Open Access

Absence of a set of plasmid-encoded genes is predictive of reduced pathogenic potential in Brachyspira hyodysenteriae

  • Tom La1,
  • Nyree D Phillips1,
  • Jill R Thomson2 and
  • David J Hampson1Email author
Veterinary Research201445:131

DOI: 10.1186/s13567-014-0131-6

Received: 30 October 2014

Accepted: 4 December 2014

Published: 16 December 2014

Abstract

The gene content of 14 strains of the intestinal spirochaete Brachyspira hyodysenteriae was compared using a DNA microarray. A consistent difference occurred in a block of four genes on the ~36 Kb plasmid, with these being present in six virulent strains and absent in eight strains with reduced pathogenic potential. These genes encoded a predicted radical S-adenosylmethionine domain protein, a glycosyl transferase group 1-like protein, an NAD dependant epimerase and a dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 2–5 epimerase: they may be involved in rhamnose biosynthesis and glycosylation. The absence of these plasmid genes in B. hyodysenteriae isolates is predictive of reduced pathogenic potential.

Introduction, methods, and results

The anaerobic intestinal spirochaete Brachyspira hyodysenteriae infects the large intestine of grower and finisher pigs to cause swine dysentery (SD) [1]. In the field signs of SD may be masked or prevented by the use of antimicrobial agents, whilst dietary ingredients may influence the occurrence and severity of disease by creating conditions within the large intestine that inhibit or promote colonisation [2]-[4]. Differences in the B. hyodysenteriae strains also may account for variations in clinical outcomes. Lysons et al. [5] reported isolating B. hyodysenteriae from pigs in herds that were free of clinical SD, and three isolates did not produce disease in experimentally infected pigs, although they colonised the colonic mucosa of some animals. Jensen and Stanton [6] reported that B. hyodysenteriae reference strain B204 colonised more experimentally challenged pigs and was more virulent than the type strain B78T. Achacha et al. [7] challenged eight groups of weaner pigs with seven reference strains and one field isolate of B. hyodysenteriae, and categorised these as being of high or low virulence. Strain B204 was considered to be virulent, whilst strains B234 and A1 were considered to have low pathogenic potential. Thomson et al. [8] challenged weaner pigs with four B. hyodysenteriae isolates from herds with only mild diarrhoea or low prevalence of disease. Fewer of the pigs challenged with these strains showed clinical signs, pathological changes or reduced growth rates compared to pigs challenged with isolates from herds with more severe disease. Host species of origin also may be involved in differences in pathogenesis, as B. hyodysenteriae strains R1 and R358 isolated from common rheas (Rhea americana) with severe typhlitis failed to colonise pigs [9].

There have been few attempts to determine why isolates of B. hyodysenteriae vary in their pathogenic potential. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of virulent B. hyodysenteriae strain WA1, including its ~36 Kb plasmid, identified 314 (~12%) predicted open reading frames (ORFs) as having potential roles in the pathogenesis of SD [10]. These included “life style” genes such as those associated with motility and chemotaxis, those encoding surface proteins and enzymes involved in the synthesis of lipooligosaccharide (LOS), and a number of genes predicted to encode proteolytic enzymes and haemolysins/cytotoxins. Subsequent evidence for a role of the 36 Kb plasmid in pathogenesis was obtained when fewer pigs developed SD after experimental challenge with a B. hyodysenteriae strain lacking the plasmid compared to pigs challenged with a strain containing the plasmid [11]. The aim of the current study was to identify genes involved in pathogenesis by comparing the gene content of strains of B. hyodysenteriae with high or low pathogenic potential using a microarray analysis.

Spirochaete strains were obtained as frozen stock from the culture collections at Murdoch University and the Scottish Agricultural College. The B. hyodysenteriae strains used in the microarray analysis were selected to include six that have been reported in the literature to be virulent (B204, BW1, NSW5, NSW15, Q17 and Vic2) and eight that have been reported to colonise fewer pigs and/or cause milder disease (A1, B78T, B234, B6933, FM88.90, R301, SA2206 and VS1) [5]-[7],[9]. These are recorded as “avirulent”, although they are not fully avirulent. Four other strains (P252/97; P257/97; P935/1/00; P44/15/00) that were considered to have low pathogenic potential based on field observations and results of experimental infection of pigs [8] subsequently were used in a PCR analysis of the plasmid genes to help confirm the findings from the microarray work.

Spirochaetes were propagated in Kunkle’s pre-reduced anaerobic broth [12], and at a density of approximately 108 cells/mL they were harvested by centrifuging at 10 000 × g, and counted under a phase contrast microscope.

Custom GeneChips were designed and manufactured by Affymetrix (Santa Clara, California) using the predicted ORFs from B. hyodysenteriae WA1 [10]. A total of 1993 of the 2638 ORFs encoded on the genome and 24 of the 31 ORFs encoded on the plasmid were represented on the chip. Each ORF was represented on the array by a series of 13 different pairs of 25-mer oligonucleotide probes. Each probe pair consisted of a perfect match oligonucleotide and a mismatch oligonucleotide. The probe set was pruned against all other B. hyodysenteriae WA1 sequences on the chip and the Affymetrix Standard Pruning Libraries for Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas spp. genomes.

Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) analysis was used to compare the gene content of the six virulent and eight “avirulent” B. hyodysenteriae strains with the gene content of virulent B. hyodysenteriae strain WA1. A single channel microarray analysis was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChips. High molecular weight DNA was extracted from the B. hyodysenteriae cells using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The integrity of all DNA preparations was confirmed by PCR using species-specific primers [13]. Purified DNA was digested with Rsa 1 and the restriction fragments were labelled with a fluorescent cyanide dye (Cy3) using the BioPrime Array CGH Genomic Labelling System (Invitrogen). The labelled genome fragments were hybridised to the B. hyodysenteriae GeneChip under moderately stringent conditions (37 °C) in a Hybridisation Oven 645 (Affymetrix) for 16 h. The GeneChips were washed and labelled using the GeneChip Hybridisation, Wash and Stain Kit (Affymetrix), using a Fluidics Station 450 (Affymetrix). The GeneChips were scanned using the Scanner 3000 (Affymetrix) and the hybridisation intensity data converted to numeric values using the GeneChip Operating Software (GCOS, Affymetrix). Affymetrix default software cut-off values were used and each ORF was categorized as “Present”, “Marginal” or “Absent”. B. hyodysenteriae strain WA1 and B. innocens strain 4/71 served as positive and negative controls, respectively.

For the seven plasmid-encoded genes absent from the GeneChip, three primer pairs were designed for PCR amplification of each (Table 1). For the four genes present in the plasmid of the virulent strains and absent in the “avirulent” strains (BHWA1_02678 to BHWA1_02681), three unique primer pairs were designed for the PCR amplification of each ORF (Table 2). High molecular weight DNA from all strains was subjected to PCR using HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The annealing temperature used for each primer was set at 5 °C less than the optimal annealing temperature to allow for a moderate stringency similar to that of the microarray hybridisation. The amplification products were electrophoresed through an agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and viewed over ultraviolet light.
Table 1

PCR primers used for the amplification of B. hyodysenteriae plasmid genes not on the GeneChip

Primer namea

Sequence (5′ – 3′)

Product size

BHWA1_02666a-F

gagaagaatatttaatacctttaatag

217 bp

BHWA1_02666a-R

cattcatatatataataataatggttgg

 

BHWA1_02666b-F

ccaaccattattattatatatatgaatg

549 bp

BHWA1_02666b-R

ctaaatctctatattgtttaactatag

 

BHWA1_02666c-F

ctatagttaaacaatatagagatttag

177 bp

BHWA1_02666c-R

ctatttttatacctaatatggtgaatat

 

BHWA1_02667a-F

actggagttgctggatttataggatc

560 bp

BHWA1_02667a-R

aagtcaggtctctgtctctttcc

 

BHWA1_02667b-F

caaataaagatcatactgttataggaatag

597 bp

BHWA1_02667b-R

atgtatagtcacgcatagtgg

 

BHWA1_02667c-F

tgtaatacatttagcaggatatgg

384 bp

BHWA1_02667c-R

ggtataggattattttcaagtatcag

 

BHWA1_02668a-F

gttcataccatttagaaaaagaagag

701 bp

BHWA1_02668a-R

gttcataccatttagaaaaagaagag

 

BHWA1_02668b-F

agaacaaaacaacataaagcatc

206 bp

BHWA1_02668b-R

catcagtaaaacaaatataatccc

 

BHWA1_02668c-F

cctgagcattatggactttc

240 bp

BHWA1_02668c-R

tgtactgtctgattttttatggtc

 

BHWA1_02672a-F

aaatgtagaagatattgtattgcc

417 bp

BHWA1_02672a-R

acctctcctatatgttttttatacttag

 

BHWA1_02672b-F

attactacaaaatgtactctaaaatgtaag

546 bp

BHWA1_02672b-R

ccatactatatgacaaaaataaaatctag

 

BHWA1_02672c-F

tatctaagtataaaaaacatataggagagg

498 bp

BHWA1_02672c-R

cagcacaaaactcacatagtg

 

BHWA1_02673a-F

aaatacttgtcaataatcttagtgg

1819 bp

BHWA1_02673a-R

tttcatcataagcaaaaataatatc

 

BHWA1_02673b-F

gtaagtggaaaaagaatgaaacatac

1032 bp

BHWA1_02673b-R

agattgtcttgacgaataaaag

 

BHWA1_02673c-F

aataaatatgacattaaaggaataaaaatc

805 bp

BHWA1_02673c-R

ctattgttagtagcaaaataataaaaatac

 

BHWA1_02674a-F

atttagaagatgtaatacctttagagg

249 bp

BHWA1_02674a-R

tcattttcgctatatttttatttac

 

BHWA1_02674b-F

ttatacaaaataggagagcctttag

363 bp

BHWA1_02674b-R

atcgcaataatctgaaaatg

 

BHWA1_02674c-F

gtatgtacttatcttttttattctattgtc

194 bp

BHWA1_02674c-R

catattggatttttatctctatgtc

 

BHWA1_02675a-F

attggatagaacatagagggag

301 bp

BHWA1_02675a-R

actgtatcatttgctatttcattag

 

BHWA1_02675b-F

tataaaaactataagaatatctctacaagg

367 bp

BHWA1_02675b-R

aacatataaggtataaaatggttgag

 

BHWA1_02675c-F

cctcaaccattttataccttatatg

184 bp

BHWA1_02675c-R

taactatattttctcgttttccttg

 

aPrimers named according to the plasmid gene they are designed to amplify.

Table 2

PCR primers for amplification of the four genes on the plasmid that were absent in the “avirulent” B. hyodysenteriae strains but present in all the virulent strains

Primer nameb

Sequence (5′ – 3′)

Product size

BHWA1_02678a-F

tagaaacggtaatcccattag

322 bp

BHWA1_02678a-R

taaaagcgaagcattagtagtag

 

BHWA1_02678b-F

tgataaagtaaatagggtagatactactac

420 bp

BHWA1_02678b-R

aaatacataaggacaaaccattac

 

BHWA1_02678c-F

ttttgctgaaatggtagagtatg

558 bp

BHWA1_02678c-R

tatagtttttactgattctttattgacatc

 

BHWA1_02679a-F

ttggtggaggagttggtac

237 bp

BHWA1_02679a-R

tgataaagaagaggatgattcc

 

BHWA1_02679b-F

tcaggtataaatccgcctaatg

495 bp

BHWA1_02679b-R

caggtactaaaccagcagtcatag

 

BHWA1_02679c-F

ggttttatatgtaagaatgaagatg

329 bp

BHWA1_02679c-R

cttagaatttgaagtccagtttg

 

BHWA1_02680a-F

gaagtttttggcataggaac

289 bp

BHWA1_02680a-R

tcattttcttttaatggtgtatc

 

BHWA1_02680b-F

aaaaggctatttagaatctgaag

280 bp

BHWA1_02680b-R

cattatctccataagtatagaaaactctac

 

BHWA1_02680c-F

tggtgatatagcaaaaagtatagc

183 bp

BHWA1_02680c-R

ccctacaataattttaggttcttcag

 

BHWA1_02681a-F

gtgggaaaaataaatctgaag

345 bp

BHWA1_02681a-R

gcttaattctacagtaaaatgctg

 

BHWA1_02681b-F

gtaatgatgaacttaaaaaatcaggtattg

266 bp

BHWA1_02681b-R

attccatgagccacataaggag

 

BHWA1_02681c-F

aaacagtcaaatatgagttatagtgc

391 bp

BHWA1_02681c-R

aaatctggtatacttttatccttttc

 

bPrimers named according to the plasmid gene they are designed to amplify.

For the four strains that were not hybridised on the microarray, spirochaetes were harvested from 1 mL of culture by centrifugation and the pellet was resuspended 1 mL sterile TE buffer. The resuspended cells were boiled for 2 min, the cellular debris pelleted by centrifugation and the supernatant subjected to PCR.

The categorised values for the CGH analysis and the PCR results for the genes missing from the microarray were merged. Genes which were present or marginal in the virulent strains but absent in the low-virulence strains were identified. None of the plasmid genes gave marginal signals.

In CGH analysis B. innocens 4/71 shared only 328 of the 1993 WA1 genes, whilst the six virulent B. hyodysenteriae strains shared between 1919 and 1982 (96.3 to 99.4%) of the genes and 1871 (93.9%) genes were common to all virulent strains (ie were core genes). The eight “avirulent” strains shared 1874 to 1930 (90.4 to 96.8%) of the WA1 genes, of which 1757 (88.2%) were common to all the “avirulent” strains. All 14 strains shared 1741 (87.4%) of the WA1 genes. Only five genes (of unknown function) were specific to B. hyodysenteriae WA1 (BHWA1_01317, BHWA1_00005, BHWA1_00006, BHWA1_01358 and BHWA1_00574). The data from the CGH analysis have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus public repository [14].

The CGH analysis identified four genes that were present in all six virulent strains (and WA1) and absent in all eight “avirulent” strains. These were located as a block of adjacent genes on the 36 Kb plasmid (positions 13–16), and were predicted to encode a radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) protein, a glycosyltranserase, an NAD-dependent epimerase and an dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase (rfb C), which are all catalytic enzymes potentially involved in LOS biosynthesis and/or glycosylation (Table 3). Two adjacent plasmid genes (positions 11 and 12) predicted to encode radical SAM domain proteins also were absent from the eight “avirulent” strains and were present in five of the six virulent strains tested (absent in NSW15). “Avirulent” strains A1 and FM88.90 did not possess the plasmid genes.
Table 3

Distribution of the B. hyodysenteriae plasmid genes amongst the virulent and “avirulent” strains determined by GeneChip microarray and PCR

Gene (position on plasmid)

Putative function

Virulent strains

Avirulent strains

B204

BW1

NSW5

NSW15

Q17

Vic 2

A1

B78

B234

B6933

FM88.90

R301

SA2206

VS1

BHWA1_02666 (1)

glycosyltransferase

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02667 (2)

NAD dependent epimerase/dehydratase

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02668 (3)

glycosyl transferase, family 2

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02669 (4)

glycosyl transferase, group 1-like protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02670 (5)

glycosyl transferase, group 1

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02671 (6)

glycosyl transferase

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02672 (7)

hydrolase (HAD superfamily) protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02673 (8)

hydrolase (HAD superfamily) protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02674 (9)

Radical SAM domain protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02675 (10)

Radical SAM domain protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02676 (11)

Radical SAM domain protein

P

P

P

A

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

BHWA1_02677 (12)

Radical SAM domain protein

P

P

P

A

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

BHWA1_02678 (13)

Radical SAM domain protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

BHWA1_02679 (14)

glycosyl transferase, group 1-like protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

BHWA1_02680 (15)

NAD dependent epimerase

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

BHWA1_02681 (16)

dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase ( rfb C)

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

BHWA1_02682 (17)

Radical SAM domain protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02683 (18)

Glucose-1-phosphate cytidylyltransferase (rfb F)

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02684 (19)

plasmid partitioning protein (cds M)

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02685 (20)

hypothetical protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02686 (21)

replicative DNA helicase

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02687 (22)

DNA primase-like protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02688 (23)

integrase

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02689 (24)

alpha-1,2-fucosyltransferase

P

A

A

P

A

P

A

P

P

P

A

A

P

P

BHWA1_02690 (25)

lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis protein-like protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02691 (26)

dTDP-D-glucose 4,6-dehydratase (rfb B)

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02692 (27)

glucose-1-phosphate thymidylyltransferase (rfb A)

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02693 (28)

dTDP-4-keto-L-rhamnose reductase (rfb D)

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02694 (29)

dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase (rfb C)

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02695 (30)

hypothetical protein

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

BHWA1_02696 (31)

glycosyltransferase

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

The names of seven of the plasmid genes that were not on the microarray (genes 1–3; 7–10) but were amplified by PCR are marked in bold. The microarray results for the four genes (genes 13–16) that were absent in the “avirulent” strains but present in the virulent strains are italicised. Genes 11 and 12 also were absent in the “avirulent” strains and were present in five of the six virulent strains (NSW15 being the exception).

P represents gene present, A represents gene absent. Strains A1 and FM88-90 lacked all 31 plasmid genes.

Other probe sets identified differences between individual virulent and “avirulent” strains, but these were not consistent. Seven sets identified individual chromosomal genes (of unknown function) in the virulent strains that were absent in six or seven of the eight “avirulent” strains (Table 4). Virulent strain NSW15 lacked four of the genes that were absent in the “avirulent” strains. There were no genes present in all the “avirulent” strains and absent in the virulent strains.
Table 4

Other chromosomal genes absent in six or seven of the eight “avirulent” strains but present in five or six of the virulent strains

 

Virulent strains

Avirulent strains

Probe set

Size (base pairs)

B204

BW1

NSW5

NSW15

Q17

Vic2

B6933

B78T

FM88-90

A1

B234

VS1

SA2206

R301

GeneBh581_at

318

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

A

A

P

A

A

A

A

GeneBh398_at

135

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

A

P

P

A

A

A

A

GeneBh1267_at

117

P

P

P

P

P

P

A

A

P

A

A

A

A

P

GeneBh1690_at

537

P

P

P

A

P

P

A

A

A

P

A

A

A

A

GeneBh310_at

93

P

P

P

A

P

P

M

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

GeneBh551_at

819

P

P

P

A

P

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

P

A

GeneBh513_at

1176

P

P

P

A

P

P

A

A

A

A

A

A

P

P

All genes are of unknown function. A, absent; P, present; M, marginal (weak signal).

PCR analysis of the seven genes on the plasmid that were not represented on the GeneChip indicated that all the B. hyodysenteriae strains except A1 and FM88.90 possessed all seven genes (Table 3).

When used on the four additional strains of low pathogenic potential that were not tested on the microarray [8], the PCRs targeting plasmid-borne genes 11 – 16 failed to amplify them from strain P944/15/10, and failed to amplify the radical SAM genes (genes 10, 11 and 12) from strain P935/1/00.

Discussion

The “avirulent” strains used in this study were not all completely avirulent, but had been shown to colonise fewer experimental animals after challenge and/or cause milder disease compared to typical field strains. They could be defined as having reduced pathogenic potential compared to typical pathogenic strains.

A striking difference in gene profiles was observed in a block of four genes located on the plasmid which were present in the virulent strains but not in these “avirulent” strains. PCR analysis showed that two adjacent genes encoding radical SAM domain proteins also were absent in the “avirulent” strains, but they were absent in one of the virulent strains as well so that the correlation was less strong.

PCR screening of four additional strains broadly supported the existence of a correlation between the plasmid genes and virulence, although two of the “avirulent” strains possessed these genes and one only lacked the radical SAM domain genes. Clearly reduced virulence may be associated with factors other than absence of the plasmid genes. The fact that the “avirulent” strains used in the study were only able to colonise and induce disease in a small proportion of pigs in previous studies suggests that the genes are most likely to be involved in facilitating aspects of colonisation rather than in lesion development. This could involve specific changes to surface molecules including such things as modification to LOS composition or glycosylation of surface proteins that are involved in attachment. Strain R301 lacked the plasmid genes and induces disease in rheas but not in pigs [9], hence suggesting that there is species-specificity in the colonisation process.

There was no evidence that other genes on the plasmid were correlated with virulence. Some other chromosomal genes of unknown function were absent in some of the avirulent strains, but the lack of consistency did not suggest that they are important in the context of pathogenesis. It is possible that other genes not represented on the microarray may be associated with virulence, and might have had a different distribution in the two sets of isolates. A more detailed understanding could be obtained by undertaking whole genomic sequencing of the B. hyodysenteriae strains.

The products of the plasmid genes that were present in the virulent strains but absent in the other strains apparently influence the pathogenesis of SD, although gene expression was not investigated. Neither was it possible to specifically inactivate the identified genes to determine whether this affects the phenotype and behaviour of the strains when used to infect pigs, due to lack of easily applicable means to genetically manipulate B. hyodysenteriae in a targeted way. Further studies of this sort should be undertaken in the future to help understand the role of the gene products.

Of the predicted gene products, radical SAM dependent enzymes catalyze a diverse assortment of reactions involved in numerous important biological pathways in other bacteria, including the biosynthesis of a wide number of enzyme cofactors and secondary metabolites, anaerobic oxidations, biosynthesis and repair of DNA, and general bacterial metabolism. SAM also is important for the production of a universal quorum-sensing signal in bacteria that regulates pathogen-host interactions. Inhibition of this enzyme in other bacteria can lead to attenuation of virulence [15].

The rfb genes shape the structure of the LOS O-antigens that are likely to be involved in host-defence mechanism. In most bacteria, the rfb genes are found on the genome as a cluster and are believed to have been acquired through lateral gene transfer [16]. An rfb ABCD gene cluster was present on the plasmid of all the B. hyodysenteriae strains tested in this study, however the additional rfb C gene on the plasmid of the virulent strains might contribute to virulence. Both rfb C genes possess the dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase conserved domain, but are only 52% similar at the protein level. B. hyodysenteriae LOS is considered to contribute to virulence as it has various biological effects in vitro and in vivo [17]-[21].

Glycosyl transferases play an important role in pathogenicity of most pathogenic bacteria [22]-[24]. They catalyse the transfer of sugar moieties to acceptor substrates such as oligosaccharides, monosaccharides, proteins and lipids. Protein glycosylation can have roles in host interactions, protection against proteolytic cleavage, protein assembly, antigenic variation, and protective immunity. Glycosyl transferases are highly specific with respect to both the donor sugar and acceptor, and to date the exact specificities of most have not been determined [25].

Overall the findings of this study indicate that a block of specific genes on the B. hyodysenteriae plasmid are involved in facilitating colonisation and development of disease. Isolates lacking these genes can be predicted to have a lower pathogenic potential in pigs than those that have the genes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Novartis Animal Health for financial support for this project. Professor Matthew Bellgard kindly read and commented on the article.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University
(2)
Scottish Agricultural College Veterinary Services, Bush Estate

References

  1. Hampson DJ: Brachyspiral colitis. Diseases of Swine. Edited by: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW. 2012, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, USA, 680-696. 10Google Scholar
  2. Pluske JR, Siba PM, Pethick DW, Durmic Z, Mullan BP, Hampson DJ: The incidence of swine dysentery in pigs can be reduced by feeding diets that limit the amount of fermentable substrate entering the large intestine. J Nutr. 1996, 126: 2920-2933.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Siba PM, Pethick DW, Hampson DJ: Pigs experimentally infected with Serpulina hyodysenteriae can be protected from developing swine dysentery by feeding them a highly digestible diet. Epidemiol Infect. 1996, 116: 207-216. 10.1017/S0950268800052456.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thomsen LE, Knudsen KE, Jensen TK, Christensen AS, Møller K, Roepstorff A: The effect of fermentable carbohydrates on experimental swine dysentery and whip worm infections in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2007, 119: 152-163. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lysons RJ, Lemcke RM, Bew J, Burrows MR, Alexander TJL: An avirulent strain of Treponema hyodysenteriae isolated from herds free of swine dysentery. Proceedings of the 7th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress: 26–31 July 1982. 1982, The Society, Mexico City, Mexico, 40-Google Scholar
  6. Jensen NS, Stanton TB: Comparison of Serpulina hyodysenteriae B78, the type strain of the species, with other S. hyodysenteriae strains using enteropathogenicity studies and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Vet Microbiol. 1993, 36: 221-231. 10.1016/0378-1135(93)90090-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Achacha M, Messier S, Mittal KR: Development of an experimental model allowing discrimination between virulent and avirulent isolates of Serpulina (Treponema) hyodysenteriae. Can J Vet Res. 1996, 60: 45-49.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomson JR, Murray BP, Henderson LE, Moore L, Meikle CS: Virulence studies in porcine Brachyspira species by experimental challenge of pigs. 2003, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Colonic Spirochaetal Infections in Animals and Humans, Eddleston, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  9. Stanton TB, Jensen NS, Bosworth BT, Kunkle RA: Evaluation of the virulence of rhea S. hyodysenteriae strains for swine. First International Virtual Conference on Infectious Diseases of Animals: Ames, Iowa, USA. 1997.
  10. Bellgard MI, Wanchanthuek P, La T, Ryan K, Moolhuijzen P, Albertyn Z, Shaban B, Motro Y, Dunn DS, Schibeci D, Hunter A, Barrero R, Phillips ND, Hampson DJ: Genome sequence of the pathogenic intestinal spirochete Brachyspira hyodysenteriae reveals adaptations to its lifestyle in the porcine large intestine. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e4641-10.1371/journal.pone.0004641.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. La T, Phillips ND, Wanchanthuek P, Bellgard MI, O’Hara AJ, Hampson DJ: Evidence that the 36 kb plasmid of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae contributes to virulence. Vet Microbiol. 2011, 153: 150-155. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kunkle RA, Harris DL, Kinyon JM: Autoclaved liquid medium for propagation of Treponema hyodysenteriae. J Clin Microbiol. 1986, 24: 669-671.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. La T, Phillips ND, Hampson DJ: Development of a duplex PCR assay for detection of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira pilosicoli in pig feces. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 3372-3375. 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3372-3375.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gene Expression Omnibus Public Repository [], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/]
  15. Parveen N, Cornell KA: Methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase, a critical enzyme for bacterial metabolism. Mol Microbiol. 2011, 79: 7-20. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07455.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Reeves PP, Wang L: Genomic organization of LPS-specific loci. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2002, 264: 109-135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nuessen ME, Birmingham JR, Joens LA: Biological activity of a lipopolysaccharide extracted from Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infect Immun. 1982, 37: 138-142.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Greer JM, Wannemuehler MJ: Pathogenesis of Treponema hyodysenteriae: induction of interleukin-1 and tumour necrosis factor by a treponemal butanol/water extract (endotoxin). Microb Pathog. 1989, 7: 279-288. 10.1016/0882-4010(89)90046-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nibbelink SK, Sacco RE, Wannemuehler MJ: Pathogenicity of Serpulina hyodysenteriae: in vivo induction of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 by a serpulinal butanol/water extract (endotoxin). Microb Pathog. 1997, 23: 181-187. 10.1006/mpat.1997.0148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nuessen ME, Joens LA, Glock RD: Involvement of lipopolysaccharide in the pathogenicity of Treponema hyodysenteriae. J Immunol. 1983, 131: 997-999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nibbelink SK, Wannemuehler MJ: Susceptibility of inbred mouse strains to infection with Serpula (Treponema) hyodysenteriae. Infect Immun. 1991, 59: 3111-3118.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Power PM, Roddam LF, Rutter K, Fitzpatrick SZ, Srikhanta YN, Jennings MP: Genetic characterization of pilin glycosylation and phase variation in Neisseria meningitidis. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 49: 833-847. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03602.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Szymanski CM, Wren BW: Protein glycosylation in bacterial mucosal pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 225-237. 10.1038/nrmicro1100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhou M, Wu H: Glycosylation and biogenesis of a family of serine-rich bacterial adhesins. Microbiology. 2009, 155: 317-327. 10.1099/mic.0.025221-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundborg M, Modhukur V, Widmalm G: Glycosyltransferase functions of E. coli O-antigens. Glycobiology. 2010, 20: 366-368. 10.1093/glycob/cwp185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© La et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement