Open Access

Detection of RHDV strains in the Iberian hare (Lepus granatensis): earliest evidence of rabbit lagovirus cross-species infection

  • Ana M Lopes1, 2, 3,
  • Sara Marques1,
  • Eliane Silva1, 4,
  • Maria J Magalhães1,
  • Ana Pinheiro1, 2, 5,
  • Paulo C Alves1, 2, 6,
  • Jacques Le Pendu3,
  • Pedro J Esteves1, 2, 7,
  • Gertrude Thompson1, 4 and
  • Joana Abrantes1Email author
Veterinary Research201445:94

DOI: 10.1186/s13567-014-0094-7

Received: 11 June 2014

Accepted: 8 August 2014

Published: 24 September 2014

Abstract

Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) is a highly lethal Lagovirus, family Caliciviridae, that threatens European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Although a related virus severely affects hares, cross-species infection was only recently described for new variant RHDV in Cape hares (Lepus capensis mediterraneus). We sequenced two strains from dead Iberian hares (Lepus granatensis) collected in the 1990s in Portugal. Clinical signs were compatible with a Lagovirus infection. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete capsid gene positioned them in the RHDV genogroup that circulated on the Iberian Peninsula at that time. This is the earliest evidence of RHDV affecting a species other than European rabbits.

Introduction, methods and results

Wild and domestic European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) are severely affected by rabbit hemorrhagic disease (RHD), an acute hepatitis that causes death within 48-72 h after infection (reviewed in [1]). RHD was first reported in 1984 in China and two years later was described in Italy, spreading to several European countries afterwards (reviewed in [1]). On the Iberian Peninsula (IP), the first reports of RHD date from 1988 (reviewed in [1]). The etiological agent of the disease, rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV), belongs to the Caliciviridae family, genus Lagovirus. The other member of this genus, European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV), causes the European brown hare syndrome (EBHS) in European and mountain hares (Lepus europaeus and L. timidus, respectively) [2]. On the IP, EBHSV was first reported in L. europaeus in 1995 (Gortázar C, personal communication). RHDV and EBHSV are non-enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses, with a similar genomic organization and ~70% of nucleotide identity [3]. RHD and EBHS share clinical signs and pathological alterations, including congestion and necrosis of the liver and massive disseminated intravascular coagulation (reviewed in [1]).

Two subspecies of O. cuniculus are found on the IP, O. cuniculus cuniculus in the northeast and O. cuniculus algirus in the southwest [4] (Figure 1). Additionally, three hare species inhabit this region: L. granatensis, distributed along Portugal, mainland Spain and Majorca; L. castroviejoi, restricted to Cantabria; and L. europaeus, confined to the Pyrenees [4] (Figure 1). Although EBHS was reported in Spain, there are no reports of the disease in L. granatensis and L. castroviejoi, both endemic to the IP.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13567-014-0094-7/MediaObjects/13567_2014_Article_94_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Map with the distribution of leporid species on the Iberian Peninsula. Light grey represents the distribution of Lepus europaeus. Dark grey corresponds to the distribution of L. castroviejoi. White represents the distribution of L. granatensis. The European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is present all over the Iberian Peninsula; the contact zone between O. c. cuniculus and O. c. algirus (restricted to the southwest region) is in medium grey. The localities where P95 (Torres Novas) and P151 (Pancas) were collected are indicated.

Despite their similarities, RHDV and EBHSV are restricted to their natural hosts, as has also been proven experimentally [5]; however, cross infection was recently described for a new RHDV variant (tentatively named RHDV2 or RHDVb) in Lepus capensis mediterraneus in Italy [6]. RHDV2 was originally described in France in 2010 [7], and is antigenically and genetically different from the classical RHDV strains [7],[8]. In this study we report the first and earliest evidence of cross-species infection of classical RHDV in the Iberian hare, L. granatensis.

