, Denham S, Sales J, Welch L, Sharp JM, Stevenson K (2010) Assessing virulence of vaccine strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in a calf model. Vet Microbiol 146:63–69PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Stratmann J, Strommenger B, Goethe R, Dohmann K, Gerlach G-F, Stevenson K, Li L-L, Zhang Q, Kapur V, Bull T (2004) A 38Kb pathogenicity island specific for Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis encodes cell surface proteins expressed in the host. Infect Immun 72:1265–1274PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Arsenault RJ, Maattanen P, Daigle J, Potter A, Griebel P, Napper S (2014) From mouth to macrophage: mechanisms of innate immune subversion by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet Res 45:54PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Menozzi FD, Rouse JH, Alavi M, Laude-Sharp M, Muller J, Bischoff R, Brennan MJ, Locht C (1996) Identification of a heparin-binding hemagglutinin present in mycobacteria. J Exp Med 184:993–1001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Lefrançois LH, Bodiera CC, Cocharda T, Canepab S, Razec D, Lanotted P, Sevilla IA, Stevenson K, Behr MA, Locht C, Biet F (2013) Novel feature of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis highlighted by characterization of the heparin-binding hemagglutinin adhesin. J Bacteriol 195:4844–4853PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Janagama HK, Jeong K, Kapur V, Coussens P, Sreevatsan S (2006) Cytokine responses of bovine macrophages to diverse clinical Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains. BMC Microbiol 6:10PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Gollnick NS, Mitchell RM, Baumgart M, Janagama HK, Sreevatsan S, Schukken YH (2007) Survival of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine monocyte-derived macrophages is not affected by host infection status but depends on the infecting bacterial genotype. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 120:93–105PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Abendaño N, Sevilla IA, Prieto JM, Garrido JM, Juste RA, Alonso-Hearn M (2013) Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolates from sheep and goats show reduced persistence in bovine macrophages than cattle, bison, deer and wild boar strains regardless of genotype. Vet Microbiol 163:325–334PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Mitchell RM, Gollnick NS, Sreevatsan S, Russell DG, Schukken YH (2011) Quantification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) survival in monocyte-derived macrophages. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 139:73–78PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhu X, Tu ZJ, Coussens PM, Kapur V, Janagama H, Naser S, Sreevatsan S (2008) Transcriptional analysis of diverse strains of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in primary bovine monocyte derived macrophages. Microbes Infect 10:1274–1282PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Gumber S, Taylor DL, Marsh IB, Whittington RJ (2009) Growth pattern and partial proteome of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis during the stress response to hypoxia and nutrient starvation. Vet Microbiol 133:344–357PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Gumber S, Whittington RJ (2009) Analysis of the growth pattern, survival and proteome of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis following exposure to heat. Vet Microbiol 136:82–90PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Kawaji S, Zhong L, Whittington RJ (2010) Partial proteome of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis under oxidative and nitrosative stress. Vet Microbiol 145:252–264PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Wagner D, Maser J, Lai B, Cai Z, Barry CE III, zu Bentrup KH, Russell DG, Bermudez LE (2005) Elemental analysis of Mycobacterium avium-, Mycobacterium tuberculosis-, and Mycobacterium smegmatis-containing phagosomes indicates pathogen-induced microenvironments within the host cell’s endosomal system. J Immunol 174:1491–1500PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Janagama HK, Senthilkumar TMA, Bannantine JP, Rodrguez GM, Smith I, Paustian ML, McGarvey JA, Sreevatsan S (2009) Identification and functional characterization of the iron-dependent regulator (IdeR) of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Microbiology 155:3683–3690PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Janagama HK, Senthilkumar TMA, Bannantine JP, Kugadas A, Jagtap P, Higgins L, Wiihuhn BA, Sreevatsan S (2010) Iron-sparing response of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis is strain dependent. BMC Microbiol 10:268PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Borrmann E, Möbius P, Diller R, Köhler H (2011) Divergent cytokine responses of macrophages to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains of Types II and III in a standardized in vitro model. Vet Microbiol 152:101–111PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Motiwala AS, Janagama HK, Paustian ML, Zhu XC, Bannantine JP, Kapur V, Sreevatsan S (2006) Comparative transcriptional analysis of human macrophages exposed to animal and human isolates of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis with diverse genotypes. Infect Immun 74:6046–6056PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Thirunavukkarasu S, de Silva K, Whittington RJ, Plain K (2013) In vivo and in vitro expression pattern of Toll-like receptors in Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection. Vet Immunol Immunopath 156:20–31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Harris SR, Feil EJ, Holden MT, Quail MA, Nickerson EK, Chantratita N, Gardete S, Tavares A, Day N, Lindsay JA, Edgeworth JD, de Lencastre H, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ, Bentley SD (2010) Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 327:469–474PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 222688–2690
  100. Rambaut A: FigTree v1.4.0. 2014 [http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/] Accessed 19 May 2015.

Copyright

© Stevenson; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.