Thioredoxin H (TrxH) contributes to adversity adaptation and pathogenicity of Edwardsiella piscicida

Thioredoxins (Trxs) play an important role in defending against oxidative stress and keeping disulfide bonding correct to maintain protein function. Edwardsiella piscicida, a severe fish pathogen, has been shown to encode several thioredoxins including TrxA, TrxC, and TrxH, but their biological roles remain unknown. In this study, we characterized TrxH of E. piscicida (named TrxHEp) and examined its expression and function. TrxHEp is composed of 125 residues and possesses typical thioredoxin H motifs. Expression of trxHEp was upregulated under conditions of oxidative stress, iron starvation, low pH, and during infection of host cells. trxHEp expression was also regulated by ferric uptake regulator (Fur), an important global regulatory of E. piscicida. Compared to the wild type TX01, a markerless trxHEp in-frame mutant strain TX01∆trxH exhibited markedly compromised tolerance of the pathogen to hydrogen peroxide, acid stress, and iron deficiency. Deletion of trxHEp significantly retarded bacterial biofilm growth and decreased resistance against serum killing. Pathogenicity analysis shows that the inactivation of trxHEp significantly impaired the ability of E. piscicida to invade host cells, reproduce in macrophages, and infect host tissues. Introduction of a trans-expressed trxH gene restored the lost virulence of TX01∆trxH. There is likely to be a complex relationship of functional complementation or expression regulation between TrxH and another two thioredoxins, TrxA and TrxC, of E. piscicida. This is the first functional report of TrxH in fish pathogens, and the findings suggest that TrxHEp is essential for coping with adverse circumstances and contributes to host infection of E. piscicida.


Introduction
Edwardsiella piscicida (formerly included in E. tarda) [1,2], one family member of Enterobacteriaceae, is a Gramnegative, motile, rod-shaped bacterium. It is a serious fish pathogen and has a broad host range that includes many species of economically important fish such as Japanese eel, flounder, turbot, red sea bream, tilapia, and channel catfish [3]. Edwardsiellosis, which is caused by E. piscicida, is one of the most severe diseases in aquaculture with freshwater as well as marine water supply, and has led to great economic losses in the aquaculture industry worldwide [4][5][6][7]. In addition to fish, E. piscicida is also pathogenic to humans and can cause gastrointestinal disorders and other diseases [8]. Since E. piscicida is an important pathogen of aquatic animals, more and more studies about E. piscicida are reported. A large number of virulence factors/systems, such as type III (T3SS) and type VI (T6SS) secretion systems, a two-component regulatory system, hemolysin, LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing system, molecular chaperons and RNA-binding protein Hfq, ferric uptake regulator, lysozyme inhibitors, and so on, are known to be involved in E. piscicida stress resistance or pathogenicity [9][10][11][12][13]. Accumulating evidence has made clear that E. piscicida is an intracellular pathogen with the capacity to evade host immune defense [11,14]. Recently, a study on intracellular trafficking pathways indicates a clear preference of E. piscicida for certain endocytic pathways and an involvement of endosomes, lysosomes, and cytoskeletons in the infection process [15]. Cheng et al. reported that this bacteria uses the tricarboxylic acid cycle to evade complement-mediated killing [16]. Another study showed that Sip2 in E. piscicida contributes to serum survival, acid resistance, intracellular replication, and host infection [17]. However, studies on the tolerance of E. piscicida to oxidative stress are limited.
Oxidative stress is a problem often encountered by most microorganisms. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are abundantly generated in various environments including in host environments, leading microorganisms to develop multiple strategies to cope with oxidative stress [18]. One of these strategies is the thioredoxin system. The thioredoxin system is widely distributed in several species, from archaea and bacteria to humans, and is composed of thioredoxin (Trx), thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), and nicotinamide adenosine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP/ NADPH) [19]. This antioxidant system transfers electrons from NADPH through TrxR to Trx and then to a large range of proteins that play critical roles in DNA synthesis and oxidative stress [20]. The major function of the Trx system is to reduce disulfide bridges in target proteins and help organisms recover from ROS stress [21,22]. In microbes, such as Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Helicobacter pylori, thioredoxins have been confirmed to involve in maintaining the intracellular redox homeostasis and play a key role in the protection of cells against ROS [23][24][25]. Moreover, the Trx system also provides the electron donor for many critical enzymes by its function of disulfide reductase and thus is related to a series of cellular functions [26].
Trx is a small (around 12 kDa) ubiquitous protein characterized by a conserved motif involving two redox-active Cys separated by a pair of amino acids (CxxC motif ) [27]. Besides the oxidoreductase function, Trx has the function of regulating cell growth, inhibiting apoptosis and regulating gene transcription [28]. The E. coli genome encodes two Trx, Trx1 (TrxA), and Trx2 (TrxC). Trx1 is the first thioredoxin discovered in E. coli, and its function as a hydrogen donor in redox reactions was identified [29]. H. pylori also contains two genes that encode Trx, trxA and trxC. TrxA expression in H. pylori is induced by stress agents, and it is the electron donor for antioxidant enzymes [24,30]. TrxC acts as a chaperone and transforms denatured arginase into its active form [31]. There are three thioredoxin in the E. piscicida genome, TrxA, TrxC, TrxH [32]. To our knowledge, there are no reports about the function study of TrxH in this pathogenic bacteria. In this study, we characterized TrxH in E. piscicida (named TrxH Ep ), examined its expression profiles under different conditions, and analyzed its role in adversity and infection. Our results provide the first insights into the biological function of E. piscicida TrxH.

Construction of the trxH Ep mutation and its complementation
The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. To construct the trxH Ep knockout strain, TX01∆trxH, inframe deletion of a 261 bp segment (residues 24 to 110) of trxH Ep was performed by overlap extension PCR as follows: the first overlap PCR was performed with the primer pair TrxHF1/R1, the second overlap PCR was performed with the primer pair TrxHF2/R2, and the fusion PCR was performed with the primer pair TrxHF1/ R2. The PCR products amplified by primer pair TrxHF1/ R2 were inserted into the suicide plasmid pDM4 [34] at the Bgl II site, resulting in pDMTrxH. S17-1λpir was transformed with pDMTrxH, and the transformants were conjugated with TX01 as described previously [35]. The transconjugants were selected on LB agar plates supplemented with 10% sucrose. One of the colonies that were resistant to sucrose and sensitive to chloramphenicol (marker of pDM4) was analyzed by PCR, and the PCR products were subjected to DNA sequencing to confirm in-frame deletion. This strain was named TX01∆trxH.
To construct the complementary strain TX01∆trxHC, trxH Ep was amplified by PCR with primers TrxHF3/R3, and the following experimental operations were done as described previously [35].
Resistance to stressors (H 2 O 2 , iron deficiency and acidic pH) and to non-immune fish serum TX01, TX01∆trxH and TX01∆trxHC were cultured in LB medium to exponential phase. To determine hydrogen peroxide and iron deficiency tolerance, LB agar plates (pH = 7) supplemented with or without 1 mM H 2 O 2 or 50 μM 2,2′dipyridyl (Dp) were streaked with 5 μL TX01, TX01∆trxH and TX01∆trxHC, respectively. For acid resistance, LB agar plates with pH = 7 or pH = 5 were streaked with the three bacteria. The plate was incubated at 28 °C for 48 h, and bacterial growth was examined. For quantitative analysis, three strains were cultured in LB medium with three stress conditions for 24 h, then the populations of cultivated bacteria were counted by diluted plate. To determine hydrogen peroxide sensitivity, TX01 and TX01∆trxH were cultured in LB medium to exponential phase, then H 2 O 2 was added to 5 mM, the bacterial growth was surveyed every hour. The experiment was performed three times. TX01, TX01∆trxH and TX01∆trxHC were cultured in LB medium to exponential phase. Then the cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in PBS. Approximately 10 5 bacterial cells were mixed with 50 μL fish serum or PBS (control). After incubation with mild agitation at 28 °C for 60 min, the mixtures were serially diluted and plated in triplicate on LB agar plates. The plates were incubated at 28 °C for 48 h, and the colonies that appeared on the plates were enumerated. The survival rate was calculated as follows: [(number of serum-treated cells)/(number of control cells)] × 100%. The experiment was performed three times.

Biofilm assay
TX01, TX01∆trxH and TX01∆trxHC were cultured in LB medium to exponential phase and diluted to 10 5 CFU/ mL. The diluted cells were transferred into a 96-well polystyrene plate (Nunc, Denmark) and incubated at 28 °C for 24 h without agitation. Then the wells were washed gently five times with PBS. The attached cells were treated with Bouin fixative for 1 h and stained with 1% crystal violet solution for 20 min. After the treatment, the unbound dye was removed by rinsing the plate several times with running water. The plate was air dried. The bound dye was eluted in ethanol, and the A 570 of eluates was measured. The experiment was performed three times.

Invasion of eukaryotic cell lines Interaction of bacteria with cultured fish cells
Examination of interactions between FG cells and E. piscicida was performed as described previously [36]. Briefly, TX01, TX01∆trxH and TX01∆trxHC were cultured in LB medium to exponential phase. FG cells were cultured in 96-well cell culture plates and 100 μL bacteria (1 × 10 7 CFU/mL) were added to FG cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1. After incubation at 23 °C for 0, 2, 4, 8 h, the plates were washed five times with PBS. To determine the number of bacterial cells associated with FG cells, the washed FG cells were lysed with 200 μL of 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 in PBS, and the lysate was diluted serially and was plated on LB agar plates supplemented with polymyxin B. After incubation overnight at 28 °C, the numbers of colonies that appeared on the plates were counted. For microscopy observation, TX01 and TX01∆trxH were labeled with FITC (Solarbio, Beijing, China). FG cells were cultured in Glass Bottom cell Culture Dish and infected with FITC-labeled bacteria for 4 h, the plates were washed three times with PBS. The cells were fixed by polyformaldehyde, then the fluorescence of extracellular bacteria was quenched by adding trypan blue (2 mg/mL in PBS). After washing three times with PBS, the cells were observed with a confocal microscope (Olympus Fluoview FV1000).

Bacterial replication in macrophages
The experiment was performed as described by Sui et al. [15] with slight modification. RAW264.7, a murine monocyte-macrophage cell line, were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Gibco, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, USA) at 37 °C in 5% CO 2 . Then 100 μL bacteria (1 × 10 7 CFU/mL) were added to RAW264.7 cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1, followed by incubation at 28 °C for 2 h. Extracellular E. piscicida was killed by adding gentamicin (100 μg/mL) to the plate, followed by incubation at 28 °C for 1 h. The cells were washed three times with PBS and cultured in DMEM containing 10 μg/mL gentamicin for 0, 2, 4, and 8 h. At each time point, the number of bacteria in macrophage was detected as described above. The experiment was performed three times.

Fish and experimental challenges for bacterial dissemination in vivo
Clinically healthy Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) (average 14.2 g) were purchased from a commercial fish farm in Shandong. The fish were maintained at ~22 °C in aerated seawater and fed daily with commercial dry pellets. Fish were acclimatized in the laboratory for 2 weeks before experimental manipulation. Before the experiment, fish were randomly sampled and examined for the presence of bacteria in the blood, liver, kidney, and spleen, and no bacteria were detected from the sampled fish. For tissue collection, fish were euthanized with an overdose of MS222 (tricaine methanesulfonate) (Sigma, USA) as previously described [37]. For tissue dissemination analysis, TX01, TX01∆trxH, and TX01∆trxHC were cultured in LB medium to an OD600 of 0.8. The cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in PBS to 10 6 CFU/mL. Japanese flounder were divided randomly into four groups and infected by intramuscular (i.m.) injection with 50 μL TX01, TX01∆trxH, TX01∆trxHC, or PBS. The kidney and spleen were taken aseptically from the fish at 24 h and 48 h post-infection (hpi). Bacterial recovery from the tissues was determined as reported previously [35]. The rest of the infected fish were monitored daily for mortality for 20 days. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of trxH Ep , trxA, and trxC expression in wild TX01 strain and mutants under different environmental conditions
To examine trxH Ep expression under in vitro conditions, TX01 was grown in LB medium with different pH (pH 5 or 7) at 28 °C, grown in LB medium with or without 2,2′dipyridyl at 28 °C, and grown in LB medium with or without hydrogen peroxide at 28 °C. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and total RNA was extracted with HP Total RNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, USA). The RNA was treated with DNase with the kit of RNase-Free DNase Set (Omega Bio-Tek, USA). One microgram of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with the Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RT-qPCR were carried out as reported previously [35]. To examine trxH Ep expression during infection of host cells, TX01 was cultured in LB medium to an OD 600 of 0.8 and resuspended in PBS to 10 6 CFU/ mL. The resuspension was used to infect FG cells, a cell line derived from flounder gill cells, as described above [38]. The cells were harvested and used for total RNA extraction and RT-qPCR analysis of trxH Ep expression as described above. The experiment was performed three times.
A fur mutant strain of E. piscicida was obtained in another study (data not published). The wild type E. piscicida TX01 and fur mutant strain were cultured in LB medium to the early exponential phase, then bacteria were harvested and total RNA was extracted. The expression of trxH Ep expression in two strains were examined by RT-qPCR as described above.
To examine the expression of trxA and trxC in wild type E. piscicida and trxH Ep knockout strain, TX01 and TX01∆trxH were cultured in LB medium with or without H 2 O 2 , cultured in LB medium with pH = 7 or pH = 5, and incubated with or without FG cells. The bacteria were harvested and total RNA was extracted. The expression of trxA and trxC expression in two strains were examined by RT-qPCR as described above.

Transcriptional regulation of the trxH Ep promoter by Fur
The speculative promoter of trxH Ep (the 510 bp DNA upstream of trxH Ep operon) was cloned by primers TrxhPF4/TrxhPR4 and was inserted into the SwaI site of pSC11, a promoter probe plasmid [39], resulting in pSH510. pSH510 was introduced into E. coli DH5α by transformation and cultured on X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-d-galactopyranoside) plate. DH5α/pSH510 was then transformed with pT (control) and pTFur, which expressed the Fur and was constructed as described by Wang et al. [40], and cultured on X-gal plate. The transformants were subjected to β-galactosidase assay [40].

Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Characterization of the TrxH Ep sequence
trxH Ep codes for a putative protein of 125 amino acids, which contains a thioredoxin domain. According to BLAST sequence analyses, TrxH Ep shares 49.6%-38.5% overall sequence identities with the thioredoxin homology of a number of species including Neisseria shayeganii, Pasteurella multocida, Zobellella maritima, Cupriavidus basilensis, Haemophilus haemoglobinophilus, Ralstonia pickettii, Pseudomonas stutzeri. Curiously, among the species with sequence identities of more than 30%, there are no common animal pathogenic bacteria even including E. coli (except Edwardsiella). TrxH Ep also share sequence identity of 37.1% with thioredoxin of Homo sapiens. The WCXXC catalytic motif, the conserved active site of the TrxH family [41], exists in TrxH Ep , suggesting that TrxH Ep is one member of the TrxH protein family. Another conservative motif, QSTL/M, also exists in TrxH Ep (Figure 1). Protein secondary structure prediction shows that the characteristic elements of the thioredoxin fold (α1, α2, α3, α4, α5, β1, β2, β3, and β4) are found in TrxH Ep (Figure 1).

Mutation of trxH Ep has multiple effects
To examine its functional importance, the trxH gene of E. piscicida TX01 was knocked out by markerless inframe deletion of a region encoding amino acid residues 24 to 110. The resulting mutant was named TX01∆trxH. Meantime, the complementary strain TX01∆trxHC, which is a genetic variant of TX01∆trxH that expresses trx in trans from a plasmid, was constructed.

Effect on bacterial resistance against stressors
Growth analysis shows that when cultured in LB medium or LB agar medium, TX01∆trxH and TX01 exhibited a comparative growth rate (Figure 2A and data not shown). This indicates that the trxH Ep mutation had no effect on growth of E. piscicida in normal conditions. However, when cultured in an LB agar plate containing H 2 O 2 , TX01 grew normally, whereas TX01∆trxH hardly grew, and the amount of TX01∆trxH in H 2 O 2 stress was significantly lower than TX01 ( Figure 2D). Consistently, when bacteria grew to early logarithmic phase in LB medium and hydrogen peroxide was added to the medium, growth analysis shows that TX01∆trxH exhibited a higher sensitivity to H 2 O 2 than TX01 at a subsequent growth period ( Figure 2E). When cultured under acidic condition, TX01∆trxH grew poorer than TX01 and the amount of TX01∆trxH was significantly lower than that of TX01 ( Figure 2B). Similarly, when cultured under iron deficiency, the growth of TX01∆trxH was obviously retarded, compared to TX01 ( Figure 2C). In contrast to TX01∆trxH, TX01∆trxHC and wild TX01 exhibited comparative capability of resistance against stresses caused by H 2 O 2 , acid, and Dp ( Figure 2 and data not shown).

Effect on bacterial resistance to non-immune fish serum
Resistance against host serum killing is an important part of the virulence mechanism in many pathogens, and E. piscicida is known to resist the bactericidal effect of fish serum [14]. To examine whether trxH Ep mutation affects the ability of serum tolerance, TX01, TX01∆trxH, and TX01∆trxHC were incubated with non-immune flounder serum for 1 h, and the survival of bacteria was determined by plate count. The result shows that TX01 and TX01∆trxHC exhibit apparent serum resistance, as 80.3% and 82.6% of the cells survived after incubation with flounder serum, respectively. However, TX01∆trxH displayed only 47.1% of surviving cells after serum treatment, which is significantly lower than for TX01 ( Figure 3A).

Effect on biofilm formation
Since trxH Ep mutations have no effect on planktonic growth of E. piscicida in normal conditions, we wanted to know whether bacterial biofilm formation was influenced by deletion of trxH Ep . The biofilm forming capacity of E. piscicida were analyzed and the result shows that biofilm growth of TX01∆trxH was significantly slower (2.2-fold less) than that of TX01. And the biofilm growth of TX01∆trxHC was similar to that of TX01 ( Figure 3B).

Effect on cell invasion in vitro
To examine whether trxH Ep mutation played any role in the infectivity of TX01, cultured FG cells were incubated with the same dose of TX01, TX01∆trxH, or TX01∆trxHC. The bacterial cells associated with infection and those invading the host cells were enumerated. The results show that the amount of TX01∆trxH recovered from FG cells was significantly lower than that of TX01 at 4 and 8 hpi, and the amount of TX01∆trxHC was comparative to that of TX01 ( Figure 4A). Consistently, microscopic analysis shows that fluorescence intensity of cells infected by FITC-labeled TX01∆trxH was significantly weaker than that of cells infected by FITC-labeled TX01 ( Figure 4B), indicating that the ability to infect the host cell was declined when trxH Ep was inactivated.
It is known that E. piscicida is able to survive and replicate in the mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 [15].
To examine whether trxH Ep mutation played any role in the intracellular survival of TX01, cultured RAW264.7 cells were incubated with the same dose of TX01 or TX01∆trxH, and extracellular bacteria were killed. The cells were then incubated further for various hours, and the number of intracellular bacteria was determined by plate count. The results show that the number of TX01∆trxH recovered from the intracellular RAW264.7 cells was significantly lower than those of TX01 at 4 and 8 hpi, and the amount of TX01∆trxHC was comparative to that of TX01 ( Figure 4C).

Effect on bacterial dissemination in the fish tissues in vivo and general virulence
To examine the effect of trxH Ep mutation on tissue infectivity, flounder were infected with the same dose of TX01, TX01∆trxH, or TX01∆trxHC, and bacterial recoveries from spleen and kidneys were determined at 24 and 48 hpi. The results show that bacterial recoveries from TX01∆trxH-infected fish were significantly lower than those from TX01-infected fish at 24 hpi and 48 hpi, and bacterial recoveries from TX01∆trxHCinfected fish were similar to those from TX01-infected fish ( Figure 5A).
To examine the effect of trxH Ep mutation on the overall bacterial virulence, Japanese flounder infected with TX01, TX01∆trxH, or TX01∆trxHC were used to monitor for mortality. The results show that at the end of the monitored period (20 days), the survival rate of TX01∆trxH-infected fish was 43.3%, which was significantly higher than that of TX01-infected fish (13.3%) ( Figure 5B).

Expression of trxH Ep , trxA and trxC in wild TX01 strain and mutants under different environmental conditions Expression of trxH Ep is modulated by stress
Since thioredoxin plays a role in maintaining the intracellular redox homeostasis, and since it may participate in response to adversity, we determined the expression of trxH Ep under normal conditions (i.e., cultured in LB medium), adverse conditions (i.e., cultured in LB medium with H 2 O 2 , Dp, or cultured in low pH LB medium), and infecting host cell condition by RT-qPCR. The results show that the expression of trxH Ep was significantly enhanced when bacteria faced hydrogen peroxide pressure, acid pressure, iron deficiency, and an intracellular environment, compared to the expression of trxH Ep in normal condition (Figures 6A and B).

Expression of trxH Ep is regulated by Fur (Ferric uptake regulator)
In a previous study of E. piscicida, we obtained a fur mutant train, which exhibited much higher virulence than wild type E. piscicida strain TX01 (data not published). Proteomic analysis shows that the expression of TrxH was significantly up-regulated in the fur mutant strain, compared to the wild type strain (data not shown). So we detected the expression of trxH Ep at the mRNA level. RT-qPCR shows that the expression of trxH Ep in the fur mutant strain was 2.4-fold higher than that of trx-H Ep in the wild type strain ( Figure 6C). Subsequently, we detected the regulatory effect of Fur on promoter activity of trxH Ep . The speculative promoter of trxH Ep , H510, was cloned to a promoter probe plasmid pSC11 and introduced into DH5α by transformation, resulting in DH5α/ pSH510. When DH5α/pSH510 was cultured in LB agar plate with X-gal, the bacterial colonies were blue, which indicates that H510 has promoter activity. DH5α/pSH510 was then transformed with pTFur and pT (control). On the X-gal plate, the blue of DH5α/pSH510/pTFur was obviously weak, compared with DH5α/pSH510/pT (Figure 6D). β-Galactosidase assays show that galactosidase activity produced by DH5α/pSH510/pTFur was significantly lower (3.1 fold) than that produced by DH5α/ pSH510/pT. These results indicate that Fur negatively regulated transcription of trxH Ep .

Expression of trxA and trxC in TX01∆trxH
There are two other thioredoxins, TrxA and TrxC, in E. piscicida, and their functions are unknown. To detect whether TrxA and TrxC undertake more functions when the TrxH function was deactivated, we examined the expression of trxA and trxC in TX01∆trxH. The results show that the deletion of trxH has no effect on the expression of trxC in normal conditions. However, when facing oxidative stress, acid pressure, or infecting host cell, the expression of trxC in TX01∆trxH was significantly up-regulated, compared to that in TX01. On the contrary, the deletion of trxH significantly induced 4.4fold expression of trxA in normal conditions, but trxA expression exhibited no difference between TX01 and TX01∆trxH in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Under an acidic environment and infecting host cell, the mRNA level of trxA in TX01∆trxH was 3.1-and 4.3-fold high, compared to the level of trxA in TX01 (Figure 7). These findings suggest that there is likely a complex relationship of functional complementation or expression regulation between TrxH and another two thioredoxins, TrxA and TrxC, of E. piscicida.

Discussion
Thioredoxins play major roles in protection of cells against toxic oxygen species as well as maintaining the intracellular thio-disulfide balance in bacteria [42]. In Figure 6 Expression analysis of trxH Ep . A Expression of trxH Ep under different conditions. RT-qPCR was performed with total RNA extracted from Edwardsiella piscicida TX01 cultured in normal LB medium (control, pH = 7), in hydrogen peroxide condition (normal LB medium with H 2 O 2 ), in acid condition (pH = 5), in iron limitation condition (with the iron chelator 2,2′dipyridyl, Dp), Expression level of trxH Ep in normal LB medium was set as 1. B RT-qPCR was performed with total RNA extracted from TX01 incubated with or without (control) FG cells. Expression level of trxH Ep without FG cells was set as 1. C RT-qPCR was performed with total RNA extracted from wild type TX01 and fur mutant strain cultured in normal LB medium. Expression level of trxH Ep in wild type TX01 strain was set as 1. D DH5α/pSH510/pTFur and DH5α/pSH510/pT were streaked and cultured on LB plate with X-gal, kanamycin, and ampicillin. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (N = 3). N, the number of times the experiment was performed. **P < 0.01. E. piscicida, the function of thioredoxins is completely unknown. Moreover, we did not find any reports about the function of thioredoxin H in pathogen bacteria. In this study, a thioredoxin H homologue, TrxH, was identified and characterized from E. piscicida. TrxH Ep contains an unusual motif (CPVC), not the typical Trx motif (CGPC), which is found in most Trx proteins. It is not known how this affects its activity or its roles.
It is reported that the expression of trx in many bacteria is induced by oxidative stress [20]. Similarly, in E. piscicida, the expression of trxH Ep was significantly enhanced in the presence of H 2 O 2 . In other adverse conditions including acid stress and iron deficiency, trxH Ep expression is upregulated. When bacteria infect host cells, the expression of trxH Ep also increases. Under these conditions, the highest induction of trxH Ep occured with iron deficiency, in which Fur exists predominately as a Figure 7 Expression of trxC and trxA in wild type Edwardsiella piscicida TX01 strain and TX01∆trxH strain. Total RNA was extracted from E. piscicida TX01 and TX01∆trxH cultured in normal LB medium (control, pH = 7), in hydrogen peroxide condition (with H 2 O 2 ), in acid condition (pH = 5), or incubating with FG cells, respectively. Expressions of trxC and trxA were analyzed by RT-qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (N = 3). N, the number of times the experiment was performed. **P < 0.01. biologically inactive apoprotein [43]. Consistently, the expression of trxH Ep in the fur mutant strain was higher than that in the wild type strain. As far as we know, this is the first report that Trx expression was regulated by Fur.
Besides TrxH, there are another two thioredoxin, TrxA and TrxC in E. piscicida. When trxH Ep was inactivated, the expression of trxC did not change under normal conditions. However, under stress or infecting host cell conditions, trxC expression was significantly induced. As a chaperone, TrxC maybe undertook more roles in adverse conditions especially when trxH was inactivated in E. piscicida. On the contrary, the expression of trxA was directly or indirectly regulated by TrxH, which is sustained by the fact that Trx possesses the property of regulating gene expression [28]. However, in the presence of hydrogen peroxide trxA expression did not appear significantly different between wild TX01 and mutant TX01∆trxH. These findings show that there is likely to be a complex relationship between the three trx genes, and further research needs to be performed in the future.
Since the expression of trxH Ep is induced by adverse conditions, it probably participates in stress resistance. Our results show that when trxH Ep was inactive, the mutant TX01∆trxH exhibited a higher sensitivity to H 2 O 2 , which indicates that trxH Ep plays an important role in tolerance to oxidative stress. Similar results were reported in other bacteria. In H. pylori, the ∆trxC mutant significantly decreased the ability of tolerance to oxygen exposure [24]. In Listeria monocytogenes, deletion of trxA markedly compromised tolerance of the pathogen to the thiol-specific oxidizing agent diamide [20]. Since Trx is involved in a series of cellular functions [26], we speculate that trxH Ep participates in coping with other adversities, and our results confirm that trxH Ep was involved in tolerance to acid stress and iron deficiency stress, which are similar to the adverse environment in the host.
It is generally known that Trx donates electrons to the disulfide bond system and helps isomerization of incorrectly paired disulfide bonds [20,44]. Since many bacterial virulence factors require stable disulfide bonds for proper folding and function, Trx is closely related to infection of bacteria [45,46]. It is reported that TrxA is essential for motility and contributes to host infection of L. monocytogenes [20]. In H. pylori, the ∆trxC mutant lacks mouse colonization ability, while the ability to colonize mouse stomachs is significantly reduced in the ∆trxA mutant [24]. In Magnaporthe oryzae, Trx1 and Trx2 also play important roles in bacterial pathogenesis [47]. In pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides lutzii, Trx1 contributes to this organism's virulence [19]. In this study, we also examined the effect of trxH Ep on E. piscicida pathogenicity. It is known that biofilm formation and serum resistance are important parts of the virulence in multiple pathogens such as E. piscicida [17,35] and H. pylori [48,49]. In the latter, the inability to acquire iron from serum has been suggested to block H. pylori virulence by weakening its growth and survival in the serum [48]. Our results show that trxH Ep mutation had no effect on growth of E. piscicida, but harmed bacterial biofilm growth. Similarly, the capability of serum resistance was significantly declined when trxH Ep was inactivated. Consistently, upon infection with host cells, TX01∆trxH compared to TX01, shows an impaired ability to infect cells and to propagate in cells, indicating that trxH is required for bacterial invasion of host cells and host tissues. These observations suggest that trxH Ep may play a role during bacterial invasion.
In conclusion, this study identified and characterized thioredoxin TrxH Ep from fish pathogen E. piscicida.
Our results indicate that TrxH Ep possesses conservative thioredoxin motifs and that the trxH Ep expression seems to be up-regulated under the pressure of several stressors, including iron deficiency. Regarding this fact, our results suggest the potential role of Fur for regulating trxH Ep expression. TrxH Ep not only played an important role in coping with adverse circumstances, but functioned as a factor that is essential to bacterial infection both at the cellular level and in a live fish model. This is the first study of TrxH in fish pathogen, and the results suggest that TrxH Ep exerts pleiotropic effects on the pathogenesis of E. piscicida.