Liver samples of two hares found dead in the field were collected in Torres Novas and Pancas, south of Portugal, in 1996 and 1998, respectively (P95 and P151; Figure 1). At necropsy, lesions compatible with an infection by a Lagovirus were observed. P95 showed congestion of the liver and lungs as well as non-coagulated blood in the chest cavity, trachea and lungs; P151 presented congestion of the kidneys and both the chest and abdominal cavity were filled with non-coagulated blood and presented dark red coloration. In both animals, blood vessels were dilated and filled with non-coagulated blood. Additionally, the livers of five dead rabbits collected in Pancas in November and December-1997 were included in this study (P129, P141-P144). These individuals also exhibited lesions compatible with a Lagovirus infection at necropsy: dark red coloration and congestion of the kidneys and spleen; heart in diastole and atria filled with blood; non-coagulated blood in the trachea, chest and abdominal cavity (P143 presented normal abdominal cavity). With the exception of P129, dilated blood vessels filled with non-coagulated blood were observed, as well as a hypertrophic, congested liver. P142-P144 additionally presented congested lungs, filled with non-coagulated blood and P129, P141 and P142 presented nasal hemorrhages.

To avoid any risk of contamination, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification of the two hare samples were performed independently from the other samples. Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcription was performed using oligo(dT) as primers and SuperScript™ III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Protocols were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were screened for the presence of RHDV and EBHSV by PCR with the primers U38 and EBHS9 as described elsewhere [9] as these primers amplify both RHDV and EBHSV. Sequencing of the fragments revealed that samples were positive for RHDV and negative for EBHSV. Additionally, and to ensure that only RHDV was present, RHDV and EBHSV-specific PCR were also performed (conditions available upon request). Amplification was successful for RHDV, but not for EBHSV. The gene encoding the capsid protein VP60 of RHDV (1740 base pairs) was fully amplified by PCR using 1 μL of the cDNA reaction, 2 pmol of each oligonucleotide, 5 μL of Phusion Flash High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and water to a final volume of 10 μL, using several pairs of primers (PCR cycle conditions are available upon request). After purification, PCR products were sequenced on an automatic sequencer ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the amplification primers. Sequences were submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers KJ943791 and KJ943792 for the sequences from hares and KJ943793-KJ943797 for the sequences from rabbits. A Blast analysis of the sequences revealed 98% identity of P95 with strain AST89 (genogroup 1; accession number Z49271) and 97% identity of P151 with strain 00-08 (Iberian group 3 of genogroup 1 [10]; accession number AJ319594).

The capsid sequences were aligned with publicly available sequences of Lagovirus (for simplicity, only part of the available sequences were used), namely RHDV genogroups 1-5 (G1-G5) [11], the antigenic variant RHDVa (G6), RHDV2, the weakly pathogenic MRCV, the non-pathogenic strain RCV-A1, and EBHSV (accession numbers of the sequences used are indicated in Figure 2). Furthermore, the alignment was screened for recombination as described elsewhere [12]. The phylogenetic relationships between the samples were estimated in MEGA6 [13], by using a Maximum Likelihood (ML) approach. The support of the nodes was assessed with a bootstrap resampling analysis (1000 replicates). The best-fit nucleotide substitution model defined by the same software (GTR + I + G) was used in the analysis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13567-014-0094-7/MediaObjects/13567_2014_Article_94_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree of the capsid gene VP60 for Lagovirus . Only bootstrap values ≥0.85 are shown. In order to facilitate visualization, major groups are collapsed, with the exception of the group containing the specimens analyzed in the study. The sequences retrieved from GenBank database for this analysis have the following accession numbers: KF494918, KF494921, KF494922, KF494924, KF494930, KF494932, KF494936, KF494943, KF494947, KF494950, KF494951, GU373618, EF558580, M67473, EU650679, EU003579, U49726, AF295785, U54983, FR823355, FJ212323, AF402614, EU003580, EF558579, JN851735, AF231353, DQ189078 (sequences from G2); AM085133, EF558576, EF558572, Y15424, EF558574, AJ535094, AJ535092, Y15426, X87607, FR823354, EF558577, EF558585, Y15441, EF558575, KC595270, AY928268, DQ189077 (sequences from G3-G5); AY523410, KF270630, AF258618, EU003582, DQ205345, DQ280493, AB300693, HM623309, EF558581, EU003578, EU003581, EF558583, EF558582, EF558584, JF412629 (RHDVa sequences); HE800529, FR819781, HE800532, HE800531, HE819400, HE800530, KC345612, JQ929052, KC345611 (RHDV2); Z32526, X98002, U09199, KC832838, KC832839, AM408588, AM933648, AM933649, AM933650, AM887765 (EBHSV sequences). RHDV sequences from Iberian hares appear in bold.

The inferred ML relationships were in agreement with those published, with EBHSV, RHDV2 and RHDVa forming well supported groups (bootstrap values of 1; Figure 2). Genogroups 1-5 cluster together, with G1, G2 and G3-G5 also forming well supported subgroups. The tree further shows the inclusion of P95 and P151 in the G1 subgroup: P151 clusters with the rabbit samples collected in the same area (P129 and P141-P144), with the Portuguese strains CB137, CB156 and CB194, dating from 1995, 1997 and 2006, respectively, and with the French strain 00-08 dating from 2000; P95 appears to be more closely related to the older European strains belonging to G1, from Spain, France and Germany. The higher average nucleotide and amino acid identity of P95 and P151 is found with G1 (95.9%-96.6% of nucleotide identity and 97.8%-98.4% of amino acid identity). Furthermore, P151 presents 99.8%-99.9% of nucleotide identity and 100% of amino acid identity with P141-P144.

In order to confirm the species identity of P95 and P151, one mitochondrial (cytochrome b) and three nuclear markers (CCR5, CXCR4 and CH2 domain of IGHG) were amplified for both samples. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the liver samples using the EasySpin Genomic DNA Minipreps Tissue Kit (Citomed, Lisbon, Portugal) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The nuclear markers have been shown to present specific SNP for Oryctolagus and Lepus and their amplification followed the conditions described in [14]-[16]. The amplification of the mitochondrial marker was performed using the primers described in [17]. PCR was performed in a final volume of 10 μL containing 1 μL of DNA, 3 pmol of each primer and 5 μL of HotStartTaq DNA Polymerase Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen) (PCR cycle conditions are available upon request). After purification, PCR products were sequenced with the amplification primers as described above. Sequences of P95 and P151 for all markers were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KJ943798-KJ943805. The obtained sequences were then visually inspected and aligned, and compared with publicly available sequences of lagomorphs. Genetic distances between P95 and P151 and the other lagomorph sequences were calculated for each marker in MEGA6 [13], using the p-distance method and 500 replicates; all positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated. Additionally, an ML approach was also used to confirm the phylogenetic position of P95 and P151 in the phylogeny of lagomorphs for each marker, using the best model estimated for each marker (Kimura2 + G for CCR5 and CXCR4; T92 for IGHG-CH2 and GTR + I + G for cytochrome b) and 500 replicates. The analysis of the genetic distances between P95 and P151 and other lagomorphs indicates that both specimens are closer to L. granatensis for all markers (genetic distance of 0.0% for nuclear genes and 0.6% for the mitochondrial gene; Table 1). Despite the lack of information for some markers, the overall highest genetic distance was observed for Ochotona spp: 8.4%-18% for nuclear markers and 19.9%-20.3% for cytochrome b. The phylogenetic analysis performed for each marker also supports the clustering of P95 and P151 with L. granatensis (data not shown).
Table 1

Genetic distances of P95 and P151 relative to lagomorphs for nuclear markers CCR5 , CXCR4 and IGHG -CH2 and mitochondrial marker cytochrome b

 

CCR5

CXCR4

IGHG-CH2

cytochromeb

 

P95

P151

P95

P151

P95

P151

P95

P151

Lepus granatensis

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6*

0.6*

Lepus europaeus

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.5

0.9

0.9

8.1*

8.1*

Lepus timidus

0.2

0.2

-

-

0.0

0.0

9.7*

9.7*

Lepus americanus

-

-

0.4

0.4

0.9

0.9

9.8*

9.8*

Lepus callotis

2.7

2.7

-

-

1.1

1.1

9.1*

9.1*

Lepus californicus

-

-

0.3

0.3

1.4

1.4

9.7*

9.7*

Lepus townsendii

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.3

-

-

9.4*

9.4*

Lepus capensis

-

-

-

-

1.1

1.1

9.7*

9.7*

Lepus saxatilis

0.0

0.0

0.3

0.3

1.1

1.1

9.8*

9.8*

Lepus castroviejoi

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.9

0.9

10.9*

10.8*

Sylvilagus brasiliensis

2.3

2.3

1.1

1.1

-

-

-

-

Sylvilagus floridanus

2.9

2.9

0.8

0.8

-

-

15.9*

16.1*

Bunolagus monticularis

5.1

5.1

1.0

1.0

-

-

14.3*

14.5*

Oryctolagus cuniculus

4.9*

4.9*

1.1*

1.1*

4.2*

4.2*

14.7*

14.9*

Ochotona princeps

18.0

18.0

8.9

8.9

-

-

19.9*

20.1*

Ochotona dauurica

-

-

8.4

8.4

-

-

20.2*

20.3*

Only species with information for at least two markers are presented in the table. Values are given in percentages; “-” means lack of information and “*” means average value (obtained by the mean of the genetic distances of three randomly selected sequences for that species).

GenBank accession numbers: DQ146764, DQ146763, GU047870, GU047868, GU047869, GU047871, GU047867, GU047872, DQ017768, GU047865, AM051305, AM051298, DQ017767, GU047873 (CCR5); EU258270, EU258265, EU258269, EU258271, EU258266, EU258268, EU258267, EU258273, EU258272, EU258264, EU258287, EU258292, EU258304, EU258275, EU258274 (CXCR4); AJ295217, AJ295221, AJ295216, AJ431716, AJ295220, AJ295219, AJ295218, AJ295222, AJ431717, L29172, AY386696, AJ430862 (IGHG-CH2); AY942565, HQ596476, AF157465, AY745113, HQ596473, AJ421471, HM233015, AY599076, AB687529, KF781432, KF781431, KF781430, HQ596467, AF010159, HQ596468, KF781354, HQ596464, KF781357, HQ596485, JN037375, JN037374, HM233008, AY292732, EU729261, HQ596480, AF009731, AY292730, AY942569, JN037350, AY176235, AY292724, U58939, AF034257, AY292718, U58931, AY292717, HG810783, HG810780, EU591094, EU591077, EU590965, AF273000, JF911809, EF567059 (cytochrome b).

Discussion

Evolution of RHDV has been widely characterized, with strains grouping according to their year of isolation [10]-[12],[18],[19]. In France, strains are divided into six genogroups, G1-G6, and most genogroups have been successively replaced [11]. Interestingly, G1 was able to persist only in the Iberian Peninsula (IP) [10] and, until 2011, it was the only genogroup found, most likely due to the Pyrenees acting as a major natural barrier that limits virus dispersal [10]. The antigenic variant RHDVa was also detected, but only in farms and never in wild populations [20]. From 2011, the new variant RHDV2 or RHDVb was detected and G1 seems to have been replaced [8],[21],[22]. Interestingly, RHDV2 was recently reported in Cape hares, L. c. mediterraneus[6], constituting the first evidence of cross infection in Lagovirus. Here we amplified and sequenced the complete capsid protein gene VP60 of a Lagovirus, confirmed to be RHDV, from Iberian hares found dead in the field in the 1990s in Portugal.

The phylogenetic analysis of the complete capsid gene VP60 revealed that the sequences obtained from the two Iberian hare specimens group with RHDV genogroup 1 (Figure 2). Since G1 was the only genogroup known to circulate in IP at the time of sample collection (1996 and 1998), this supports our finding of a cross-species infection of RHDV. Additionally, it appears that two different strains were able to infect hares: the sequences of P95 and P151 present 96 nucleotide differences that translate into 17 amino acid differences in the VP60 (nucleotide genetic distance of 6% and amino acid genetic distance of 2.8%; data not shown). Moreover, the strains are located in different nodes of the phylogenetic tree: P151 clusters with a recent French strain and Portuguese strains, including RHDV strains sequenced from rabbits collected in the same location that also experienced an RHDV outbreak, while P95 is basal to older Spanish, French and German G1 sequences.

Species determination, achieved by the analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial markers, confirmed the hare specimens as being L. granatensis (Table 1), which is also consistent with the morphological characterization and species geographic range in Portugal [4] (Figure 1). Since all five living lagomorph taxa inhabiting the IP (L. granatensis, L. europaeus, L. castroviejoi and both subspecies of O. cuniculusO. c. cuniculus and O. c. algirus) were represented in these analyses, further confidence is given to the species identification.

L. europaeus is the main host of EBHSV, and L. timidus is affected only in regions where L. europaeus is also present [2]; no reports of EBHSV exist in L. granatensis despite the analysis of high numbers of animals (Gortázar C, personal communication). On the IP, L. europaeus is restricted to a region between the Ebro River and the Pyrenees, and a narrow contact zone exists between L. europaeus and L. granatensis[23] (Figure 1). Hence, despite some evidence of ancestral and ongoing hybridization between both species and with L. timidus[24], transmission of the virus between these species might be quite limited. In addition, and as for RHDV, the Pyrenees might also restrict EBHSV introduction on the IP. Thus, contact of Iberian hares is more likely to occur with RHDV than with EBHSV.

Our results further show that the RHDV outbreak that occurred at the end of 1997 in a rabbit population, as confirmed by the RHDV positive rabbit samples P141-P144, was the source of the Lagovirus that caused the fatal infection in P151. Indeed, P151 was found dead in January-1998, only one month after those rabbits died. The high nucleotide and amino acid identity also confirmed this observation (99.8% and 100%, respectively). The possibility that the observed results were due to contamination was discarded given that RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification of hare samples were performed independently from the rabbit samples. Also, none of the sequences obtained from hares was identical to previously amplified sequences in our facilities or any other sequences available in public databases. Thus, the susceptibility of Iberian hares (L. granatensis) to RHDV is confirmed by our results. Nevertheless, how RHDV is able to overcome species boundaries is unknown.

At present, only glycans of the histo-blood group antigens family have been associated with rabbit susceptibility to RHDV [25]; however, preliminary data indicate that glycans are differently located in hare tissues (Le Pendu J, Abrantes J, Lopes AM, personal communication). Other factors could have promoted the cross infection. The higher mutation capacity of RNA viruses might partially explain their ability to jump species boundaries [26]. Also, the closer the species are to the natural host, the more susceptible they are to the virus [27]. Despite this, the majority of virus transfers to new hosts do not cause severe outbreaks, but only single infections or limited outbreaks [26]. This seems to be the case in our study, where RHDV was able to infect the two hares analysed, but not capable to cause easily detectable outbreaks. Additionally, viral recombination in unfavorable environments is associated with transmission to new hosts [26]. Although recombination is rare in RNA viruses, there are previous reports of recombination in RHDV [28],[29]. Screening of our alignment showed no evidence of recombination; nevertheless, only a quarter of the total viral genome was investigated, so it is unclear if recombination contributed to the host switch. Nonetheless, on two occasions, classical RHDV spilled over into individual Iberian hares. While this is an interesting finding, it has not been reported in Iberian hares since then. Therefore, it is likely that these have been isolated “spill-over” events in areas where the habitats of the two hosts overlap and host densities were high [30].

In sum, we report the identification of two different RHDV strains in L. granatensis that represent two independent infections, one in 1996 and the other in 1998. This finding of RHDV in Iberian hares represents the earliest evidence of a cross-species transmission of classical RHDV otherwise considered species-specific.

Authors' contributions

AML drafted the manuscript and performed the analyses; SM, ES, MJM and AP carried out the genetic studies for viral amplification and species identification; PCA coordinated the sampling collection and necropsies; JLP discussed the data; GT, PJE and JA designed the study; JA helped to draft the manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript, read and approved the final version.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Christian Gortázar for sharing information on EBHSV reports on the Iberian Peninsula. This work was supported by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; research project ref.: FCT-ANR/BIA-BIC/0043/2012). FCT also supported the doctoral grants of AML and AP (refs.: SFRH/BD/78738/2011 and SFRH/BD/71252/2010) and the FCT Investigator grant of JA (ref.: IF/01396/2013). “Genomics Applied To Genetic Resources” co-financed by North Portugal Regional Operational Programme 2007/2013 (ON.2 – O Novo Norte), under the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF), through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), also supported this work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CIBIO-UP, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos-Universidade do Porto/InBIO, Laboratório Associado
(2)
Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto
(3)
INSERM, UMR892; CNRS, UMR6299, Université de Nantes
(4)
ICBAS, Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto
(5)
SaBIO – Instituto de Investigacion en Recursos Cinegeticos (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM)
(6)
Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana
(7)
Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde (CESPU)

References

  1. Abrantes J, van der Loo W, Le Pendu J, Esteves PJ: Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) and rabbit haemorhhagic disease virus (RHDV): a review. Vet Res. 2012, 43: 12-10.1186/1297-9716-43-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gavier-Widén D, Mörner T: Epidemiology and diagnosis of the European brown hare syndrome in Scandinavian countries: a review. Rev Sci Tech. 1991, 10: 453-458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Le Gall G, Huguet S, Vende P, Vautherot J-F, Rasschaert D: European brown hare syndrome virus: molecular cloning and sequencing of the genome. J Gen Virol. 1996, 77: 1693-1697. 10.1099/0022-1317-77-8-1693.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alves PC, Hackländer K: Lagomorph species: geographical distribution and conservation status. Lagomorph Biology: Evolution, Ecology and Conservation. 2008, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 395-405. 10.1007/978-3-540-72446-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lavazza A, Scicluna MT, Capucci L: Susceptibility of hares and rabbits to the European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV) and rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) under experimental conditions. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1996, 43: 401-410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Puggioni G, Cavadini P, Maestrale C, Scivoli R, Botti G, Ligios C, Le Gall-Reculé G, Lavazza A, Capucci L: The new French 2010 Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus causes an RHD-like disease in the Sardinian Cape Hare (Lepus capensis mediterraneus). Vet Res. 2013, 44: 96-10.1186/1297-9716-44-96.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Le Gall-Reculé G, Zwingelstein F, Boucher S, Le Normand B, Plassiart G, Portejoie Y, Decors A, Bertagnoli S, Guérin JL, Marchandeau S: Detection of a new variant of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus in France. Vet Rec. 2011, 168: 137-138. 10.1136/vr.d697.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalton KP, Nicieza I, Balseiro A, Muguerza MA, Rosell JM, Casais R, Álvarez ÁL, Parra F: Variant rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus in young rabbits, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012, 18: 2009-2012. 10.3201/eid1812.120341.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lopes AM, Gavier-Widén D, Le Gall-Reculé G, Esteves PJ, Abrantes J: Complete coding sequences of European brown hare syndrome virus (EBHSV) strains isolated in 1982 in Sweden. Arch Virol. 2013, 158: 2193-2196. 10.1007/s00705-013-1714-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Müller A, Freitas J, Silva E, Le Gall-Reculé G, Zwingelstein F, Abrantes J, Esteves PJ, Alves PC, van der Loo W, Kolodziejek J, Nowotny N, Thompson G: Evolution of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from the Iberian Peninsula. Vet Microbiol. 2009, 135: 368-373. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Le Gall-Reculé G, Zwingelstein F, Laurent S, de Boisséson C, Portejoie Y, Rasschaert D: Phylogenetic analysis of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus in France between 1993 and 2000, and the characterisation of RHDV antigenic variants. Arch Virol. 2003, 148: 65-81. 10.1007/s00705-002-0908-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kovaliski J, Sinclair R, Mutze G, Peacock D, Strive T, Abrantes J, Esteves PJ, Holmes EC: Molecular epidemiology of Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease Virus in Australia: when one became many. Mol Ecol. 2014, 23: 408-420. 10.1111/mec.12596.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S: MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013, 30: 2725-2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abrantes J, Esteves PJ, Carmo CR, Müller A, Thompson G, van der Loo W: Genetic characterization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 gene in lagomorphs: comparison between the families Ochotonidae and Leporidae. Int J Immunogenet. 2008, 35: 111-117. 10.1111/j.1744-313X.2007.00735.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carmo CR, Esteves PJ, Ferrand N, van der Loo W: Genetic variation at chemokine receptor CCR5 in leporids: alteration at the 2nd extracellular domain by gene conversion with CCR2 in Oryctolagus, but not in Sylvilagus and Lepus species. Immunogenetics. 2006, 58: 494-501. 10.1007/s00251-006-0095-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Esteves PJ, Alves PC, Ferrand N, van der Loo W: Restriction fragment alleles of the rabbit IGHG genes with reference to the rabbit IGHGCH2 or e locus polymorphism. Anim Genet. 2002, 33: 309-311. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00877.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Melo-Ferreira J, Boursot P, Suchentrunk F, Ferrand N, Alves PC: Invasion from the cold past: extensive introgression of mountain hare (Lepus timidus) mitochondrial DNA into three other hare species in northern Iberia. Mol Ecol. 2005, 14: 2459-2464. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02599.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerr PJ, Kitchen A, Holmes EC: Origin and phylodynamics of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus. J Virol. 2009, 83: 12129-12138. 10.1128/JVI.01523-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hicks AL, Duffy S: One misdated sequence of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus prevents accurate estimation of its nucleotide substitution rate. BMC Evol Biol. 2012, 12: 74-10.1186/1471-2148-12-74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Abrantes J, Lopes AM, Dalton KP, Parra F, Esteves PJ: Detection of RHDVa on the Iberian Peninsula: isolation of an RHDVa strain from a Spanish rabbitry. Arch Virol. 2014, 159: 321-326. 10.1007/s00705-013-1808-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Abrantes J, Lopes AM, Dalton KP, Melo P, Correia JJ, Ramada M, Alves PC, Parra F, Esteves PJ: New variant of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus, Portugal, 2012-2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013, 19: 1900-1902. 10.3201/eid1911.130908.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Calvete C, Sarto P, Calvo AJ, Monroy F, Calvo JH: Could the new rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus variant (RHDVb) be fully replacing classical RHD strains in the Iberian Peninsula?. World Rabbit Sci. 2014, 22: 91-10.4995/wrs.2014.1715.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Palomo LJ, Gisbert J, Blanco JC: Atlas y libro rojo de los mamíferos terrestres de España. In Madrid: Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU; 2007.
  24. Melo-Ferreira J, Farelo L, Freitas H, Suchentrunk F, Boursot P, Alves PC: Home-loving boreal hare mitochondria survived several invasions in Iberia: the relative roles of recurrent hybridisation and allele surfing. Heredity (Edinb). 2014, 112: 265-273. 10.1038/hdy.2013.102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nyström K, Le Gall-Reculé G, Grassi P, Abrantes J, Ruvoën-Clouet N, Le Moullac-Vaidye B, Lopes AM, Esteves PJ, Strive T, Marchandeau S, Dell A, Haslam SM, Le Pendu J: Histo-blood group antigens act as attachment factors of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus infection in a virus strain-dependent manner. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7: e1002188-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002188.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Parrish CR, Holmes EC, Morens DM, Park E-C, Burke DS, Calisher CH, Laughlin CA, Saif LJ, Daszak P: Cross-species virus transmission and the emergence of new epidemic diseases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008, 72: 457-470. 10.1128/MMBR.00004-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Longdon B, Hadfield JD, Webster CL, Obbard DJ, Jiggins FM: Host phylogeny determines viral persistence and replication in novel hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7: e1002260-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002260.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Forrester NL, Moss SR, Turner SL, Schirrmeier H, Gould EA: Recombination in rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus: possible impact on evolution and epidemiology. Virology. 2008, 376: 390-396. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.03.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Abrantes J, Esteves PJ, van der Loo W: Evidence for recombination in the major capsid gene VP60 of the rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV). Arch Virol. 2008, 153: 329-335. 10.1007/s00705-007-1084-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferreira C, Paupério J, Alves PC: The usefulness of field data and hunting statistics in the assessment of wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) conservation status in Portugal. Wildlife Res. 2010, 37: 223-229. 10.1071/WR09137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lopes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement