Skip to main content

Table 4 Sensitivity analysis for each varied parameter for the simulations

From: Disease properties, geography, and mitigation strategies in a simulation spread of rinderpest across the United States

Parameter

Normalized Forward Sensitivity Index

(ratio infected cows that progress to symptoms)

11.3

(ratio infected sheep that progress to symptoms)

3.4

θ D (ratio infected that die)

3.4

(ratio infected hogs that progress to symptoms)

0.5

T c (time after detection until culling implemented)

0.4

ε s (efficacy short range movement control)

0.3

1/λ L (residency time in latent stage)

0.2

1/λ Vs (residency time in vaccinated susceptible)

-0.2

ε l (efficacy long range movement control)

0.2

ε q (efficacy of quarantine)

-0.1

1/λ I (residency time in infectious stage)

0.1

1/λ C and 1/λ Ve (time in carrier stage either vaccinated or not)

0.1

ε Vs (efficacy vaccine for susceptible animals)

0

T v1 (time after 1st infection until vaccination)

0

T l (time after detection until long range movement control implemented)

0

T q (time after detection until quarantine)

0

Back to article page

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716