Open Access

Induction of inflammatory cytokines and toll-like receptors in chickens infected with avian H9N2 influenza virus

  • Nguyen Tai Nang1, 2,
  • Joo Sub Lee1, 2,
  • Byung Min Song1, 2,
  • Young Myong Kang1, 2,
  • Hyun Soo Kim3 and
  • Sang Heui Seo1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
Veterinary Research201142:64

DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-64

Received: 27 December 2010

Accepted: 18 May 2011

Published: 18 May 2011

Abstract

H9N2 influenza virus is endemic in many Asian countries and is regarded as a candidate for the next human pandemic. Knowledge of the induction of inflammatory responses and toll-like receptors (TLRs) in chickens infected with H9N2 is limited. Here, we show that H9N2 induces pro-inflammatory cytokines such as transforming growth factor-beta 3; tumor necrosis factor-alpha; interferon-alpha, -beta, and gamma; and TLR 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 15 in trachea, lung, and intestine of infected chickens. In the lung, TLR-15 was dominantly induced. Taken together, it seems that H9N2 infections efficiently induce inflammatory cytokines and TLRs in trachea, lung and intestine of chickens.

Introduction

Influenza A viruses circulate in aquatic birds such as gulls and shorebirds, and are in evolutional stasis [1]. Some avian influenza viruses are occasionally transmitted to terrestrial birds such as chickens and ducks, and mammals like horses and pigs. Currently, 16 serologically distinct hemagglutinin (HA) and nine neuraminidase (NA) influenza virus subtypes are circulating in aquatic birds [1, 2].

H9N2 influenza virus (hereafter referred to as H9N2) was first isolated from diseased chickens in China in 1994. Since then, this virus has been found in many countries including Korea, India, and Pakistan [37]. In Eurasia, three distinct H9N2 lineages, Chicken/Beijing/1/94 (Ck/Bei-like), Quail/Hong Kong/G1/97 (G1-like), and Duck/Hong Kong/Y439/97 (Y439-like or Korea-like), are circulating in domestic poultry, with the Ck/Bei-like and G1-like viruses in circulation in China, the Middle East, and Germany [8, 9]. Y-439-like viruses were isolated in ducks in Hong Kong in 1997 and have been found in poultry in Korea since 1996 [5, 10].

H9N2 can infect humans. In 1999, two cases of mild influenza were reported in two children infected with H9N2 [11] and in 2003 H9N2 also infected a 5-year-old child in Hong Kong [12].

Inflammatory cytokines are suggested to be involved in pathogenesis in humans, pigs, and horses [1316]. Infections of humans by H5N1 were associated with the expression of MxA protein and interferon-alpha (INF-α) mRNA as demonstrated in autopsy lung tissues [15]. Experimental infection of pigs with swine influenza virus correlated the clinical signs with the levels of INF-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [13]. Infections of horses with equine influenza virus elicited the production of inflammatory cytokines such as INF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α [14].

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are important for eliciting innate immunity in animals by playing an essential role as pattern recognition receptors that detect infectious pathogens by recognizing the conserved molecular structures known as pathogen associated molecular patterns [1719]. The recognition of TLRs by pathogens induces the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates, and inflammatory cytokines. In chickens, 10 TLR genes (TLR1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3, 4, 5, 7, 15, and 21) have been identified [2023].

The current study was undertaken to investigate the inflammatory cytokines and TLRs induced in H9N2-infected chickens, to further the understanding the early pathogenesis and immune responses in H9N2 infection.

Materials and methods

Virus and chickens

The H9N2 representative, A/Chicken/Korea/S21/2004, was grown in 10-day-old fertilized eggs. The experiments were performed in a BSL-3 facility approved by the Korean government. Specific pathogen free (SPF) chickens (White Leghorn) that were 3-4 weeks o1d were purchased from a local farm. Animal work was approved by internal animal ethics committee at Chungnam National University.

Viral titration

Chickens (n = 5 per group) were intranasally (i.n.) infected with 0.5 mL of 106 log 10 egg infectious dose 50/mL (log10EID50/mL) of A/Chicken/Korea/S21/2004 and tissues of the trachea, lung, and intestine were collected after chickens were euthanized by cervical dislocation. The collected tissues (0.5 g) were homogenized in 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing ampicillin and penicillin, and were centrifuged to obtain the supernatant. Virus in the supernatant was determined by log10EID50/mL as described previously [24]. The viral titer in intestine was the mean of jejunum and colon including rectum.

