Salmonella Typhimurium induces SPI-1 and SPI-2 regulated and strain dependent downregulation of MHC II expression on porcine alveolar macrophages
- Alexander Van Parys1Email author,
- Filip Boyen1,
- Elin Verbrugghe1,
- Bregje Leyman1,
- Flahou Bram1,
- Freddy Haesebrouck†1 and
- Frank Pasmans†1
© Van Parys et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 December 2011
Accepted: 13 June 2012
Published: 13 June 2012
Foodborne salmonellosis is one of the most important bacterial zoonotic diseases worldwide. Salmonella Typhimurium is the serovar most frequently isolated from persistently infected slaughter pigs in Europe. Circumvention of the host’s immune system by Salmonella might contribute to persistent infection of pigs. In the present study, we found that Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a specifically downregulated MHC II, but not MHC I, expression on porcine alveolar macrophages in a Salmonella pathogenicity island (SPI)-1 and SPI-2 dependent way. Salmonella induced downregulation of MHC II expression and intracellular proliferation of Salmonella in macrophages were significantly impaired after opsonization with Salmonella specific antibodies prior to inoculation. Furthermore, the capacity to downregulate MHC II expression on macrophages differed significantly among Salmonella strains, independently of strain specific differences in invasion capacity, Salmonella induced cytotoxicity and altered macrophage activation status. The fact that strain specific differences in MHC II downregulation did not correlate with the extent of in vitro SPI-1 or SPI-2 gene expression indicates that other factors are involved in MHC II downregulation as well. Since Salmonella strain dependent interference with the pig’s immune response through downregulation of MHC II expression might indicate that certain Salmonella strains are more likely to escape serological detection, our findings are of major interest for Salmonella monitoring programs primarily based on serology.
Nontyphoidal salmonellosis is one of the most important bacterial zoonotic diseases, yearly resulting in an estimated 155 000 deaths worldwide . In European countries, Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium (Salmonella Typhimurium) is the serovar most frequently isolated from slaughter pigs . Pig carcass contamination with Salmonella Typhimurium can largely be attributed to persistently infected pigs . In most cases, the bacterium will asymptomatically colonize pigs, resulting in a so called “carrier status” [4, 5]. In the past, Salmonella infections in pig herds have traditionally been diagnosed by culturing intestinal or faecal samples . Because pigs only excrete high numbers of bacteria during the acute phase of infection and then become intermittently excreting carriers, serological surveillance is perceived as a practical (high-throughput) and cost-effective alternative for monitoring Salmonella infection in pig herds [6–9].
After infection by a pathogen, the host’s immune system will respond through an innate and a subsequent adaptive immune response. The success of many persisting pathogens relies on their ability to resist, circumvent or counteract the host’s innate and/or adaptive immune responses. Several bacteria and viruses have developed pathways interfering with antigen presentation by the host’s immune system, for example by inhibition of MHC expression and antigen presentation through distinct mechanisms [10–12]. The Salmonella genome contains several Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs’), clusters of genes that encode virulence factors involved in different stages of Salmonella pathogenicity . SPI-2, encoding a type III secretion system, plays a role in Salmonella-mediated downregulation of cell surface MHC class II expression in human cell lines by recruiting membrane for the Salmonella containing vacuole . However, Salmonella exhibits host specific behaviour and no data are available yet on this phenomenon in pigs. In addition, it is not known whether different Salmonella strains might be able to interfere differentially with the MHC II expression pathway in porcine cells. By manipulating the porcine humoral immune response, certain Salmonella strains might be able to persist better than strains that do not interfere with the immune response in pigs.
Besides direct SPI mediated effects on MHC recruitment, expression of MHC molecules may be affected by other Salmonella induced effects on macrophages, like cytotoxicity and altered macrophage activation status. Salmonella infection of porcine macrophages results in a type of cell death called pyroptosis. In contrast to apoptosis, Salmonella induced pyroptosis affects plasma membrane integrity and might thus interfere with the expression of macrophage surface molecules . Furthermore, Salmonella infection of mammalian cells induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as part of the cellular immune response to eradicate intracellular pathogens and might also interfere with the expression of surface molecules [15, 16].
In the present study, we examined whether a Salmonella Typhimurium strain, which can persist in pigs, is able to downregulate MHC expression on porcine macrophages in a SPI-1 and/or SPI-2 dependent way, as a possible mechanism to circumvent antibody production by the pig’s immune system. Furthermore, in an attempt to elucidate the importance for Salmonella to interfere with the antibody response in pigs, we verified the role of Salmonella specific antibodies in the bacterium’s ability to interfere with the MHC presentation pathway and in intracellular proliferation of Salmonella in porcine macrophages. Finally, we examined whether different Salmonella strains exhibit similar effects on MHC II expression.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and manipulations
Primers used in this study
In addition to Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a, other strains used in this study were Salmonella Typhimurium pig isolates MB2150, MB2216, MB2222, MB2223, MB2233 and MB2498 and the pigeon isolate DAB69 , one isolate of Salmonella serovars Brandenburg, Derby and Infantis, all isolated from pigs and a chicken isolate Salmonella serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 . Finally, an Escherichia coli strain p4:o32 isolated from a bovine mastitis case was tested .
For flowcytometrical analysis of Salmonella infected macrophages, all Salmonella strains were transformed with the pFPV25.1 carbenicillin-resistant plasmid expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the constitutive promoter of rpsM. For inoculation of macrophages, bacteria were grown for 16 h at 37 °C in 5 mL LB broth with 25 μg/mL carbenicillin (Sigma-Aldrich) for selective growth of GFP-transformed bacteria.
Pig antisera against Salmonella Typhimurium
Pig antisera were raised in Salmonella-negative piglets, as approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University (EC2008/124). To prepare positive serum, piglets were intramuscularly injected twice, with a 3 weeks interval, with 2 mL of a bacterin consisting of equal volumes of formalin-inactivated Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 5 × 108 colony forming units (CFU) per mL, before inactivation) and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant. Negative serum was prepared in piglets injected twice with 2 mL of an emulsion consisting of equal volumes of PBS and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein using VenoJect blood collection tubes (Terumo Europe N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The blood samples were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C to facilitate blood clotting and were then centrifuged for 10 min at 520 × g and 20 °C. Serum was collected and tested for the presence of Salmonella specific antibodies using a commercially available LPS-based swine Salmonella Typhimurium test kit (IDEXX Europe B.V., Hoofddorp, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Serum samples were stored at -80 °C until further use.
Bacteria were opsonized by adding an equal volume of pig serum to a Salmonella Typhimurium 16 h culture, containing approximately 1 × 109 CFU per mL, and by subsequent incubation for 20 min at 37 °C on a shaker. For complement inactivation, the sera were placed at 56 °C for 10 min prior to opsonization.
Porcine alveolar macrophages were isolated from lungs of humanely euthanized Salmonella-free piglets as described previously . Using this isolation method, the purity of the macrophage pellets varied between 90% and 97% and the viability was more than 95% . Macrophage pellets were suspended in foetal calf’s serum (FCS; Gibco Life Technologies, Ghent, Belgium) with 10% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) and stored in liquid nitrogen at approximately 107 cells per mL until further use. Prior to seeding, macrophages were thawed at room temperature, washed in 10 mL Hank’s buffered salt solution (HBSS; Gibco) containing 10% FCS (and without FCS for the macrophage activation assay) and centrifuged at 520 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in RPMI medium composed of Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium with phenol red (RPMI; Gibco), 10% v/v FCS, 2 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), 1 mL v/v MEM non essential amino acids 100× (Gibco) and 100 μg/mL penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco), unless otherwise stated. The number of macrophages per mL as well as their viability was determined using trypan blue exclusion and a counting chamber (Bürker, Marienfeld, Germany). All macrophage assays were conducted 3 times independently in triplicate, unless otherwise stated, with macrophages from 3 different pigs.
The effect of Salmonella enterica infection on MHC expression on porcine macrophages
Macrophages were seeded in a 29-well plate in 25 cm² tissue culture treated flasks with filter cap (Greiner Bio-One) at 5 × 106 cells per flask. Macrophages were allowed to adhere for 2 h at 37 °C and were then inoculated with Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a that was either not opsonized, opsonized with porcine serum containing anti-Salmonella Typhimurium antibodies or opsonized with negative pig serum, at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. Flasks were centrifuged at 520 × g for 10 min at 37 °C and subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Macrophages were washed 3 times with HBSS containing calcium and magnesium (HBSS+; Gibco) and treated with 100 μg/mL gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich) in RPMI for 1 h at 37 °C to kill all extracellular bacteria. The cells were washed again 3 times with HBSS+ and fresh medium was added. This timepoint was considered as 0 h post inoculation. Macrophages were scraped off of the flask’s bottom at 0 and 24 h post inoculation using rubber cell scrapers (Greiner Bio-One), washed with 5 mL ice-cold HBSS and resuspended in medium. These suspensions were equally distributed over 2 flowcytometry tubes (Becton-Dickinson Labware Europe, Meylan-Cedex, France). Macrophages were incubated with 10% complement inactivated Salmonella-negative goat serum and 10% complement inactivated Salmonella-negative pig serum for 15 min on ice to reduce background staining. After centrifugation, macrophage pellets were resuspended in a primary antibody mixture or in RPMI for the negative controls. The primary antibody mixtures were composed of RPMI, 15% FCS and 2% mouse anti-pig SLA class I (1:50 diluted; AbD Serotec, Kidlington, Oxford, UK) or 20% mouse anti-pig SLA class II DQ (1:5 diluted; AbD Serotec). After 50 min incubation on ice, cells were washed with ice-cold HBSS to remove unbound antibodies. After centrifugation, macrophage pellets were resuspended in a secondary antibody mixture or RPMI for the negative control tubes, and incubated for 50 min on ice and in the dark. The secondary antibody mixture contained RPMI, 15% FCS and 2% goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 633 antibody (1:50 diluted; Molecular Probes, Oregon, USA). Macrophages treated with only the primary or secondary antibody mixture served as controls. After a final washing step, the pellets were resuspended in 0.5 mL ice-cold HBSS for flowcytometric analysis. Flowcytometric measurements were performed using a FACScantoTM II cytometer (Becton–Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium). First, macrophages were discriminated from bacteria and debris based on forward (FSC) and side (SSC) light scatter (parent population). Subsequently, Salmonella infected macrophages were distinguished from uninfected macrophages in the parent population, based on GFP fluorescence using the FL-1 fluorescence channel, and the MHC I and II expression levels of infected and uninfected macrophages were measured using the FL-5 fluorescence channel. Data were expressed in arbitrary units and the mean FL-5 value of Salmonella infected and uninfected macrophages were calculated using the FACSDiva software (Becton–Dickinson).
Exactly the same procedure was used for macrophage infection and subsequent detection of MHC II expression levels with all other strains and mutants used in this study.
As a measure for the Salmonella invasion capacity in macrophages, the number of macrophages infected by strain 112910 that was opsonized with negative or positive pig serum, or by any other Salmonella strain at 0 h pi, as assessed by measurement in the FL-1 fluorescence channel, was expressed as the percentage relative to the macrophages infected by strain 112910a at the same timepoint. Salmonella Typhimurium ΔhilA, that is impaired in macrophage invasion , and its complement ΔhilAc were used as internal controls for the use of flowcytometrical data to assess Salmonella invasion capacity.
Macrophage viability assay
We used the neutral red uptake assay to assess possible cytotoxic effects of Salmonella infection on macrophage viability. Macrophages were cultured and inoculated in a 96-well plate as described above for the flowcytometry experiments. Twenty-four hours after inoculation, 200 μL of freshly prepared neutral red solution (33 μg/mL neutral red (Merck N.V./S.A., Overijse, Belgium) in RPMI without phenol red), prewarmed at 37 °C, was added to each well and plates were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Macrophages were washed 3 times with HBSS+ and treated with 170 μL extracting solution, composed of absolute ethanol/distilled water/glacial acetic acid 50/49/1 (v/v/v), for 10 min at room temperature on a shaker to release the neutral red dye. Hundred microliter from each well were transferred to an IWAKI multi well plate and the absorbance was determined at 540 nm using a microplate ELISA reader (Multiscan MS, Thermo Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). Macrophage cell viability at 24 h post inoculation (pi) was expressed as the percentage of viable macrophages compared to uninfected macrophages at this timepoint.
Impact of opsonization with antibodies on intracellular proliferation of Salmonella Typhimurium in porcine macrophages
Macrophages were seeded in a 29-well plate at 2 × 105 per well and were inoculated at MOI 10 with Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a that was either non-opsonized, opsonized with porcine serum containing Salmonella Typhimurium specific antibodies or opsonized with negative pig serum. Macrophages were then treated with 100 μg/mL gentamicin as described above. After 0 or 5 h incubation at 37 °C, macrophages were lysed using 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10-fold dilutions were plated on brilliant green agar (BGA; International Medical Products N.V./S.A., Brussels, Belgium) to enumerate viable intracellular bacteria.
Macrophage activation assay
To assess the influence of Salmonella infection on the macrophage activation status, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by macrophages was measured using the lucigenin assay . Macrophages were suspended in RPMI medium without phenol red and without FCS, and seeded at 2 × 105 cells per well in a 96-well cell culture plate (Greiner Bio-One). After 2 h incubation at 37 °C, lucigenin (Sigma-Aldrich) solution at a final concentration of 400 μM and Salmonella were added to each well at MOI 10. Positive control wells were treated with 20 μg/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Sigma-Aldrich) solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) to induce macrophage activation. Luminescence was measured every 2 min for 5 consecutive hours using a Fluoroskan Ascent Microplate Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Breda, The Netherlands) with 1000 ms integration time at 37 °C. The ROS production of infected macrophages was expressed relative to the ROS production of PMA treated macrophages (positive control).
Macrophages were seeded, inoculated with Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a at MOI 100 and incubated in 75 cm² tissue culture treated flasks with filter cap (Greiner Bio-One) as described above for the flowcytometric experiments. At 0 h and 24 h post inoculation, macrophages were scraped off in HBSS + with a cell scraper, brought in a 15 mL tube and centrifuged at 520 × g for 10 min at 37 °C. The cells were lysed for 90 min on ice in 1 mL of freshly prepared RIPA buffer composed of 150 mM NaCl (VWR International BVBA, Leuven, Belgium); 1.0% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich); 0.5% sodium deoxycholate (Sigma-Aldrich); 50 mM Tris pH 8.0 (Sigma-Aldrich); and protease inhibitor cocktail (1:10 diluted; Sigma-Aldrich). Additionally, all samples were sonicated for 4 × 20 s on ice with an Ultrasonic Processor Sonicator XL (Misonix Incorporated, Farmingdale, USA), brought to the same protein concentration using the Bradford-based Protein Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines, and stored at -80 °C until further use.
Eight μL of each sample was spotted on a Trans-Blot nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and air dried for 10 min. All subsequent incubation and washing steps were performed on a shaker at room temperature. The membrane was incubated for 30 min in blocking buffer composed of TBS-T buffer (20 mM Tris; 15 mM NaCl; 0.05% Tween-20 (Merck, Schuchardt, Germany) at pH 7.5) with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich). The primary antibody mixture (1:100 diluted mouse anti-pig SLA class II DQ in 0.1% BSA/TBS-T buffer) was applied onto the membrane for 1 h. The membrane was washed 3 × 5 min with TBS-T buffer and subsequently incubated for 1 h with the secondary antibody mixture (1:5000 diluted HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, USA) in 0.1% BSA/TBS-T buffer). After washing the membrane 1 × 15 min and 2 × 5 min in TBS-T and 1 × 5 min in TSB (without Tween-20), the CN/DAB substrate kit (Thermoscientific, USA) was applied onto the membrane, according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The membrane was scanned with the GS-800 densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and visually evaluated. In addition, individual spot densities were calculated and expressed as arbitrary densitometry units using the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Level of hilA, sopB, ssrA/B and ssaH expression in different Salmonella strains
The pCS26 plasmid was used for the construction of transcriptional fusions between the promoter regions of Salmonella Typhimurium hilA sopB ssrA/B or ssaH genes on one hand, and luxCDABE genes on the other hand, as decribed before [31, 32]. Plasmids with the transcriptional fusions were isolated using the Qiagen Plasmid Midi Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands), electroporated in electrocompetent Salmonella bacteria and plated on LB agar with 100 μg/mL kanamycin (Sigma-Aldrich) for selective growth of transformants. Bacteria containing the transcriptional fusions were grown for 16 h in LB with 100 μg/mL kanamycin and 1:10000 diluted in LB. Luminescence was measured every 15 min for 24 h using a Fluoroskan Ascent Microplate Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) with 5000 ms integration time at 37 °C. The extent of hilA sopB ssrA/B and ssaH gene expression is presented as the integral of relative luminescence units (RLU) over a 24 h measurement period.
The capacity to downregulate MHC expression was determined by calculating the average mean FL-5 ratio between Salmonella infected and uninfected macrophages at 0 h and 24 h post inoculation (pi) of 3 independent experiments. Differences in MHC expression level between macrophages infected with strain 112910a, either opsonized or not opsonized, and its isogenic mutants at 0 h and 24 h pi were evaluated using a one-way ANOVA on the calculated mean ratios, assuming normal distribution and equal variances. The MHC II expression level of macrophages inoculated with different Salmonella strains was evaluated using a paired Student’s t-test on the calculated mean ratios at 0 h and 24 h pi. Intracellular proliferation of Salmonella strain 112910a in macrophages was evaluated using an independent samples Student’s t-test with log CFU per mL as dependent and group as fixed factor.
The invasion capacity of strain 112910a, either opsonized or not with positive or negative pig serum, and its isogenic mutants ΔhilA and ΔhilAc was compared using a one-way ANOVA, assuming normal distributions and equal variances. ROS production by macrophages infected with Salmonella strain 112910a that was either not opsonized, or opsonized with negative or positive pig serum prior to inoculation of macrophages, was analyzed using an unpaired Student’s t-test with equal variances not assumed. Differences in Salmonella invasiveness and in the effects of Salmonella on macrophage viability and ROS production for the different Salmonella strains were evaluated using a one-way ANOVA, assuming normal distributions and equal variances. Correlations between MHC expression on one hand, and Salmonella invasiveness, macrophage viability, ROS production or hilA, sopB, ssrA/B and ssaH gene expression on the other hand, were evaluated using the Pearson’s correlation test on the respective datasets. Spot densities from the dot blot assay were evaluated using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests and a one-way ANOVA, assuming normal distributions and equal variances.
A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant and a value of 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10 was considered borderline significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corporation, New York, USA).
Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a reduces MHC II but not MHC I expression on porcine macrophages in a SPI-1 and SPI-2 dependent way
To determine the possible role of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 and/or 2 (SPI-1 and SPI-2, respectively) in Salmonella induced downregulation of MHC II expression on macrophages, the expression level between uninfected macrophages (PAMuninf) and macrophages infected with either strain 112910a (PAM112910a), its isogenic deletion mutants ΔhilA (PAMΔhilA), ΔssrA/B (PAMΔssrA/B) or their respective complements ΔhilAc (PAMΔhilAc) and ΔssrA/Bc (PAMΔssrA/Bc) was compared. At 0 h, mean MHC II expression level ratios between Salmonella infected and uninfected macrophages were approximately 1 for macrophages inoculated with strain 112910a or its isogenic mutants and did not significantly differ from each other (p > 0.05). At 24 h pi, PAMΔhilA/PAMuninf and PAMΔssrA/B/PAMuninf were significantly higher than PAM112910a/PAMuninf at the same timepoint (p < 0.05), suggesting at least partial inhibition of MHC II downregulation when hilA or ssrA/B was deleted. Furthermore, complementation of the respective deletion mutants resulted in PAMΔhilA c/PAMuninf and PAMΔssrA/B c/PAMuninf 24 h pi that did not significantly differ from PAM112910a/PAMuninf at the same timepoint (p ≥ 0.05), indicating functional restoration of the wild type phenotype. The fact that PAMΔssrA/B/PAMuninf 24 h pi was still significantly lower than the same ratio at 0 h pi, while this was not the case for PAMΔhilA/PAMuninf, suggests a more important role for SPI-1 than for SPI-2 in Salmonella induced downregulation of MHC II expression on macrophages. These results are summarized in Figure 1A.
Opsonization of Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a with Salmonella specific antibodies inhibits downregulation of MHC II expression on, limits intracellular proliferation in and enhances ROS production by macrophages
Because Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a was able to downregulate MHC II expression on porcine macrophages, and might thus interfere with the MHC II dependent pig’s antibody response towards Salmonella infection, we wanted to examine if opsonization of Salmonella with Salmonella specific antibodies was detrimental to the bacterium’s MHC II downregulating and intracellular proliferation capacity in porcine macrophages.
First, we examined the effect of opsonization with serum antibodies on Salmonella induced downregulation of MHC II expression on porcine macrophages. Macrophages were inoculated with bacteria opsonized either with pig serum containing anti-Salmonella Typhimurium antibodies (PAM112910aPOS) or with negative pig serum (PAM112910aNEG). At 0 h, average mean PAM112910a/PAMuninf, PAM112910aNEG/PAMuninf and PAM112910aPOS/PAMuninf were 0.990 ± 0.043; 1.172 ± 0.088 and 1.161 ± 0.101 and did not significantly differ from each other (p > 0.05; Figure 1A). After 24 h incubation, PAM112910aNEG/PAMuninf was significantly lower than PAM112910aNEG/PAMuninf at 0 h pi on one hand (p ≤ 0.05), and than PAM112910aPOS/PAMuninf at 24 h pi on the other hand (p ≤ 0.05), while PAM112910aPOS/PAMuninf at 24 h did not significantly differ from the ratio at 0 h pi (p > 0.05). This shows that opsonization of strain 112910a with Salmonella specific serum antibodies suppressed the bacterium’s ability to downregulate MHC II expression on macrophages (Figure 1A).
When strain 112910 was opsonized with either positive or negative pig serum prior to infection of macrophages, based on flowcytometrical data, significantly more macrophages were infected compared to macrophages inoculated with non opsonized bacteria (p ≤ 0.05; Figure 1B). As an internal control for proper use of flowcytometry to assess the Salmonella invasion capacity, the invasion capacity of strain 112910a isogenic mutants ΔhilA and ΔhilAc was determined. We found that ΔhilA was significantly impaired in macrophage invasion compared to the background strain and to its complement ΔhilAc (p ≤ 0.05; Figure 1B). Using a gentamicin protection assay, it was found that bacteria that were not opsonized or opsonized with negative pig serum were able to significantly proliferate intracellularly 5 h post inoculation of macrophages (p ≤ 0.05; Figure 1C). Salmonellae that were opsonized with pig serum containing Salmonella specific antibodies, prior to inoculation of macrophages, did not significantly proliferate (p > 0.05; Figure 1C). Furthermore, macrophages infected with strain 112910a that was opsonized with positive pig serum showed a tendency towards the production of higher amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) than macrophages infected with strain 112910a that was not opsonized or opsonized with negative pig serum prior to inoculation of macrophages (Figure 1D). These differences were only statistically significant between macrophages infected with Salmonella opsonized with positive pig serum on one hand, and with Salmonella opsonized with negative serum on the other hand (p ≤ 0.05).
Reduction of MHC II expression is Salmonella specific and Salmonella strain dependent
Strain dependent downregulation of MHC II expression on macrophages does not correlate with differences in Salmonella invasion capacity or Salmonella induced cytotoxicity and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production
We verified whether the observed strain dependent capacity to downregulate MHC II expression on porcine macrophages correlated with Salmonella invasion capacity or altered macrophage viability or activation status.
Differential expression of SPI-1 and SPI-2 genes does not correlate with strain dependent downregulation of MHC II expression
At present, preharvest Salmonella monitoring programs are primarily based on serological analysis, an inexpensive method that allows rapid screening of high numbers of pig herds . The onset of seroconversion after Salmonella infection in pigs is difficult to predict and can range from 6 days up to 25 weeks after oral inoculation, depending on, among others, the inoculation strain and inoculation dose used and piglet age [7, 9, 33, 34]. Yet, no data are available about the underlying mechanisms that account for these differences.
Seroconversion is initiated when antigen-presenting cells like macrophages and dendritic cells present pathogen-derived peptide antigens to T cells in 2 different ways. In the endogenous pathway, polypeptides that access the host cell’s cytosol are degraded by the proteasome and are presented at the surface of antigen presenting cells through MHC I molecules. Salmonella, however, enters the host cell through the endocytic route, causing its peptides to be presented via MHC II molecules after lysosomal degradation [35, 36]. Antigens bound to MHC II are presented to naïve CD4+ helper T cells that will develop into effector T cells. The latter than differentiate into two major subtypes of cells known as type 1 and type 2 helper T cells (Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively), depending on, among others, the chemo- and cytokine environment. Th1 cells predominantly activate macrophages while Th2 cells will induce maturation of B cells to antibody producing plasma cells. Because the MHC II antigen presenting pathway is able to mount both a cellular and/or humoral immune response, bacteria that interfere with the MHC II expression might radically influence the host’s immune response towards infection. Generally, the expression of MHC II molecules on the surface of macrophages is upregulated following ingestion of microorganisms and recognition of their foreign molecular pattern . We found that Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a specifically downregulated MHC II expression on the surface of macrophages and that the MHC I level of macrophages remained unaffected 24 h post inoculation (pi). These results suggest that Salmonella specifically interferes with the MHC II presentation pathway in porcine macrophages, leaving the MHC I pathway undisturbed. Furthermore, downregulation of MHC II expression on porcine macrophages turned out to be Salmonella specific, since we found that an Escherichia coli strain, another closely to Salmonella related member of the Enterobacteriaceae family, was unable to induce MHC II downregulation. Inoculation of bovine macrophages with Salmonella Typhimurium did not cause downregulation of MHC II expression . Although porcine alveolar macrophages represent a quite specific model which might explain their differential behaviour compared to macrophages or other cell types from other host species, our findings might provide further evidence for host-specific Salmonella behaviour.
Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands (SPIs’) are clusters of genes encoding virulence factors that play an important role at different stages of the pathogenesis of Salmonella infections in pigs . We examined whether SPI-1 and/or SPI-2 were involved in the observed Salmonella induced downregulation of MHC II expression on macrophages. Salmonella Typhimurium SPI-1 plays a crucial role in the colonization and invasion of the porcine gut , while SPI-2 is predominantly involved in replication and survival of Salmonella Typhimurium in porcine macrophages . HilA and SsrA/B are major regulators of SPI-1 and SPI-2, respectively, and both regulators induce transcriptional activation of downstream genes in response to a variety of stimuli [23, 40]. We found that Salmonella Typhimurium induced downregulation of MHC II expression was at least partly dependent on SPI-1 and SPI-2. Since recent evidence shows that SPI-1 is also involved in intracellular behaviour of Salmonella in macrophages, besides its main role in cell invasion , the fact that MHC II downregulation is inhibited when SPI-1 is abolished is not a complete surprise. Both SPI-1 and SPI-2 encode a type 3 secretion system, T3SS-1 and T3SS-2 respectively, a needle-like structure that is used to inject so called ‘effector proteins’ into the host cell’s cytosol, for uptake of the bacterium or to adapt the intracellular environment in function of Salmonella survival. Mitchell and colleagues already showed that SPI-2 effector SifA plays a role in downregulation of MHC II expression on human Mel JuSo cells, possibly by recruiting vesicles that transport MHC II molecules to the cell membrane, to maintain the integrity of the Salmonella containing vacuole (SCV) . In support of the hypothesis of redistribution of MHC II molecules from the cell surface to the SCV, our data from the dot blot assay suggest no change in the total amount of MHC II molecules in uninfected and Salmonella infected macrophages 24 h post inoculation. It is likely that SPI-1 and SPI-2 secreted effector proteins cause the Salmonella induced downregulation of MHC II expression on porcine macrophages. Altogether, we showed an explicit role for SPI-1 and a more discreet role for SPI-2 in downregulation of MHC II expression on porcine macrophages. However, because MHC II expression levels in ΔhilA and ΔssrA/B infected macrophages were not completely restored, other factors than SPI-1 and SPI-2 might be involved as well.
It has commonly been assumed that resistance to facultatively intracellular bacteria like Salmonella Typhimurium predominantly requires a cellular immune response. However, there appear to be multiple mechanisms by which antibodies can influence the course of infection with such pathogens . We found that, when Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a was opsonized with Salmonella specific antibodies prior to inoculation of macrophages, the bacterium lost its capacity to interfere with MHC II expression and was less able to proliferate in porcine macrophages. A proposed mechanism by which antibodies might interfere with Salmonella virulence is by sterically hindering the proper insertion of T3SS-1 and/or T3SS-2, since both secretion systems are required for successful intracellular proliferation of Salmonella.
Salmonella can actively invade macrophages using T3SS-1 or can be taken up passively through Fc-receptor mediated phagocytosis . Besides an effect through sterical hindrance of T3SS, it is thus possible that opsonization of Salmonella with serum antibodies favoured phagocytosis over Salmonella controlled invasion. It was found that when Salmonella was opsonized prior to inoculation of macrophages, approximately 2 to 2.5 times more bacteria were internalized than in macrophages that were inoculated with non opsonized Salmonella. Salmonellae internalized into macrophages reside within Salmonella containing vacuoles (SCV) and the environment in these SCV after Fc-receptor mediated phagocytosis is different from that after T3SS-1 dependent invasion . These different environmental changes might subsequently result in differences in the expression of hilA and other Salmonella genes, and in this way alter the intracellular behaviour of the microorganism [32, 43, 44]. Since we showed that downregulation of MHC II expression is SPI-1 and SPI-2 dependent, differential gene expression caused by the used internalization mechanism might affect the extent of Salmonella interference with the MHC II expression on macrophages. The mechanism of Salmonella internalization might furthermore affect the macrophage activation level. Indeed, macrophages that phagocytosed Salmonella that was opsonized with Salmonella specific antibodies produced more ROS than macrophages infected with bacteria that were not opsonized, or opsonized with negative pig serum, indicating increased macrophage activation . Furthermore, enhanced ROS production can result in growth inhibition of intracellular bacteria and even destruction of these bacteria , which might explain why Salmonella was less able to proliferate intracellularly after opsonization with Salmonella specific antibodies. Inhibition of downregulation of MHC II expression when Salmonella was opsonized with antibodies prior to inoculation of macrophages might, in addition to sterically hindering the proper insertion of T3SS-1 and/or T3SS-2, thus be the result of enhanced phagocytosis and/or ROS production and subsequent changes in Salmonella virulence gene expression. The findings that opsonization of Salmonella with specific antibodies prior to inoculation of porcine macrophages limits intracellular proliferation and inhibits downregulation of MHC II expression emphasize the importance for Salmonella to circumvent antibody production for successful persistence in the pig host.
Since strain and host specific behaviour is a key characteristic of Salmonella pathogenesis [46, 47], we determined if other Salmonella isolates exhibited the same phenotype as strain 112910a. We found that the extent of MHC II downregulation differed considerably among various Salmonella strains. Salmonella Typhimurium strain MB2216, a pig isolate, and strain DAB69, a pigeon isolate, and serovar Infantis and Derby strains, both pig isolates, exhibited no downregulation of MHC II expression in the current setup.
Subsequently, it was determined if the strain specific differences in MHC II downregulation capacity were inherent to macrophage infection by that particular strain, or correlated with Salmonella invasion capacity in, Salmonella induced cytotoxicity on and ROS production by macrophages. The Salmonella invasion capacity of the tested Salmonella strains did not significantly differ, except for strain MB2498 that was significantly impaired in infecting macrophages. This might be due to the fact that this strain was markedly less motile than the other strains, as assessed by growing the strains in semi solid agar [48, 49]. Infection with all tested Salmonella strains was cytotoxic for macrophages 24 h pi. Finally, the macrophage activation status indicated by ROS production measurement did not differ between Salmonella strains. Because we found no significant correlation between the extent of MHC II downregulation on one hand, and Salmonella invasiveness, cytotoxicity or induction of ROS production on the other hand, we can conclude that strain specific differences in the capacity to downregulate MHC II expression on porcine macrophages are irrespective of strain specific differences in invasion capacity and cytotoxic effects on or induction of ROS production by macrophages.
Since we showed that SPI-1 and SPI-2 are involved in Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a induced downregulation of MHC II expression, we wanted to examine if differential SPI-1 and/or SPI-2 gene expression accounted for the observed differences in MHC II downregulation between Salmonella strains. Surprisingly, no correlation was found between the expression of SPI-1 genes hilA and sopB for a certain strain, although this can be due to the fact that expression of the effector protein SopB is only partly regulated by HilA . Furthermore, no sopB expression was detected in Salmonella MB2498 and Derby strains, indicating the absence of the sopB containing SPI-5 in these strains [13, 50]. Expression of SPI-2 genes ssrA/B and ssaH markedly differed between Salmonella strains, and in contrast to hilA and sopB expression, a significantly positive correlation was found between ssrA/B and ssaH expression in a certain strain. However, no correlation was found between SPI-1 or SPI-2 gene expression and the capacity to downregulate MHC II expression. Although Salmonella gene expression in LB medium and inside macrophages might vary, the fact that SPI-1 and SPI-2 gene expression patterns of different Salmonella strains did not correlate with their capacity to interfere with the MHC II expression level of macrophages might indicate that other factors than SPI-1 and SPI-2 are also involved in Salmonella induced MHC II downregulation.
In conclusion, we showed that Salmonella Typhimurium strain 112910a specifically downregulated MHC II expression on porcine macrophages in merely a SPI-1 and SPI-2 dependent way. Furthermore, opsonization of Salmonella with antibodies counterbalanced the bacterium’s capacity to downregulate MHC II expression and to proliferate intracellularly, emphasizing the importance for Salmonella to interfere with the host’s immune response for successful persistence. The extent of MHC II downregulation on macrophages differed among Salmonella strains and these strain specific differences did not correlate with differential SPI-1 and/or SPI-2 expression, providing evidence that besides SPI-1 and SPI-2 other factors are also involved in Salmonella induced downregulation of MHC II expression. Our findings might imply that Salmonella strains that are capable of circumventing the pig’s immune response can better persist in pigs, interfering with serological screenings that are used in most preharvest Salmonella monitoring programs in Europe to date.
The technical assistance of Rosalie Devloo and Nathalie Vanrysselberghe is greatly appreciated. This work was supported by the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT Vlaanderen), Brussels, Belgium (grant IWT Landbouw 040791) and the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).
- Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E, Angulo FJ, Kirk M, O’Brien SJ, Jones TF, Fazil A, Hoekstra RM: The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010, 50: 882-889. 10.1086/650733.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anonymous: Report of the task force on zoonoses data collection on the analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in slaughter pigs, in the EU, 2006-2007. Part A: Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA J. 2008, 135: 1-111.Google Scholar
- Botteldoorn N, Heyndrickx M, Rijpens N, Grijspeerdt K, Herman L: Salmonella on pig carcasses: positive pigs and cross contamination in the slaughterhouse. J Appl Microbiol. 2003, 95: 891-903. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02042.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood RL, Pospischil A, Rose R: Distribution of persistent Salmonella Typhimurium infection in internal organs of pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1989, 50: 1015-1021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Maes D, Van Immerseel F, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F: Non-typhoidal Salmonella infections in pigs: a closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis and control. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 130: 1-19. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Proux K, Houdayer C, Humbert F, Cariolet R, Rose V, Eveno E, Madec F: Development of a complete ELISA using Salmonella lipopolysaccharides of various serogroups allowing to detect al infected pigs. Vet Res. 2000, 31: 481-490. 10.1051/vetres:2000134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen B, Baggesen D, Bager F, Haugegaard J, Lind P: The serological response to Salmonella serovars Typhimurium and Infantis in experimentally infected pigs, The time course followed with an indirect anti-LPS ELISA and bacteriological examinations. Vet Microbiol. 1995, 47: 205-218. 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00113-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srinand S: Serologic studies of experimentally induced Salmonella choleraesuis var kunzendorf infection in pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1995, 56: 1163-1168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Winsen RL, van Nes A, Keuzenkamp D, Urlings HAP, Lipman LJA, Biesterveld S, Snijders JMA, Verheijden JHM, van Knapen F: Monitoring of transmission of Salmonella enterica serovars in pigs using bacteriological and serological detection methods. Vet Microbiol. 2001, 80: 267-274. 10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00313-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hornef WH, Wick MJ, Rhen M, Normark S: Bacterial strategies for overcoming host innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2002, 3: 1033-1040. 10.1038/ni1102-1033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hegde NR, Chevalier MS, Johnson DC: Viral inhibition of MHC class II antigen presentation. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24: 278-285. 10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00099-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell EK, Mastroeni P, Kelly AP, Trowsdale J: Inhibition of cell surface MHC class II expression by Salmonella. Eur J Immunol. 2004, 434: 2559-2567.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blondel CJ, Jiménez JC, Contreras I, Santiviago CA: Comparative genomic analysis uncovers 3 novel loci encoding type six secretion systems differentially distributed in Salmonella serotypes. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 354-10.1186/1471-2164-10-354.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fink SL, Cookson BT: Pyroptosis and host cell death responses during Salmonella infection. Cell Microbiol. 2007, 9: 2562-2570. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01036.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donné E, Pasmans F, Boyen F, Van Immerseel F, Adriaensen C, Hernalsteens J-P, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F: Survival of Salmonella serovar Typhimurium inside porcine monocytes is associated with complement binding and suppression of the production of reactive oxygen species. Vet Microbiol. 2005, 107: 205-214. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.01.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jantsch J, Chikkaballi D, Hensel M: Cellular aspects of immunity to intracellular Salmonella enterica. Immunol Rev. 2011, 240: 185-195. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00981.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyen F, Pasmans F, Van Immerseel F, Donné E, Morgan E, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F: Porcine in vitro and in vivo models to assess the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium for pigs. Lab Anim. 2009, 43: 46-52. 10.1258/la.2007.007084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Parys A, Boyen F, Volf J, Verbrugghe E, Leyman B, Rychlik I, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F: Salmonella Typhimurium resides largely as an extracellular pathogen in porcine tonsils, independently of biofilm-associated genes csgA, csgD and adrA. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 144: 93-99. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Datsenko KA, Wanner BL: One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 6640-6645. 10.1073/pnas.120163297.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyen F, Pasmans F, Donné E, Van Immerseel F, Adriaensen C, Hernalsteens JP, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F: Role of SPI-1 in the interactions of Salmonella Typhimurium with porcine macrophages. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 113: 35-44. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyen F, Pasmans F, Van Immerseel F, Morgan E, Botteldoorn N, Heyndrickx M, Volf J, Favoreel H, Hernalsteens JP, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F: A limited role for SsrA/B in persistent Salmonella Typhimurium infections in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 128: 364-373. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thijs IMV, De Keersmaecker SCJ, Fadda A, Engelen K, Zhao H, McClelland M, Marchal K, Vanderleyden J: Delineation of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium HilA regulon through genome-wide location and transcript analysis. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 4587-4596. 10.1128/JB.00178-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carroll RK, Liao X, Morgan LK, Cicirelli EM, Li Y, Sheng W, Feng X, Kenney LJ: Structural and functional analysis of the C-terminal DNA binding domain of the Salmonella Typhimurium SPI-2 response regulator SsrB. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 12008-12019. 10.1074/jbc.M806261200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leemans J, Langenakens J, Degreve H, Deblaere R, Vanmontagu M, Schell J: Broad-host-range cloning vectors derived from the W-plasmid Sa. Gene. 1982, 19: 361-364. 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90027-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pasmans F, Van Immerseel F, Heyndrickx M, Martel A, Godard C, Wildemauwe C, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F: Host adaptation of pigeon isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serovar Typhimurium variant Copenhagen phage type 99 is associated with enhanced macrophage cytotoxicity. Infect Immun. 2003, 71: 6068-6074. 10.1128/IAI.71.10.6068-6074.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, De Smet I, Mast J, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R: Dynamics of immune cell infiltration in the caecal lamina propria of chickens after neonatal infection with a Salmonella Enteritidis strain. Dev Comp Immunol. 2002, 26: 355-364. 10.1016/S0145-305X(01)00084-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vangroenweghe F, Duchateau L, Burvenich C: Moderate inflammatory reaction during experimental Escherichia coli mastitis in primiparous cows. J Dairy Sci. 2004, 87: 886-895. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73233-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valdivia RH, Falkow S: Bacterial genetics by flow cytometry: rapid isolation of Salmonella Typhimurium acid-inducible promoters by differential fluorescence induction. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 22: 367-378. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.00120.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dom P, Haesebrouck F, Debaetselier P: Chemiluminescence properties of porcine pulmonary alveolar macrophages and polymorphonuclear cells. Vet Quart. 1994, 16: 87-90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bekay RE, Álvarez M, Carballo M, Martín-Nieto J, Monteseirín J, Pintado E, Bedoya FJ, Sobrino F: Activation of phagocytic cell NADPH oxidase by norfloxacin: a potential mechanism to explain its bactericidal action. J Leukocyte Biol. 2002, 71: 255-261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rychlik I, Martin G, Methner U, Lovell M, Cardova L, Sebkova A, Sevcik M, Damborsky J, Barrow PA: Identification of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium genes associated with growth suppression in stationary-phase nutrient broth cultures and in the chicken intestine. Arch Microbiol. 2002, 178: 411-420. 10.1007/s00203-002-0458-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Boyen F, Bohez L, Pasmans F, Volf J, Sevcik M, Rychlik I, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R: Medium-chain fatty acids decrease colonization and invasion through hilA suppression shortly after infection of chickens with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Appl Environ Microb. 2004, 70: 3582-3587. 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3582-3587.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Österberg J, Wallgren P: Effects of a challenge dose of Salmonella Typhimurium or Salmonella Yoruba on the patterns of excretion and antibody responses of pigs. Vet Rec. 2008, 162: 580-586. 10.1136/vr.162.18.580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scherer K, Szabo I, Rösler U, Appel B, Hensel A, Nöckler K: Time course of infection with Salmonella Typhimurium and its influence on fecal shedding, distribution in inner organs, and antibody response in fattening pigs. J Food Protect. 2008, 71: 699-705.Google Scholar
- Villadangos JA: Presentation of antigens by MHC class II molecules: getting the most out of them. Mol Immunol. 2001, 38: 329-346. 10.1016/S0161-5890(01)00069-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knodler LA, Steele-Mortimer O: Taking possession: biogenesis of the Salmonella-containing vacuole. Traffic. 2003, 4: 587-599. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00118.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M, Schlomchik MJ: Macrophages are scavenger cells that can be induced by pathogens to present foreign antigens to naïve T cells. Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease. Edited by: Lawrence E. 2005, Garland Science Publishing, New York, 334-335. 6Google Scholar
- Norimatsu M, Harris J, Chance V, Dougan G, Howard CJ, Villarreal-Ramos B: Differential response of bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells to infection with Salmonella Typhimurium in a low-dose model in vitro. Immunology. 2003, 108: 55-61. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01557.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyen F, Pasmans F, Van Immerseel F, Morgan E, Adriaensen C, Hernalsteens JP, Decostere A, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F: Salmonella Typhimurium SPI-1 genes promote intestinal but not tonsillar colonization in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 8: 2899-2907.Google Scholar
- Troxell B, Sikes M, Fink R, Vazquez-Torres A, Jones-Carson J, Hassan H: Fur negatively regulates hns and is required for the expression of hilA and virulence in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 2011, 193: 497-505. 10.1128/JB.00942-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casadevall A: Antibody-mediated protection against intracellular pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6: 102-107. 10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01208-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drecktrah D, Knodler LA, Ireland R, Steele-Mortimer O: The mechanism of Salmonella entry determines the vacuolar environment and intracellular gene expression. Traffic. 2006, 7: 39-51. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00360.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim S, Yong K, Ryu S: Analysis of Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 expression in response to the changes of osmolarity. J Microbiol Biotechn. 2005, 15: 175-182.Google Scholar
- Yu XY, McGourty K, Liu M, Unsworth KE, Holden DW: pH sensing by intracellular Salmonella induces effector translocation. Science. 2010, 328: 1040-1043. 10.1126/science.1189000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigues APD, Carvalho ASC, Santos AS, Alves CN, Do Nascimento JLM, Silva EOS: Kojic acid, a secondary metabolite from Aspergillus sp., acts as an inducer of macrophage activation. Cell Biol Int. 2011, 35: 335-343. 10.1042/CBI20100083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Volf J, Havlickova H, Hradecka H, Ondrackova P, Matiasovic J, Faldyna M, Rychlik I: Epidemiology and interaction of Salmonella enterica serovar Derby, Infantis and Typhimurium with porcine alveolar macrophages. Vet Microbiol. 2010, 146: 105-110. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bearson BL, Bearson SMD: Host specific differences alter the requirement for certain Salmonella genes during swine colonization. Vet Microbiol. 2011, 150: 215-219. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moreira CG, Weinshenker D, Sperandio V: QseC mediates Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium virulence in vitro and in vivo. Infect Immun. 2010, 78: 914-926. 10.1128/IAI.01038-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shah DH, Zhou X, Addwebi T, Davis MA, Orfe L, Call DR, Guard J, Besser TE: Cell invasion of poultry-associated Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates is associated with pathogenicity, motility and proteins secreted by the type III secretion system. Microbiology. 2011, 157: 1428-1445. 10.1099/mic.0.044461-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood MW, Jones MA, Watson PR, Hedges S, Wallis TS, Galyov EE: Identification of a pathogenicity island required for Salmonella enteropathogenicity. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 29: 883-891. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00984.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.