Skip to main content

Table 2 Model parameter description and disease input ranges used with supportive references

From: Disease properties, geography, and mitigation strategies in a simulation spread of rinderpest across the United States

  Parameter description Baseline Range Ref.
λ Vs rate of progression from vaccinated susceptible to recovered 1/10.5 days 7-14 [28]
λ Ve rate of progression from vaccinated quiescent infected to recovered 1/698.75 days 120-1277.5 [8]
λ R rate of progression from recovered to susceptible 0 0 N/A
θ L ratio of infected progress to clinical symptoms 0.975 0.95-1.0 [8]
θ D ratio of infectious that die 0.9 0.8-1.0 [26]
ε q efficacy of quarantine (ratio of susceptible successfully quarantined) 0.5 0.1-0.9 [22]
ε vs efficacy of vaccine for susceptibles (will move into immune) 0.775 0.6-0.95 [6]
ε ve efficacy of vaccine for exposed (latent only) 0.775 0.6-0.95 [5, 6]
ε c efficacy of culling 0.5 N/A [10, 29]
ε s efficacy of short-range movement control 0.5 0.1-0.9 N/A
ε l efficacy of long-range movement control 0.5 0.1-0.9 N/A
T l time after detection until inter-state movement restricted 6.5 days 1-14 N/A