Open Access

Babesias of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Ireland

  • Annetta Zintl1,
  • Eugene J Finnerty2,
  • Thomas M Murphy3,
  • Theo de Waal1 and
  • Jeremy S Gray2Email author
Veterinary Research201142:7

DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-7

Received: 8 February 2010

Accepted: 7 October 2010

Published: 18 January 2011

Abstract

Blood samples were obtained from 38 wild red deer (Cervus elaphus) at two sites in Ireland and subjected to PCR analysis of the 18S rRNA gene followed by sequencing. Two fragments of the 18S rRNA gene were generated by two different PCR protocols and subsequent sequencing suggested that at least six of the deer were infected by a babesia that, in those loci, is indistinguishable from Babesia divergens, an important tick-borne pathogen of cattle and of zoonotic significance. Additionally, a B. odocoilei-like parasite was detected in three samples and a babesia that did not match any sequences in the GenBank database was found in five samples. Neither B. capreoli nor B. venatorum (EU1) were found. There have been several reports of B. divergens occurring in deer species, including red deer, roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). However, in view of recent re-sequencing of bovine-origin samples deposited previously in GenBank, it is unlikely that any of these sequences from deer are B. divergens. The present study describes the only deer piroplasm detected so far that shows complete identity with B. divergens, in just over half of the 18S rRNA gene. The entire gene of this deer parasite should be analysed and transmission experiments undertaken before the infectivity of B. divergens for red deer can be confirmed.

Introduction

There has been considerable recent interest in the identity of Babesia spp. in deer, because of concerns about the health of endangered host species such as chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) [1] and also because of the possibility of deer acting as reservoirs for important cattle parasites such as Babesia divergens[2]. Earlier studies on red (Cervus elaphus) and sika (C. nippon) deer babesias in Europe suggested that they were morphologically and antigenically indistinguishable from B. divergens, but were not transmissible to splenectomised calves. They were therefore tentatively identified as B. capreoli[3, 4], which was first observed in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) [5]. With the advent of molecular taxonomy based on analysis of DNA sequences, several authors described parasites in roe, red or reindeer as B. divergens or B. divergens- like [2, 612]. These authors based their conclusions on 18S rRNA gene sequence alignment, but none of their samples showed 100% similarity with B. divergens sequences of bovine origin in GenBank. Resequencing of the 18S rRNA gene from the same strains of B. divergens originally deposited in GenBank showed that all were in fact identical and that there were errors in the original sequences (Slemenda et al., unpublished, cited in [13]). This suggests that parasites showing less than 100% similarity for this gene should not be designated B. divergens and to date there are no studies showing that B. divergens occurs naturally in ruminant hosts other than cattle.

An opportunity to re-examine this situation arose during a serosurvey of deer parasites in free-ranging wild Irish deer. Blood samples from 38 red deer from two National Parks in different geographical locations were analysed by two PCR protocols targeting the 18S rRNA gene, and the products then sequenced and aligned for identification purposes.

Materials and methods

Blood samples were collected from red deer shot by the National Parks and Wildlife Service as part of the seasonal cull in Glenveagh (n = 27) and Killarney (n = 11) (Figure 1). From each animal 3 to 4 mL whole blood were collected into EDTA. Following centrifugation and removal of plasma, the packed cell component was stored at -20°C. DNA was subsequently extracted from thawed and mixed 100 mg packed cells of each sample using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche, Burgess Hill, UK). A nested PCR protocol was used initially to screen all samples (protocol I). The positive samples were then additionally analysed using a hemi-nested PCR protocol (protocol II). The two PCR protocols target different regions of the 18S rRNA gene and are modifications of previous published assays. Details are provided in Table 1. B. divergens DNA extracted from a bovine isolate was used as a positive control. Negative controls were performed in the absence of template DNA. PCR products were fractionated on 2% agarose gels and visualised by staining with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). Amplicons were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) and sequenced (GATC Biotech AG, Konstanz, Germany). Consensus sequences were obtained from between 5 to 14 forward and 2 reverse sequences, each. Comparisons were made with published sequences using NCBI Blast, aligned with the ClustalW2 sequence alignment programme and logged in GenBank under accession numbers GU475472 to GU475475. Because of insufficient sequence overlap at the 5'end, logged sequences are approximately 40 bp shorter than the amplicons.
Table 1

Details of the nested and hemi-nested PCR protocols used to screen deer blood samples for the presence of Babesia spp.

PCR protocol

Primers (positions)*

 

Amplification protocol

Reference

I

1st PCR:

   

Product size*:

BTH-1F (365-385)

5'cct gag aaa cgg cta cca cat ct

94°C: 10 min,

[23]

561 bp

BTH-1R (1031-1050)

5' ttg cga cca tac tcc ccc ca

40 cycles: 95°C: 30 s, 68°C: 1 min, 72°C: 1 min

 
   

72°C: 10 min

 
 

nested PCR:

   
 

GF2 (466-487)

5' gtc ttg taa ttg gaa tga tgg

94°C: 10 min

[19]

 

GR2 (1006-1026)

5' cca aag act ttg att tct ctc

40 cycles: 95°C: 30 s, 60°C: 1 min, 72°C: 1 min

 
   

72°C: 10 min

 

II

1st PCR:

   

Product size*:

Babfor (959-977)

5'gac tag gga ttg gag gtc

94°C: 10 min

[24]

576 bp

Babrev (1589-1610)

5'gaa taa ttc acc gga tca ctc

35 cycles: 95°C: 1 min, 53°C: 1.5 min, 72°C: 1.5 min

 
   

72°C: 10 min

 
 

nested PCR

   
 

BT2-F (1035-1055)

5'gga gta tgg tcg caa gtc tg

94°C: 10 min

[23]

 

Babrev

 

35 cycles: 95°C: 1 min, 53°C: 1.5 min, 72°C: 1.5 min

 
   

72°C: 10 min

 

* product sizes and primer positions according to reference sequence AY046576

Figure 1

Locations of sites where deer were sampled.

Phylogenetic analysis of the relationship between sequences of our isolates and published sequence data was carried out using MEGA version 3.1 [14]. This software programme was used to construct a Neighbour-Joining tree. Tree reliability was assessed by the bootstrap method with 1000 pseudoreplicates.

Results

The initial screen using PCR protocol I revealed that 18 deer carried Babesia spp. infections (26%), with 17 originating from Glenveagh and 1 from Killarney (Table 2). The Babesia species present in these animals were identified by sequence-analysis of fragments amplified using both PCR protocols. Six samples from Glenveagh showed 100% similarity to B. divergens (GenBank AY046576) in both fragments of the 18S rRNA gene (logged in GenBank under accession numbers GU475472 (PCR protocol I) and GU475473 (protocol II)). In a further five isolates one amplicon (resulting either from PCR protocol I or II) showed 100% B. divergens similarity, although the second amplicon could only be identified to genus level. In addition, identical nested PCR products (amplified using protocol I) from three Glenveagh deer samples were 98% similar to B. odocoilei (GenBank AY046577) and have been logged as GU475474. Five products from PCR protocol II (4 from Glenveagh and 1 from Killarney) were also identical to each other but did not closely match any Babesia species in the GenBank database (96% similarity with B. divergens, B. odocoilei and EU1) (accession number GU475475) (Table 2). Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic positions of the amplicons arising from PCR protocol I, which proved to be more discriminating than PCR protocol II. The latter protocol generated amplicons that did not differentiate bovine-origin B. divergens from any of the B. divergens-like species, but showed that the unknown Babesia sp. is clearly separate from B. divergens, B. odocoilei and B. venatorum (Figure 3). The remaining positive PCR amplicons could only be identified to Babesia genus level due to poor sequencing data.
Table 2

Presence of Babesia spp. in red deer whole blood samples from Glenveagh and Killarney.

Glenveagh

   

Deer N°

+/-

species ID according to product I

species ID according to product II

G1

+

98% identical with B. odocoilei*

96% identical with B. odocoilei, B. divergens, EU1**

G2

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

100% identical to B. divergens***

G3

+

98% identical with B. odocoilei*

96% identical with B. odocoilei, B. divergens, EU1**

G4

-

  

G5

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

Babesia sp****

G6

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

100% identical to B. divergens***

G7

+

Babesia sp****

96% identical with B. odocoilei, B. divergens, EU1**

G8

-

  

G9

-

  

G10

+

Babesia sp****

96% identical with B. odocoilei, B. divergens, EU1**

G11

-

  

G12

-

  

G13

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

100% identical to B. divergens***

G14

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

100% identical to B. divergens***

G15

+

Babesia sp****

100% identical to B. divergens***

G16

+

Babesia sp****

-

G17

-

  

G18

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

100% identical to B. divergens***

G19

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

-

G20

-

  

G21

-

  

G22

+

Babesia sp****

Babesia sp****

G23

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

100% identical to B. divergens***

G24

-

  

G25

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

Babesia sp****

G26

-

  

G27

+

98% identical with B. odocoilei*

Babesia sp****

Killarney

   

Deer N°

+/-

species ID according to product I

species ID according to product II

KR1

-

  

KR2

-

  

KR3

-

  

KR4

-

  

KR5

+

100% identical to B. divergens***

96% identical with B. odocoilei, B. divergens, EU1**

KR6

-

  

KR7

-

  

KR8

-

  

KR9

-

  

KR10

-

  

KR11

-

  

Babesia spp were identified by sequence allignment of amplification products from PCR protocols I and II (products I and II respectively).

* sequence identical between G1, G3 and G27 (reference sequence: AY046577)

** sequence identical between G1, G3, G7, G10, KR5 (reference sequences: AY046575, AY046576, AY046577)

*** reference sequence: AY046576

**** amplicons only identifiable to genus level due to poor sequencing data

Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationships of deer Babesia species (present study in bold) according to the sequence amplified by PCR protocol I (bp loci 527-1005 in reference sequence AY046576*). The tree was constructed by sequence alignment of the 18S rRNA gene fragment and neighbour-joining analysis. Tree reliability was assessed by the bootstrap method with 1 000 pseudoreplicates (MEGA version 3.1, [14]). (*all amplicons exclude the primer sequences (as they are not part of the original DNA template) and approx. 40 bp at the 5' region for which there was insufficient over-lapping sequencing data).

Figure 3

Phylogenetic relationships of deer Babesia species (present study in bold) according to the sequence amplified by PCR protocol II (bp loci 1096-1589 in reference sequence AY046576*). The tree was constructed as described for Figure 2.

Discussion

Reports of the identification of B. divergens in reindeer [8], roe deer [2, 6, 9, 12], red deer [2] and chamois [1] were noteworthy because this parasite is not only an important pathogen of cattle but is also zoonotic, causing a dangerous fulminating disease in splenectomised patients [15, 16]. The presence of B. divergens in free-ranging wild deer would affect our understanding of both bovine and human babesiosis epidemiology. However, reliance on similarity of fragments of the 18S rRNA gene for identification of this parasite is questionable. Although this gene is of great taxonomic value within the Apicomplexa, it has been suggested that it may not discriminate well between very closely related parasites [11]. Furthermore, few of the recent studies on babesia in European deer analysed the whole gene, or attempted infection with deer parasites of splenectomised cattle or gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus), both of which infections are reliable markers for B. divergens identity [16]. The most complete sequences analysed were from babesias in farmed reindeer in Scotland [8] and from roe deer in Slovenia [2]. In both these studies it was concluded that the high level of similarity (99.8 and 99.6% respectively) when compared with B. divergens GenBank depositions made in the mid-90s (U16370, UO7885 and Z48751) justified identity with B. divergens. However, when the whole 18S rRNA gene from the original B. divergens strains were resequenced, along with several others, it was found that all were identical and the only strain that had been accurately sequenced among the early GenBank depositions was U16370 (Slemenda et al., unpublished, cited in [13]). This calls into question B. divergens identity of any isolates showing less than 100% similarity to U16370. Although further bovine B. divergens sequence data were recently deposited in GenBank, these show only one (EF458223, EF458224, EF458227) or two (EF458219) base pair differences from the approximately 12 accurate sequences of other B. divergens bovine isolates in the data base. None of the deer-derived babesia isolates referred to above showed less than four base-pair differences and in only one study [8] was an attempt made to infect gerbils. No infection occurred but this could have been due to reduced viability of the parasites resulting from the delay in their arrival at the laboratory by mail.

The tentative identification of B. divergens in the present study is based on analysis of two fragments of the 18S rRNA gene (bp loci 527-1005 and 1096-1589 in the bovine origin reference sequence, AY046576), more than half the total gene of 1728 bp. In the other publications that reported detection of B. divergens and where a significantly large proportion of the gene was analysed, base pair differences compared with AY046576 occurred at the following base pair loci - 632, 663, 1277 (AY098643[8]); 373, 631, 663, 804, 1365, 1423 (AY572456[2]), whereas no differences from our sequences were found at these loci. Schmid et al. [11] detected B. divergens-like piroplasms with a similar level of 18S rDNA similarity (99.5% and 99.6%) in roe deer and chamois. They did not identify these parasites as B. divergens and suggested they should be regarded as B. capreoli, although the sequences (EU182596 and EU182597) do not show 100% 18S rDNA similarity with this species either (AY726009). It is possible that bovine B. divergens, which evidently shows negligible variability in the 18S rRNA gene [13, 17], is a variant of deer origin that has developed specificity for cattle.

In striking contrast to the above three studies, the B. divergens-like sequences from the present study showed no differences from bovine B. divergens sequences at base pair loci 527-1005 and 1096-1589. Whether or not this parasite is truly identical with bovine B. divergens requires further study, but this is also the first reliable demonstration of a B. divergens- like piroplasm (even if not B. divergens) in red deer because the only previous study that considered this deer species [2], apparently did not attempt to sequence the PCR product.

The highest proportion of babesia-infected deer occurred in the Glenveagh herd and most identifiable babesia sequences were also obtained from this herd. Although serology detected antibodies in the majority of the Killarney samples (unpublished data), no identifiable amplicons could be generated by PCR. It is not obvious why these differences occurred. The deer in all the locations were exposed to heavy tick (Ixodes ricinus) challenge judging by the numerous attached ticks observed at culling.

It is of interest that neither B. capreoli nor B. venatorum were found in the present study. B. capreoli was first described by Enigk and Friedhoff [5], in roe deer based primarily on morphology. Adam and Blewett [3], and Gray et al. [4], tentatively identified parasites isolated from red deer and sika deer respectively as B. capreoli, based on origin, morphology and antigenicity. In both cases transfer to splenectomised calves failed to result in infection, suggesting that these parasites were not B. divergens, though in the light of recent DNA analysis data it seems likely that they were B. divergens-like parasites. More recently, DNA analysis by Hoby et al. [7] and Malandrin et al. [18] confirmed that B. capreoli occurs in roe deer and the former authors also detected this parasite in chamois and red deer, though single samples only were positive in these latter host species. B. venatorum (EU1) first came to scientific notice as a zoonotic infection [13], and has since then been firmly associated with roe deer [18, 19], but has not so far been detected in red deer. The apparent absence of both B. capreoli and B. venatorum in the present study correlates well with the fact that roe deer do not occur in Ireland [20].

B. odocoilei is a piroplasm of American white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and close relatives of this parasite have been detected in European ticks (I. ricinus) by PCR [13, 21]. Unfortunately no sequence data are available from the PCR products of the tick analyses for comparison with the present study, which appears to be the first record of such a piroplasm in European deer, though the B. odocoilei-like parasite detected by Hilpertshauser et al. [22] was in ticks removed from roe deer and which therefore contained deer blood. One further sequence in the present study was identifiable as Babesia sp. but did not match any sequence in GenBank. Since it was identical in samples from five individual deer, it may represent a new babesia 18S rDNA sequence.

Analysis of the complete 18S rRNA gene would, of course, have provided a greater level of confidence in the identity of the babesias detected in this study. Unfortunately, available resources did not permit this. Nevertheless, the gene fragment analysis presented here suggests that there are at least two Babesia species, if not three, in the red deer sampled in this study. The significance of these parasites as disease agents is unknown and further studies, in addition to gene analysis, including isolation of the parasites and transmission studies in in vitro or in vivo systems are necessary to establish their identities, particularly that of the putative B. divergens.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the rangers of the National Parks and Wildlife Service at Glenveagh and Killarney for facilitating collection of samples.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UCD School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin
(2)
UCD School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin
(3)
Central Veterinary Laboratories

References

  1. Hoby S, Robert N, Mathis A, Schmid N, Meli ML, Hofmann-Lehmann R, Lutz H, Deplazes P, Ryser-Degiorgis MP: Babesiosis in free-ranging chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) from Switzerland. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 148: 341-345. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.06.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Duh D, Petrovec M, Bidovec A, Avsic-Zupanc T: Cervids as Babesiae hosts, Slovenia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 1121-1123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Adam KM, Blewett DA, Brocklesby DW, Sharman GA: The isolation and characterization of a Babesia from red deer (Cervus elaphus). Parasitology. 1976, 73: 1-11. 10.1017/S0031182000051271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gray JS, Murphy TM, Taylor SM, Blewett DA, Harrington R: Comparative morphological and cross transmission studies with bovine and deer babesias in Ireland. Prev Vet Med. 1990, 9: 185-193. 10.1016/0167-5877(90)90065-P.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Enigk K, Friedhoff K: Babesia capreoli n. sp. in the deer (Capreolus capreolus L.). Z Tropenmed Parasitol. 1962, 13: 8-20. In GermanPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cancrini G, Gabrielli S, Lori A, Grifoni G, Calderini P: Morphology and genetics of a Babesia isolate from Capreolus capreolus. J Wildl Dis. 2008, 44: 168-171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoby S, Mathis A, Doherr MG, Robert N, Ryser-Degiorgis MP: Babesia capreoli infections in alpine chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra), roe deer (Capreolus c. capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) from Switzerland. J Wildl Dis. 2009, 45: 748-753.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Langton C, Gray JS, Waters PF, Holman PJ: Naturally-acquired babesiosis in a reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) herd in Great Britain. Parasitol Res. 2003, 89: 194-198. 10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0194:MEOCOB]2.0.CO;2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sawczuk M, Maciejewska A, Adamska M, Skotarczak B: Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) as a reservoir of protozoans from Babesia and Theileria genus in north-western Poland. Wiad Parazytol. 2005, 51: 243-247. In PolishPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. García-Sanmartín J, Nagore D, García-Pérez AL, Juste RA, Hurtado A: Molecular diagnosis of Theileria and Babesia species infecting cattle in Northern Spain using reverse line blot macroarrays. BMC Vet Res. 2006, 2: 16-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmid N, Deplazesm P, Hobym S, Ryser-Degiorgis MP, Edelhofer R, Mathis A: Babesia divergens-like organisms from free-ranging chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) and roe deer (Capreolus c. capreolus) are distinct from B. divergens of cattle origin - an epidemiological and molecular genetic investigation. Vet Parasitol. 2008, 154: 14-20. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.02.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tampieri MP, Galuppi R, Bonoli C, Cancrini G, Moretti A, Pietrobelli M: Wild ungulates as Babesia hosts in northern and central Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008, 8: 667-674. 10.1089/vbz.2008.0001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Herwaldt BL, Caccio S, Gherlinzoni F, Aspöck H, Slemenda SB, Piccaluga P, Martinelli G, Edelhofer R, Hollenstein U, Poletti G, Pampiglione S, Löschenberger K, Tura S, Pieniazek NJ: Molecular characterization of a non-Babesia divergens organism causing zoonotic babesiosis in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 942-948.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M: MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004, 5: 150-163. 10.1093/bib/5.2.150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunfeld KP, Hildebrandt A, Gray JS: Babesiosis: Recent insights into an ancient disease. Int J Parasitol. 2008, 38: 1219-1237. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Zintl A, Mulcahy G, Skerrett HE, Taylor SM, Gray JS: Babesia divergens, a bovine blood parasite of veterinary and zoonotic importance. Clin Rev Microbiol. 2003, 16: 622-636. 10.1128/CMR.16.4.622-636.2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray J, Zintl A, Hildebrandt A, Hunfeld KP, Weiss L: Zoonotic babesiosis: Overview of the disease and novel aspects of pathogen identity. Ticks Tick-borne Dis. 2010, 1: 3-10. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2009.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Malandrin L, Jouglin M, Sun Y, Brisseau N, Chauvin A: Redescription of Babesia capreoli (Enigk and Friedhoff, 1962) from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): Isolation, cultivation, host specificity, molecular characterisation and differentiation from Babesia divergens. Int J Parasitol. 2010, 40: 277-284. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.08.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bonnet S, Jouglin M, L'Hostis M, Chauvin A: Babesia sp. EU1 from roe deer and transmission within Ixodes ricinus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13: 1208-1210.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Whitehead GK: The deer of Great Britain and Ireland. 1964, Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Duh D, Petrovec M, Avsic-Zupanc T: Diversity of Babesia infecting European sheep ticks (Ixodes ricinus). J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 3395-3397. 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3395-3397.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilpertshauser H, Deplazes P, Schnyder M, Gern L, Mathis A: Babesia spp. identified by PCR in ticks collected from domestic and wild ruminants in southern Switzerland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 6503-65077. 10.1128/AEM.00823-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Saraña A, Barba-Carretero JC: Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe. Part II. Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary history. Vet Parasitol. 2003, 114: 173-194. 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00141-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Blaschitz M, Narodoslavsky-Gföller M, Kanzler M, Stanek G, Walochnik J: Babesia species occurring in Austrian Ixodes ricinus ticks. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 4841-48. 10.1128/AEM.00035-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zintl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement