Skip to main content

Table 3 Minimal models exploring factors affecting variation in M. hyopneumoniae infection status, ln-transformed no. of copies and VNTR types in pigs

From: The role of co-infections in M. hyopneumoniae outbreaks among heavy fattening pigs: a field study

Response variable

Explanatory variable

 

Parameter estimate ± SE

Statistic

p-value

M. hyopneumoniae infection status†

Groupb

A

2.67 ± 0.55

χ22 = 32.8

<0.0001

 

B

1.98 ± 0.47

  
 

Timec

T1

0.37 ± 0.33

χ21 = 0.25

0.62

 

M. hyorhinis

infection statusd

Infected

0.58 ± 0.27

χ21 = 4.59

0.032

 

P. multocida infection statusd

Infected

−0.71 ± 0.33

χ21 = 4.49

0.034

 

Group:Timeb, c

Group A: T1

−0.42 ± 0.61

χ22 = 4.01

0.13

  

Group B: T1

−1.01 ± 0.50

  

M. hyopneumoniae no. of copies (ln-transformed)*, a

Groupb

A

3.45 ± 0.54

F2, 425 = 19.7

<0.0001

 

B

2.04 ± 0.55

  

Timec

T1

0.03 ± 0.59

F1, 425 = 14.7

0.0001

M. hyorhinis

infection statusd

Infected

1.11 ± 0.33

F1, 425 = 11.2

0.0009

 

A. pleuropneumoniae infection statusd

Infected

0.65 ± 0.40

F1, 425 = 2.70

0.10

 

Group:Timeb, c

Group A: T1

−1.84 ± 0.75

F2, 425 = 3.48

0.032

  

Group B: T1

−1.74 ± 0.77

  

M. hyopneumoniae MLVA†, a

Groupb

A

−1.73 ± 0.51

χ22 = 1.02

0.60

 

B

−1.18 ± 0.49

  

Timec

T1

2.41 ± 0.59

χ21 = 9.20

0.0024

PRRSV

infection statusd

Infected

1.13 ± 0.56

χ21 = 4.09

0.043

 

Group:Timeb, c

Group A: T1

−2.54 ± 0.70

χ22 = 13.42

0.0012

  

Group B: T1

−2.13 ± 0.71

  
  1. In all the models, pig IDs and farm IDs were included as random intercepts.
  2. †mixed logistic regression; * linear mixed model; a only positive animals; b Group C held as reference; c T0 held as reference; d not-infected held as reference.