Quantification of inflammatory cytokines and TLRs by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Total RNA was collected from chickens (n = 5 per group) that were infected i.n. with 0.5 mL of 106 EID50/mL of A/Chicken/Korea/S21/2004 using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Chickens were euthanized by cervical dislocation and tissues samples (0.5 g) of the trachea, lung and intestine were collected in tubes. One milliliter of TRIzol reagent was added to tubes containing tissues and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Chloroform (200 μL) was added and the solution was mixed by vortexing for 15 s and centrifuged for 15 min, 12 000 rpm, 4°C. The upper RNA-containing band was collected and mixed with 500 μL of isopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a new 1.5 mL tube. Each sample was centrifuged for 10 min, 10 000 rpm, 4°C, and the RNA-containing pellet was washed with 100 μL of 75% ethanol in water by centrifuging for 5 min at 10 000 rpm and 4°C. The washed RNA was resuspended in 50 μL of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water.

The mRNAs of chicken inflammatory cytokines and TLRs were quantified using quantitative real-time PCR. To synthesize the cDNA, 1 μL of oligo dT primers (0.5 μmoles) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added to a total volume of 9 μL in a 0.05 mL tube. The mixture was reacted for 5 min at 70°C prior to incubation for 5 min at 4°C. Then, each sample received 4 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 4 μL of 5X reverse transcriptase enzyme buffer, 1 μL of RNase inhibitor, 1 μL of reverse transcriptase, and 1 μL of dNTP (10 mM). Each sample was incubated for 5 min at 25°C, 60 min at 42°C, and 15 min at 70°C. SYBR Green-based real-time PCR was performed using a Roto-Gene 6000 apparatus (Corbett, Mortlake, Australia) and SensiMix Plus SYBR (Quantace, London, UK) based on recommendations of the manufacturer. A duplicate of each sample was run. A total volume of 20 μL containing 2 μL cDNA, 10 μL SYBR mixture, and inflammatory cytokine-specific (Table 1) or TLR-specific primers (Table 2) (1 μL forward primer (20 pmole) and 1 μL of reverse primer (20 pmole)) was used for 40 cycles of PCR: 5 s at 95°C, 15 s at 60°C, and 25 s at 72°C. Cytokine and TLR expression levels in tissues were normalized to those of chicken glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The results of real-time PCR were quantified by the comparative threshold method after deductions of data from uninfected chickens as previously described [25]. The fold change of mRNA of cytokines or TLRs in intestine was the mean of jejunum and colon including rectum.
Table 1

Cytokine primer.

Cytokine

Forward Primer

Reverse Primer

TGF-b3

1251F-GGTGGTGAAATCCTGCAAGT

1642R-CCCATTTCCAATCCCTCTTT

TNF-α

57F-CTTCTGAGGCATTTGGAAGC

407R-ACTGGGCGGTCATAGAACAG

INF-α

208F-GACATGGCTCCCACACTACC

556R-AGGCGCTGTAATCGTTGTCT

INF-β

421F-GCTCACCTCAGCATCAACAA

607R-GGGTGTTGAGACGTTTGGAT

INF-γ

320F- TGAGCCAGATTGTTTCGATG

471R-CTTGGCCAGGTCCATGATA

IL-1β

134F-GGATTCTGAGCACACCACAGT

405R-TCTGGTTGATGTCGAAGATGTC

IL-2

83F-TTGGCTGTATTTCGGTAG CA

251R-GTGCACTCCTGGGTCTCAGT

IL-4

99F-GGAGAGCATCCGGATAGTGA

284R-TGACGCATGTTGAGGAAGAG

IL-6

545F-ATCCGGCAGATGGTGATAAA

707R-CCCTCACGGTCTTCTCCATA

IL-8

459F-CATCATGAAGCATTCCATCT

663R-CTTCCA AGGGATCTTCATTT

IL-10

249F-GCTGCGCTTCTACACAGATG

451R-TCCCGTTCTCATCCATCTTC

GAPDH

343F-GACGTGCAGCAGGAACACTA

370R-TCTCCATGGTGGTGA AGACA

Table 2

Toll-like receptor primers.

Toll-like receptors

Forward Primer

Reverse Primer

TLR-1

2199F- GCTGTGTCAGCATGAGAGGA

2436R-GTG GTACCTCGCAGGGATAA

TLR-2

421F-GAA AGTTCCCCCTTTTCCAG

666R-AGAGTGCAGAAGGTCCCTGA

TLR-3

1256F-CCTCCTTGGGACACCTGA AA

1494R-ATTCCGCAGTGGATGAAAAG

TLR-4

2624F-GCTGGGCAA AGTGAA AAGAG

2846R-TAAGAACAGCCCGTTCATCC

TLR-5

202F-CCACTGCTGGAGGATTTGTT

416R-TCCAGGATGGAATCTCCA AG

TLR-7

2978F- AGAGACTGGCTTCCAGGACA

3196R- CAGCTGAACATACCGGGACT

TLR-15

893F-CCATCAACAGCCTGGAAACT

1129R-CCTGGTTTCTGACCAAGGAA

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Product and Services Solutions, version 10.0 (SPSS, Cary, NC, USA). ANOVA analysis was performed by comparing infected data to uninfected data. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Viral titers in H9N2-infected chickens

Chickens (n = 5 per group) were exposed to the representative H9N2 to establish that the virus was capable of infection. The viral titers were determined by log10EID50/mL in tissue samples from trachea, lung, and intestine collected on day 1, 2, and 4 post-infection (pi). H9N2 replicated well in all tissues (Figure 1). The viral titer in tracheas, lungs, and intestine on day 4 pi was 4.75, 5.5, and 6.0 log10EID50/mL, respectively.
Figure 1

Viral titers in tissues of H9N2-infected chickens. Chickens (n = 5 per group) were i.n. infected with A/Chicken/Korea/S21/2004 (H9N2) and tissues of trachea, lung, and intestine were collected on 1, 2 or 4 days pi. Tissues of infected or uninfected chickens were homogenized in 1 mL of PBS and the viral titers were determined by log10EID50/mL. Data represent the mean ± standard errors of the viral titers of five chickens. Statistical analysis was performed by the comparison of data of uninfected chickens. No virus was detected in uninfected chickens. [*P < 0.05], [**P < 0.001].

Inflammatory cytokines in H9N2-infected chickens

To determine inflammatory cytokines in tissue of trachea, lung, and intestine of H9N2-infected chickens, quantitative real-time PCR was performed using primers specific for chicken cytokines such as TGF-β3, TNF-α, IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, and mRNA of trachea, lung, and intestine of chickens (n = 5 per group) on day 1, 2, and 4 pi. In trachea, the inflammatory cytokines (TGF-β3, TNF-α, INF-α, INF-γ) were induced to higher levels in the H9N2-infected chickens than in the uninfected chickens (Figure 2a). In lung, the inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, INF- β, INF-γ) were induced to higher levels in the H9N2-infected chickens than in the uninfected chickens (Figure 2b). In intestine, the inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-β, INF-γ) were induced to higher levels in the H9N2-infected chickens than in the uninfected chickens (Figure 2c). The tissue levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 were similar in infected and uninfected chickens (data not shown). In trachea tissue, TNF-α was induced to a greater extent than TGF-β3, TNF-α, INF-α, INF-β, and INF-γ on days 1, 2, and 4 pi. The fold-change of TNF-α in the trachea of chickens on day 4 pi was 9.1, while the fold-change of TGF-β3, INF-α, INF-β, and INF-γ was 1.6, 1.2, 0.8, and 8.9, respectively (Figure 2a). In lung tissue, INF-γ was induced higher in the infected chickens than TGF-β3, TNF-α, INF-α, and INF-β on days 2 or 4 pi. The fold-change of INF-γ in the lungs in infected chickens was 5.6, while that of TGF-β3, TNF-α, IFN-α, and INF-β was 0.5, 3.2, 0.7, and 3.6 on day 4 pi, respectively (Figure 2b). In intestine tissue, INF-γ was induced more in the infected chickens than TGF-β3, TNF-α, INF-α, and INF-β. The fold-change of INF-γ in intestine tissue was 19.3 on day 2 pi, whereas that of TGF-β3, TNF-α, INF-α, and INF-β was 1.3, 4.5, 0.8, and 11.7 on day 2 pi, respectively (Figure 2c).
Figure 2

Inflammatory cytokines in tissues of H9N2-infected chickens. Total RNA was collected from tissues of infected or uninfected chickens (n = 5 per group) with A/Chicken/Korea/S21/2004 (H9N2), and cytokines were quantified using primers specific for chicken cytokines and SYBR Green-based real-time PCR. Data represent the mean ± standard error of five chickens. Panels A, B, and C depict results from trachea, lung, and intestinal tissue. Statistical analysis was performed by the comparison of data of uninfected chickens. [*P < 0.05], [**P < 0.001].

Induction of TLRs in H9N2-infected chickens

We determined the induction of TLRs in trachea, lung, and intestine tissue in those chickens examined in the experiment summarized in Figure 2, since TLRs are involved in the induction of inflammatory cytokines. In trachea tissue, among the tested TLRs, TLR-15 was not induced in the H9N2-infected chickens, TLR-1 was less induced in the H9N2-infected chickens, and TLR-4 was the highest induced (17.1-fold change on day 1 pi) (Figure 3a). In lung tissue, all tested TLRs were induced in the H9N2-infected chickens with TLR-15 was the highest induced (9.2-fold change on day 2 pi) (Figure 3b). In intestine tissue, TLR-3 was not induced and TLR-5 was the highest induced, with a 39.2-fold change on day 4 pi (Figure 3c).
Figure 3

TLRs in tissues of H9N2-infected chickens. Induction of TLRs using total RNA (Figure 2) was quantified using primers specific for chicken TLRs and SYBR Green-based real-time polymerase chain reaction. Data represent the mean ± standard error of five chickens. Panels A, B, and C depict results from trachea, lung, and intestinal tissue. Statistical analysis was performed by the comparison of data of uninfected chickens. [*P < 0.05], [**P < 0.001].

Discussion

H9N2 is endemic in many countries including Korea and China, and is regarded as one of the candidates for the next human pandemic. We studied mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokine and TLRs in H9N2-infected chickens to understand the early inflammatory responses and pathogenesis of the infection. The data demonstrate that H9N2 infects trachea, lung, and intestine tissue, and induces the production of inflammatory cytokines and TLRs in these tissues.

Our data showed that cytokine inductions increased as viral titers increased in tracheas and lungs of chickens infected with H9N2. In tracheas, the higher inductions of TNF-α and INF-γ were made on 4 days pi when viral titer peaked. In lungs, TNF-α, INF-β, and INF-γ were induced higher on 4 days when viral titer peaked. Previous studies suggest that cytokines may be involved in both clearance of virus and pathological tissue damage. A study on a chicken macrophage cell line infected with H9N2 showed that inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-8 were up-regulated [26]. However, this study did not measure the induction of inflammatory cytokines in vivo. In vivo studies in pigs or horses infected with influenza virus indicated that the clinical signs are correlated with the production of inflammatory cytokines [13, 14]. When 3-week-old piglets were infected with swine H1N1 influenza virus (A/Swine/Belgium/1/98), inflammatory cytokines such as INF-α, IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-α peaked in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid 24-39 h pi, when viral titers and clinical signs of infected pigs were the highest [13]. In horses infected with H3N8 equine influenza virus (A/Equine/Kildare/89), inflammatory cytokines such as INF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were up-regulated when the amount of inflammatory cytokines were determined by quantitative real-time PCR [14]. It was also reported that the infections of humans with highly pathogenic (HP) H5N1 influenza virus and the infection of mice with HP H5N1 or 1918 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus could elicit the production of inflammatory cytokines [15, 27]. The autopsy lung tissues from human patients infected with HP H5N1 influenza virus showed the elevated expression of pro-inflammatory MxA, IFN-α, and IP-10 compared to control lung tissues of humans [15]. Infection of mice with HP H5N1 or pandemic 1918 H1N1 influenza virus led to the rapid infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils into the lungs, resulting in the acute inflammation with the production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α, IL-6 and INF-γ [27].

When we determined the induction of TLRs in trachea, lung, and intestine tissue, TLR-4, TLR-15, and TLR-5 were dominantly induced in trachea, lung, and intestine, respectively. The results suggest that the different tissues can respond to H9N2 using the different TLRs and that tissue specific expression of TLRs can be induced. TLR-15 was induced higher in lungs, but it was not induced in tracheas of chickens infected with H9N2 influenza virus. Targeting theses TLRs for therapeutic purpose can be one of ways to defend chickens from the infections of avian influenza viruses. The recent study showed that the pre-stimulation of TLR-2 and TLR-4 by their ligand could increase the resistance to highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses in mice [28]. Information on TLR induction in chickens infected with influenza viruses is scarce. A previous study with a chicken macrophage cell line infected with H9N2 showed that TLR-7 expression was up-regulated and was involved in cytokine responses [26]. When chickens were infected with Marek's disease virus via the respiratory route, the expression of TLR-3 and TLR-7 increased in the lungs [29].

When we determined the kinetics gene expression of inflammatory cytokines or TLRs some genes increased as time elapsed, but others did not. In trachea, the induction of TNF-α was similar on 1, 2 or 4 days pi, while the induction of INF-γ increased as time lapsed. In trachea, TLR-4 was induced highest on 1 day pi, rather than 4 days pi, while in intestine, the induction of TLR-5 was induced highest on 4 days pi rather than 1 day pi.

In conclusion, infection of chickens with H9N2 may induce the production of inflammatory cytokines in trachea, lung, and intestinal cells by inducing different TLRs.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a grant (A084411) from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea. A staff in HARRISCO, an English editing company, edited this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Influenza Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University
(2)
Institute for Influenza Virus: Chungnam National University
(3)
Laboratory of Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University

References

  1. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y: Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev. 1992, 56: 152-179.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fouchier RA, Munster V, Wallensten A, Bestebroer TM, Herfst S, Smith D, Rimmelzwaan GF, Olsen B, Osterhaus AD: Characterization of a novel influenza A virus hemagglutinin subtype (H16) obtained from black-headed gulls. J Virol. 2005, 79: 2814-2822. 10.1128/JVI.79.5.2814-2822.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bi J, Deng G, Dong J, Kong F, Li X, Xu Q, Zhang M, Zhao L, Qiao J: Phylogenetic and molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza isolates from chickens in Northern China from 2007-2009. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (9pii): e13063-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ge FF, Zhou JP, Liu J, Wang J, Zhang WY, Sheng LP, Xu F, Ju HB, Sun QY, Liu PH: Genetic evolution of H9 subtype influenza viruses from live poultry markets in Shanghai, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47: 3294-3300. 10.1128/JCM.00355-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim JA, Cho SH, Kim HS, Seo SH: H9N2 influenza viruses isolated from poultry in Korean live bird markets continuously evolve and cause the severe clinical signs in layers. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 118: 169-176. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.07.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Naeem K, Ullah A, Manvell RJ, Alexander DJ: Avian influenza A subtype H9N2 in poultry in Pakistan. Vet Rec. 1999, 145 (19): 560-10.1136/vr.145.19.560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tosh C, Nagarajan S, Behera P, Rajukumar K, Purohit K, Kamal RP, Murugkar HV, Gounalan S, Pattnaik B, Vanamayya PR, Pradhan HK, Dubey SC: Genetic analysis of H9N2 avian influenza viruses isolated from India. Arch Virol. 2008, 153: 1433-1439. 10.1007/s00705-008-0131-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aamir UB, Wernery U, Ilyushina N, Webster RG: Characterization of avian H9N2 influenza viruses from United Arab Emirates 2000 to 2003. Virology. 2007, 361: 45-55. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.037.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Xu KM, Smith GJ, Bahl J, Duan L, Tai H, Vijaykrishna D, Wang J, Zhang JX, Li KS, Fan XH, Webster RG, Chen H, Peiris JS, Guan Y: The genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in poultry from southern China, 2000 to 2005. J Virol. 2007, 81: 10389-10401. 10.1128/JVI.00979-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi YK, Seo SH, Kim JA, Webby RJ, Webster RG: Avian influenza viruses in Korean live poultry markets and their pathogenic potential. Virology. 2005, 332: 529-537. 10.1016/j.virol.2004.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin YP, Shaw M, Gregory V, Cameron K, Lim W, Klimov A, Subbarao K, Guan Y, Krauss S, Shortridge K, Webster R, Cox N, Hay A: Avian-to-human transmission of H9N2 subtype influenza A viruses: relationship between H9N2 and H5N1 human isolates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 9654-9658.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Butt KM, Smith GJ, Chen H, Zhang LJ, Leung YH, Xu KM, Lim W, Webster RG, Yuen KY, Peiris JS, Guan Y: Human infection with an avian H9N2 influenza A virus in Hong Kong in 2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 5760-5767. 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5760-5767.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Barbé F, Atanasova K, Van Reeth K: Cytokines and acute phase proteins associated with acute swine influenza infection in pigs. Vet J. 2011, 187: 48-53. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.12.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Quinlivan M, Nelly M, Prendergast M, Breathnach C, Horohov D, Arkins S, Chiang YW, Chu HJ, Ng T, Cullinane A: Pro-inflammatory and antiviral cytokine expression in vaccinated and unvaccinated horses exposed to equine influenza virus. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 7056-7064. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Thitithanyanont A, Engering A, Uiprasertkul M, Ekchariyawat P, Wiboon-Ut S, Kraivong R, Limsalakpetch A, Kum-Arb U, Yongvanitchit K, Sa-Ard-Iam N, Rukyen P, Mahanonda R, Kawkitinarong K, Auewarakul P, Utaisincharoen P, Sirisinha S, Mason CJ, Fukuda MM, Pichyangkul S: Antiviral immune responses in H5N1-infected human lung tissue and possible mechanisms underlying the hyperproduction of interferon-inducible protein IP-10. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 398: 752-758. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim YH, Kim HS, Cho SH, Seo SH: Influenza B virus causes milder pathogenesis and weaker inflammatory responses in ferrets than influenza A virus. Viral Immunol. 2009, 22: 423-430. 10.1089/vim.2009.0045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Akira S: Toll receptor families: structure and function. Semin Immunol. 2004, 16: 1-2. 10.1016/j.smim.2003.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Medzhitov R, Janeway CA: Innate immunity: the virtues of a nonclonal system of recognition. Cell. 1997, 91: 295-298. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80412-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Werling D, Jungi TW: TOLL-like receptors linking innate and adaptive immune response. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2003, 91: 1-12. 10.1016/S0165-2427(02)00228-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Boyd Y, Goodchild M, Morroll S, Bumstead N: Mapping of the chicken and mouse genes for toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) to an evolutionarily conserved chromosomal segment. Immunogenetics. 2001, 52: 294-298. 10.1007/s002510000268.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fukui A, Inoue N, Matsumoto M, Nomura M, Yamada K, Matsuda Y, Toyoshima K, Seya T: Molecular cloning and functional characterization of chicken toll-like receptors. A single chicken toll covers multiple molecular patterns. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 47143-47149. 10.1074/jbc.M103902200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Temperley ND, Berlin S, Paton IR, Griffin DK, Burt DW: Evolution of the chicken Toll-like receptor gene family: a story of gene gain and gene loss. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 62-10.1186/1471-2164-9-62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yilmaz A, Shen S, Adelson DL, Xavier S, Zhu JJ: Identification and sequence analysis of chicken Toll-like receptors. Immunogenetics. 2005, 56: 743-753. 10.1007/s00251-004-0740-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Reed LE, Muench H: A simple method for estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg. 1938, 27: 493-497.Google Scholar
  25. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Xing Z, Cardona CJ, Li J, Dao N, Tran T, Andrada J: Modulation of the immune responses in chickens by low-pathogenicity avian influenza virus H9N2. J Gen Virol. 2008, 89 (Pt 5): 1288-1299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Perrone LA, Plowden JK, García-Sastre A, Katz JM, Tumpey TM: H5N1 and 1918 pandemic influenza virus infection results in early and excessive infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils in the lungs of mice. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4 (8): e1000115-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000115.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shinya K, Okamura T, Sueta S, Kasai N, Tanaka M, Ginting TE, Makino A, Eisfeld AJ, Kawaoka Y: Toll-like receptor pre-stimulation protects mice against lethal infection with highly pathogenic influenza viruses. Virol J. 2011, 8 (1): 97-10.1186/1743-422X-8-97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Abdul-Careem MF, Haq K, Shanmuganathan S, Read LR, Schat KA, Heidari M, Sharif S: Induction of innate host responses in the lungs of chickens following infection with a very virulent strain of Marek's disease virus. Virology. 2009, 393: 250-257. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement